<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Incredibly unsafe pistol demo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:17:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: maxx</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-14077</link>
		<dc:creator>maxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 15:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-14077</guid>
		<description>I found only one pertinent opinion.
That IPSC/IDPA deom should be prepared in a regular firing camp.

Regarding the range of those so called guns, what to say. They are built to stop the agressor at 7-10 meters. OK, at that range the damges can occur but at the matter fact their pourpose is to stop the agressor and to avoid to be harmed by an injust and violent action.
I own in my collection some of those weapons, here in Romania those guns are legal and can be even carried concealed by anyone as long is over 18 year age and has the right authorization from the police.
I boght from Kishinew, Republic Moldavia, FORT 12P and a revolver Schmeisser 820 AE , both of them chambered in 9mm [.380], one in PA other on R. Along the years I owned and a Walther P50T, a Walther PP, a Mauser HSC 90 and lately a Rohm RG88, all of them chambered in 10x22T
rubber bullets all. But those ones I sold them.
I am using them in IPSC/IDPA contests and of course, I can use them for self defense.
Testing them [FORT 12 and Schmeisser 820 AE] I can tell you that even after 10-12 meters are not harmful, under that distance the damages can be serious. Just think that Yellow Pages was pentrated to page 400 at 9 meters with both of them.
Here are some results: one rubber bullet at 0,9 grams launched with 320 meters / second can develop 59 Joules. That is not a joke at all.

As the conclusion, those weapons are built so that cannot fire the real rounds and the ammo with rubber bullet is not considered to be dangerous as long you are using the gun in a right way and NOT IN A PUBLIC PLACES.

The people from that boat was not in danger not for a second and the officials that organized that demo in public has a single circumstance: the exercise was held on the top-hill place, so, no way that in less then 100 meters to meet somebody ... :).

If there is somebody that want some links to see our tests, it has only to leave here a message.

By the way, I have founded here in Romania the Romanian Self Defense Club and the website www.b46.me is the website with our resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found only one pertinent opinion.<br />
That IPSC/IDPA deom should be prepared in a regular firing camp.</p>
<p>Regarding the range of those so called guns, what to say. They are built to stop the agressor at 7-10 meters. OK, at that range the damges can occur but at the matter fact their pourpose is to stop the agressor and to avoid to be harmed by an injust and violent action.<br />
I own in my collection some of those weapons, here in Romania those guns are legal and can be even carried concealed by anyone as long is over 18 year age and has the right authorization from the police.<br />
I boght from Kishinew, Republic Moldavia, FORT 12P and a revolver Schmeisser 820 AE , both of them chambered in 9mm [.380], one in PA other on R. Along the years I owned and a Walther P50T, a Walther PP, a Mauser HSC 90 and lately a Rohm RG88, all of them chambered in 10&#215;22T<br />
rubber bullets all. But those ones I sold them.<br />
I am using them in IPSC/IDPA contests and of course, I can use them for self defense.<br />
Testing them [FORT 12 and Schmeisser 820 AE] I can tell you that even after 10-12 meters are not harmful, under that distance the damages can be serious. Just think that Yellow Pages was pentrated to page 400 at 9 meters with both of them.<br />
Here are some results: one rubber bullet at 0,9 grams launched with 320 meters / second can develop 59 Joules. That is not a joke at all.</p>
<p>As the conclusion, those weapons are built so that cannot fire the real rounds and the ammo with rubber bullet is not considered to be dangerous as long you are using the gun in a right way and NOT IN A PUBLIC PLACES.</p>
<p>The people from that boat was not in danger not for a second and the officials that organized that demo in public has a single circumstance: the exercise was held on the top-hill place, so, no way that in less then 100 meters to meet somebody &#8230; <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>If there is somebody that want some links to see our tests, it has only to leave here a message.</p>
<p>By the way, I have founded here in Romania the Romanian Self Defense Club and the website <a href="http://www.b46.me" rel="nofollow">http://www.b46.me</a> is the website with our resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-13408</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-13408</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Matt!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Matt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Groom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-13401</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-13401</guid>
		<description>Umm, I think Raphael said this:

Hello,

I am fascinated by the weapons but I live the Belgium that has a very restrictive legislation regarding detention of weapon.  I look for to obtain me the weapon of my choice in sale by correspondence between the wore and Belgium, present jusqià (?), unsuccessfully.  I am not nevertheless an adventurous, a simple fascinated one.  In end, I will have to be done a reason and wait again a small year to obtain the necessary permits.  You are lucky to be able to live your passion to the Newspaper (I think he means blog)...  Some will say that &quot;that lives by the sword, perish by the sword&quot; but I believe that to too to fear the sword, one perish under the whip.  

Well to you. 

Sorry if I&#039;m out of place for this, but I had to know what he wrote!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, I think Raphael said this:</p>
<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I am fascinated by the weapons but I live the Belgium that has a very restrictive legislation regarding detention of weapon.  I look for to obtain me the weapon of my choice in sale by correspondence between the wore and Belgium, present jusqià (?), unsuccessfully.  I am not nevertheless an adventurous, a simple fascinated one.  In end, I will have to be done a reason and wait again a small year to obtain the necessary permits.  You are lucky to be able to live your passion to the Newspaper (I think he means blog)&#8230;  Some will say that &#8220;that lives by the sword, perish by the sword&#8221; but I believe that to too to fear the sword, one perish under the whip.  </p>
<p>Well to you. </p>
<p>Sorry if I&#8217;m out of place for this, but I had to know what he wrote!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphaël</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-13388</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphaël</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-13388</guid>
		<description>Bonjour,

Je suis passionné par les armes mais j&#039;habite la Belgique qui a une législation très restrictive en matière de détention d&#039;arme. Je cherche à me procurer l&#039;arme de mon choix en vente par correspondance entre les usa et la Belgique, jusqià présent, sans succès. Je ne suis pourtant pas un aventurier, un simple passionné. En fin, je vais devoir me faire une raison et patienter encore une petite année pour obtenir les permis nécessaires. Vous avez de la chance de pouvoir vivre votre paassion au quotidien... Certain diront que &quot;qui vit par le glaive, périt par le glaive&quot; mais je crois qu&#039;à trop craindre le glaive, on périt sous le fouet.

Bien à vous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonjour,</p>
<p>Je suis passionné par les armes mais j&#8217;habite la Belgique qui a une législation très restrictive en matière de détention d&#8217;arme. Je cherche à me procurer l&#8217;arme de mon choix en vente par correspondance entre les usa et la Belgique, jusqià présent, sans succès. Je ne suis pourtant pas un aventurier, un simple passionné. En fin, je vais devoir me faire une raison et patienter encore une petite année pour obtenir les permis nécessaires. Vous avez de la chance de pouvoir vivre votre paassion au quotidien&#8230; Certain diront que &#8220;qui vit par le glaive, périt par le glaive&#8221; mais je crois qu&#8217;à trop craindre le glaive, on périt sous le fouet.</p>
<p>Bien à vous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12833</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12833</guid>
		<description>Forgot the link. 

http://www.simunition.com/index_en.php

You can go to youtube and search videos for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot the link. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.simunition.com/index_en.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.simunition.com/index_en.php</a></p>
<p>You can go to youtube and search videos for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12796</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12796</guid>
		<description>I know why so many people are upset about nothing. 

I assume from what trigger288 posted, the ammo are simulation munitions and the weapons are modified to use it. The gun and ammo simulate the real thing. 

Blackwater or any high level training schools uses something similar to it. They are used in training and at time students and staffs gets hit at point blank range. Sure it hurt but it doesn’t kill you. 

In the end it comes down to people that have no experience and those that have them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know why so many people are upset about nothing. </p>
<p>I assume from what trigger288 posted, the ammo are simulation munitions and the weapons are modified to use it. The gun and ammo simulate the real thing. </p>
<p>Blackwater or any high level training schools uses something similar to it. They are used in training and at time students and staffs gets hit at point blank range. Sure it hurt but it doesn’t kill you. </p>
<p>In the end it comes down to people that have no experience and those that have them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shturman</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12674</link>
		<dc:creator>Shturman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12674</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is correct for 100%, it&#039;s just a matter of poor safety behavior, attitude and many lacks, I can tell this like an HSE Engineer. 
My phrase &quot;this shooting is 100% safe&quot; is a blaming on the laws, not on the public safety. I wanted to show how sometimes the stupid laws can bring people to a greater stupidity. It is a really funny situation: gangs are not afraid of these guns, but police says &quot;It&#039;s OK guys&quot;. This leads to total ignoring of such a devices (in our laws these items called &quot;devices&quot;, not &quot;guns&quot;) like guns as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is correct for 100%, it&#8217;s just a matter of poor safety behavior, attitude and many lacks, I can tell this like an HSE Engineer.<br />
My phrase &#8220;this shooting is 100% safe&#8221; is a blaming on the laws, not on the public safety. I wanted to show how sometimes the stupid laws can bring people to a greater stupidity. It is a really funny situation: gangs are not afraid of these guns, but police says &#8220;It&#8217;s OK guys&#8221;. This leads to total ignoring of such a devices (in our laws these items called &#8220;devices&#8221;, not &#8220;guns&#8221;) like guns as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crabula</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12668</link>
		<dc:creator>Crabula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12668</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care what range those rubber bullets are effective at. It is irrelevant. The point is that it sets a bad example for the public being demonstrated to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care what range those rubber bullets are effective at. It is irrelevant. The point is that it sets a bad example for the public being demonstrated to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shturman</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12666</link>
		<dc:creator>Shturman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12666</guid>
		<description>Gents, 
I absolutely agree with trigger288.
First of all, the gun on the pictures is Horhe. These guns are the modification of our Ukrainian pistol Fort-12, its traumatic version (master model - Fort-12R), which in Russian Federation has special stoppers inside the barrel (do avoid of shooting with normal rounds) which people call - teeth.
Can you imagine, that poor smooth rubber ball, whilst coming through such stoppers and extremely losing own power, can fly away for over the 213 meters??? Guys, this bullet flies, in the best case, for 15-20 meters, its effectiveness is 10 meters maximum (against drunk people - 0!). 
So, this shooting is 100% safe, real unsafe shooting normally takes place during hunting, where people are shooting with the self made steel or bronze bullets, due to their ricochets. 
The price of these useless toys is high, but the price of the registry is also not too cheap. But in Russia everybody can buy traumatic gun after 18 years old. In Ukraine we have even more stupidity: only special categories of people can own &quot;condom thrower&quot;: deputies, journalists, policemen and their family members, military officers and some others. So, if I want to buy it, it is prohibited for me (officially). If non-officially, to become a journalist in my country costs 400$, the gun&#039;s price is 350$, medical certifications and other expenses - 50$. Any questions???
Normal guns (pistols and revolvers are prohibited for civilians, only long guns are permitted almost without any restrictions)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gents,<br />
I absolutely agree with trigger288.<br />
First of all, the gun on the pictures is Horhe. These guns are the modification of our Ukrainian pistol Fort-12, its traumatic version (master model &#8211; Fort-12R), which in Russian Federation has special stoppers inside the barrel (do avoid of shooting with normal rounds) which people call &#8211; teeth.<br />
Can you imagine, that poor smooth rubber ball, whilst coming through such stoppers and extremely losing own power, can fly away for over the 213 meters??? Guys, this bullet flies, in the best case, for 15-20 meters, its effectiveness is 10 meters maximum (against drunk people &#8211; 0!).<br />
So, this shooting is 100% safe, real unsafe shooting normally takes place during hunting, where people are shooting with the self made steel or bronze bullets, due to their ricochets.<br />
The price of these useless toys is high, but the price of the registry is also not too cheap. But in Russia everybody can buy traumatic gun after 18 years old. In Ukraine we have even more stupidity: only special categories of people can own &#8220;condom thrower&#8221;: deputies, journalists, policemen and their family members, military officers and some others. So, if I want to buy it, it is prohibited for me (officially). If non-officially, to become a journalist in my country costs 400$, the gun&#8217;s price is 350$, medical certifications and other expenses &#8211; 50$. Any questions???<br />
Normal guns (pistols and revolvers are prohibited for civilians, only long guns are permitted almost without any restrictions)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trigger288</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12592</link>
		<dc:creator>trigger288</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12592</guid>
		<description>2 Cemetery&#039;s Gun Blob:

Yes. But the price on this &quot;pistols&quot; with legal documents is fantastic. More than $1000 for a useless toy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 Cemetery&#8217;s Gun Blob:</p>
<p>Yes. But the price on this &#8220;pistols&#8221; with legal documents is fantastic. More than $1000 for a useless toy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trigger288</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12589</link>
		<dc:creator>trigger288</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12589</guid>
		<description>2 Erik:
NO! They can not!

2 Crabula:
Those rubber bullets are &quot;effective&quot; up to 5 meters and &quot;danger&quot; up to 50 meters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 Erik:<br />
NO! They can not!</p>
<p>2 Crabula:<br />
Those rubber bullets are &#8220;effective&#8221; up to 5 meters and &#8220;danger&#8221; up to 50 meters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikeone</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12585</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikeone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12585</guid>
		<description>LOL WOW! Just WOW!  

Imagine if that happened here! And the media sh!* storm it would cause.

Its just bad form no matter how you look at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL WOW! Just WOW!  </p>
<p>Imagine if that happened here! And the media sh!* storm it would cause.</p>
<p>Its just bad form no matter how you look at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crabula</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12584</link>
		<dc:creator>Crabula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12584</guid>
		<description>Whether or not the guns are &quot;real&quot; or the bullets are only &quot;effective&quot; out to about 50 meters is irrelevant. The fact is that this is still a very very poor example of proper safety protocol. It is particularly poor considering that this is a public demonstration. 

It&#039;s never ok to demonstrate, to an untrained public, an improper or unsafe way of doing things and then saying &quot;it&#039;s ok. I&#039;m a professional.&quot; There is too much potential to give someone a false sense of confidence in doing something for which they have been taught wrong from the start.

Man, you guys make me look long winded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether or not the guns are &#8220;real&#8221; or the bullets are only &#8220;effective&#8221; out to about 50 meters is irrelevant. The fact is that this is still a very very poor example of proper safety protocol. It is particularly poor considering that this is a public demonstration. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s never ok to demonstrate, to an untrained public, an improper or unsafe way of doing things and then saying &#8220;it&#8217;s ok. I&#8217;m a professional.&#8221; There is too much potential to give someone a false sense of confidence in doing something for which they have been taught wrong from the start.</p>
<p>Man, you guys make me look long winded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12582</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12582</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re setting a bad example.  Regardless of the ammunition they should have taken steps to show every aspect of weapons safety.  Especially considering these were &quot;new shooters&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re setting a bad example.  Regardless of the ammunition they should have taken steps to show every aspect of weapons safety.  Especially considering these were &#8220;new shooters&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freiheit</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12581</link>
		<dc:creator>Freiheit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12581</guid>
		<description>Even &quot;dangerous to 50m&quot; still puts the round out into the river where a boat might be. I also see walking paths on the satellite but no roping off in the pictures.

I&#039;d chalk this up as safe by the numbers but not by common sense or best practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even &#8220;dangerous to 50m&#8221; still puts the round out into the river where a boat might be. I also see walking paths on the satellite but no roping off in the pictures.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d chalk this up as safe by the numbers but not by common sense or best practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12579</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12579</guid>
		<description>Those pistols can also fire standard rounds in 9x18 Mak.  They&#039;re just using low-power rubber stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those pistols can also fire standard rounds in 9&#215;18 Mak.  They&#8217;re just using low-power rubber stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: workinwifdakids</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12578</link>
		<dc:creator>workinwifdakids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12578</guid>
		<description>I respectfully propose that training to violate any of the 4 rules of firearms safety may result in tragedy.  If it&#039;s capable of firing a projectile, we need to be aware of our target, and what&#039;s beyond it.
							Sorry, forgot to add great post! Can&#039;t wait to see your next post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respectfully propose that training to violate any of the 4 rules of firearms safety may result in tragedy.  If it&#8217;s capable of firing a projectile, we need to be aware of our target, and what&#8217;s beyond it.<br />
							Sorry, forgot to add great post! Can&#8217;t wait to see your next post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Reich</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12575</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Reich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12575</guid>
		<description>They were obviously playing Russian Roulette.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were obviously playing Russian Roulette.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: workinwifdakids</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12573</link>
		<dc:creator>workinwifdakids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12573</guid>
		<description>I respectfully propose that training to violate any of the 4 rules of firearms safety may result in tragedy.  If it&#039;s capable of firing a projectile, we need to be aware of our target, and what&#039;s beyond it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respectfully propose that training to violate any of the 4 rules of firearms safety may result in tragedy.  If it&#8217;s capable of firing a projectile, we need to be aware of our target, and what&#8217;s beyond it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affe</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12564</link>
		<dc:creator>Affe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12564</guid>
		<description>Something tells me that Russian casualty-tolerance is slightly higher than ours.  See, eg, WWI, WWII, Beslan...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something tells me that Russian casualty-tolerance is slightly higher than ours.  See, eg, WWI, WWII, Beslan&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cemetery's Gun Blob</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12563</link>
		<dc:creator>Cemetery's Gun Blob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12563</guid>
		<description>Sad thing trigger288:

In NJ those pistols you say are not real firearms, would be classified as such, thus would be heavily regulated as well.

Funny juxtaposition there NJ vs. Russia.  Who&#039;s got more freedom?

But then again, can regular folks own those guns in Russia?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad thing trigger288:</p>
<p>In NJ those pistols you say are not real firearms, would be classified as such, thus would be heavily regulated as well.</p>
<p>Funny juxtaposition there NJ vs. Russia.  Who&#8217;s got more freedom?</p>
<p>But then again, can regular folks own those guns in Russia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Groom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12562</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12562</guid>
		<description>I find it ironic and interesting that the Russians are now more free than the British.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it ironic and interesting that the Russians are now more free than the British.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12561</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12561</guid>
		<description>Rubber bullets or no- I&#039;m still canceling my riverboat tour of Tarusa!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rubber bullets or no- I&#8217;m still canceling my riverboat tour of Tarusa!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12556</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12556</guid>
		<description>In Soviet Russia, bad habits teach you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Soviet Russia, bad habits teach you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob@thenest</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12554</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob@thenest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12554</guid>
		<description>It still gives me the willies.  Emotion over logic, I know.  Another good example of why it&#039;s not necesarily good evidence just because it&#039;s a photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It still gives me the willies.  Emotion over logic, I know.  Another good example of why it&#8217;s not necesarily good evidence just because it&#8217;s a photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12553</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12553</guid>
		<description>trigger288, ah! That makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trigger288, ah! That makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trigger288</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/27/incredibly-unsafe-pistol-demo/#comment-12552</link>
		<dc:creator>trigger288</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7208#comment-12552</guid>
		<description>The &quot;pistols&quot; on the photos are not real firearms. Ttey are loaded with low-energy traumatic cartriges with soft rubber bullets. It is danger up to 50 meters. Ewerything is ok with safety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;pistols&#8221; on the photos are not real firearms. Ttey are loaded with low-energy traumatic cartriges with soft rubber bullets. It is danger up to 50 meters. Ewerything is ok with safety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
