<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bushmaster ACR coming late this year &#8230; maybe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/30/bushmaster-acr-coming-late-this-year-maybe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/30/bushmaster-acr-coming-late-this-year-maybe/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:38:33 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/30/bushmaster-acr-coming-late-this-year-maybe/#comment-12211</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6945#comment-12211</guid>
		<description>M24, yea, a civilian version is not capable of select fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M24, yea, a civilian version is not capable of select fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M24</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/30/bushmaster-acr-coming-late-this-year-maybe/#comment-12209</link>
		<dc:creator>M24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6945#comment-12209</guid>
		<description>Is this even legal to own?  It is a fully automatic weapon right?  Would a semi-auto version have to be purchased be civilians (non-military)?  However, I have no doubt that it will be the gun that our future troops will be equiped with.  It is extremely efficient and is very customizable and adaptable.  I look forward to seeing this come out.  It is easily one of my favorite designs for a rifle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this even legal to own?  It is a fully automatic weapon right?  Would a semi-auto version have to be purchased be civilians (non-military)?  However, I have no doubt that it will be the gun that our future troops will be equiped with.  It is extremely efficient and is very customizable and adaptable.  I look forward to seeing this come out.  It is easily one of my favorite designs for a rifle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/30/bushmaster-acr-coming-late-this-year-maybe/#comment-11513</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6945#comment-11513</guid>
		<description>This Rifle resembles a HKG36 (my favourite weapon) looks cool a truly third generation 5.56 rifle was it evaluated for the millitary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Rifle resembles a HKG36 (my favourite weapon) looks cool a truly third generation 5.56 rifle was it evaluated for the millitary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bolter</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/30/bushmaster-acr-coming-late-this-year-maybe/#comment-11503</link>
		<dc:creator>Bolter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6945#comment-11503</guid>
		<description>SCAR-16 going for about 3k on Gunbroker.  But it has the sex appeal:  can you spell &quot;U-S-A-S-O-C&quot;?  More competition is good in this arena I think.  Good luck to Bushmaster/Remington.  Hope it makes it to market.  Looks interesting.  Market has a decent number of piston-driven 5.56 entrants already, and you can add a lot of similar doodads to them.

Bolter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SCAR-16 going for about 3k on Gunbroker.  But it has the sex appeal:  can you spell &#8220;U-S-A-S-O-C&#8221;?  More competition is good in this arena I think.  Good luck to Bushmaster/Remington.  Hope it makes it to market.  Looks interesting.  Market has a decent number of piston-driven 5.56 entrants already, and you can add a lot of similar doodads to them.</p>
<p>Bolter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Groom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/30/bushmaster-acr-coming-late-this-year-maybe/#comment-11500</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6945#comment-11500</guid>
		<description>The Kel-Tec RFB was announced as being $3000, and it&#039;s MSRP is $1880. I&#039;ve seen them on Gun Broker for $5000, but that&#039;s not Kel-Tec&#039;s fault. 

The Massada/ACR isn&#039;t gonna get built until Cerberus is good and ready to build it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kel-Tec RFB was announced as being $3000, and it&#8217;s MSRP is $1880. I&#8217;ve seen them on Gun Broker for $5000, but that&#8217;s not Kel-Tec&#8217;s fault. </p>
<p>The Massada/ACR isn&#8217;t gonna get built until Cerberus is good and ready to build it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/30/bushmaster-acr-coming-late-this-year-maybe/#comment-11494</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6945#comment-11494</guid>
		<description>For that kind of money I rather go with a good FAL or M14. It is too much for a plastic rifle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For that kind of money I rather go with a good FAL or M14. It is too much for a plastic rifle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/30/bushmaster-acr-coming-late-this-year-maybe/#comment-11492</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6945#comment-11492</guid>
		<description>IF they actually hit the schedule and IF it is at that price, I&#039;ll be second in line for one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF they actually hit the schedule and IF it is at that price, I&#8217;ll be second in line for one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/30/bushmaster-acr-coming-late-this-year-maybe/#comment-11484</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6945#comment-11484</guid>
		<description>...Except $1,500 becomes $4,000.  The Kel Tec RFB comes to mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Except $1,500 becomes $4,000.  The Kel Tec RFB comes to mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddy Alvarez</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/30/bushmaster-acr-coming-late-this-year-maybe/#comment-11483</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddy Alvarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6945#comment-11483</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ll believe it when i see it... actually, when i own it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ll believe it when i see it&#8230; actually, when i own it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canthros</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/30/bushmaster-acr-coming-late-this-year-maybe/#comment-11478</link>
		<dc:creator>Canthros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6945#comment-11478</guid>
		<description>This at least matches up with the late 2009 estimate that Bushmaster gave out toward the end of last year, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This at least matches up with the late 2009 estimate that Bushmaster gave out toward the end of last year, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
