<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has China developed a PDW based on the QBZ-95?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jobjed</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-67578</link>
		<dc:creator>jobjed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-67578</guid>
		<description>the qbz-03 was not made to replace the qbz-95, but rather made for paratroopers. the qbz-03 was more compact when folded which made it more convenient for jumping out of an airplane and the fact that the sights are more widely spaced means that the lines of sight is more accurate than the qbz-95, a significant feature considering that paratroopers usually drop behind enemy lines and need to shoot accurately and conservatively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the qbz-03 was not made to replace the qbz-95, but rather made for paratroopers. the qbz-03 was more compact when folded which made it more convenient for jumping out of an airplane and the fact that the sights are more widely spaced means that the lines of sight is more accurate than the qbz-95, a significant feature considering that paratroopers usually drop behind enemy lines and need to shoot accurately and conservatively.</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-67578" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('67578', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-67578-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-67578" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('67578', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-67578-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-19580</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-19580</guid>
		<description>Ejection and trigger pull has allegedly been solved by Kel-Tec&#039;s RFB.
Belted ammo and drums seems like a non-issue for a service rifle.
Supposedly the RFB has several hardened steel sheets protecting the shooters face. I&#039;d like to see this tested though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ejection and trigger pull has allegedly been solved by Kel-Tec&#8217;s RFB.<br />
Belted ammo and drums seems like a non-issue for a service rifle.<br />
Supposedly the RFB has several hardened steel sheets protecting the shooters face. I&#8217;d like to see this tested though.</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-19580" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('19580', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-19580-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-19580" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('19580', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-19580-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wengv</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-19442</link>
		<dc:creator>wengv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-19442</guid>
		<description>the drawbacks of bullup rifles.

1. case ejection port is close to user&#039;s chest. this design is not for lefties.
2. trigger pull is too heavy due to the connection rod.
3. can&#039;t use belted ammo or drum magazine.
4. if any kaboom, the user will be injured severely since the bolt is right under his cheek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the drawbacks of bullup rifles.</p>
<p>1. case ejection port is close to user&#8217;s chest. this design is not for lefties.<br />
2. trigger pull is too heavy due to the connection rod.<br />
3. can&#8217;t use belted ammo or drum magazine.<br />
4. if any kaboom, the user will be injured severely since the bolt is right under his cheek.</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-19442" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('19442', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-19442-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-19442" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('19442', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-19442-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">2</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gun nuts from china</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16339</link>
		<dc:creator>gun nuts from china</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16339</guid>
		<description>those guns which are designed by PLA usually keep the similar looking
just like the Russia cousin for short training time for new gen. fire arms 
but those china made guns may have difference design and mechanism
so don&#039;t be so serious about shape and size to conjecture their relation
the same thing happen on Taiwan T-65 series AR too
in the early stage T65 look alike a her USA parent AR 18
but at the mess produced T-65K2
it look like a AR15 type than AR 18 &#039;s one
but it&#039;s still keeping the ar 18 refined mechanism
[some said it work much alike the HK416&#039;s]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those guns which are designed by PLA usually keep the similar looking<br />
just like the Russia cousin for short training time for new gen. fire arms<br />
but those china made guns may have difference design and mechanism<br />
so don&#8217;t be so serious about shape and size to conjecture their relation<br />
the same thing happen on Taiwan T-65 series AR too<br />
in the early stage T65 look alike a her USA parent AR 18<br />
but at the mess produced T-65K2<br />
it look like a AR15 type than AR 18 &#8216;s one<br />
but it&#8217;s still keeping the ar 18 refined mechanism<br />
[some said it work much alike the HK416's]</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16339" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16339', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16339-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16339" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16339', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16339-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vitor</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16216</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16216</guid>
		<description>Jdun1911, dont generalize all bullpups. The Tavor has been very well received by israeli and colombian troops, the Kel-Tec RFB is getting great reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jdun1911, dont generalize all bullpups. The Tavor has been very well received by israeli and colombian troops, the Kel-Tec RFB is getting great reviews.</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16216" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16216', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16216-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16216" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16216', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16216-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16207</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16207</guid>
		<description>So why is bullpup a bad design? The ar15.com thread didn&#039;t explain why this would be the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why is bullpup a bad design? The ar15.com thread didn&#8217;t explain why this would be the case.</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16207" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16207', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16207-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16207" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16207', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16207-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: china boy</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16155</link>
		<dc:creator>china boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16155</guid>
		<description>I am a chinese boy ,firearm fans,95B was made in 1997,it is not a PDW,but shot carbine,used by the solders on naval fleet and special police force.ballistic was not good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a chinese boy ,firearm fans,95B was made in 1997,it is not a PDW,but shot carbine,used by the solders on naval fleet and special police force.ballistic was not good.</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16155" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16155', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16155-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16155" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16155', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16155-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16139</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16139</guid>
		<description>Yep, you guys are right. The gloves are covering the barrel. I have updated the blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, you guys are right. The gloves are covering the barrel. I have updated the blog post.</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16139" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16139', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16139-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16139" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16139', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16139-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16137</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16137</guid>
		<description>Jarkko, are you able to post a link to a screenshot of page 75. I can&#039;t figure out how to get the example issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jarkko, are you able to post a link to a screenshot of page 75. I can&#8217;t figure out how to get the example issue.</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16137" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16137', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16137-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16137" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16137', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16137-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schowgun</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16134</link>
		<dc:creator>Schowgun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16134</guid>
		<description>Kyle is right.  You can see some muzzle extending beyond the white gloves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle is right.  You can see some muzzle extending beyond the white gloves.</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16134" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16134', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16134-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16134" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16134', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16134-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16128</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16128</guid>
		<description>It looks like those Chinese sailors came off the same assembly line as the carbines. Those guys are clones!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like those Chinese sailors came off the same assembly line as the carbines. Those guys are clones!</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16128" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16128', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16128-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">1</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16128" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16128', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16128-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarkko Koskinen</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16122</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarkko Koskinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16122</guid>
		<description>Actually those guns were published in Milipol 2006. Photos of them are visible in Rekyyli-magazine (finnish only) at page 75 on this online-sample issue:

http://www.rekyyli.fi/naytenumero/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually those guns were published in Milipol 2006. Photos of them are visible in Rekyyli-magazine (finnish only) at page 75 on this online-sample issue:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rekyyli.fi/naytenumero/" rel="nofollow">http://www.rekyyli.fi/naytenumero/</a></p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16122" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16122', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16122-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16122" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16122', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16122-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16121</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16121</guid>
		<description>Oh someone posted a link to your site for the Type 03. Didn&#039;t know you have a article on the rifle or maybe I just forgot about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh someone posted a link to your site for the Type 03. Didn&#8217;t know you have a article on the rifle or maybe I just forgot about it.</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16121" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16121', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16121-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16121" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16121', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16121-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16120</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16120</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not an expert on Chinese weapons but someone did mention on AR15.com that the QBZ-95 was a disappointment. They went back to a conventional design instead of bullpup with the Type 03. 

They found out really fast why bullpup are bad design. Good for them.

http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=6&amp;f=2&amp;t=293193</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not an expert on Chinese weapons but someone did mention on AR15.com that the QBZ-95 was a disappointment. They went back to a conventional design instead of bullpup with the Type 03. </p>
<p>They found out really fast why bullpup are bad design. Good for them.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=6&#038;f=2&#038;t=293193" rel="nofollow">http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=6&#038;f=2&#038;t=293193</a></p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16120" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16120', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16120-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16120" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16120', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16120-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.A.W.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16116</link>
		<dc:creator>R.A.W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16116</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure that&#039;s the existing short-barreled QBZ model.  The type 05 SMG lacks the foregrip and the magazine is very wide and short because it&#039;s quad stack design.  I think Kyle has it right, it looks shorter than it is because their gloves are covering the barrel and blending in with their shirts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that&#8217;s the existing short-barreled QBZ model.  The type 05 SMG lacks the foregrip and the magazine is very wide and short because it&#8217;s quad stack design.  I think Kyle has it right, it looks shorter than it is because their gloves are covering the barrel and blending in with their shirts.</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16116" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16116', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16116-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16116" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16116', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16116-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16109</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16109</guid>
		<description>Grumpy, good call. It is really hard to see the size of the magazines due to the angle of the photo. It does seem to me that the mags look bigger than the QCW pistol magazines. 

What do you guys think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grumpy, good call. It is really hard to see the size of the magazines due to the angle of the photo. It does seem to me that the mags look bigger than the QCW pistol magazines. </p>
<p>What do you guys think?</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16109" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16109', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16109-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16109" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16109', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16109-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XxleoxX</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16103</link>
		<dc:creator>XxleoxX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16103</guid>
		<description>just looks like a short type 97....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just looks like a short type 97&#8230;.</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16103" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16103', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16103-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">1</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16103" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16103', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16103-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16095</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16095</guid>
		<description>More and more Chicom JUNK. The chinese are make a carnine of there QBZ-97 rifle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More and more Chicom JUNK. The chinese are make a carnine of there QBZ-97 rifle.</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16095" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16095', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16095-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16095" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16095', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16095-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">3</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16092</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16092</guid>
		<description>Same thing -but since they are holding the bbl protrusion with their white gloves, it looks shorter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same thing -but since they are holding the bbl protrusion with their white gloves, it looks shorter.</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16092" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16092', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16092-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16092" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16092', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16092-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: West</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/10/13/has-china-developed-a-pdw-based-on-the-qbz-95/comment-page-1/#comment-16087</link>
		<dc:creator>West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=8453#comment-16087</guid>
		<description>Pretty impressive, they are gearing up across the board. Especially their new Jin-Class SSBN program on Hainan Island.

Oh, and I love the ladies uniforms - knee high boots and short skirts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty impressive, they are gearing up across the board. Especially their new Jin-Class SSBN program on Hainan Island.</p>
<p>Oh, and I love the ladies uniforms &#8211; knee high boots and short skirts.</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-16087" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16087', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16087-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-16087" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16087', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16087-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)

Served from: www.thefirearmblog.com @ 2012-02-11 10:50:26 -->
