<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .50 GI AR-15 Uppers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/20/50-gi-ar-15-uppers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/20/50-gi-ar-15-uppers/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:26:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/20/50-gi-ar-15-uppers/#comment-22565</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8667#comment-22565</guid>
		<description>I bet that would be fun in a SBR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet that would be fun in a SBR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 475AR</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/20/50-gi-ar-15-uppers/#comment-17542</link>
		<dc:creator>475AR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8667#comment-17542</guid>
		<description>Yes, the AR is a great platform for the GI, as can be seen in the video the recoil is stright back and very little muzzle rise. With the 1-4 power scope on it I never have problem watching the target during recoil. It seems now when going to the range I shoot the GI more then any of my AR&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the AR is a great platform for the GI, as can be seen in the video the recoil is stright back and very little muzzle rise. With the 1-4 power scope on it I never have problem watching the target during recoil. It seems now when going to the range I shoot the GI more then any of my AR&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/20/50-gi-ar-15-uppers/#comment-16932</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8667#comment-16932</guid>
		<description>Ok, thanks for replying, Matt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, thanks for replying, Matt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Groom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/20/50-gi-ar-15-uppers/#comment-16808</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8667#comment-16808</guid>
		<description>I believe I&#039;ve read in one of the glossies that the law says you can&#039;t have anything bigger than .520&quot;, which means you can have things like a .512&quot; diameter bullet in your .50 Alaskan or something and still be legal. .512&quot; is actually  about 13mm, so maybe the law actually says &quot;Nothing bigger than 13mm...&quot; or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe I&#8217;ve read in one of the glossies that the law says you can&#8217;t have anything bigger than .520&#8243;, which means you can have things like a .512&#8243; diameter bullet in your .50 Alaskan or something and still be legal. .512&#8243; is actually  about 13mm, so maybe the law actually says &#8220;Nothing bigger than 13mm&#8230;&#8221; or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/20/50-gi-ar-15-uppers/#comment-16769</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8667#comment-16769</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with the .50GI as a pistol caliber? Assuming the .45ACP is a good self-defense caliber a bigger bullet should be even more effective, right? And as long as it fits in a single stack pistol magazine I don&#039;t see why not.

Is larger than 50 caliber weapons legal in the US? I think there is some upper limit for rifles at .50 (BMG). Does this apply to handguns?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with the .50GI as a pistol caliber? Assuming the .45ACP is a good self-defense caliber a bigger bullet should be even more effective, right? And as long as it fits in a single stack pistol magazine I don&#8217;t see why not.</p>
<p>Is larger than 50 caliber weapons legal in the US? I think there is some upper limit for rifles at .50 (BMG). Does this apply to handguns?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Groom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/20/50-gi-ar-15-uppers/#comment-16729</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8667#comment-16729</guid>
		<description>Finally, a practical use for the .50 GI. I would buy one. This would make an excellent SBR PDW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, a practical use for the .50 GI. I would buy one. This would make an excellent SBR PDW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpudGun</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/20/50-gi-ar-15-uppers/#comment-16678</link>
		<dc:creator>SpudGun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8667#comment-16678</guid>
		<description>9mm then .40 then .45 and now .50 - with that train of reasoning, I fully expect to buy a .75 AR-15 upper by next April.

If I had a dollar for the number of times I&#039;ve wished I could fire a .50 pistol cartridge from an AR-15, I&#039;d have .37 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9mm then .40 then .45 and now .50 &#8211; with that train of reasoning, I fully expect to buy a .75 AR-15 upper by next April.</p>
<p>If I had a dollar for the number of times I&#8217;ve wished I could fire a .50 pistol cartridge from an AR-15, I&#8217;d have .37 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
