<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SOCOM Precision Sniper Rifle (PSR) Competition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/23/socom-precision-sniper-rifle-psr-competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/23/socom-precision-sniper-rifle-psr-competition/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:38:33 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zach</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/23/socom-precision-sniper-rifle-psr-competition/#comment-17355</link>
		<dc:creator>zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6843#comment-17355</guid>
		<description>why would a single shot falling block be at all useful for modern military operations? Does the M40A3 use a McMillan stock? Cause it looks like an A5 with different cheekrest</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why would a single shot falling block be at all useful for modern military operations? Does the M40A3 use a McMillan stock? Cause it looks like an A5 with different cheekrest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/23/socom-precision-sniper-rifle-psr-competition/#comment-16759</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6843#comment-16759</guid>
		<description>Hmm... requirement #6 implies a repeating weapon with a 5 round magazine.  Yet requirement #2 does not say it must be a repeating weapon!  So why not use a falling-block single-shot action?  Perhaps the Ruger No. 1 action?

Perhaps such a system wouldn&#039;t make the grade in terms of accuracy.  But every rifle would be ambidextrous, the overall cartridge length and cartridge resistance to recoil wouldn&#039;t be as much a problem (long 300 grain bullets in .338 Lapua for example), and overall system length wouldn&#039;t be as much a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; requirement #6 implies a repeating weapon with a 5 round magazine.  Yet requirement #2 does not say it must be a repeating weapon!  So why not use a falling-block single-shot action?  Perhaps the Ruger No. 1 action?</p>
<p>Perhaps such a system wouldn&#8217;t make the grade in terms of accuracy.  But every rifle would be ambidextrous, the overall cartridge length and cartridge resistance to recoil wouldn&#8217;t be as much a problem (long 300 grain bullets in .338 Lapua for example), and overall system length wouldn&#8217;t be as much a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/23/socom-precision-sniper-rifle-psr-competition/#comment-16656</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6843#comment-16656</guid>
		<description>Phil,
   I realize the odds of you reading this slim, but yes.   1 MOA is totally realistic at 1500.   Barrett, Chey Tac, Dakota, Remington, McMillan, and numerous others have demonstrated .5 MOA or better out to 2500.   Though not with 10 round groups, that I&#039;ve seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,<br />
   I realize the odds of you reading this slim, but yes.   1 MOA is totally realistic at 1500.   Barrett, Chey Tac, Dakota, Remington, McMillan, and numerous others have demonstrated .5 MOA or better out to 2500.   Though not with 10 round groups, that I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ERic Blumensaadt</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/23/socom-precision-sniper-rifle-psr-competition/#comment-14696</link>
		<dc:creator>ERic Blumensaadt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6843#comment-14696</guid>
		<description>By looking at the new .338 Norma Magnum case I would guess that it may be more consistently accurate than the .338 Lapua Magnum (originally developed in the U.S. than adopted by Lapua).

I say this because in benchrest shooting cartridges that are shorter, fatter and have a sharper shoulder angle tend to generate better accuracy. 
In any case I&#039;d like either cartridge in a Desert Tactical SRS  bullpup bolt rifle. Now THAT&#039;S a rifle to meet the SOCOM specs if I ever saw one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By looking at the new .338 Norma Magnum case I would guess that it may be more consistently accurate than the .338 Lapua Magnum (originally developed in the U.S. than adopted by Lapua).</p>
<p>I say this because in benchrest shooting cartridges that are shorter, fatter and have a sharper shoulder angle tend to generate better accuracy.<br />
In any case I&#8217;d like either cartridge in a Desert Tactical SRS  bullpup bolt rifle. Now THAT&#8217;S a rifle to meet the SOCOM specs if I ever saw one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/23/socom-precision-sniper-rifle-psr-competition/#comment-11283</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6843#comment-11283</guid>
		<description>One other little typo issue, 1500 meters = 1640.4 yds. Little typo but big difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other little typo issue, 1500 meters = 1640.4 yds. Little typo but big difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/23/socom-precision-sniper-rifle-psr-competition/#comment-11265</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6843#comment-11265</guid>
		<description>Don, meters. I have updated the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don, meters. I have updated the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/23/socom-precision-sniper-rifle-psr-competition/#comment-11261</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6843#comment-11261</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve,

What is the unit of measurement on the drop test?

-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve,</p>
<p>What is the unit of measurement on the drop test?</p>
<p>-D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/23/socom-precision-sniper-rifle-psr-competition/#comment-11257</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6843#comment-11257</guid>
		<description>it sucks that they;re not  gonna use the CheyTac....its so accurate....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it sucks that they;re not  gonna use the CheyTac&#8230;.its so accurate&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/23/socom-precision-sniper-rifle-psr-competition/#comment-11256</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6843#comment-11256</guid>
		<description>Is 1 MOA at 1500 meters realistic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is 1 MOA at 1500 meters realistic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
