Comments on: Blade Runner gun sold for $270,000

By: Erik

Erik — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:56:23 +0000

I agree with you, Eric. No question about the right to do it. The wisdom of it? That is another story. You mis-spell your name btw….

By: eric

eric — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:35:43 +0000

Whatever, there is nothing wrong with it. The ability to do something like this is part of the many things that makes this country great and what it is.

By: Oswald Bastable

Oswald Bastable — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 06:55:49 +0000

$270k!

And my wife thinks that when I visit the gunshop I have done- questionable things…

By: whatever

whatever — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:10:45 +0000

There is something seriously wrong with the way things are when someone will spend $270K on a movie prop.

By: CS

CS — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 04:03:20 +0000

(that last comment was aimed at readers comments, not the post) You don’t need to post this btw… Just had a weekend in 7500 feet high mountains doing some precision rifle target practice, too much sun)

By: CS

CS — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 04:00:11 +0000

He uses the gun throughout the movie to shoot replicants.

Also, the original movie gun was sold – not a replica of it…

By: Heath

Heath — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 01:55:32 +0000

Man alive, that is a lot of money for something to look at! I don’t remember seeing that piece in the movie. I will have to watch it again and look for it.

By: Rodolfo

Rodolfo — Sun, 31 May 2009 18:49:02 +0000

Just for that, I’m putting Blade Runner on.
No ‘director’s cut’ for me

By: Wolfwood

Wolfwood — Sun, 31 May 2009 18:45:23 +0000

I can’t possibly be the only person to think that there’s money to be made in working replicas of famous movie guns. Why aren’t there any?

By: Tetsubo

Tetsubo — Sun, 31 May 2009 11:47:05 +0000

I have wanted this pistol for more than half my life. Even a good quality mock-up would do. I just don’t have the money to buy one nor the skill to make one. But it is lovely.