<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: S&amp;W 22A Pistol Recall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/22/sw-22a-pistol-recall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/22/sw-22a-pistol-recall/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:18:29 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/22/sw-22a-pistol-recall/#comment-11801</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6820#comment-11801</guid>
		<description>Just recieved mine back from the recall retrofit. Took about 2 weeks including shipping time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just recieved mine back from the recall retrofit. Took about 2 weeks including shipping time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/22/sw-22a-pistol-recall/#comment-11227</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6820#comment-11227</guid>
		<description>I doubt it Vak, lately it seems like recalls are the rule instead of the exception at S&amp;W nowadays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it Vak, lately it seems like recalls are the rule instead of the exception at S&amp;W nowadays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/22/sw-22a-pistol-recall/#comment-11226</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6820#comment-11226</guid>
		<description>Lol recall for slamfires....Fullauto 22 pistol anyone? Hard to believe a 22 can beat down something like that. Dont think so Vak...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol recall for slamfires&#8230;.Fullauto 22 pistol anyone? Hard to believe a 22 can beat down something like that. Dont think so Vak&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vak</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/22/sw-22a-pistol-recall/#comment-11211</link>
		<dc:creator>Vak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6820#comment-11211</guid>
		<description>Would an unsafe fiream retail higher for collectors ?

I mean, in a way, those are rare and quite unique. Like a misprinted stamp for people who collect stamps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would an unsafe fiream retail higher for collectors ?</p>
<p>I mean, in a way, those are rare and quite unique. Like a misprinted stamp for people who collect stamps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/22/sw-22a-pistol-recall/#comment-11190</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6820#comment-11190</guid>
		<description>The kaboom apparently is unrelated to the unintended discharges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kaboom apparently is unrelated to the unintended discharges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
