<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adams Arms Piston Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/12/adams-arms-piston-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/12/adams-arms-piston-review/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:18:29 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adams Shorty</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/12/adams-arms-piston-review/#comment-15551</link>
		<dc:creator>Adams Shorty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 08:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6706#comment-15551</guid>
		<description>I just installed the darbine length system with one piece bolt carrier about a month ago on a custom upper with a Daniel Defense 9.5 FSP Light rail. I have 2 other uppers one a 16 inch barrel with a AK 74 muzzel brake and the other a 20 inch with a rifle length gas system and both are Direct Impengment. After compairing all uppers the Adams Arms piston retrofit does make the rifle run cleaner and cooler where it counts, the bolt assembly! The recoil isn&#039;t much different than a DI system but then the two DI uppers I have are Bull Barrels and one is compensated so they don&#039;t move much. The AA Piston upper is lowder than the others due to a shorter barrel length and I&#039;m using a FSC 556 Bulldog Brake from Addax Tactical (designed by Primary Weapons Systems) but all of that asside if feel like I&#039;m shooting my Ruger 10/22!
I don&#039;t have much expierence with many other Piston uppers other than POF which is very well made as well so my recomendation is buy an Adams Arms kit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just installed the darbine length system with one piece bolt carrier about a month ago on a custom upper with a Daniel Defense 9.5 FSP Light rail. I have 2 other uppers one a 16 inch barrel with a AK 74 muzzel brake and the other a 20 inch with a rifle length gas system and both are Direct Impengment. After compairing all uppers the Adams Arms piston retrofit does make the rifle run cleaner and cooler where it counts, the bolt assembly! The recoil isn&#8217;t much different than a DI system but then the two DI uppers I have are Bull Barrels and one is compensated so they don&#8217;t move much. The AA Piston upper is lowder than the others due to a shorter barrel length and I&#8217;m using a FSC 556 Bulldog Brake from Addax Tactical (designed by Primary Weapons Systems) but all of that asside if feel like I&#8217;m shooting my Ruger 10/22!<br />
I don&#8217;t have much expierence with many other Piston uppers other than POF which is very well made as well so my recomendation is buy an Adams Arms kit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/12/adams-arms-piston-review/#comment-12939</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 04:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6706#comment-12939</guid>
		<description>Why does everybody not want to clean their rifles?

I want the piston system because it&#039;s more reliable. 

That&#039;s why I use the M6A3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does everybody not want to clean their rifles?</p>
<p>I want the piston system because it&#8217;s more reliable. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I use the M6A3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glwbear</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/12/adams-arms-piston-review/#comment-12937</link>
		<dc:creator>glwbear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 02:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6706#comment-12937</guid>
		<description>I have a ADAMS ARMS Piston system in a AR Pistol and after some minor adjustments it is a super system to have! 

It makes the Gun so much eaiser to Clean and NO more carbon build up in the Bolt!

I highly recommend it.

glwbear
34 years Law Enforcement &amp; the Private Sector</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a ADAMS ARMS Piston system in a AR Pistol and after some minor adjustments it is a super system to have! </p>
<p>It makes the Gun so much eaiser to Clean and NO more carbon build up in the Bolt!</p>
<p>I highly recommend it.</p>
<p>glwbear<br />
34 years Law Enforcement &amp; the Private Sector</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: splatacaster</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/12/adams-arms-piston-review/#comment-11607</link>
		<dc:creator>splatacaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6706#comment-11607</guid>
		<description>How much would you have to shoot to notice a need for having either a long or a short stroke piston operating system??????
 Which is the best way to go long stroke or short stroke??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much would you have to shoot to notice a need for having either a long or a short stroke piston operating system??????<br />
 Which is the best way to go long stroke or short stroke??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/12/adams-arms-piston-review/#comment-10882</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6706#comment-10882</guid>
		<description>Valhalla, AR15 piston does not make it cleaner nor more reliable. However, it does make it easy to clean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valhalla, AR15 piston does not make it cleaner nor more reliable. However, it does make it easy to clean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/12/adams-arms-piston-review/#comment-10855</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6706#comment-10855</guid>
		<description>Why would you want to do this to a gun? like, what are the advantages?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you want to do this to a gun? like, what are the advantages?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/12/adams-arms-piston-review/#comment-10826</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6706#comment-10826</guid>
		<description>@Dom: Except the Mini-14 doesn&#039;t use a gas piston :)

While the operating rod design of the Mini-14 is in some ways similar to a piston system, it&#039;s actually got more in common with Remington gas-operated shotguns than true gas piston guns like the FAL or .30 Carbine.  For anyone not familiar with the Mini-14 or piston systems, I&#039;ll go into a bit more detail...

Whereas a piston setup like the Carbine vents gas to push the piston into the op-rod assembly, the force of which pushes the rod backwards and operates the bolt, the Mini-14 has a gas aperture or valve which directly vents gas into a cavity on the op-rod.  I guess you could say the Mini-14/Remington design eliminates the middle man, but it still cruds up the inside of your stock!  The crud just isn&#039;t in the working parts of the action, which is the big argument against direct impingement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dom: Except the Mini-14 doesn&#8217;t use a gas piston <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>While the operating rod design of the Mini-14 is in some ways similar to a piston system, it&#8217;s actually got more in common with Remington gas-operated shotguns than true gas piston guns like the FAL or .30 Carbine.  For anyone not familiar with the Mini-14 or piston systems, I&#8217;ll go into a bit more detail&#8230;</p>
<p>Whereas a piston setup like the Carbine vents gas to push the piston into the op-rod assembly, the force of which pushes the rod backwards and operates the bolt, the Mini-14 has a gas aperture or valve which directly vents gas into a cavity on the op-rod.  I guess you could say the Mini-14/Remington design eliminates the middle man, but it still cruds up the inside of your stock!  The crud just isn&#8217;t in the working parts of the action, which is the big argument against direct impingement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/12/adams-arms-piston-review/#comment-10822</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6706#comment-10822</guid>
		<description>While the piston looks better in theory, I understand there are some subtle advantages of the direct impingement system, like the recoil force being more on the center of the bore, and perhaps the barrel being subjected to bending forces from the piston. Or something else nobody has thought of...

As always when upgrading or changing something, rigorous training and testing in the environment you intend to use your tool is prudent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the piston looks better in theory, I understand there are some subtle advantages of the direct impingement system, like the recoil force being more on the center of the bore, and perhaps the barrel being subjected to bending forces from the piston. Or something else nobody has thought of&#8230;</p>
<p>As always when upgrading or changing something, rigorous training and testing in the environment you intend to use your tool is prudent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/12/adams-arms-piston-review/#comment-10821</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6706#comment-10821</guid>
		<description>This is one of the reasons Mini-14 owners like Mini-14s. If only Bill had built an accurate gun, it would have been great. Adding this to your AR is very, very cool. 

Not sure about ROF but it definitely keeps the mechanism cleaner and thus more reliable. Blow-by definitely happens, Ken, I can tell you from experience with my Mini, but it doesn&#039;t hurt anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the reasons Mini-14 owners like Mini-14s. If only Bill had built an accurate gun, it would have been great. Adding this to your AR is very, very cool. </p>
<p>Not sure about ROF but it definitely keeps the mechanism cleaner and thus more reliable. Blow-by definitely happens, Ken, I can tell you from experience with my Mini, but it doesn&#8217;t hurt anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/12/adams-arms-piston-review/#comment-10797</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6706#comment-10797</guid>
		<description>Interesting...How do you prevent blowby on that &quot;cone shaped&quot; piston. Just a nerd question...lol!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230;How do you prevent blowby on that &#8220;cone shaped&#8221; piston. Just a nerd question&#8230;lol!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/12/adams-arms-piston-review/#comment-10770</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6706#comment-10770</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got three piston kits on my list of candidates for my next build, and Adams is up there.  My only real worry is whether or not it&#039;ll fit under Yankee Hill free float handguards, which I&#039;m rather fond of.  My current rifle has a &quot;smooth carbine&quot; handguard, so if the kits by CMMG or Adams will fit under that I&#039;ll be saving up for one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got three piston kits on my list of candidates for my next build, and Adams is up there.  My only real worry is whether or not it&#8217;ll fit under Yankee Hill free float handguards, which I&#8217;m rather fond of.  My current rifle has a &#8220;smooth carbine&#8221; handguard, so if the kits by CMMG or Adams will fit under that I&#8217;ll be saving up for one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valhalla</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/06/12/adams-arms-piston-review/#comment-10766</link>
		<dc:creator>Valhalla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6706#comment-10766</guid>
		<description>so, does this increase its maximum semi-automatic firing abilities, or just keep the gun cleaner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, does this increase its maximum semi-automatic firing abilities, or just keep the gun cleaner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
