9mm NATO damages 9mm Luger pistol

About a month ago I mentioned a post by Caleb warning people not to use 9mm NATO rounds in 9mm Luger / Parabellum pistols.

A reader, who shall remain anonymous, emailed me this account of what happened to him.

Your message about the 9 mm Nato versus 9 mm Luger (9×19 mm, 9 mm Para) is correct and should be a warning to all users of 9 mm pistols. I found out the the higher pressure of the Nato round can be punishing. The same day as I received my first and brand new police service pistol, the Walther P5, I took it to my shooting club to show it to the lads and to shoot it.

Because I ran out of ammo, I borrowed a box from a military friend, who used 9 mm Nato rounds. After two shots my new pistol jammed, because the extractor broke off. I had some explanation to do the next day in order to get my service gun back in working order and got the message: Never use military ammo in non-military firearms. So, any surplus army ammo: use it in the Browning High-Power or the Glock, but not in “civilian” pistols.

Related Posts

Steve Jun 1st 2009 ammunition, handguns Tags: , , , 12 Comments

12 Responses to “9mm NATO damages 9mm Luger pistol”

  1. Canthroson 02 Jun 2009 at 12:16 am link comment

    I’m pretty sure that the Browning High-Power is not rated for 9mm NATO (or +P). It may be something you can get away with in the FM (Argentine) models, but ISTR reading that you’ll eventually batter the frame running that stuff through one of the FN/Browning guns.

  2. Hughon 02 Jun 2009 at 1:53 am link comment

    Isn’t the Walther P5 a NATO service pistol? I believe at one time it was used by the SAS

  3. Wynbonifaceon 02 Jun 2009 at 3:25 am link comment

    Hugh, nope German police contract pistol.

    http://world.guns.ru/handguns/hg86-e.htm

  4. SQon 02 Jun 2009 at 4:23 am link comment

    From Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walther_P5):

    P5C:
    Approx 3,000 examples of this pistol were adopted in the 1980s by the British Army as Pistol L102A1 (NATO Stock Number 1005-99-978-4952) for issue to the Royal Irish Regiment (Home Service) as a Personal Protection Weapon.

  5. Brian Parkeron 02 Jun 2009 at 5:33 am link comment

    From page 13 of the owner’s manual for my Ruger SR9:
    “No 9mm Parabellum ammunition manufactured in accordance with NATO, U.S., SAAMI, or CIP standards is known to be beyond the design limits or known not to function in these pistols.”

    Kinda makes me glad I bought it instead of other well known 9mm’s.

  6. cyleon 02 Jun 2009 at 6:32 am link comment

    NATO is +P. Make sure your gun is rated before firing.

  7. B Woodmanon 03 Jun 2009 at 2:00 am link comment

    What about the Ruger P85? I’ve heard it’s robust.

  8. Griffinon 03 Jun 2009 at 8:44 pm link comment

    Would a Sig P250 be considered a Service Pistol?

  9. Alexon 10 Jul 2009 at 8:29 am link comment

    The Walther P5 is a piece of **** anyway: horrible trigger, may discharge if dropped. Massad Ayoob talks about seeing baskets full of broken HPs as a result of firing 9 mm NATO ammo in one of his books.

  10. wicked pandaon 01 Aug 2009 at 11:26 pm link comment

    What about the Walther P1?? i guess it can handle +P ammo, i know for sure it can t handle hollow poit but FMJ in 115 gr seems OK. i bougth a box of 124Gr. FMJ last month but i haven t tried yet, i t ll be usure??

  11. Lanceon 08 Oct 2009 at 7:52 am link comment

    Glocks arnt supposed to use 9mm NATO ammo either. The only pistol made to shoot US NATO ammo is the Beretta 92F and M-92FS models.

  12. Tyon 09 Oct 2009 at 5:11 pm link comment

    Hirtenberger used a Glock 17 to test fire hot 9mm loads. This one was retired after 348,210 rounds. I would feel safe shooting any 9mm out of a Glock.

    http://www.cybershooters.org/IWA2000/Glock17.JPG

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy: I reserve the right to remove comments at my discretion. Think of comment threads like a dinner party at someone's house. If you make the party unpleasant for others or me, you won't be invited back. I am happy to tolerate a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but I'm not going to tolerate nastiness, rudeness, trolling, vitriol, or excessive snarkiness toward the author(s) or other commenters. You may make your case passionately, but civility is expected. Please stay on topic and respect the technical nature of this blog.
Spam Filtering: To avoid spam, comments are filtered using Akismet and then manually approved. Do not be alarmed if you comment does not appear instantly. I do not check the spam folder more than once per day.