<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Winchester SX-AR Autoloading Centerfire Rifle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:11:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-27838</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-27838</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m assuming the R-25 breaks down like an AR-15 which is way easier to clean, but, if its impingement gas like an AR-15 then it has to be easy to clean because it gets dirty!  Thats the whole idea of the piston system. Each has pluses and minus&#039;.  My son has an M1A with 22&quot; barrel that will get a run next to the FN next month when the weather improves.  
I do like the FNAR trigger pull.  BAR is the same.  Having a .243 to compare next to the .308 I do have to say that for follow up shots the .243 is better.  If I had a heavier Barrel on the .243 I could lay down some truly accurate suppressive fire.  .243 has Less recoil, shoots flatter, and less muzzle jump. With 90 - 100gr bullets it is way better than a 5.56 and you don&#039;t have think about drop until you get further out.  The AR-10 variants with .243 and .260 caliber rounds fit the sporting gun applications.  Winchester could fill the gaps with the SXAR, but they are missing the boat...again.  oh well,  thats why we have gunsmiths...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m assuming the R-25 breaks down like an AR-15 which is way easier to clean, but, if its impingement gas like an AR-15 then it has to be easy to clean because it gets dirty!  Thats the whole idea of the piston system. Each has pluses and minus&#8217;.  My son has an M1A with 22&#8243; barrel that will get a run next to the FN next month when the weather improves.<br />
I do like the FNAR trigger pull.  BAR is the same.  Having a .243 to compare next to the .308 I do have to say that for follow up shots the .243 is better.  If I had a heavier Barrel on the .243 I could lay down some truly accurate suppressive fire.  .243 has Less recoil, shoots flatter, and less muzzle jump. With 90 &#8211; 100gr bullets it is way better than a 5.56 and you don&#8217;t have think about drop until you get further out.  The AR-10 variants with .243 and .260 caliber rounds fit the sporting gun applications.  Winchester could fill the gaps with the SXAR, but they are missing the boat&#8230;again.  oh well,  thats why we have gunsmiths&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK_USP_45</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-27413</link>
		<dc:creator>HK_USP_45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-27413</guid>
		<description>Brian, it must be your area, because we have it sitting on shelves here.

I have the R-25 and the FNAR, but not the AR-10.  I just got the R-25 scoped today, so I&#039;ll be shooting it good tomorrow.

Just a couple of quick comparisons of the 2: 1. FNAR has 100x better trigger. 2. R-25 is 10x easier to clean.

Maybe eventually I&#039;ll set up a side by side comparison.  Maybe when it gets a bit warmer outside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, it must be your area, because we have it sitting on shelves here.</p>
<p>I have the R-25 and the FNAR, but not the AR-10.  I just got the R-25 scoped today, so I&#8217;ll be shooting it good tomorrow.</p>
<p>Just a couple of quick comparisons of the 2: 1. FNAR has 100x better trigger. 2. R-25 is 10x easier to clean.</p>
<p>Maybe eventually I&#8217;ll set up a side by side comparison.  Maybe when it gets a bit warmer outside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-27385</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-27385</guid>
		<description>HK,  I&#039;m still waiting on Hornady .308 superperformance.  It would be nice if they produced enough to match the advertising hype.  At least drop the price on the custom line!!
I&#039;m looking for some side by side comparisons of the R-25, AR-10, and the FNAR if anyone has had all three show up at the same time at the range.
I got a little time in at 300 yds this weekend with the FNAR.  Mine&#039;s a lite barrel with 3X9 Nikon BDC.  No bipod, no bags,  Just the picnic table.  This rifle will shoot 3/4 moa quick 3 shot groups, but I can&#039;t shoot 5 shot groups quick.  I did this with 147gr Winchester FMJ and 150gr Hornady custom.  With a lead sled this makes the 1/2 -3/4 MOA 5 shot group.  I&#039;m used to higher velocity bolt action guns so this is a little new for me, but I think I could handle the zombies if they show up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HK,  I&#8217;m still waiting on Hornady .308 superperformance.  It would be nice if they produced enough to match the advertising hype.  At least drop the price on the custom line!!<br />
I&#8217;m looking for some side by side comparisons of the R-25, AR-10, and the FNAR if anyone has had all three show up at the same time at the range.<br />
I got a little time in at 300 yds this weekend with the FNAR.  Mine&#8217;s a lite barrel with 3X9 Nikon BDC.  No bipod, no bags,  Just the picnic table.  This rifle will shoot 3/4 moa quick 3 shot groups, but I can&#8217;t shoot 5 shot groups quick.  I did this with 147gr Winchester FMJ and 150gr Hornady custom.  With a lead sled this makes the 1/2 -3/4 MOA 5 shot group.  I&#8217;m used to higher velocity bolt action guns so this is a little new for me, but I think I could handle the zombies if they show up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBIAlaska</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-27282</link>
		<dc:creator>RBIAlaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-27282</guid>
		<description>Any recommendations for a bore guide for the FN AR?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any recommendations for a bore guide for the FN AR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK_USP_45</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26657</link>
		<dc:creator>HK_USP_45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26657</guid>
		<description>Brian,  you mean the Hornady SuperFormance?  Yes, I have some.  I used it when I was zeroing in my R-25 at the 25 yardline.  It seems to shoot really nice, but I only shot 5 rounds before my cheap Walmart $49 scope went totally to crap.

As soon as I get my new scope on it, I can give you more feedback.  I wanted to try the new Redfield to see if it&#039;s as good as advertised, but the reticle I wanted in the 3-9x42 is on backorder until Feb 28, so I have to wait until it gets shipped.  It&#039;s killing me to have to wait to shoot my new R-25.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,  you mean the Hornady SuperFormance?  Yes, I have some.  I used it when I was zeroing in my R-25 at the 25 yardline.  It seems to shoot really nice, but I only shot 5 rounds before my cheap Walmart $49 scope went totally to crap.</p>
<p>As soon as I get my new scope on it, I can give you more feedback.  I wanted to try the new Redfield to see if it&#8217;s as good as advertised, but the reticle I wanted in the 3-9&#215;42 is on backorder until Feb 28, so I have to wait until it gets shipped.  It&#8217;s killing me to have to wait to shoot my new R-25.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26634</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 01:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26634</guid>
		<description>The 147gr winchester FMJ works well.  Get the fresh stuff tho, not the sportsmans guide crap from 1982!  Reasonable cost, doesn&#039;t crap up the barrel. and groups well.  Any body get hold of the new Hornady ammo yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 147gr winchester FMJ works well.  Get the fresh stuff tho, not the sportsmans guide crap from 1982!  Reasonable cost, doesn&#8217;t crap up the barrel. and groups well.  Any body get hold of the new Hornady ammo yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK_USP_45</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26617</link>
		<dc:creator>HK_USP_45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26617</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know anything about the German stuff.  The stuff I was talking about isn&#039;t Cabelas, it&#039;s Winchester.  I just said you can get it there (or pretty much anywhere).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know anything about the German stuff.  The stuff I was talking about isn&#8217;t Cabelas, it&#8217;s Winchester.  I just said you can get it there (or pretty much anywhere).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBIAlaska</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26610</link>
		<dc:creator>RBIAlaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26610</guid>
		<description>HK_USP_45 -

Regarding ammo comments - Do you think the German 7.62X51 (308) DAG NATO ammo is similar to the Cabelas NATO stuff you&#039;ve been shooting?  

motor_grunt -

My bi-pod is also jumping from the recoil.  I moved my left hand to one of the legs of the bipod and and tugged slightly downward.  Reduced the movement considerably.  I made followup shots in a 6 inch circle about 1 or 2 seconds apart.  Did about 20 rds.  Big fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HK_USP_45 -</p>
<p>Regarding ammo comments &#8211; Do you think the German 7.62X51 (308) DAG NATO ammo is similar to the Cabelas NATO stuff you&#8217;ve been shooting?  </p>
<p>motor_grunt -</p>
<p>My bi-pod is also jumping from the recoil.  I moved my left hand to one of the legs of the bipod and and tugged slightly downward.  Reduced the movement considerably.  I made followup shots in a 6 inch circle about 1 or 2 seconds apart.  Did about 20 rds.  Big fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBIAlaska</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26540</link>
		<dc:creator>RBIAlaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26540</guid>
		<description>HK_USP_45 -

Regarding ammo comments - Do you think the German 7.62X51 (308) DAG NATO ammo is similar to the Cabelas NATO stuff you&#039;ve been shooting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HK_USP_45 -</p>
<p>Regarding ammo comments &#8211; Do you think the German 7.62X51 (308) DAG NATO ammo is similar to the Cabelas NATO stuff you&#8217;ve been shooting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigdtraveler</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26497</link>
		<dc:creator>bigdtraveler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26497</guid>
		<description>I just got my sxar the other day , put a scope on it . after a couple of sighting in shoots at 25 yards. shot a 5/8&quot; 5 shot group at 100 yards w / factory ammo. alsome weapon, cant wait to work up a real load for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got my sxar the other day , put a scope on it . after a couple of sighting in shoots at 25 yards. shot a 5/8&#8243; 5 shot group at 100 yards w / factory ammo. alsome weapon, cant wait to work up a real load for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK_USP_45</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26492</link>
		<dc:creator>HK_USP_45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26492</guid>
		<description>RBIAlaska -- I would recommend NOT shooting steel out of your rifle.  JMO.    I question how good it can be for various parts, such as the extractor.  You wouldn&#039;t feed your purebred hunting dog kmart dog food, so don&#039;t feed your nice rifles crap ammo.

Reloading is actually pretty fun.  And I load high-quality ammo for 1/2 the price of the cheapest crap I can find.

For cheap ammo, I&#039;ve had good luck with Sellier and Ballot.  The thing about them, though, they very from lot to lot.  Some lots are about the best stuff you can buy, other lots, not so much.

The cheapest stuff I&#039;ve found that I shoot out of my FNAR is the Winchester branded 7.62 NATO stuff.  Cabelas has it.  It&#039;s labeled as not being reloads, but when you pull the stuff out of the box, the cases look like they&#039;ve been carried for 8 months around Iraq linked together for a M240 or something.  They shoot pretty good though.  It&#039;s not going to be match quality, but if you just want to blow off some rounds, It&#039;s good enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RBIAlaska &#8212; I would recommend NOT shooting steel out of your rifle.  JMO.    I question how good it can be for various parts, such as the extractor.  You wouldn&#8217;t feed your purebred hunting dog kmart dog food, so don&#8217;t feed your nice rifles crap ammo.</p>
<p>Reloading is actually pretty fun.  And I load high-quality ammo for 1/2 the price of the cheapest crap I can find.</p>
<p>For cheap ammo, I&#8217;ve had good luck with Sellier and Ballot.  The thing about them, though, they very from lot to lot.  Some lots are about the best stuff you can buy, other lots, not so much.</p>
<p>The cheapest stuff I&#8217;ve found that I shoot out of my FNAR is the Winchester branded 7.62 NATO stuff.  Cabelas has it.  It&#8217;s labeled as not being reloads, but when you pull the stuff out of the box, the cases look like they&#8217;ve been carried for 8 months around Iraq linked together for a M240 or something.  They shoot pretty good though.  It&#8217;s not going to be match quality, but if you just want to blow off some rounds, It&#8217;s good enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBIAlaska</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26482</link>
		<dc:creator>RBIAlaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 01:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26482</guid>
		<description>Bought 250 rounds of  German 7.62X51 (308) DAG NATO ammo.  Shot about 40 rounds.  Forgot my sand bags.  Just shot with the bipod and put a camera bag under the stock.  Grouped almost as well as the Hornady and Winchester at 100 and 200 yds.  Got home and dropped the trigger assembly to clean.  Didn&#039;t really need it.  Probably going to buy 500 or 1,000 more rounds of this stuff at $424.00 per thousand.  Anyone recommend something cheaper/better quality?  Not really interested in reloading.  Cabela&#039;s has some &quot;Herter&#039;s&quot; steel case stuff at $379.00 per thousand.  Anyone have an opinion of which is better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bought 250 rounds of  German 7.62X51 (308) DAG NATO ammo.  Shot about 40 rounds.  Forgot my sand bags.  Just shot with the bipod and put a camera bag under the stock.  Grouped almost as well as the Hornady and Winchester at 100 and 200 yds.  Got home and dropped the trigger assembly to clean.  Didn&#8217;t really need it.  Probably going to buy 500 or 1,000 more rounds of this stuff at $424.00 per thousand.  Anyone recommend something cheaper/better quality?  Not really interested in reloading.  Cabela&#8217;s has some &#8220;Herter&#8217;s&#8221; steel case stuff at $379.00 per thousand.  Anyone have an opinion of which is better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK_USP_45</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26355</link>
		<dc:creator>HK_USP_45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 01:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26355</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t recall ever having any malfunctions.  I&#039;m still under 200 rounds, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t recall ever having any malfunctions.  I&#8217;m still under 200 rounds, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBIAlaska</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26342</link>
		<dc:creator>RBIAlaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26342</guid>
		<description>HK_USP_45

I used to buy these products for cleaning my nasty AK&#039;s and SKS&#039;s.  I&#039;m not sure about the one&#039;s you mentioned, but I noticed that most of these products are at least 51% acetone.  They mix enough other stuff in to keep the volatility down, at least that&#039;s what I was told.  I found a home made recipe on the internet called &quot;Ed&#039;s Red&quot; or Ed&#039;s Red Bore Cleaner.  Ingredients listed below.  I don&#039;t add the lanolin.  It saves a little money for tight wads like me. 

1 part Dexron II, IIe or III ATF, GM Spec. D-20265 or later.

1 part Kerosene - deodorized, K1

1 part Aliphatic Mineral Spirits, Fed. Spec. TT-T-2981F, CAS
#64741-49-9, or may substitute &quot;Stoddard Solvent&quot;, CAS #8052-41-3, or
equivalent, (aka &quot;Varsol&quot;)

1 part Acetone, CAS #67-64-1.

(Optional up to 1 lb. of Lanolin, Anhydrous, USP per gallon, OK to
substitute Lanolin, Modified, Topical Lubricant, from the drug store)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HK_USP_45</p>
<p>I used to buy these products for cleaning my nasty AK&#8217;s and SKS&#8217;s.  I&#8217;m not sure about the one&#8217;s you mentioned, but I noticed that most of these products are at least 51% acetone.  They mix enough other stuff in to keep the volatility down, at least that&#8217;s what I was told.  I found a home made recipe on the internet called &#8220;Ed&#8217;s Red&#8221; or Ed&#8217;s Red Bore Cleaner.  Ingredients listed below.  I don&#8217;t add the lanolin.  It saves a little money for tight wads like me. </p>
<p>1 part Dexron II, IIe or III ATF, GM Spec. D-20265 or later.</p>
<p>1 part Kerosene &#8211; deodorized, K1</p>
<p>1 part Aliphatic Mineral Spirits, Fed. Spec. TT-T-2981F, CAS<br />
#64741-49-9, or may substitute &#8220;Stoddard Solvent&#8221;, CAS #8052-41-3, or<br />
equivalent, (aka &#8220;Varsol&#8221;)</p>
<p>1 part Acetone, CAS #67-64-1.</p>
<p>(Optional up to 1 lb. of Lanolin, Anhydrous, USP per gallon, OK to<br />
substitute Lanolin, Modified, Topical Lubricant, from the drug store)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motor_grunt</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26306</link>
		<dc:creator>motor_grunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26306</guid>
		<description>Good ideas.  Have y&#039;all had any trouble with the weapon functioning after shooting a moderate amount?  I&#039;ve only put 150 or so rounds thru it. No malfuntions except  Wolf ammo had misfires (but that is junk russian ammo- make sure to clean the bore after firing that stuff- corrosive powder).  They say the pin doesn&#039;t strike the primer hard enough to set it off.

Anybody shoot a benelli SBE?  Mine wasn&#039;t 100% for a snipe hunt.  Maybe the low-brass lead?  Wasn&#039;t cycling every time.  i just cleaned it the weekend prior. ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good ideas.  Have y&#8217;all had any trouble with the weapon functioning after shooting a moderate amount?  I&#8217;ve only put 150 or so rounds thru it. No malfuntions except  Wolf ammo had misfires (but that is junk russian ammo- make sure to clean the bore after firing that stuff- corrosive powder).  They say the pin doesn&#8217;t strike the primer hard enough to set it off.</p>
<p>Anybody shoot a benelli SBE?  Mine wasn&#8217;t 100% for a snipe hunt.  Maybe the low-brass lead?  Wasn&#8217;t cycling every time.  i just cleaned it the weekend prior. ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK_USP_45</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26269</link>
		<dc:creator>HK_USP_45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26269</guid>
		<description>Some of those spray quick scrub cleaners work pretty well.  I think the best one is by Shooter&#039;s choice, Quick Scrub III, but that&#039;s hard to find.  Break Free makes a pretty good one, as does Birchwood Casey. (you can get the Break Free scrub cleaner with a Winchester label at Wallie World for $5, as compared to the normal $10.

You just spray the quick scrub into the receiver and all the crud runs out.  It works really well.  You do have to watch it on the plastic parts, though, it can discolor them (or so it warns).  It beats taking them all apart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of those spray quick scrub cleaners work pretty well.  I think the best one is by Shooter&#8217;s choice, Quick Scrub III, but that&#8217;s hard to find.  Break Free makes a pretty good one, as does Birchwood Casey. (you can get the Break Free scrub cleaner with a Winchester label at Wallie World for $5, as compared to the normal $10.</p>
<p>You just spray the quick scrub into the receiver and all the crud runs out.  It works really well.  You do have to watch it on the plastic parts, though, it can discolor them (or so it warns).  It beats taking them all apart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBIAlaska</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26236</link>
		<dc:creator>RBIAlaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26236</guid>
		<description>Exactly.  After I watched a video on youtube on how to disassemble and clean I decided not to.  I just take off the forearm and wipe it down.  I think I&#039;ll pay my gunsmith to do a thorough cleaning.  This definitely is no SKS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.  After I watched a video on youtube on how to disassemble and clean I decided not to.  I just take off the forearm and wipe it down.  I think I&#8217;ll pay my gunsmith to do a thorough cleaning.  This definitely is no SKS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK_USP_45</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26205</link>
		<dc:creator>HK_USP_45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 04:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26205</guid>
		<description>The bipod does dig into my back pretty bad.  My biggest criticism, though, is that it&#039;s a bear to clean.  The fact that it takes 3 different tools to take apart for cleaning is not good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bipod does dig into my back pretty bad.  My biggest criticism, though, is that it&#8217;s a bear to clean.  The fact that it takes 3 different tools to take apart for cleaning is not good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBIAlaska</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26198</link>
		<dc:creator>RBIAlaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26198</guid>
		<description>motor_grunt &amp; HK_USP_45 -

The only critisicm I have of this rifle has been having to move the sling to the side after attaching a bipod.  Very uncomfortable.  I bought a picatinny sling swivel and attached the sling to the side using it.  It swivels better and has more separation from the rifle.  Perfect.  I also stalk and still hunt unless its pouring down rain (then I get in one of my hunting buddy&#039;s boxes).  This setup is as comfortable as any rifle I have that weighs half as much.  I&#039;ll be able to carry it now without it poking me in the back or side. 

One more thing.  That SOCOM M14 is a thing of beauty.  Not going to get one though.  When I have that kind money, I&#039;m seriously considering adding a silencer to my FNAR.  The video in my previous post has me thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>motor_grunt &amp; HK_USP_45 -</p>
<p>The only critisicm I have of this rifle has been having to move the sling to the side after attaching a bipod.  Very uncomfortable.  I bought a picatinny sling swivel and attached the sling to the side using it.  It swivels better and has more separation from the rifle.  Perfect.  I also stalk and still hunt unless its pouring down rain (then I get in one of my hunting buddy&#8217;s boxes).  This setup is as comfortable as any rifle I have that weighs half as much.  I&#8217;ll be able to carry it now without it poking me in the back or side. </p>
<p>One more thing.  That SOCOM M14 is a thing of beauty.  Not going to get one though.  When I have that kind money, I&#8217;m seriously considering adding a silencer to my FNAR.  The video in my previous post has me thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK_USP_45</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26187</link>
		<dc:creator>HK_USP_45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26187</guid>
		<description>motor-grunt, Semper Fi.

Yeah, us jarheads are pretty emphatic about our support for FN.  My T.O. weapon during most of my infantry time was the M249.  Including my time in the red-dirt hell a.k.a. Somalia, and it never let me down.  Neither did the M9 I also carried.

I have not seen 5 rd mags for the SX-AR or FNAR, only 10 (SX) and 20 (FN).  I would think they would be making them, since the SXAR is a hunting rifle, and some states have 5 rd limits.

If the FN AR is called the FNAR, why is the Winchester AR not called the WAR?  j/k</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>motor-grunt, Semper Fi.</p>
<p>Yeah, us jarheads are pretty emphatic about our support for FN.  My T.O. weapon during most of my infantry time was the M249.  Including my time in the red-dirt hell a.k.a. Somalia, and it never let me down.  Neither did the M9 I also carried.</p>
<p>I have not seen 5 rd mags for the SX-AR or FNAR, only 10 (SX) and 20 (FN).  I would think they would be making them, since the SXAR is a hunting rifle, and some states have 5 rd limits.</p>
<p>If the FN AR is called the FNAR, why is the Winchester AR not called the WAR?  j/k</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motor_grunt</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-26165</link>
		<dc:creator>motor_grunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-26165</guid>
		<description>RBIAlska-
I know what you mean about 40degrees.  I live next door in south LA.  Yeah, i would much rather shoot off of bags than a bipod, but the long mags make that easier said than done. that&#039;s why im looking for a short 5rd mag.  I also like to still-hunt rather than hunt out of a stand.  I bought an adjustable mono-pod for hunting.  I&#039;ve done lots of hunting in west Texas and i think that would be a good buy.  I haven&#039;t shot off of it yet, but i can&#039;t wait to. 

I&#039;m a former Marine and i used two machine guns made by FN. M249(5.56mm) and M240(7.62mm).  They never let me down.  

My next purchase will be a SOCOM M14 and after that i want a PS90.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RBIAlska-<br />
I know what you mean about 40degrees.  I live next door in south LA.  Yeah, i would much rather shoot off of bags than a bipod, but the long mags make that easier said than done. that&#8217;s why im looking for a short 5rd mag.  I also like to still-hunt rather than hunt out of a stand.  I bought an adjustable mono-pod for hunting.  I&#8217;ve done lots of hunting in west Texas and i think that would be a good buy.  I haven&#8217;t shot off of it yet, but i can&#8217;t wait to. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a former Marine and i used two machine guns made by FN. M249(5.56mm) and M240(7.62mm).  They never let me down.  </p>
<p>My next purchase will be a SOCOM M14 and after that i want a PS90.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBIAlaska</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-25962</link>
		<dc:creator>RBIAlaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-25962</guid>
		<description>motor_grunt -
Thanks for the bipod info.  Take a look at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O70HyH9--bU.  This guy is pushing his Knight Armamont M110 with a bipod against some pretty rigid sand bags.  Five shots in 5 seconds at 220 yards.  I&#039;m going to try and replicate that setup next time it gets warm in Texas.  We freeze to death at anything below 40 degrees.  
Also I&#039;d like to have a 10 rd mag.  My buddy has one and has heard that 5 rd mags are available without the crimps but he hasn&#039;t seen one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>motor_grunt -<br />
Thanks for the bipod info.  Take a look at <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O70HyH9--bU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O70HyH9&#8211;bU</a>.  This guy is pushing his Knight Armamont M110 with a bipod against some pretty rigid sand bags.  Five shots in 5 seconds at 220 yards.  I&#8217;m going to try and replicate that setup next time it gets warm in Texas.  We freeze to death at anything below 40 degrees.<br />
Also I&#8217;d like to have a 10 rd mag.  My buddy has one and has heard that 5 rd mags are available without the crimps but he hasn&#8217;t seen one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK_USP_45</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-25821</link>
		<dc:creator>HK_USP_45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-25821</guid>
		<description>JimmyJo, it is the same rifle, as far as it&#039;s general make-up and components, but I&#039;m not sure about some of the accurizing features that the FNAR has, such as if the trigger group is the same, or if the barrel is the same.  Not even sure if Winchester uses an H-bar or the light barrel version of the FNAR.  It appears like an H-bar in the pic they have on their site.

There is a slight price difference, I don&#039;t know if that is due to an actual difference in manufacture (which could mean that there is some type of difference in quality of material?) costs, or if it&#039;s just that FNH thought an FN branded sniper rifle marketed towards LE/Military would sell for more than an Winchester branded hunting rifle in camo.

Right now I&#039;m really digging the MO Brush camo and love it on my savage, and would love it on my Win SX-AR (if I were to buy one), however, I fear that in 20 years the camo will look silly and dated compared to the advanced stuff that will be out then.  Kind of like my shotgun from 1988 with the silly/terrible camo that dates it back to the 80s.  Therefore, even though I love MO Brush, I&#039;m glad I have the FNAR in black, which the finish won&#039;t be dated in 20 years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JimmyJo, it is the same rifle, as far as it&#8217;s general make-up and components, but I&#8217;m not sure about some of the accurizing features that the FNAR has, such as if the trigger group is the same, or if the barrel is the same.  Not even sure if Winchester uses an H-bar or the light barrel version of the FNAR.  It appears like an H-bar in the pic they have on their site.</p>
<p>There is a slight price difference, I don&#8217;t know if that is due to an actual difference in manufacture (which could mean that there is some type of difference in quality of material?) costs, or if it&#8217;s just that FNH thought an FN branded sniper rifle marketed towards LE/Military would sell for more than an Winchester branded hunting rifle in camo.</p>
<p>Right now I&#8217;m really digging the MO Brush camo and love it on my savage, and would love it on my Win SX-AR (if I were to buy one), however, I fear that in 20 years the camo will look silly and dated compared to the advanced stuff that will be out then.  Kind of like my shotgun from 1988 with the silly/terrible camo that dates it back to the 80s.  Therefore, even though I love MO Brush, I&#8217;m glad I have the FNAR in black, which the finish won&#8217;t be dated in 20 years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-25789</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 02:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-25789</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m getting a kick out of bouncing back and forth between the 16&quot; FNAR blog, The &quot;long barrel blog&quot; and this one.  I have to agree with the guys using Hornady Factory ammo.  I&#039;m making double holes with custom 150gr SST and have the super performance on order.  I scored an FNAR light barrel at Gander in January for $1250 ($1100 with rebate) and I&#039;ve seen Cabella&#039;s offer them for same.  Haven&#039;t seen a single SXAR on display.  Forget $850.  
I really would like to see the SXAR offered in hunting calibers like .243, 7mm WSM and .300 WSM.  Browning will not associate its pretty guns with pistol grips so we need Winchester to do it.  The barrel is the key component I am interested in.  The BAR just has too light a barrel for the heavy calibers.  I have the .243 BAR and it is my favorite rifle, but in a .308 or bigger caliber the BAR barrel just seems too light, but then I carry a 26&quot; heavy Barrelled Kimber Sonora .300 Win Mag for the long shots.
If your worried about your black FNAR being a little Fuggly put some fake gold (bronze powder) in the lettering on the receiver and mount a leupold with the gold ring on it or a Nikon with gold lettering.  Then top it off with a little scripture in gold leaf.  Sweet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting a kick out of bouncing back and forth between the 16&#8243; FNAR blog, The &#8220;long barrel blog&#8221; and this one.  I have to agree with the guys using Hornady Factory ammo.  I&#8217;m making double holes with custom 150gr SST and have the super performance on order.  I scored an FNAR light barrel at Gander in January for $1250 ($1100 with rebate) and I&#8217;ve seen Cabella&#8217;s offer them for same.  Haven&#8217;t seen a single SXAR on display.  Forget $850.<br />
I really would like to see the SXAR offered in hunting calibers like .243, 7mm WSM and .300 WSM.  Browning will not associate its pretty guns with pistol grips so we need Winchester to do it.  The barrel is the key component I am interested in.  The BAR just has too light a barrel for the heavy calibers.  I have the .243 BAR and it is my favorite rifle, but in a .308 or bigger caliber the BAR barrel just seems too light, but then I carry a 26&#8243; heavy Barrelled Kimber Sonora .300 Win Mag for the long shots.<br />
If your worried about your black FNAR being a little Fuggly put some fake gold (bronze powder) in the lettering on the receiver and mount a leupold with the gold ring on it or a Nikon with gold lettering.  Then top it off with a little scripture in gold leaf.  Sweet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmyjo</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-25765</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmyjo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-25765</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric,
Well yea, at $850 vs $1500 the Winchester SX-AR wins everytime.
Lets us know how it shoots.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric,<br />
Well yea, at $850 vs $1500 the Winchester SX-AR wins everytime.<br />
Lets us know how it shoots.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric H</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-25752</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 09:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-25752</guid>
		<description>I purchased one a week ago for $850.00, I have not gotten a chance to shoot it but for that price I could not pass it up.  I went back to the same store and they had another for the same price, this was a Sportsman’s Warehouse.  I was planning on getting a FNAR but for $600.00 difference I can live without a few rails and the brush camo looks really good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased one a week ago for $850.00, I have not gotten a chance to shoot it but for that price I could not pass it up.  I went back to the same store and they had another for the same price, this was a Sportsman’s Warehouse.  I was planning on getting a FNAR but for $600.00 difference I can live without a few rails and the brush camo looks really good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmyjo</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-25741</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmyjo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-25741</guid>
		<description>I have read as much as I can find about the FNAR and the Winchester SX-AR.
What I have looked for but cannot find is a definitive statement conforming or denying they are except for color and trim the exact same rifle.
Does anyone know?
My local Winchester rep pleads ignorance.  
If they are true equals I will likely buy the Winchester for $1200 + tax.  The FNAR all seem to be in the $1500 range.
Having said that, if accuracy with the SX-AR is guaranteed to be &quot;whatever&quot;, and the FNAR is guaranteed to be 1&quot; range then the $300 difference is irrelevant.
Semer Fi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read as much as I can find about the FNAR and the Winchester SX-AR.<br />
What I have looked for but cannot find is a definitive statement conforming or denying they are except for color and trim the exact same rifle.<br />
Does anyone know?<br />
My local Winchester rep pleads ignorance.<br />
If they are true equals I will likely buy the Winchester for $1200 + tax.  The FNAR all seem to be in the $1500 range.<br />
Having said that, if accuracy with the SX-AR is guaranteed to be &#8220;whatever&#8221;, and the FNAR is guaranteed to be 1&#8243; range then the $300 difference is irrelevant.<br />
Semer Fi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motor_grunt</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-25675</link>
		<dc:creator>motor_grunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-25675</guid>
		<description>RBIAlaska-
I shot mine with a harris bi-pod and it jumped so high from the recoil that my rifle would actually come off the bench an inch or more and when it came back down i had to aquire a whole new sight picture.   Maybe from the vertical vibration of the barrel or possibly just my particular set-up. 

Factory Hornady 150gr BTSP ammo shoots very well for me. My trigger is very crisp and sharp.  Best out of box trigger yet.  

I have detachable scope mounts because i was in a hurry to hunt and no 30mm picatinny rings were in stock at my gun shop.  I used Wolf and Brown Bear ammo to get on paper. When I fired the hornady factory ammo, they had so much more pop that the point of impact shifted vertically a little each time. After the 3rd shot, they grouped sub-moa. Since then, the rifle has been very accurate. I was worried about the mounts being inadequate, but they have been holding true ever since. 

Does anyone know the dimensions(length) of the 5 rd mag?  I read that they are as long as the 10rd witha crimp in the mag walls to prevent loading more than 5.  I want one for hunting but if it is as long as the 10rd then that&#039;s beside the point unless you&#039;re hunting where 10rd is illegal. I thought i saw a pic of 5rd and it was smaller than 10rd but i haven&#039;t seen an actual mag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RBIAlaska-<br />
I shot mine with a harris bi-pod and it jumped so high from the recoil that my rifle would actually come off the bench an inch or more and when it came back down i had to aquire a whole new sight picture.   Maybe from the vertical vibration of the barrel or possibly just my particular set-up. </p>
<p>Factory Hornady 150gr BTSP ammo shoots very well for me. My trigger is very crisp and sharp.  Best out of box trigger yet.  </p>
<p>I have detachable scope mounts because i was in a hurry to hunt and no 30mm picatinny rings were in stock at my gun shop.  I used Wolf and Brown Bear ammo to get on paper. When I fired the hornady factory ammo, they had so much more pop that the point of impact shifted vertically a little each time. After the 3rd shot, they grouped sub-moa. Since then, the rifle has been very accurate. I was worried about the mounts being inadequate, but they have been holding true ever since. </p>
<p>Does anyone know the dimensions(length) of the 5 rd mag?  I read that they are as long as the 10rd witha crimp in the mag walls to prevent loading more than 5.  I want one for hunting but if it is as long as the 10rd then that&#8217;s beside the point unless you&#8217;re hunting where 10rd is illegal. I thought i saw a pic of 5rd and it was smaller than 10rd but i haven&#8217;t seen an actual mag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathiashunter</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-25010</link>
		<dc:creator>mathiashunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-25010</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s it, I have been thinking about getting this gun for about a month now but was not sure, but you guys made my mind up, it&#039;s as good as mine cause I&#039;m gonna go buy one. Thanks everybody!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s it, I have been thinking about getting this gun for about a month now but was not sure, but you guys made my mind up, it&#8217;s as good as mine cause I&#8217;m gonna go buy one. Thanks everybody!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBIAlaska</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-22789</link>
		<dc:creator>RBIAlaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-22789</guid>
		<description>S/TX - I agree 100%.  Mild recoil is accurate.  The recoil of my Remington .270 Mountain Rifle takes most of the fun out of shooting it.  I have shot 40 or more rounds out of my FNAR and could keep going.  No sore shoulder at all.  I just installed a bipod and I&#039;m really curious to see if it will help my accuracy for follow up shots.  We have pigs in East Texas now, but so far they&#039;ve outsmarted me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S/TX &#8211; I agree 100%.  Mild recoil is accurate.  The recoil of my Remington .270 Mountain Rifle takes most of the fun out of shooting it.  I have shot 40 or more rounds out of my FNAR and could keep going.  No sore shoulder at all.  I just installed a bipod and I&#8217;m really curious to see if it will help my accuracy for follow up shots.  We have pigs in East Texas now, but so far they&#8217;ve outsmarted me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S/TX</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-22479</link>
		<dc:creator>S/TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-22479</guid>
		<description>Bought one of those awesome shooting fuggly guns last week.  I put an Eotec on it.  I thought the recoil was mild compared to my A-bolt 270WSM.  Smooth shooting.  And I bought it for what it was bred for.  I like having the extra rounds and the extra punch for self defense and still be able to flip my target well down range if need be.  And if any pigs or nilgai step out of the brush, they&#039;re gonners.  One of previous posts are correct, the rifle looks much, much better in person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bought one of those awesome shooting fuggly guns last week.  I put an Eotec on it.  I thought the recoil was mild compared to my A-bolt 270WSM.  Smooth shooting.  And I bought it for what it was bred for.  I like having the extra rounds and the extra punch for self defense and still be able to flip my target well down range if need be.  And if any pigs or nilgai step out of the brush, they&#8217;re gonners.  One of previous posts are correct, the rifle looks much, much better in person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBIAlaska</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-21460</link>
		<dc:creator>RBIAlaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-21460</guid>
		<description>HK_USP_45 - Thanks for your comments.  I have a little homework to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HK_USP_45 &#8211; Thanks for your comments.  I have a little homework to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK_USP_45</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-20777</link>
		<dc:creator>HK_USP_45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-20777</guid>
		<description>RBIAlaska,

No, I missed desert storm.  I checked into my first unit the day the air war started.  Unfortunately, our AOR was SE Asia, and if you remember back then, N. Korea was threatening to invade S. Korea, and there was a coup attempt in the Philippines.  I was in Somalia, though, but my T.O. weapon was a M249 and an M9.

So, I have never carried my A2 into a combat situation, but I have taken it into some extensive desert and jungle training, as well as annual weapons qual.  I got out before the Corps started using the carbine, so I don&#039;t really have a lot of hands-on with it, either.

Here are a couple of things to consider, and I wouldn&#039;t be hesitant to get one, they are OUTSTANDING rifles.
1.  What are you going to be using it for?  anything over 300 meters, I would get an A2, not a carbine.  Home defense; then a carbine.  for varmint, then an R-15-type rifle.  Big game, then an R-25-type rifle in .308, or other large calibers.
2.  Me personally, I would never use wolf ammo in my AR.  I&#039;m paranoid it&#039;s going to leave a shellac residue.  You can get cheap ammo that won&#039;t harm your gun, such as Winchester, UMC, S&amp;B, etc.  The S&amp;B stuff is pretty good for the price, it&#039;s just a little lacking in QC.  Because I&#039;ve shot some of their stuff from a good batch that was some REALLY good stuff, then I&#039;ve shot some stuff that wasn&#039;t too good.
3.  If you do a lot of shooting, start reloading, like I did last April.  But a Lee set for $120 and get yourself some .223 dies and a crimper for $30.  You&#039;ll be loading ammo for about 25 cents per round instead of .50-1.00 per round, and the handloads will be in the quality level of the 1.00 per round.
4. As for brands of AR, there are a lot of good ARs out there, depending on what you want.  I&#039;m looking at Colt and Bravo Co for when I buy my Carbine.  But quite honestly, if I find a good deal on another brand, I&#039;ll buy it.  If I were you, I would wait until after the holidays, because I have a feeling the price of ARs will come down as some of the venders will want to get rid of some inventory (The AR market is slowing down some, but is saturated with a lot of ARs.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RBIAlaska,</p>
<p>No, I missed desert storm.  I checked into my first unit the day the air war started.  Unfortunately, our AOR was SE Asia, and if you remember back then, N. Korea was threatening to invade S. Korea, and there was a coup attempt in the Philippines.  I was in Somalia, though, but my T.O. weapon was a M249 and an M9.</p>
<p>So, I have never carried my A2 into a combat situation, but I have taken it into some extensive desert and jungle training, as well as annual weapons qual.  I got out before the Corps started using the carbine, so I don&#8217;t really have a lot of hands-on with it, either.</p>
<p>Here are a couple of things to consider, and I wouldn&#8217;t be hesitant to get one, they are OUTSTANDING rifles.<br />
1.  What are you going to be using it for?  anything over 300 meters, I would get an A2, not a carbine.  Home defense; then a carbine.  for varmint, then an R-15-type rifle.  Big game, then an R-25-type rifle in .308, or other large calibers.<br />
2.  Me personally, I would never use wolf ammo in my AR.  I&#8217;m paranoid it&#8217;s going to leave a shellac residue.  You can get cheap ammo that won&#8217;t harm your gun, such as Winchester, UMC, S&amp;B, etc.  The S&amp;B stuff is pretty good for the price, it&#8217;s just a little lacking in QC.  Because I&#8217;ve shot some of their stuff from a good batch that was some REALLY good stuff, then I&#8217;ve shot some stuff that wasn&#8217;t too good.<br />
3.  If you do a lot of shooting, start reloading, like I did last April.  But a Lee set for $120 and get yourself some .223 dies and a crimper for $30.  You&#8217;ll be loading ammo for about 25 cents per round instead of .50-1.00 per round, and the handloads will be in the quality level of the 1.00 per round.<br />
4. As for brands of AR, there are a lot of good ARs out there, depending on what you want.  I&#8217;m looking at Colt and Bravo Co for when I buy my Carbine.  But quite honestly, if I find a good deal on another brand, I&#8217;ll buy it.  If I were you, I would wait until after the holidays, because I have a feeling the price of ARs will come down as some of the venders will want to get rid of some inventory (The AR market is slowing down some, but is saturated with a lot of ARs.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBIAlaska</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-20699</link>
		<dc:creator>RBIAlaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-20699</guid>
		<description>HK_USP_45&#039;

Were you in Desert Storm?  Re: your comments on AR.  Iv&#039;e been very hesitant to buy one.  I&#039;ve looked at the short barrel carbines, if that&#039;s what they&#039;re called.  I believe I&#039;d have way too much fun shooting my steel targets, although I&#039;ve seen some cheap ammo like the Wolf I use for my SKS and AK&#039;s.  My FN buddy likes the Wilson Combat - Urban Tactical, but said a Bushmaster will do about the same thing.  What is your preference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HK_USP_45&#8242;</p>
<p>Were you in Desert Storm?  Re: your comments on AR.  Iv&#8217;e been very hesitant to buy one.  I&#8217;ve looked at the short barrel carbines, if that&#8217;s what they&#8217;re called.  I believe I&#8217;d have way too much fun shooting my steel targets, although I&#8217;ve seen some cheap ammo like the Wolf I use for my SKS and AK&#8217;s.  My FN buddy likes the Wilson Combat &#8211; Urban Tactical, but said a Bushmaster will do about the same thing.  What is your preference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK_USP_45</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-20578</link>
		<dc:creator>HK_USP_45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-20578</guid>
		<description>RBIAlaska,

I hear ya, I&#039;ve always been a bolt gun guy for hunting, just because of the old &quot;more accurate than a semi&quot; argument.  But I&#039;ve done a lot of rethinking on that.  I don&#039;t know if that still holds as true as it used to with modern semis.  There&#039;s guys out there winning matches that are choosing AR platform rifles over bolt guns.

I love my FNAR, but now I think I want to add a R-25 to my collection (which has more than doubled in the last year.  I went from 10 guns to 26 guns in the last year.  It&#039;s been fun.).  I&#039;ve always been a fan of the AR.  Well, I shouldn&#039;t say ALWAYS; back BEFORE I actually was issued one and shot it I bitched about what crap it was just because of everything I had heard from Vietnam vets.  Once I actually shot one, I became a fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RBIAlaska,</p>
<p>I hear ya, I&#8217;ve always been a bolt gun guy for hunting, just because of the old &#8220;more accurate than a semi&#8221; argument.  But I&#8217;ve done a lot of rethinking on that.  I don&#8217;t know if that still holds as true as it used to with modern semis.  There&#8217;s guys out there winning matches that are choosing AR platform rifles over bolt guns.</p>
<p>I love my FNAR, but now I think I want to add a R-25 to my collection (which has more than doubled in the last year.  I went from 10 guns to 26 guns in the last year.  It&#8217;s been fun.).  I&#8217;ve always been a fan of the AR.  Well, I shouldn&#8217;t say ALWAYS; back BEFORE I actually was issued one and shot it I bitched about what crap it was just because of everything I had heard from Vietnam vets.  Once I actually shot one, I became a fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBIAlaska</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-20519</link>
		<dc:creator>RBIAlaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-20519</guid>
		<description>Its fun reading the comments.  Thought I&#039;d ad my 2 cents.  Always shot a .270 Remington bolt action.  My Father and his Father shot the same .270 in a slide action.  We were always too tight to shoot them much though.  Obama got elected and now I own semi&#039;s out the cazoo.  22 mag., sks, ak&#039;s etc.  Friend of mine talked me into buying the FN with a big ole scope and a GG&amp;G tripod.  This thing groups an average 1 in. MOA and I have one group that looks like 1 ragged hole.  Its a nice rifle.  Fun to shoot.  Hornady TAP 168 and Winchester 150 gr. bullets hardly drop at 200 yds.  As far as looks, comparing it to my bolt action Mountain Rifle is kinda like comparing my blue heeler and my Labrador.  Love them both the same but deciding which one is prettier is difficult.  They both do a good job at what they are bred by God to do.  One more thing, it does get a lot of looks at the range.  Most of the old timers love it.  Maybe they&#039;re just being polite.  Kinda like and ugly baby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its fun reading the comments.  Thought I&#8217;d ad my 2 cents.  Always shot a .270 Remington bolt action.  My Father and his Father shot the same .270 in a slide action.  We were always too tight to shoot them much though.  Obama got elected and now I own semi&#8217;s out the cazoo.  22 mag., sks, ak&#8217;s etc.  Friend of mine talked me into buying the FN with a big ole scope and a GG&amp;G tripod.  This thing groups an average 1 in. MOA and I have one group that looks like 1 ragged hole.  Its a nice rifle.  Fun to shoot.  Hornady TAP 168 and Winchester 150 gr. bullets hardly drop at 200 yds.  As far as looks, comparing it to my bolt action Mountain Rifle is kinda like comparing my blue heeler and my Labrador.  Love them both the same but deciding which one is prettier is difficult.  They both do a good job at what they are bred by God to do.  One more thing, it does get a lot of looks at the range.  Most of the old timers love it.  Maybe they&#8217;re just being polite.  Kinda like and ugly baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK_USP_45</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-18139</link>
		<dc:creator>HK_USP_45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-18139</guid>
		<description>I have never NOT bought a gun because of the price of extra magazines.  IF that were the case...heck, mags for my browning buckmark .22 are like $30.  My ruger LCP is $20-25.  You really can&#039;t compare the FNAR mag to an (cheap as you said) AR-10 mag, either.  The things are solid bricks.  They&#039;re a weapon in their own right.

I feel like I&#039;m on a women&#039;s shoe blog, instead of a gun blog.  &quot;It&#039;s ugly, I wouldn&#039;t buy it.&quot;  &quot;It&#039;s too expensive to accessories it.&quot;  Just shoot the gun.  And I would argue that for the quality, accuracy and features that you get with this rifle, no you can&#039;t find a lot out there for this price. Not in a .308 tactical/sniping combat/hoot&#039;enanny zombie killing rifle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never NOT bought a gun because of the price of extra magazines.  IF that were the case&#8230;heck, mags for my browning buckmark .22 are like $30.  My ruger LCP is $20-25.  You really can&#8217;t compare the FNAR mag to an (cheap as you said) AR-10 mag, either.  The things are solid bricks.  They&#8217;re a weapon in their own right.</p>
<p>I feel like I&#8217;m on a women&#8217;s shoe blog, instead of a gun blog.  &#8220;It&#8217;s ugly, I wouldn&#8217;t buy it.&#8221;  &#8220;It&#8217;s too expensive to accessories it.&#8221;  Just shoot the gun.  And I would argue that for the quality, accuracy and features that you get with this rifle, no you can&#8217;t find a lot out there for this price. Not in a .308 tactical/sniping combat/hoot&#8217;enanny zombie killing rifle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-18131</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-18131</guid>
		<description>But like all things . Over time someone will make an aftermarket mag for alot less, meanwhile you have an excellent weapon .What other autoloading tactical weapon can you find with .308 power that shoots as well and costs less?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But like all things . Over time someone will make an aftermarket mag for alot less, meanwhile you have an excellent weapon .What other autoloading tactical weapon can you find with .308 power that shoots as well and costs less?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-17966</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-17966</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been wanting a 308 combat style rifle for a while.  I wanted an FNAR but then heard all of the complaints about how expensive and hard to find the magazines are.
When I first saw the SX-AR I thought it would be the &quot;one&quot; especially because it appears to use cheap and plentiful AR-10 mags.  I have now lost interest as it is the same rifle as the FNAR with the same unjustifiably over priced magazines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been wanting a 308 combat style rifle for a while.  I wanted an FNAR but then heard all of the complaints about how expensive and hard to find the magazines are.<br />
When I first saw the SX-AR I thought it would be the &#8220;one&#8221; especially because it appears to use cheap and plentiful AR-10 mags.  I have now lost interest as it is the same rifle as the FNAR with the same unjustifiably over priced magazines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeepjumper</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-17431</link>
		<dc:creator>jeepjumper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 03:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-17431</guid>
		<description>Ugly....  Who cares how cute the rifle is, what counts is what happens on the business end and this little &quot;hunkajunk&quot; hits what you point it at!  And, with it&#039;s sizeable weight, feels really good when you squeeze the trigger off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugly&#8230;.  Who cares how cute the rifle is, what counts is what happens on the business end and this little &#8220;hunkajunk&#8221; hits what you point it at!  And, with it&#8217;s sizeable weight, feels really good when you squeeze the trigger off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-16516</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-16516</guid>
		<description>Ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK_USP_45</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-16302</link>
		<dc:creator>HK_USP_45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-16302</guid>
		<description>It is fuggly, but I think that is mostly due to the pistol grip combined with the hump on the stock.  Both serve a purpose, though.  In my opinion, everything front of the rear stock/pistol grip looks good.  

Also the mag is a plus compared to the BAR 3 rounds.

It&#039;s ugly, but if you shoot one, you&#039;ll like it.  It&#039;s not really as ugly at the range as it is in pictures.  AND, it is also cheaper than the AR offerings in .308, like the Remington, which you couldn&#039;t even find a month ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is fuggly, but I think that is mostly due to the pistol grip combined with the hump on the stock.  Both serve a purpose, though.  In my opinion, everything front of the rear stock/pistol grip looks good.  </p>
<p>Also the mag is a plus compared to the BAR 3 rounds.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ugly, but if you shoot one, you&#8217;ll like it.  It&#8217;s not really as ugly at the range as it is in pictures.  AND, it is also cheaper than the AR offerings in .308, like the Remington, which you couldn&#8217;t even find a month ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK_USP_45</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-16301</link>
		<dc:creator>HK_USP_45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-16301</guid>
		<description>Erik brings up a good point about offering the same gun under two different names.  FN has been doing that for awhile with Winchester and Browning offerings.  Their last generation auto shotguns come to mind (I forgot the names, I think the Winchester was the X2, the browning the Gold-something).  I don&#039;t know how well that worked for them.

I&#039;m not going to lie, I&#039;m pretty much an FN fanboy.  They did right be me in the Marines, and they&#039;re doing right by the US shooting community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erik brings up a good point about offering the same gun under two different names.  FN has been doing that for awhile with Winchester and Browning offerings.  Their last generation auto shotguns come to mind (I forgot the names, I think the Winchester was the X2, the browning the Gold-something).  I don&#8217;t know how well that worked for them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to lie, I&#8217;m pretty much an FN fanboy.  They did right be me in the Marines, and they&#8217;re doing right by the US shooting community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-16299</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-16299</guid>
		<description>Steve, yea, I also want one but there are other tools that can do the job just as well but cheaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, yea, I also want one but there are other tools that can do the job just as well but cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Groom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/15/new-winchester-sx-ar-autoloading-centerfire-rifle/#comment-16290</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8509#comment-16290</guid>
		<description>No, sir. I don&#039;t like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, sir. I don&#8217;t like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
