<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tactilite .50 BMG AR-15 Upper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:18:29 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/#comment-15886</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7035#comment-15886</guid>
		<description>I think the word these people are looking for is impulse. While the total force is not reduced, because of impulse, the actual damage that force does is. Its like Cymond said. Except instead of a hard punch all at once 4 punches that are 1/4 of the strength happening over time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the word these people are looking for is impulse. While the total force is not reduced, because of impulse, the actual damage that force does is. Its like Cymond said. Except instead of a hard punch all at once 4 punches that are 1/4 of the strength happening over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamil Arikut</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/#comment-12102</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamil Arikut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7035#comment-12102</guid>
		<description>Dear Safir and  AT 14 users,

I am writing you below the address of the web site opened by the Turkish Safir T 14 users and owners club , they have opened a visitors blog in English too, to interchange ideas with their  foreign counterparts and get in contact with the T14 users worldwide.They have events and such, please participate.

www.safir-t14.com

Youre very much welcome to visit and get in touch.

Kamil Arikut

Safir Arms</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Safir and  AT 14 users,</p>
<p>I am writing you below the address of the web site opened by the Turkish Safir T 14 users and owners club , they have opened a visitors blog in English too, to interchange ideas with their  foreign counterparts and get in contact with the T14 users worldwide.They have events and such, please participate.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.safir-t14.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.safir-t14.com</a></p>
<p>Youre very much welcome to visit and get in touch.</p>
<p>Kamil Arikut</p>
<p>Safir Arms</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/#comment-11839</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7035#comment-11839</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve owned and fired a few thousand rounds of .50 on a DPMS single shot lower attached to both an 18&quot; UltraLite-50 and 22&quot; UltraMag-50 conversions.  Absolutely no extra wear or stress on the lower attachment points.

There&#039;s actually LESS felt recoil from the shorter barrels as the bullet exits sooner and consequently all that extra powder and gas behind it gets used up in the muzzle brake.

No problem hitting a 400yd gong at a local range.
My UltraLite is setup with just the iron sights and my UltraMag has a OKO red-dot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve owned and fired a few thousand rounds of .50 on a DPMS single shot lower attached to both an 18&#8243; UltraLite-50 and 22&#8243; UltraMag-50 conversions.  Absolutely no extra wear or stress on the lower attachment points.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s actually LESS felt recoil from the shorter barrels as the bullet exits sooner and consequently all that extra powder and gas behind it gets used up in the muzzle brake.</p>
<p>No problem hitting a 400yd gong at a local range.<br />
My UltraLite is setup with just the iron sights and my UltraMag has a OKO red-dot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/#comment-11814</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7035#comment-11814</guid>
		<description>Okay, but there&#039;s a difference between throwing the intricate working bits of a scope off target, and tearing aluminum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, but there&#8217;s a difference between throwing the intricate working bits of a scope off target, and tearing aluminum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freiheit</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/#comment-11812</link>
		<dc:creator>Freiheit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7035#comment-11812</guid>
		<description>Well, lets settle this durability issue. If someone would care to have an AR lower and one of these uppers shipped to me, with a few thousand rounds of ammo, I will happily cover range time, take notes, pictures, and find out how durable it is. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, lets settle this durability issue. If someone would care to have an AR lower and one of these uppers shipped to me, with a few thousand rounds of ammo, I will happily cover range time, take notes, pictures, and find out how durable it is. <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cymond</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/#comment-11802</link>
		<dc:creator>Cymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7035#comment-11802</guid>
		<description>Nick, the concern is the stress from the recoil. The upper will recoil backwards, putting force through the lower/shoulder stock and into the shooter. Hopefully, most of the force is absorbed by the muzzle brake, gun&#039;s weight*, and physical movement. Still, there will be some strain on the lower. 

Scopes technically don&#039;t take any stress either, but watch what happens if you put a cheap scope on a high powered rifle and shoot enough rounds. Eventually you can shock and vibrate a cheap scope to the point that it won&#039;t hold its zero anymore. That&#039;s why most scopes are labeled as &quot;shock proof&quot;.  

*Gun weight doesn&#039;t actually reduce the force, but it slows it down. It&#039;s like the difference between a fast punch vs a hard shove.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, the concern is the stress from the recoil. The upper will recoil backwards, putting force through the lower/shoulder stock and into the shooter. Hopefully, most of the force is absorbed by the muzzle brake, gun&#8217;s weight*, and physical movement. Still, there will be some strain on the lower. </p>
<p>Scopes technically don&#8217;t take any stress either, but watch what happens if you put a cheap scope on a high powered rifle and shoot enough rounds. Eventually you can shock and vibrate a cheap scope to the point that it won&#8217;t hold its zero anymore. That&#8217;s why most scopes are labeled as &#8220;shock proof&#8221;.  </p>
<p>*Gun weight doesn&#8217;t actually reduce the force, but it slows it down. It&#8217;s like the difference between a fast punch vs a hard shove.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/#comment-11800</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7035#comment-11800</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a single shot bolt rifle. There&#039;s no buffer or spring, so there&#039;s no stress placed on the lower. All the stress is on the upper and bolt lugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a single shot bolt rifle. There&#8217;s no buffer or spring, so there&#8217;s no stress placed on the lower. All the stress is on the upper and bolt lugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/#comment-11798</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7035#comment-11798</guid>
		<description>Vote, yep, there would be a lot of blast ... not always a bad thing :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote, yep, there would be a lot of blast &#8230; not always a bad thing <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vote For David</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/#comment-11789</link>
		<dc:creator>Vote For David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7035#comment-11789</guid>
		<description>Nevermind that, how about the blast/report from a 18&quot; .50BMG rifle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevermind that, how about the blast/report from a 18&#8243; .50BMG rifle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/#comment-11787</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7035#comment-11787</guid>
		<description>This is cool and all (I&#039;d love a .50 BMG Barrett 82A1), but why would you want a &quot;lite&quot; .50 BMG with a ultra-short barrel and without a bi-pod? These things are designed to shoot far, and the extra weight helps reduce the recoil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is cool and all (I&#8217;d love a .50 BMG Barrett 82A1), but why would you want a &#8220;lite&#8221; .50 BMG with a ultra-short barrel and without a bi-pod? These things are designed to shoot far, and the extra weight helps reduce the recoil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/#comment-11778</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7035#comment-11778</guid>
		<description>Mainsail: My thoughts exactly. AR parts on a .50 BMG rifle seems like a recipe for fatigue cracks and various other problems.
I&#039;m guessing this seemingly questionable design is mainly driven by stupid rules and regulations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mainsail: My thoughts exactly. AR parts on a .50 BMG rifle seems like a recipe for fatigue cracks and various other problems.<br />
I&#8217;m guessing this seemingly questionable design is mainly driven by stupid rules and regulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmathers</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/#comment-11775</link>
		<dc:creator>mmathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7035#comment-11775</guid>
		<description>All the recoil is delivered in a linear fashion from the chamber straight back into the buffer tube/stock. The lower is really just there to have something to put the trigger bits inside of.

---
as for having a 18.5&quot; barrel 50cal that&#039;s designed for being shot from the shoulder? That sounds perfect for varmiting :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the recoil is delivered in a linear fashion from the chamber straight back into the buffer tube/stock. The lower is really just there to have something to put the trigger bits inside of.</p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
as for having a 18.5&#8243; barrel 50cal that&#8217;s designed for being shot from the shoulder? That sounds perfect for varmiting <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canthros</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/#comment-11768</link>
		<dc:creator>Canthros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7035#comment-11768</guid>
		<description>Something about having &#039;ultralight&#039; and &#039;.50 BMG&#039; in the same sentence sounds dreadfully uncomfortable to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something about having &#8216;ultralight&#8217; and &#8216;.50 BMG&#8217; in the same sentence sounds dreadfully uncomfortable to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mainsail</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/#comment-11762</link>
		<dc:creator>Mainsail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7035#comment-11762</guid>
		<description>Not knowing much about the AR-15 platform, but is the alloy lower really up to the power of the 50cal?

The hinge mount is hardly designed for the increased recoil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not knowing much about the AR-15 platform, but is the alloy lower really up to the power of the 50cal?</p>
<p>The hinge mount is hardly designed for the increased recoil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XxleoxX</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/07/08/tactilite-50-bmg-ar-15-upper/#comment-11761</link>
		<dc:creator>XxleoxX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=7035#comment-11761</guid>
		<description>doesnt seem like a bad idea :) i would get one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doesnt seem like a bad idea <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  i would get one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
