<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remington HD Ultimate Home Defense Shotshell &#8230; birdshot for home defense?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:17:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-27406</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-27406</guid>
		<description>I just keyworded Serial Shooters. On AZcentral.com they tell the story of what happened.I was wrong-they did kill six and wounded 17 people.Also it says they were using a .410. Yes a .410 shotgun.I know they also HAD 12 and 20 guages-guess they just liked the .410. I would definately think BB or #2 &amp; #4 could and would do they trick in MY apartment out of a 12 or 20 gauge.Try to find pics of the victims .410 wounds-awful.I will test these self defense shells out.Please look up these Serial Shooters on Azcental.com -It enlightened me. My heart goes out to the innocent victims and their familes.The shooters need to be....well, I can&#039;t say.It is a messed up world killing people with babies at home for &quot;random recreational violence&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just keyworded Serial Shooters. On AZcentral.com they tell the story of what happened.I was wrong-they did kill six and wounded 17 people.Also it says they were using a .410. Yes a .410 shotgun.I know they also HAD 12 and 20 guages-guess they just liked the .410. I would definately think BB or #2 &amp; #4 could and would do they trick in MY apartment out of a 12 or 20 gauge.Try to find pics of the victims .410 wounds-awful.I will test these self defense shells out.Please look up these Serial Shooters on Azcental.com -It enlightened me. My heart goes out to the innocent victims and their familes.The shooters need to be&#8230;.well, I can&#8217;t say.It is a messed up world killing people with babies at home for &#8220;random recreational violence&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-27403</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-27403</guid>
		<description>I saw a few years ago in Arizona or New Mexico there was a guy or guys shooting people with shotguns and birdshot.Some were 20 gauges some were 12 gauges.Like a weird evil experiment.He/they would pull up to a guy sitting on a bench or walking down the sidewalk and shot him in the belly.I think everyone lived but every one had a huge scar with smaller pellet scars around it and surgical incision scars.The main scar was as big as a saucer-no kidding.They showed 3-4 victims.They were in the hospital for days and weeks-lost intestines.As one victim said when he pulled his shirt up-Quote:He gut busted me.They all stopped and or curled up, begged for help then had hours of surgery.Thats in the belly.From a far lane of the road to a sidewalk bench is-Say 30 feet or so? I Imagine if in shot the chest they wouldnt lose only intestines but pieces of heart and lungs.Or if shot in the face they probably wouldnt have a face. I&#039;ve taken beatings and been in bad accidents(broke bones).I know these guys werent pumped up on dope,just relaxing when they were shot but I DONT think I could do anything even IF I was enraged/drunk/or high with the wounds they showed on TV.Try to look it up on the web.They caught the guy/guys.I think they turned on each other IIRC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a few years ago in Arizona or New Mexico there was a guy or guys shooting people with shotguns and birdshot.Some were 20 gauges some were 12 gauges.Like a weird evil experiment.He/they would pull up to a guy sitting on a bench or walking down the sidewalk and shot him in the belly.I think everyone lived but every one had a huge scar with smaller pellet scars around it and surgical incision scars.The main scar was as big as a saucer-no kidding.They showed 3-4 victims.They were in the hospital for days and weeks-lost intestines.As one victim said when he pulled his shirt up-Quote:He gut busted me.They all stopped and or curled up, begged for help then had hours of surgery.Thats in the belly.From a far lane of the road to a sidewalk bench is-Say 30 feet or so? I Imagine if in shot the chest they wouldnt lose only intestines but pieces of heart and lungs.Or if shot in the face they probably wouldnt have a face. I&#8217;ve taken beatings and been in bad accidents(broke bones).I know these guys werent pumped up on dope,just relaxing when they were shot but I DONT think I could do anything even IF I was enraged/drunk/or high with the wounds they showed on TV.Try to look it up on the web.They caught the guy/guys.I think they turned on each other IIRC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-22021</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-22021</guid>
		<description>Grey- I think the biggest selling point is that a wounded troll means an assault charge rather than a murder charge in places where police may not respect the castle doctrine. When I lived in CT I loaded 3in turkey shot because it&#039;s goes down easier amongst the more liberal leaning states to say I am a sportsman who used his sporting arm to defend himself than I was ready for that guy and meant to kill him.

Here in SC I have a deep larder of slugs and buck. If I moved back to the North East I&#039;d stock more politically correct loads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grey- I think the biggest selling point is that a wounded troll means an assault charge rather than a murder charge in places where police may not respect the castle doctrine. When I lived in CT I loaded 3in turkey shot because it&#8217;s goes down easier amongst the more liberal leaning states to say I am a sportsman who used his sporting arm to defend himself than I was ready for that guy and meant to kill him.</p>
<p>Here in SC I have a deep larder of slugs and buck. If I moved back to the North East I&#8217;d stock more politically correct loads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grey</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-21976</link>
		<dc:creator>Grey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-21976</guid>
		<description>Oh, the other thing that I see is for close range, center of mass hits, you should see massive energy transfer, the results of which should be very, very unpleasant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, the other thing that I see is for close range, center of mass hits, you should see massive energy transfer, the results of which should be very, very unpleasant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grey</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-21974</link>
		<dc:creator>Grey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-21974</guid>
		<description>Small shot will have less tendency to overpenetrate walls, doors, and trolls.  In addition, &quot;winging&quot; a troll may have several desired results:

1.)  A wounded troll may choose to flee the hostile environment.

2.)  A wounded troll that flees the scene may require medical attention/hospitalization.  When the police arrive to question the troll and doctors treating him, it should be fairly easy for them to piece things together.  How many trolls are showing up at hospitals with expensive, high-end tungsten shot rather than cheap lead...

3.)  A wounded troll may leave more DNA evidence at the scene to further investigation/prosecution.

4.)  A wounded troll may experience some loss of function or immediate and severe impairment of abilities, resulting in the troll being as easier target for follow-up shots.

To be honest, #4 and #2 shot are nothing to sneeze when there are a couple hundred of them flying downrange.  A couple of these followed by 1-2 slugs or buck, just in case things get real ugly, might not be bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small shot will have less tendency to overpenetrate walls, doors, and trolls.  In addition, &#8220;winging&#8221; a troll may have several desired results:</p>
<p>1.)  A wounded troll may choose to flee the hostile environment.</p>
<p>2.)  A wounded troll that flees the scene may require medical attention/hospitalization.  When the police arrive to question the troll and doctors treating him, it should be fairly easy for them to piece things together.  How many trolls are showing up at hospitals with expensive, high-end tungsten shot rather than cheap lead&#8230;</p>
<p>3.)  A wounded troll may leave more DNA evidence at the scene to further investigation/prosecution.</p>
<p>4.)  A wounded troll may experience some loss of function or immediate and severe impairment of abilities, resulting in the troll being as easier target for follow-up shots.</p>
<p>To be honest, #4 and #2 shot are nothing to sneeze when there are a couple hundred of them flying downrange.  A couple of these followed by 1-2 slugs or buck, just in case things get real ugly, might not be bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John B.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-18322</link>
		<dc:creator>John B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-18322</guid>
		<description>I can only say that 00buck is what I have waiting on an intruder whether home invasion or burgler. I work and struggle to do all the things for my family. I have no sympathy for thugs.Yes 00buck. JB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only say that 00buck is what I have waiting on an intruder whether home invasion or burgler. I work and struggle to do all the things for my family. I have no sympathy for thugs.Yes 00buck. JB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Vaughn</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-17669</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Vaughn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-17669</guid>
		<description>I bought the wife a Rem. youth express (20ga) years ago, first round was the bird shot. Them came the buckshot.
The way the house was laid out, we did not want the buckshot going throug the walls into the kids bedrooms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought the wife a Rem. youth express (20ga) years ago, first round was the bird shot. Them came the buckshot.<br />
The way the house was laid out, we did not want the buckshot going throug the walls into the kids bedrooms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-17372</link>
		<dc:creator>Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-17372</guid>
		<description>Finn Agaard once wrote favorably of lead 6 shot in a 20 ga. youth model for home defense. I couldn&#039;t agree more. Just remember, the minute you pull that trigger you are on your way to court. Bird shot out of a youth shotgun is going to look a lot better to the jury than a slug out of something that looks like an UZI. Sure, everybody&#039;s got three cast iron balls when they are writing notes here, but ... real life is usually a lot different. I wouldn&#039;t buy this expensive junk because I&#039;ve got lots of bird shot around. That price is just stupid money! My daughter&#039;s Winchester Ranger Youth 120 will suit just fine for home defense. The bad guys not counting on gettting shot. Period. And that 20 ga. will cut him in half at 20 feet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finn Agaard once wrote favorably of lead 6 shot in a 20 ga. youth model for home defense. I couldn&#8217;t agree more. Just remember, the minute you pull that trigger you are on your way to court. Bird shot out of a youth shotgun is going to look a lot better to the jury than a slug out of something that looks like an UZI. Sure, everybody&#8217;s got three cast iron balls when they are writing notes here, but &#8230; real life is usually a lot different. I wouldn&#8217;t buy this expensive junk because I&#8217;ve got lots of bird shot around. That price is just stupid money! My daughter&#8217;s Winchester Ranger Youth 120 will suit just fine for home defense. The bad guys not counting on gettting shot. Period. And that 20 ga. will cut him in half at 20 feet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-16986</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-16986</guid>
		<description>i personally think its a waste of money all they did was slap the words home defense on it so they could charge you more for it. 35$ a box is quite expensive when you could use any 3 inch or bigger shell with number 4 steel shot and get the same effect. really any high velocity duck or goose round with tungston is just as effective and you spend about ten dollars less</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i personally think its a waste of money all they did was slap the words home defense on it so they could charge you more for it. 35$ a box is quite expensive when you could use any 3 inch or bigger shell with number 4 steel shot and get the same effect. really any high velocity duck or goose round with tungston is just as effective and you spend about ten dollars less</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh J</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-16056</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-16056</guid>
		<description>this subject is rather funny any bullet can kill bb, pellet or rubber.
that being said if I shoot I shoot to kill, maybe does not cut it.
there is a good point to disable an intruder instead of kill as homeowners have been charged with ridiculous crimes for defending themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this subject is rather funny any bullet can kill bb, pellet or rubber.<br />
that being said if I shoot I shoot to kill, maybe does not cut it.<br />
there is a good point to disable an intruder instead of kill as homeowners have been charged with ridiculous crimes for defending themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-15771</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-15771</guid>
		<description>Shot penetration photos:
http://www.shotgunworld.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=7&amp;t=109958

Box o&#039; Truth:
http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot3.htm

Birdshot can be devastating, but remember that an intruder might not oblige you with a clean head-on chest shot.  If you have to go through an arm you&#039;ll want more penetration.  And you can&#039;t rely on pain -- to reliably stop someone you need to penetrate deep enough to break the important bits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shot penetration photos:<br />
<a href="http://www.shotgunworld.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=7&amp;t=109958" rel="nofollow">http://www.shotgunworld.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=7&amp;t=109958</a></p>
<p>Box o&#8217; Truth:<br />
<a href="http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot3.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot3.htm</a></p>
<p>Birdshot can be devastating, but remember that an intruder might not oblige you with a clean head-on chest shot.  If you have to go through an arm you&#8217;ll want more penetration.  And you can&#8217;t rely on pain &#8212; to reliably stop someone you need to penetrate deep enough to break the important bits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-15713</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-15713</guid>
		<description>At very close range - say within seven yards or so, bird shot will create a devastating wound. 

Some of the logic (mentioned previously in this topic) with bird shot for self defense is that if you are shooting the assailant inside your house, the shot is less likely to cause damage to walls, etc.

Another may be that 00&#039; buck and slugs will continue to travel through walls, furniture and family members, and right on through to the neighbors house as well.

Having seen the after effects of a slug accidentally discharged into a wall, I can understand why tungsten bird shot might be the first choice for a  home full of spouses, kids, pets, and in laws.... well maybe not in laws. lol 

Personally, I&#039;m partial to low recoil 2 3/4 00&#039; buck. Its hard to argue with at any distance, and less likely to miss than slugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At very close range &#8211; say within seven yards or so, bird shot will create a devastating wound. </p>
<p>Some of the logic (mentioned previously in this topic) with bird shot for self defense is that if you are shooting the assailant inside your house, the shot is less likely to cause damage to walls, etc.</p>
<p>Another may be that 00&#8242; buck and slugs will continue to travel through walls, furniture and family members, and right on through to the neighbors house as well.</p>
<p>Having seen the after effects of a slug accidentally discharged into a wall, I can understand why tungsten bird shot might be the first choice for a  home full of spouses, kids, pets, and in laws&#8230;. well maybe not in laws. lol </p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;m partial to low recoil 2 3/4 00&#8242; buck. Its hard to argue with at any distance, and less likely to miss than slugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill davis</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14429</link>
		<dc:creator>bill davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14429</guid>
		<description>Because I flew helicopters in the Army and my beady eyes look mean I was chosen to train swat type teams.  I&#039;m establishing my bona fides here and that is I don&#039;t have any real life experience in this stuff buy hunt mostly with a bow (once again, no experiene with bird shot).  

We used semi-auto handguns and fully automatic submachine gund and ARs, in hostage and room clearing training.  Training was one thing but I often thought a choked shotgun would be better even in hostage situations.  Hold 2 inches off an ear vs. tyring to hit the guy in the side of the head of that is all the target you have.  I guess either way adrenelin is the culprit that causes 100 rounds shot in a room shootout and no one hit.  So, for what it is worth, this is just another tool to use if you would prefer it over the old slug or buck rounds.

I do like a pump shotgun for home defense because of the cycling sound but there are no guarantees the sound is a deterent either as some of these guys are high or act &quot;stupidly&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because I flew helicopters in the Army and my beady eyes look mean I was chosen to train swat type teams.  I&#8217;m establishing my bona fides here and that is I don&#8217;t have any real life experience in this stuff buy hunt mostly with a bow (once again, no experiene with bird shot).  </p>
<p>We used semi-auto handguns and fully automatic submachine gund and ARs, in hostage and room clearing training.  Training was one thing but I often thought a choked shotgun would be better even in hostage situations.  Hold 2 inches off an ear vs. tyring to hit the guy in the side of the head of that is all the target you have.  I guess either way adrenelin is the culprit that causes 100 rounds shot in a room shootout and no one hit.  So, for what it is worth, this is just another tool to use if you would prefer it over the old slug or buck rounds.</p>
<p>I do like a pump shotgun for home defense because of the cycling sound but there are no guarantees the sound is a deterent either as some of these guys are high or act &#8220;stupidly&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanner</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14350</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 03:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14350</guid>
		<description>if you were to shoot someone with either 00 buck or bird shot both will inflict pain and are both potentially lethal loads depending on the area that the person is shot

since it is intended for home defense chances are that u will be close quarters and in your home when you use either one they might be thinking bird shot wont do as much damage to the inside of your home</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you were to shoot someone with either 00 buck or bird shot both will inflict pain and are both potentially lethal loads depending on the area that the person is shot</p>
<p>since it is intended for home defense chances are that u will be close quarters and in your home when you use either one they might be thinking bird shot wont do as much damage to the inside of your home</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whatever</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14329</link>
		<dc:creator>Whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14329</guid>
		<description>One thing that would make a difference in how effective this would be is exactly what this shot is. If it&#039;s pure Tungsten, then it would be denser than Lead so would probably penetrate farther than a similarly sized Lead pellet (Densities: Tungsten=19 g/cc, Lead=11 g/cc). If it&#039;s a Tungsten alloy, it&#039;s density might not be all that different from Lead, so there&#039;d be little gain in depth of penetration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that would make a difference in how effective this would be is exactly what this shot is. If it&#8217;s pure Tungsten, then it would be denser than Lead so would probably penetrate farther than a similarly sized Lead pellet (Densities: Tungsten=19 g/cc, Lead=11 g/cc). If it&#8217;s a Tungsten alloy, it&#8217;s density might not be all that different from Lead, so there&#8217;d be little gain in depth of penetration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14286</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14286</guid>
		<description>You all seem to be missing the obvious point here. When you are shooting inside your house, how far are you going to be shooting? 15-30&#039; I bet. Take your gun gun with the modified choke and shoot a load of tungston shot at a 2x8 plank and see what happens to it. I bet it has a big hole in it and lots of damage around the hole.

 Most people don&#039;t have a para-military style shotgun in their house with an open choke. They have a hunting gun with a modified or full choke in it. That choke is going to have the pattern of the tungston shot narrowed down to a very small diameter at house fighting ranges. Tungston is hard than lead, and penetrates deeper than lead. I have no doubt that this a ammo shot out of a hunting shotgun will kill anyone that gets centered with the load.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You all seem to be missing the obvious point here. When you are shooting inside your house, how far are you going to be shooting? 15-30&#8242; I bet. Take your gun gun with the modified choke and shoot a load of tungston shot at a 2&#215;8 plank and see what happens to it. I bet it has a big hole in it and lots of damage around the hole.</p>
<p> Most people don&#8217;t have a para-military style shotgun in their house with an open choke. They have a hunting gun with a modified or full choke in it. That choke is going to have the pattern of the tungston shot narrowed down to a very small diameter at house fighting ranges. Tungston is hard than lead, and penetrates deeper than lead. I have no doubt that this a ammo shot out of a hunting shotgun will kill anyone that gets centered with the load.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14276</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14276</guid>
		<description>They should rename it subdivision shot which is what it is probably designed for. Sub-divisions like mine are all over the place and they all have one thing in common; if you let lose with the big guns you risk killing the neighbor. My biggest fear isn&#039;t that a I&#039;ll get hit with a home invasion (I work at home and carry my piece on me at all times) but that the youngin&#039; across the way will get hit, pull out the AK I saw him buy at the local pawn shop and put 30 through my house. 

I like shotguns, and prefer slugs for self-defense. And I&#039;m not sure why they need to market special self-defense birdshot when you can find #3 buck even for 20ga weirdos like me which I&#039;m more confident won&#039;t go astray, but I don&#039;t see birdshot as so much lead confetti. I know a few guys who load up with &quot;goose shot&quot; when out in the woods for those two legged snakes and when I lived in Jersey and NYC plenty of bodies went to the morgue with a .22 in their dome. If there&#039;s a market sell it, but why aren&#039;t people just buying the cheaper birdshot? There is a bit of blarney here with the marketing, but birdshot is viable for home defense if the shot #2 or #4 is used at close range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should rename it subdivision shot which is what it is probably designed for. Sub-divisions like mine are all over the place and they all have one thing in common; if you let lose with the big guns you risk killing the neighbor. My biggest fear isn&#8217;t that a I&#8217;ll get hit with a home invasion (I work at home and carry my piece on me at all times) but that the youngin&#8217; across the way will get hit, pull out the AK I saw him buy at the local pawn shop and put 30 through my house. </p>
<p>I like shotguns, and prefer slugs for self-defense. And I&#8217;m not sure why they need to market special self-defense birdshot when you can find #3 buck even for 20ga weirdos like me which I&#8217;m more confident won&#8217;t go astray, but I don&#8217;t see birdshot as so much lead confetti. I know a few guys who load up with &#8220;goose shot&#8221; when out in the woods for those two legged snakes and when I lived in Jersey and NYC plenty of bodies went to the morgue with a .22 in their dome. If there&#8217;s a market sell it, but why aren&#8217;t people just buying the cheaper birdshot? There is a bit of blarney here with the marketing, but birdshot is viable for home defense if the shot #2 or #4 is used at close range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theotherryan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14241</link>
		<dc:creator>theotherryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14241</guid>
		<description>Check box of truth. Bird shot is for shooting birds, it simply does not penetrate enough to reliably stop people. They probably think a gimmick might make more than buckshot for $5 for a pack of 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check box of truth. Bird shot is for shooting birds, it simply does not penetrate enough to reliably stop people. They probably think a gimmick might make more than buckshot for $5 for a pack of 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hsoi</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14231</link>
		<dc:creator>hsoi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14231</guid>
		<description>Given Dom&#039;s ballistics link and extrapolating a bit, well.... these rounds may do something... maybe. Again, it&#039;d be nice to see specific data. If I had access to ballistics gel and such range facilities, I&#039;d be happy to test but alas I don&#039;t.

Nevertheless, birdshot remains on the low-end for self-defense rounds. It&#039;s better than nothing, but I can&#039;t see making it a first choice. It just doesn&#039;t penetrate deep enough. Yeah maybe the guy might bleed to death, eventually... but you just don&#039;t know the psyche of an attacker. Maybe merely showing them the gun will deter with no shots fired, maybe he&#039;ll need a lot of lead in him before he goes down. You just don&#039;t know. But it&#039;s your life... gamble with it how you wish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given Dom&#8217;s ballistics link and extrapolating a bit, well&#8230;. these rounds may do something&#8230; maybe. Again, it&#8217;d be nice to see specific data. If I had access to ballistics gel and such range facilities, I&#8217;d be happy to test but alas I don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, birdshot remains on the low-end for self-defense rounds. It&#8217;s better than nothing, but I can&#8217;t see making it a first choice. It just doesn&#8217;t penetrate deep enough. Yeah maybe the guy might bleed to death, eventually&#8230; but you just don&#8217;t know the psyche of an attacker. Maybe merely showing them the gun will deter with no shots fired, maybe he&#8217;ll need a lot of lead in him before he goes down. You just don&#8217;t know. But it&#8217;s your life&#8230; gamble with it how you wish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14228</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14228</guid>
		<description>I have updated the blog post with the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have updated the blog post with the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14227</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14227</guid>
		<description>Dom, thanks for the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dom, thanks for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14226</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14226</guid>
		<description>By the way, here is some data on #4 shot terminal ballistics:

http://www.frfrogspad.com/terminal2.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, here is some data on #4 shot terminal ballistics:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.frfrogspad.com/terminal2.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.frfrogspad.com/terminal2.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whatever</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14225</link>
		<dc:creator>Whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14225</guid>
		<description>http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/04/toxic-tungste-1/

&lt;i&gt;The Army has stopped producing so-called &quot;green&quot; training rounds, because of research showing that the bullets’ main ingredient may be more toxic than previously thought. But that element, tungsten, is also in an array of other ammunition and munitions, as well. Which means all sorts of rockets, missiles, and anti-tank rounds may present an environmental hazard and a health risk.&lt;/i&gt;

Maybe Remington had a lot of Tungsten pellets ready to be used as a lead substitute in hunting loads but is now thinking better of it due to potential environmental concerns. So instead of disposing of the Tungsten pellets, they had their marketing department come up with a solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/04/toxic-tungste-1/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/04/toxic-tungste-1/</a></p>
<p><i>The Army has stopped producing so-called &#8220;green&#8221; training rounds, because of research showing that the bullets’ main ingredient may be more toxic than previously thought. But that element, tungsten, is also in an array of other ammunition and munitions, as well. Which means all sorts of rockets, missiles, and anti-tank rounds may present an environmental hazard and a health risk.</i></p>
<p>Maybe Remington had a lot of Tungsten pellets ready to be used as a lead substitute in hunting loads but is now thinking better of it due to potential environmental concerns. So instead of disposing of the Tungsten pellets, they had their marketing department come up with a solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubbaearle</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14220</link>
		<dc:creator>bubbaearle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14220</guid>
		<description>Someone mentioned earlier that  it smelled of &quot;noob&quot; - I think he&#039;s correct. I think they&#039;re capitalizing on market forces to make a quick buck on &quot;noobs&quot; that don&#039;t know any better.

Has anyone seen prices for this? Cheaper than 00, but more expensive than birdshot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone mentioned earlier that  it smelled of &#8220;noob&#8221; &#8211; I think he&#8217;s correct. I think they&#8217;re capitalizing on market forces to make a quick buck on &#8220;noobs&#8221; that don&#8217;t know any better.</p>
<p>Has anyone seen prices for this? Cheaper than 00, but more expensive than birdshot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpudGun</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14218</link>
		<dc:creator>SpudGun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14218</guid>
		<description>This issue seems to have been pretty well debated. So, show of hands, who is going to throw away their buckshot and buy these instead for home defense?

Come on, don&#039;t be shy. I know Remington hasn&#039;t released one bit of data or stated exactly how these shells are the optimum load for home defense over say, any other kind of shotgun load, but you don&#039;t need to know all that trivial stuff. 

Look, it comes in a black box with the words &#039;Ultimate Home Defense&#039; written on it, so it must be true. Plus the plastic hulls are all cool and black as well. In a night time, panic situation, having black colored ammo in the dark is good right?

So don&#039;t go out and buy inexpensive bird shot for home defense, that would be stoopid. Buy this one is made from a tungsten alloy...oooh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This issue seems to have been pretty well debated. So, show of hands, who is going to throw away their buckshot and buy these instead for home defense?</p>
<p>Come on, don&#8217;t be shy. I know Remington hasn&#8217;t released one bit of data or stated exactly how these shells are the optimum load for home defense over say, any other kind of shotgun load, but you don&#8217;t need to know all that trivial stuff. </p>
<p>Look, it comes in a black box with the words &#8216;Ultimate Home Defense&#8217; written on it, so it must be true. Plus the plastic hulls are all cool and black as well. In a night time, panic situation, having black colored ammo in the dark is good right?</p>
<p>So don&#8217;t go out and buy inexpensive bird shot for home defense, that would be stoopid. Buy this one is made from a tungsten alloy&#8230;oooh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14209</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14209</guid>
		<description>Bob, good point</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, good point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14205</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14205</guid>
		<description>Pancho, thanks for your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pancho, thanks for your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14203</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14203</guid>
		<description>Steve, interesting, thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, interesting, thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14201</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14201</guid>
		<description>B, the problem would be that tungsten has a much higher melting point (I think), and a barrel may not be able to handle such a hard slug bouncing down the barrel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B, the problem would be that tungsten has a much higher melting point (I think), and a barrel may not be able to handle such a hard slug bouncing down the barrel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amos</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14199</link>
		<dc:creator>amos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14199</guid>
		<description>One thing to consider: the severity of the wound is proportional to the cube of the number of hits.  Each pellet is a &quot;hit&quot;, and multiple pellets greatly increase your chances of hitting something vital.

That being said, you do need a certain amount of penetration.  Anything that will penetrate 12 inches would be pretty lethal. 

I know that a .177 pellet rifle is capable of killing a human (the case I heard of was a child, heart shot) but I would prefer something a bit larger than BB&#039;s for better penetration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing to consider: the severity of the wound is proportional to the cube of the number of hits.  Each pellet is a &#8220;hit&#8221;, and multiple pellets greatly increase your chances of hitting something vital.</p>
<p>That being said, you do need a certain amount of penetration.  Anything that will penetrate 12 inches would be pretty lethal. </p>
<p>I know that a .177 pellet rifle is capable of killing a human (the case I heard of was a child, heart shot) but I would prefer something a bit larger than BB&#8217;s for better penetration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Owens</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14195</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14195</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to catch some heat for this, but I&#039;ve done time on both sides of the gun counter, and when I was setting up a customer for home defense, I frequently set them up with game loads for self defense if their residence made that the most logical choice. 

Simpy put, for apartment and condo dwellers and those living in the still-close confines of many suburban communities where stick-built homes are packed closely together, loads like this are the best compromise between fight-stopping power and the danger of over-penetration.

Perhaps you live along in a rural setting. Great. Enjoy your buckshot, backed by slugs. 

If you have neighbors, however, it is your responsibility not to endanger their lives while attempting to guard your own.  These purpose-built rounds are going to be better than the #4-#6 shot I used to recommend. I&#039;m sure many &quot;experts&quot; think that isn&#039;t enough, but I assure you than in the close confines of an in-home shooting where few people will be taking shots longer than 20 feet, lead shot is lethal. This denser load with provide greater penetration for those on the bubble and can extend the lethal range a few yards further out, but I&#039;m not sure it is needed.

Buckshot and slugs in the burbs is an idea for gun shop commandos, IMHO. If you doubt me, read up on how far both penetrate in sheet rock, and then count the number of layers to your child&#039;s bed, or to your neighbor&#039;s bedroom, because statistics indicate you&#039;re going to miss more often than you hit in such confrontations


Sure, you might stop a home invasion with Buck and slugs. But by employing such a payload, you&#039;ve become a greater threat to your neighbors and family members than the home invader himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to catch some heat for this, but I&#8217;ve done time on both sides of the gun counter, and when I was setting up a customer for home defense, I frequently set them up with game loads for self defense if their residence made that the most logical choice. </p>
<p>Simpy put, for apartment and condo dwellers and those living in the still-close confines of many suburban communities where stick-built homes are packed closely together, loads like this are the best compromise between fight-stopping power and the danger of over-penetration.</p>
<p>Perhaps you live along in a rural setting. Great. Enjoy your buckshot, backed by slugs. </p>
<p>If you have neighbors, however, it is your responsibility not to endanger their lives while attempting to guard your own.  These purpose-built rounds are going to be better than the #4-#6 shot I used to recommend. I&#8217;m sure many &#8220;experts&#8221; think that isn&#8217;t enough, but I assure you than in the close confines of an in-home shooting where few people will be taking shots longer than 20 feet, lead shot is lethal. This denser load with provide greater penetration for those on the bubble and can extend the lethal range a few yards further out, but I&#8217;m not sure it is needed.</p>
<p>Buckshot and slugs in the burbs is an idea for gun shop commandos, IMHO. If you doubt me, read up on how far both penetrate in sheet rock, and then count the number of layers to your child&#8217;s bed, or to your neighbor&#8217;s bedroom, because statistics indicate you&#8217;re going to miss more often than you hit in such confrontations</p>
<p>Sure, you might stop a home invasion with Buck and slugs. But by employing such a payload, you&#8217;ve become a greater threat to your neighbors and family members than the home invader himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regolith</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14194</link>
		<dc:creator>Regolith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14194</guid>
		<description>Lead BB is supposed to be about the minimum you can go before it becomes extremely ineffective, so the tungsten BB&#039;s (which should perform just a bit better) might not be &lt;i&gt;too&lt;/I&gt; bad, particularly if you&#039;re in an apartment. 

I wouldn&#039;t want to use the #2/#4 stuff, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lead BB is supposed to be about the minimum you can go before it becomes extremely ineffective, so the tungsten BB&#8217;s (which should perform just a bit better) might not be <i>too</i> bad, particularly if you&#8217;re in an apartment. </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t want to use the #2/#4 stuff, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Huff</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14193</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Huff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14193</guid>
		<description>I think it depends on your jurisdiction.  Are you more likely to be sued by a survivor, or the victim&#039;s estate?  Also, how comfortable are you with the idea of actually killing someone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it depends on your jurisdiction.  Are you more likely to be sued by a survivor, or the victim&#8217;s estate?  Also, how comfortable are you with the idea of actually killing someone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nas</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14188</link>
		<dc:creator>Nas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14188</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s got to be about over-penetration of walls and doors, considering that most folks shooting in the dark when frightened aren&#039;t very good shots.  Drywall is not good cover.  I&#039;ve accidentally shot a wad-cutter pellet from an air rifle (.177, 900fps) through a regular house wall.  It had about a 45 degree angle of entry with two very clean holes in the drywall.  It was pointed in a safe direction, so only the drywall was injured.  A single pellet from some 00 buck would have even better penetration, especially the 12ga magnum 00 buck I keep in my home defense guns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s got to be about over-penetration of walls and doors, considering that most folks shooting in the dark when frightened aren&#8217;t very good shots.  Drywall is not good cover.  I&#8217;ve accidentally shot a wad-cutter pellet from an air rifle (.177, 900fps) through a regular house wall.  It had about a 45 degree angle of entry with two very clean holes in the drywall.  It was pointed in a safe direction, so only the drywall was injured.  A single pellet from some 00 buck would have even better penetration, especially the 12ga magnum 00 buck I keep in my home defense guns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: komrad</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14186</link>
		<dc:creator>komrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14186</guid>
		<description>Honestly wouldn&#039;t 00 buck be cheaper than tungsten. If you really live in an area where you are at risk of home invasion, you would probably feel better knowing your gun and ammo has a reputation for being a man stopper rather than being possibly better. This may be a bit off topic, but can you reload shotgun shells with standard steel air gun BBs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly wouldn&#8217;t 00 buck be cheaper than tungsten. If you really live in an area where you are at risk of home invasion, you would probably feel better knowing your gun and ammo has a reputation for being a man stopper rather than being possibly better. This may be a bit off topic, but can you reload shotgun shells with standard steel air gun BBs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hsoi</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14185</link>
		<dc:creator>hsoi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14185</guid>
		<description>Trouble is, if it&#039;s not going to go through wallboard, it&#039;s not going to go through bad guys either (birdshot can go through wallboard). Sure I&#039;m not volunteering to get shot by birdshot, it wouldn&#039;t be pleasant. But if the time has come to shoot, then you need to stop... not bluff, not piss off, not hope and pray. 

That all said, before I totally write this stuff off, like I said before I&#039;d like to see some actual data. As Steve mentioned, maybe they know something we don&#039;t... maybe there&#039;s something to the tungsten alloy. It&#039;d be nice to see some data and not just marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trouble is, if it&#8217;s not going to go through wallboard, it&#8217;s not going to go through bad guys either (birdshot can go through wallboard). Sure I&#8217;m not volunteering to get shot by birdshot, it wouldn&#8217;t be pleasant. But if the time has come to shoot, then you need to stop&#8230; not bluff, not piss off, not hope and pray. </p>
<p>That all said, before I totally write this stuff off, like I said before I&#8217;d like to see some actual data. As Steve mentioned, maybe they know something we don&#8217;t&#8230; maybe there&#8217;s something to the tungsten alloy. It&#8217;d be nice to see some data and not just marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14183</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14183</guid>
		<description>Yes,wound and maim...that will work. That will be one perp who could actually go to the civil suit against you for making him look like the elephant man when you were done bustin bb&quot;s in him. Ill pass...Ill take my 00 buck and hollow points thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes,wound and maim&#8230;that will work. That will be one perp who could actually go to the civil suit against you for making him look like the elephant man when you were done bustin bb&#8221;s in him. Ill pass&#8230;Ill take my 00 buck and hollow points thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14176</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14176</guid>
		<description>About a month ago, I stumbled across this at the local Dick&#039;s Sporting Goods.  Kinda perplexed by it, due to the fact that the box didnt supply any data on its effectiveness, that it was bird shot pellets, and the price!  Wracking my brain as to the marketing behind it, and all I can come up with is WHY?  Why not instead make a home defense load with 00, #1 or even #4 buck in tungsten +whatever metal combo. WOuld seem to make more sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About a month ago, I stumbled across this at the local Dick&#8217;s Sporting Goods.  Kinda perplexed by it, due to the fact that the box didnt supply any data on its effectiveness, that it was bird shot pellets, and the price!  Wracking my brain as to the marketing behind it, and all I can come up with is WHY?  Why not instead make a home defense load with 00, #1 or even #4 buck in tungsten +whatever metal combo. WOuld seem to make more sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Witmann</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14174</link>
		<dc:creator>Witmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14174</guid>
		<description>Heavy birdshots are allowed for hunting deer in Denmark. The biggest one allowed here is number 1 ( 4 mm shots)

I&#039;ve taken deer with it at close range, no problem. At 10 meters it fractured bones and punched into the chest cavity of the deer.  any longer range and it looses penetration FAST! 

A deer is smaller than a grown man, but at short ranges and with the large birdshot pellets it&#039;s still not all bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heavy birdshots are allowed for hunting deer in Denmark. The biggest one allowed here is number 1 ( 4 mm shots)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve taken deer with it at close range, no problem. At 10 meters it fractured bones and punched into the chest cavity of the deer.  any longer range and it looses penetration FAST! </p>
<p>A deer is smaller than a grown man, but at short ranges and with the large birdshot pellets it&#8217;s still not all bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14173</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14173</guid>
		<description>Have you ever seen what bird shot will do at 10-20 feet? It&#039;s one big jagged hole. I doubt any burgler or other bad guy would survive a blast of tungston at 20 feet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever seen what bird shot will do at 10-20 feet? It&#8217;s one big jagged hole. I doubt any burgler or other bad guy would survive a blast of tungston at 20 feet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pancho</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14172</link>
		<dc:creator>Pancho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14172</guid>
		<description>I have done some testing with several types of shot for defense and spent some time getting to know my HD Shotgun. Their are a lot of myths about short barreled defensive shotguns. All Shot whether it is #6 or 00 buck hits like a Slug on soft targets under 5 yards. Under 7 yards Bird shot is still very impressive. After 7 yards out to 25 yards Buck Shot seems to have the desired penetration and effect. After 25 yards in most shotguns 00 buck has spread to much to be 100% reliable. I have shot some great Vang Comp gun that extend that range a bit. 

Don&#039;t take my word for it. Get some phone books, some plywood and some card board targets. Shoot the plywood with your trusted 00 buck at different distances and then try those same distances with the bird shot. I know phone books and plywood don&#039;t simulate flesh but for comparison against trusted 00 they can be used. Anyone serious about using a Shotgun should take some time to pattern their gun with at every distance and card board targets are great for that. 

The Shotgun is a great tool and adaptable to any home or property size. Just a note, Bird Shot does go through drywall walls and usually but not always, stops in the opposite wall on the other side of the shot through room. 00 buck will make it through a couple walls but not much more than a bird shot and slugs will come out on the other side of the house. I load my Shotgun with 00 Buck and keep 4 rounds of Brenneke slugs in the Speedfeed stock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have done some testing with several types of shot for defense and spent some time getting to know my HD Shotgun. Their are a lot of myths about short barreled defensive shotguns. All Shot whether it is #6 or 00 buck hits like a Slug on soft targets under 5 yards. Under 7 yards Bird shot is still very impressive. After 7 yards out to 25 yards Buck Shot seems to have the desired penetration and effect. After 25 yards in most shotguns 00 buck has spread to much to be 100% reliable. I have shot some great Vang Comp gun that extend that range a bit. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t take my word for it. Get some phone books, some plywood and some card board targets. Shoot the plywood with your trusted 00 buck at different distances and then try those same distances with the bird shot. I know phone books and plywood don&#8217;t simulate flesh but for comparison against trusted 00 they can be used. Anyone serious about using a Shotgun should take some time to pattern their gun with at every distance and card board targets are great for that. </p>
<p>The Shotgun is a great tool and adaptable to any home or property size. Just a note, Bird Shot does go through drywall walls and usually but not always, stops in the opposite wall on the other side of the shot through room. 00 buck will make it through a couple walls but not much more than a bird shot and slugs will come out on the other side of the house. I load my Shotgun with 00 Buck and keep 4 rounds of Brenneke slugs in the Speedfeed stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crabula</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14169</link>
		<dc:creator>Crabula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14169</guid>
		<description>I think it may have something to do with over-penetration. Heavier pellets could go through walls and harm family members. I think that the idea is that these pellets will easily tear through flesh but stop in a couple layers of dry-wall and insulation. It may not cause a whole lot of internal damage but it should still hurt like hell and would most likely cause a fair amount of blood loss. 
It seems like you are relying as much on the psychological impact of being shot as you are on the actual lethality of the round itself. Somewhere between shooting rubber balls and 00 buck. 

So yeah, I think that the idea is to provide reasonably lethal force without having to worry about nailing family members through the walls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it may have something to do with over-penetration. Heavier pellets could go through walls and harm family members. I think that the idea is that these pellets will easily tear through flesh but stop in a couple layers of dry-wall and insulation. It may not cause a whole lot of internal damage but it should still hurt like hell and would most likely cause a fair amount of blood loss.<br />
It seems like you are relying as much on the psychological impact of being shot as you are on the actual lethality of the round itself. Somewhere between shooting rubber balls and 00 buck. </p>
<p>So yeah, I think that the idea is to provide reasonably lethal force without having to worry about nailing family members through the walls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Doran Trail Boss</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14166</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Doran Trail Boss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14166</guid>
		<description>I have tested bird shot as a defensive load, what you have to realize, unless you live in a castle. Most homes your longest self defense shot is going to be about 7 paces max,  in a good deal of homes even closer. The pastern on bird shot at that distance depending on brand, type of barrel etc is a 4-6 inch spread, and obviously tighter at closer ranges. I do not care who you are,  try and soak that up and still be willing to fight. You will either be down or trying to get your butt out the door. 

If the person firing knows what they are doing,  they will hit the threat with followup shots until there is no longer a threat.  

In a home defense situation most people take up a defensive position if they are smart, like my elderly mother who has been trained to lock her door and get behind her bed, using the bed as a rest, and a barrier, keeping the gun on the door. While she is on the phone with 911.   

Now say what you like, but their is no criminal I know who is going to soak up that bird shot at that range if he comes through that door, he will not keep coming,  Further because of her age and build she can get off multiple shots of bird shot pretty quickly and on target.  

People seem to think criminals are like what they see in the movies. The Zombie guy who can soak up multiple rounds of buck and keeps coming. When shots are fired people start moving, either to the ground or away from the muzzle blast.  

In foreign countries where bird shot is all that is available, people kill each other with it often.  

All of that being said do I recommend bird shot? No not if a person is capable of using something else. However in certain applications and with certain persons  I would say absolutely.  What you have to keep in mind is, there is no THE answer for anything. You do what works for you based on your situation, and use the options that will allow you to do your best in every situation. 

And do not say recoil, and muzzle jump does not matter when you are fighting for your life because it does matter. Control and followup shots can be and are important. You get no better control when your adrenaline is pumping. 

Maybe we will do a video showing what bird shot will do at different distances. I will assure hen you see it at home defense distance, it is more devastating then you might think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tested bird shot as a defensive load, what you have to realize, unless you live in a castle. Most homes your longest self defense shot is going to be about 7 paces max,  in a good deal of homes even closer. The pastern on bird shot at that distance depending on brand, type of barrel etc is a 4-6 inch spread, and obviously tighter at closer ranges. I do not care who you are,  try and soak that up and still be willing to fight. You will either be down or trying to get your butt out the door. </p>
<p>If the person firing knows what they are doing,  they will hit the threat with followup shots until there is no longer a threat.  </p>
<p>In a home defense situation most people take up a defensive position if they are smart, like my elderly mother who has been trained to lock her door and get behind her bed, using the bed as a rest, and a barrier, keeping the gun on the door. While she is on the phone with 911.   </p>
<p>Now say what you like, but their is no criminal I know who is going to soak up that bird shot at that range if he comes through that door, he will not keep coming,  Further because of her age and build she can get off multiple shots of bird shot pretty quickly and on target.  </p>
<p>People seem to think criminals are like what they see in the movies. The Zombie guy who can soak up multiple rounds of buck and keeps coming. When shots are fired people start moving, either to the ground or away from the muzzle blast.  </p>
<p>In foreign countries where bird shot is all that is available, people kill each other with it often.  </p>
<p>All of that being said do I recommend bird shot? No not if a person is capable of using something else. However in certain applications and with certain persons  I would say absolutely.  What you have to keep in mind is, there is no THE answer for anything. You do what works for you based on your situation, and use the options that will allow you to do your best in every situation. </p>
<p>And do not say recoil, and muzzle jump does not matter when you are fighting for your life because it does matter. Control and followup shots can be and are important. You get no better control when your adrenaline is pumping. </p>
<p>Maybe we will do a video showing what bird shot will do at different distances. I will assure hen you see it at home defense distance, it is more devastating then you might think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14162</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14162</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;The fact that a two major ammunition manufacturers are selling bird shot for self defense makes me wonder if they know something we do not?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Since I find it unlikely neither Federal nor Remington has managed to change the laws of physics, I would think the only thing we might have been unaware of that those manufacturers know is how much market there is for such rounds. :) Remember, plenty of people still do not really know what they are talking about and revert to that old standby, &quot;Well I wouldn&#039;t want to get shot with it.&quot; (I wouldn&#039;t want to get a paper cut, but in a life-or-death struggle one of those won&#039;t stop me...)

AB:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;but if you give an intruder a freckle pattern with birdshot, he’ll have to go to the doctor sometime. And most docs log all gunshot injuries, Perhaps the blast pattern is distinctive so if the homeowner does shoot a person, the area hospitals and clinics can look for it.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

A round that fails to stop the attacker but makes him easier to find later, so the murder of the defender won&#039;t remain an open case? Usually, when such twisted logic is applied, people are stripped of their legal right to self-defense entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;The fact that a two major ammunition manufacturers are selling bird shot for self defense makes me wonder if they know something we do not?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Since I find it unlikely neither Federal nor Remington has managed to change the laws of physics, I would think the only thing we might have been unaware of that those manufacturers know is how much market there is for such rounds. <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Remember, plenty of people still do not really know what they are talking about and revert to that old standby, &#8220;Well I wouldn&#8217;t want to get shot with it.&#8221; (I wouldn&#8217;t want to get a paper cut, but in a life-or-death struggle one of those won&#8217;t stop me&#8230;)</p>
<p>AB:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;but if you give an intruder a freckle pattern with birdshot, he’ll have to go to the doctor sometime. And most docs log all gunshot injuries, Perhaps the blast pattern is distinctive so if the homeowner does shoot a person, the area hospitals and clinics can look for it.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>A round that fails to stop the attacker but makes him easier to find later, so the murder of the defender won&#8217;t remain an open case? Usually, when such twisted logic is applied, people are stripped of their legal right to self-defense entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Woodman</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/08/remington-hd-ultimate-home-defense-shotshell-birdshot-for-home-defense/#comment-14161</link>
		<dc:creator>B Woodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7678#comment-14161</guid>
		<description>This tungsten shot, can you melt it down, same as lead?

(See Y-Man&#039;s post on turning bird shot into a slug).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This tungsten shot, can you melt it down, same as lead?</p>
<p>(See Y-Man&#8217;s post on turning bird shot into a slug).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
