<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guns that shoot around corners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/17/guns-that-shoot-around-corners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/17/guns-that-shoot-around-corners/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Groom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/17/guns-that-shoot-around-corners/#comment-12230</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7123#comment-12230</guid>
		<description>I have always thought that using a direct fire weapon for indirect fire was the epitome of stupidity. In WWI, before the invention of rifle-grenades, this made some sense, but we&#039;ve come a long way since then. Things like the corner shot are terribly unnecessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always thought that using a direct fire weapon for indirect fire was the epitome of stupidity. In WWI, before the invention of rifle-grenades, this made some sense, but we&#8217;ve come a long way since then. Things like the corner shot are terribly unnecessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/17/guns-that-shoot-around-corners/#comment-12224</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7123#comment-12224</guid>
		<description>Sven, nifty, I had not seen the parascope before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sven, nifty, I had not seen the parascope before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven Ortmann</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/17/guns-that-shoot-around-corners/#comment-12223</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven Ortmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7123#comment-12223</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s much more.
The Germans had such a periscope rifle in WWI as well.

Parascope is a modern low-tech but clever approach to the problem.
http://www.ar-15.us/Articles.php?action=detail&amp;g=content1203811894
and there are several less clever, compact folding mirror competitors around.

The &quot;camera an rifle + helmet-mounted display&quot; concept was explored in several recent soldier modernization programs (Land Warrior, FELIN and others).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s much more.<br />
The Germans had such a periscope rifle in WWI as well.</p>
<p>Parascope is a modern low-tech but clever approach to the problem.<br />
<a href="http://www.ar-15.us/Articles.php?action=detail&amp;g=content1203811894" rel="nofollow">http://www.ar-15.us/Articles.php?action=detail&amp;g=content1203811894</a><br />
and there are several less clever, compact folding mirror competitors around.</p>
<p>The &#8220;camera an rifle + helmet-mounted display&#8221; concept was explored in several recent soldier modernization programs (Land Warrior, FELIN and others).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
