Comments on: LaRue Tactical on the lawsuit with A.R.M.S http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/21/larue-tactical-on-the-lawsuit-with-a-r-m-s/ Firearms not Politics Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:19:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: 8n02 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/21/larue-tactical-on-the-lawsuit-with-a-r-m-s/comment-page-1/#comment-24980 8n02 Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:09:18 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8709#comment-24980 A.R.M.S. mounts are junk! I look forward to the day when I don't have to see any on military weapons. I guess when your product sucks you have to go into a big power grab to try and stop the competition. It is the only thing you can do when you can't match the quality. A.R.M.S. mounts are junk! I look forward to the day when I don’t have to see any on military weapons. I guess when your product sucks you have to go into a big power grab to try and stop the competition. It is the only thing you can do when you can’t match the quality.

Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: Lance http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/21/larue-tactical-on-the-lawsuit-with-a-r-m-s/comment-page-1/#comment-16882 Lance Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:12:13 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8709#comment-16882 Its all too confushing to me. Its all too confushing to me.

Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: Steve http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/21/larue-tactical-on-the-lawsuit-with-a-r-m-s/comment-page-1/#comment-16876 Steve Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:18:59 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8709#comment-16876 bloody lawsuits. Thanks for the link. bloody lawsuits. Thanks for the link.

Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: jdun1911 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/21/larue-tactical-on-the-lawsuit-with-a-r-m-s/comment-page-1/#comment-16875 jdun1911 Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:17:37 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8709#comment-16875 You can’t copyright numbers. Intel tries that in court against AMD X86 in the early 90’s and it didn’t go their way. So they rename their product to Pentium line of processors. ARMS is in a decline so it is no surprise that they start to sue other companies left and right. It use to be that ARMS products was the go to but in the last few years AR15 community move away from them and toward newer companies like LaRue and Magpul. Arms has a pending lawsuit against Magpul for Mbus. http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=2&f=124&t=179232 You can’t copyright numbers. Intel tries that in court against AMD X86 in the early 90’s and it didn’t go their way. So they rename their product to Pentium line of processors.

ARMS is in a decline so it is no surprise that they start to sue other companies left and right. It use to be that ARMS products was the go to but in the last few years AR15 community move away from them and toward newer companies like LaRue and Magpul.

Arms has a pending lawsuit against Magpul for Mbus.

http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=2&f=124&t=179232

Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: ishida http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/21/larue-tactical-on-the-lawsuit-with-a-r-m-s/comment-page-1/#comment-16811 ishida Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:45:25 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8709#comment-16811 How the hell did they get a trademark on the number 17!? Or CALIBERS!? If they've trademarked calibers, EVERY OTHER MANUFACTURER is in deep sheeeeet. How the hell did they get a trademark on the number 17!?

Or CALIBERS!?

If they’ve trademarked calibers, EVERY OTHER MANUFACTURER is in deep sheeeeet.

Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: Fred http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/21/larue-tactical-on-the-lawsuit-with-a-r-m-s/comment-page-1/#comment-16810 Fred Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:37:10 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8709#comment-16810 He's suing Magpul for using flip down apertures on the MBus too. He’s suing Magpul for using flip down apertures on the MBus too.

Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]>