<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LaRue Tactical on the lawsuit with A.R.M.S</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/21/larue-tactical-on-the-lawsuit-with-a-r-m-s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/21/larue-tactical-on-the-lawsuit-with-a-r-m-s/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:17:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 8n02</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/21/larue-tactical-on-the-lawsuit-with-a-r-m-s/#comment-24980</link>
		<dc:creator>8n02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8709#comment-24980</guid>
		<description>A.R.M.S. mounts are junk! I look forward to the day when I don&#039;t have to see any on military weapons. I guess when your product sucks you have to go into a big power grab to try and stop the competition. It is the only thing you can do when you can&#039;t match the quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A.R.M.S. mounts are junk! I look forward to the day when I don&#8217;t have to see any on military weapons. I guess when your product sucks you have to go into a big power grab to try and stop the competition. It is the only thing you can do when you can&#8217;t match the quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/21/larue-tactical-on-the-lawsuit-with-a-r-m-s/#comment-16882</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8709#comment-16882</guid>
		<description>Its all too confushing to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its all too confushing to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/21/larue-tactical-on-the-lawsuit-with-a-r-m-s/#comment-16876</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8709#comment-16876</guid>
		<description>bloody lawsuits. Thanks for the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bloody lawsuits. Thanks for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/21/larue-tactical-on-the-lawsuit-with-a-r-m-s/#comment-16875</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8709#comment-16875</guid>
		<description>You can’t copyright numbers. Intel tries that in court against AMD X86 in the early 90’s and it didn’t go their way. So they rename their product to Pentium line of processors.

ARMS is in a decline so it is no surprise that they start to sue other companies left and right. It use to be that ARMS products was the go to but in the last few years AR15 community move away from them and toward newer companies like LaRue and Magpul.

Arms has a pending lawsuit against Magpul for Mbus. 

http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=2&amp;f=124&amp;t=179232</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can’t copyright numbers. Intel tries that in court against AMD X86 in the early 90’s and it didn’t go their way. So they rename their product to Pentium line of processors.</p>
<p>ARMS is in a decline so it is no surprise that they start to sue other companies left and right. It use to be that ARMS products was the go to but in the last few years AR15 community move away from them and toward newer companies like LaRue and Magpul.</p>
<p>Arms has a pending lawsuit against Magpul for Mbus. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=2&amp;f=124&amp;t=179232" rel="nofollow">http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=2&amp;f=124&amp;t=179232</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ishida</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/21/larue-tactical-on-the-lawsuit-with-a-r-m-s/#comment-16811</link>
		<dc:creator>ishida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8709#comment-16811</guid>
		<description>How the hell did they get a trademark on the number 17!?

Or CALIBERS!?

If they&#039;ve trademarked calibers, EVERY OTHER MANUFACTURER is in deep sheeeeet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the hell did they get a trademark on the number 17!?</p>
<p>Or CALIBERS!?</p>
<p>If they&#8217;ve trademarked calibers, EVERY OTHER MANUFACTURER is in deep sheeeeet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/21/larue-tactical-on-the-lawsuit-with-a-r-m-s/#comment-16810</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8709#comment-16810</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s suing Magpul for using flip down apertures on the MBus too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s suing Magpul for using flip down apertures on the MBus too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
