<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charter Arms Rimless Revolver update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/26/charter-arms-rimless-revolver-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/26/charter-arms-rimless-revolver-update/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Meltron</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/26/charter-arms-rimless-revolver-update/#comment-27920</link>
		<dc:creator>Meltron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6469#comment-27920</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s totally vaporware, a company should be able to at least have one protoype that they can let us &#039;heathens&#039; touch or at least examine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s totally vaporware, a company should be able to at least have one protoype that they can let us &#8216;heathens&#8217; touch or at least examine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuckster</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/26/charter-arms-rimless-revolver-update/#comment-10965</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuckster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6469#comment-10965</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the big deal? I own a Colt .32 Detective Special that also handles .32 ACP without any moons etc. Some of you reloaders should know that the .32 ACP does in fact have a slight rim which is enough to hold the cartridge firmly in the cylinder. My Colt also has an external firing pin that has no trouble making contact with the primer.

Now here is something the Homies in the Ghetto do. On cartridges that fall through the cylinder they will wrap thin copper wire around the base of the bullet, just enough to prevent it from falling through. I have never tried it but wonder if it can be done with 9mm luger rounds in a .38 ?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the big deal? I own a Colt .32 Detective Special that also handles .32 ACP without any moons etc. Some of you reloaders should know that the .32 ACP does in fact have a slight rim which is enough to hold the cartridge firmly in the cylinder. My Colt also has an external firing pin that has no trouble making contact with the primer.</p>
<p>Now here is something the Homies in the Ghetto do. On cartridges that fall through the cylinder they will wrap thin copper wire around the base of the bullet, just enough to prevent it from falling through. I have never tried it but wonder if it can be done with 9mm luger rounds in a .38 ?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/26/charter-arms-rimless-revolver-update/#comment-10816</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6469#comment-10816</guid>
		<description>I thought before the shot show they had to pull out due to patent issues, that they had patent problems and couldn&#039;t show they stuff till it was ironed out. and they probably still waiting for the office to approve it. As I hear the patent office is backed up constantly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought before the shot show they had to pull out due to patent issues, that they had patent problems and couldn&#8217;t show they stuff till it was ironed out. and they probably still waiting for the office to approve it. As I hear the patent office is backed up constantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KP</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/26/charter-arms-rimless-revolver-update/#comment-9950</link>
		<dc:creator>KP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 08:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6469#comment-9950</guid>
		<description>Nuts, that looked interesting.  Speaking of interesting/neat handguns that aren&#039;t out yet, any word on the Boberg XR9?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nuts, that looked interesting.  Speaking of interesting/neat handguns that aren&#8217;t out yet, any word on the Boberg XR9?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K. D.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/26/charter-arms-rimless-revolver-update/#comment-9938</link>
		<dc:creator>K. D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 22:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6469#comment-9938</guid>
		<description>I doubt we see the pistol now.....I am pretty disappointed. I think I&#039;ll buy used Taurus 9mm with the moon-clips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt we see the pistol now&#8230;..I am pretty disappointed. I think I&#8217;ll buy used Taurus 9mm with the moon-clips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/26/charter-arms-rimless-revolver-update/#comment-9936</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 22:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6469#comment-9936</guid>
		<description>Richard, thanks for the tip :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, thanks for the tip <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/26/charter-arms-rimless-revolver-update/#comment-9933</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6469#comment-9933</guid>
		<description>Steve,

Thanks for posting this.  Two days before Charter Arms released this press release, I had written on my site about the possibility that the CARR might be vaporware, and I spelled out some of the reasons why.  I hope to see this revolver produced, as I really like the concept.

When I spoke to a Charter employee who answered the phone in their media office, but elected not to give me his name, he said that production was pushed back to &quot;late July.&quot;  I didn&#039;t see any mention of a production date in the press release, so I am guessing that July is not likely either.

I hope to see this revolver in the near future, but I am guessing it will be a long time, if ever, before we see it.

Thanks,

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Thanks for posting this.  Two days before Charter Arms released this press release, I had written on my site about the possibility that the CARR might be vaporware, and I spelled out some of the reasons why.  I hope to see this revolver produced, as I really like the concept.</p>
<p>When I spoke to a Charter employee who answered the phone in their media office, but elected not to give me his name, he said that production was pushed back to &#8220;late July.&#8221;  I didn&#8217;t see any mention of a production date in the press release, so I am guessing that July is not likely either.</p>
<p>I hope to see this revolver in the near future, but I am guessing it will be a long time, if ever, before we see it.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
