<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brownells now selling their own AR-15 barrel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/31/brownells-now-selling-their-own-ar-15-barrel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/31/brownells-now-selling-their-own-ar-15-barrel/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:41:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/31/brownells-now-selling-their-own-ar-15-barrel/#comment-12746</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 01:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7239#comment-12746</guid>
		<description>A better profile compromise would be a smooth taper, without all the skinny under the handguards, fat in front of the FSB, M203 notch nonsense.  Something like Noveske&#039;s N4 profile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A better profile compromise would be a smooth taper, without all the skinny under the handguards, fat in front of the FSB, M203 notch nonsense.  Something like Noveske&#8217;s N4 profile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/31/brownells-now-selling-their-own-ar-15-barrel/#comment-12740</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7239#comment-12740</guid>
		<description>M4 profile save you few pounds of weight. That&#039;s why people prefer it to HBAR or pencil barrel. It is a good compromise between the two. 

4140 &lt; 4150 &lt; CMV (Chrome Moly Vanadium), but for all intended purpose no one will notice the difference. So don&#039;t sweat if you have a 4140 barrel.

With that said, you can get a better deal then what Brownells is offering. Shop around it&#039;s only a click away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M4 profile save you few pounds of weight. That&#8217;s why people prefer it to HBAR or pencil barrel. It is a good compromise between the two. </p>
<p>4140 &lt; 4150 &lt; CMV (Chrome Moly Vanadium), but for all intended purpose no one will notice the difference. So don&#039;t sweat if you have a 4140 barrel.</p>
<p>With that said, you can get a better deal then what Brownells is offering. Shop around it&#039;s only a click away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brando</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/31/brownells-now-selling-their-own-ar-15-barrel/#comment-12726</link>
		<dc:creator>Brando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7239#comment-12726</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s truly mind boggling to see AR and component manufacturing proliferate to the level it has in the last 10-15 years.  I remember when there were really only a few companies making complete rifles, let alone components, and that was THAT long ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s truly mind boggling to see AR and component manufacturing proliferate to the level it has in the last 10-15 years.  I remember when there were really only a few companies making complete rifles, let alone components, and that was THAT long ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/31/brownells-now-selling-their-own-ar-15-barrel/#comment-12721</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7239#comment-12721</guid>
		<description>They lost me at 4140 barrel steel.  Also I&#039;m a little weary of all these barrels using the &quot;M4&quot; profile, when 99.99% of them will NEVER have a M203 mounted to them.  There are much better barrel profiles out there.

At least it&#039;s 5.56 and 1/7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They lost me at 4140 barrel steel.  Also I&#8217;m a little weary of all these barrels using the &#8220;M4&#8243; profile, when 99.99% of them will NEVER have a M203 mounted to them.  There are much better barrel profiles out there.</p>
<p>At least it&#8217;s 5.56 and 1/7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Groom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/31/brownells-now-selling-their-own-ar-15-barrel/#comment-12714</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7239#comment-12714</guid>
		<description>No Hard Chrome? When will people learn?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Hard Chrome? When will people learn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
