<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Semi-Auto Shotgun Pistol: MAUL = AWESOME</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:38:33 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J.A. James</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/#comment-12780</link>
		<dc:creator>J.A. James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 04:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6440#comment-12780</guid>
		<description>In the early 80s I was assigned to the 1/509 (ABCT) based in Vicenza, Italy. Combat Support Company had two TOW platoons, the Redeye platoon as well as my own Recon/Scout platoon. 
During one of our seemingly endless number of training deployments, we were in northern Turkey taking part in a joint NATO exercise. Several members of the Recon section as well as a few TOW bunnies and some other folks from the Bn were sent to a brief training session conducted by the 10th Special Forces Group out of Bad Tolz, West Germany. We had some guys from the 2nd Para in the UK as well as some Turkish Paracommandos, a few of the Italian Paracaduti Alpini troops and some guys from Belgium and the West German Falschirmjager Regiment. We had missiles, we had a lot of free time, it was northern Turkey in August so I still blame the heat for anything that might have been considered to be &quot;poor judgement.&quot; 

Nobody was terribly impressed with anybody elses normal jobs so discussions turned to &#039;What If&#039; scenarios. One of the scenarios was, &quot;What if your TOW jeep is put out of commission and takes your tracker and other electronics with it?&quot; Schematics were viewed, dust covers were removed from the missile, wires were connected, many people suddenly found a really strong desire to be a long way away and behind the biggest rocks they could find. 

It was a hell of a show when it fired. To this day I think an early generation TOW missile would make a pretty outstanding off-route anti-armor mine. A lot more effective than any of the other systems then in the inventory. I&#039;m not quite sure how you&#039;d aim the damned thing but if that could be worked out, it would make a pretty spectacular impression on a wayward enemy armored vehicle. 

The Redeye guys refused to be outthought by a bunch of grunts so as I understand it, later in the day one of their training rounds was successfully set off. As for the Dragon, one of the methods to destroy it was listed in the operator&#039;s manual as, &quot;fire the missile either conventionally or by field expedient means making sure to elevate the muzzle high enough that even without the electronic control of the tracker-sight it will travel far enough to arm and subsequently detonate down range.&quot; (words pretty much to that effect) Though given the number of outright stupidity in the Army&#039;s field manuals of the time, I probably shouldn&#039;t take it as gospel since the only place I saw the reference was in the manual. The Dragon was a lot of fun to watch being fired though, it hopped around like a malevolent beagle as it made its way toward the target. Sounded like a string of firecrackers going off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the early 80s I was assigned to the 1/509 (ABCT) based in Vicenza, Italy. Combat Support Company had two TOW platoons, the Redeye platoon as well as my own Recon/Scout platoon.<br />
During one of our seemingly endless number of training deployments, we were in northern Turkey taking part in a joint NATO exercise. Several members of the Recon section as well as a few TOW bunnies and some other folks from the Bn were sent to a brief training session conducted by the 10th Special Forces Group out of Bad Tolz, West Germany. We had some guys from the 2nd Para in the UK as well as some Turkish Paracommandos, a few of the Italian Paracaduti Alpini troops and some guys from Belgium and the West German Falschirmjager Regiment. We had missiles, we had a lot of free time, it was northern Turkey in August so I still blame the heat for anything that might have been considered to be &#8220;poor judgement.&#8221; </p>
<p>Nobody was terribly impressed with anybody elses normal jobs so discussions turned to &#8216;What If&#8217; scenarios. One of the scenarios was, &#8220;What if your TOW jeep is put out of commission and takes your tracker and other electronics with it?&#8221; Schematics were viewed, dust covers were removed from the missile, wires were connected, many people suddenly found a really strong desire to be a long way away and behind the biggest rocks they could find. </p>
<p>It was a hell of a show when it fired. To this day I think an early generation TOW missile would make a pretty outstanding off-route anti-armor mine. A lot more effective than any of the other systems then in the inventory. I&#8217;m not quite sure how you&#8217;d aim the damned thing but if that could be worked out, it would make a pretty spectacular impression on a wayward enemy armored vehicle. </p>
<p>The Redeye guys refused to be outthought by a bunch of grunts so as I understand it, later in the day one of their training rounds was successfully set off. As for the Dragon, one of the methods to destroy it was listed in the operator&#8217;s manual as, &#8220;fire the missile either conventionally or by field expedient means making sure to elevate the muzzle high enough that even without the electronic control of the tracker-sight it will travel far enough to arm and subsequently detonate down range.&#8221; (words pretty much to that effect) Though given the number of outright stupidity in the Army&#8217;s field manuals of the time, I probably shouldn&#8217;t take it as gospel since the only place I saw the reference was in the manual. The Dragon was a lot of fun to watch being fired though, it hopped around like a malevolent beagle as it made its way toward the target. Sounded like a string of firecrackers going off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/#comment-12771</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6440#comment-12771</guid>
		<description>J.A., good point. There has been some talk about a handgun firing &quot;normal&quot; handgun rounds using the metal storm principal. The barrel would probably have to be the upper reciever.

Out of interest, how did you come to know that an expensive missile could be fired with a battery?  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.A., good point. There has been some talk about a handgun firing &#8220;normal&#8221; handgun rounds using the metal storm principal. The barrel would probably have to be the upper reciever.</p>
<p>Out of interest, how did you come to know that an expensive missile could be fired with a battery?  <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.A. James</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/#comment-12763</link>
		<dc:creator>J.A. James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6440#comment-12763</guid>
		<description>Those happy days of failure to breach a door on the first round could be things of the past. I just can&#039;t but get warm, fuzzy feelings at the thought of a pair of these brutes mounted side by side. If two five round bursts of 12ga breaching rounds won&#039;t unlock the door, you really need to be using high explosives. 

Now here&#039;s a thoroughly bothersome question. What parts of a fielded MetalStorm system are the US BATF-E going to classify as the &#039;Firearm&#039;? The barrels? They have the ignition system and part of the fire control. The receiver? Depending on configuration, it can be as simple as battery storage and the Safe/Fire switching systems. 

Having never lost my amazement at the ingenuity found in young, bored, badly supervised soldiers, I can say from personal experience that a TOW Missile round can be fired with nothing more than some wires and a big enough battery. Same for a Dragon and the old Redeye. 

Will there come a time when a stack of five 12ga shells is considered a DD by the US Fed? I haven&#039;t seen any of the current prototypes from MetalStorm but I did get to see one of their 40mm testbed guns at Picatinny a number of years ago. Pretty much anybody who&#039;s able to read the pinout schematic of a computer IDE connector could read the schematic for the connectors in the 40mm grenade launcher. That puts it back in the realm of some wire and a big battery.

As always, YMMV. Seems today is a bit of a Get-Snarky-With-Stupid-Bureaucracies day for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those happy days of failure to breach a door on the first round could be things of the past. I just can&#8217;t but get warm, fuzzy feelings at the thought of a pair of these brutes mounted side by side. If two five round bursts of 12ga breaching rounds won&#8217;t unlock the door, you really need to be using high explosives. </p>
<p>Now here&#8217;s a thoroughly bothersome question. What parts of a fielded MetalStorm system are the US BATF-E going to classify as the &#8216;Firearm&#8217;? The barrels? They have the ignition system and part of the fire control. The receiver? Depending on configuration, it can be as simple as battery storage and the Safe/Fire switching systems. </p>
<p>Having never lost my amazement at the ingenuity found in young, bored, badly supervised soldiers, I can say from personal experience that a TOW Missile round can be fired with nothing more than some wires and a big enough battery. Same for a Dragon and the old Redeye. </p>
<p>Will there come a time when a stack of five 12ga shells is considered a DD by the US Fed? I haven&#8217;t seen any of the current prototypes from MetalStorm but I did get to see one of their 40mm testbed guns at Picatinny a number of years ago. Pretty much anybody who&#8217;s able to read the pinout schematic of a computer IDE connector could read the schematic for the connectors in the 40mm grenade launcher. That puts it back in the realm of some wire and a big battery.</p>
<p>As always, YMMV. Seems today is a bit of a Get-Snarky-With-Stupid-Bureaucracies day for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Groom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/#comment-9876</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 02:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6440#comment-9876</guid>
		<description>I saw this at the NDIA show in Las Vegas this week. 1.8Lbs of 12 gauge goodness. 

DO  WANT!

This is a very good use of this technology. There are not currently any rapid firing, compact, lightweight, less lethal weapons on the market, so even if this concept only worked for less lethal applications, it would still be a good idea.

The only thing they had at the show other than Less Lethal rubber tipped rounds was Steel Slugs. I was assured by the Metal Storm people that this was DEFINITELY being developed for use of Buckshot. I get the distinct impression that these models were in the proof of concept stage, but the concept works, and it&#039;s probably the most innovative thing I saw at the show.

The magazine tube/barrel holds five rounds, and is inserted from the front. Empty tubes are ejected and a new tube inserted in their place. The tube is not reloadable in the field, since it must be reloaded in a clean room, but they are theoretically reusable. It is un-rifled, since it&#039;s intended to work as a shotgun. I asked if the slugs would be gyroscopically stabilized, Ala Gyrojet, and they said no.

I personally believe this technology should be installed on every M4, and with the adoption of modern rifle grenade designs, would make every serviceman more lethal, more versatile, and less encumbered vs. carrying an M203 or say a conventional shotgun and a pistol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this at the NDIA show in Las Vegas this week. 1.8Lbs of 12 gauge goodness. </p>
<p>DO  WANT!</p>
<p>This is a very good use of this technology. There are not currently any rapid firing, compact, lightweight, less lethal weapons on the market, so even if this concept only worked for less lethal applications, it would still be a good idea.</p>
<p>The only thing they had at the show other than Less Lethal rubber tipped rounds was Steel Slugs. I was assured by the Metal Storm people that this was DEFINITELY being developed for use of Buckshot. I get the distinct impression that these models were in the proof of concept stage, but the concept works, and it&#8217;s probably the most innovative thing I saw at the show.</p>
<p>The magazine tube/barrel holds five rounds, and is inserted from the front. Empty tubes are ejected and a new tube inserted in their place. The tube is not reloadable in the field, since it must be reloaded in a clean room, but they are theoretically reusable. It is un-rifled, since it&#8217;s intended to work as a shotgun. I asked if the slugs would be gyroscopically stabilized, Ala Gyrojet, and they said no.</p>
<p>I personally believe this technology should be installed on every M4, and with the adoption of modern rifle grenade designs, would make every serviceman more lethal, more versatile, and less encumbered vs. carrying an M203 or say a conventional shotgun and a pistol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rivrdog</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/#comment-9864</link>
		<dc:creator>Rivrdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 16:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6440#comment-9864</guid>
		<description>What Simon says. There is NO shortage of ideas to project less-than-lethal force, and NO shortage of equipment to do it.

There IS a shortage of new ideas for CQB (lethal) equipment.

MetalStorm started out as an idea to project an overwhelming amount of lethal force. It had important applications for area-denial tactics.

This business of using it in a low-powered version to project LTL loads is NOT what we need in a new weapons system, but it might reflect the direction we are going to go in with our new wuss Commander-in-chief.

What I would like to see MetalStorm develop is a serial-loaded 12-ga system with rounds having a low-powered launch charge, but a high-velocity rocket motor, getting them to the target at least trans-sonic at 25 meters or less. During the &#039;Nam war, a company, GyroJet, pioneered something like that, but aside from making locator flares for downed airmen, they never sold the idea to the DOD. The handheld locator flares had a max velocity of 1100 fps, IIRC, and WERE used to defeat enemy soldiers on a couple of occasions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Simon says. There is NO shortage of ideas to project less-than-lethal force, and NO shortage of equipment to do it.</p>
<p>There IS a shortage of new ideas for CQB (lethal) equipment.</p>
<p>MetalStorm started out as an idea to project an overwhelming amount of lethal force. It had important applications for area-denial tactics.</p>
<p>This business of using it in a low-powered version to project LTL loads is NOT what we need in a new weapons system, but it might reflect the direction we are going to go in with our new wuss Commander-in-chief.</p>
<p>What I would like to see MetalStorm develop is a serial-loaded 12-ga system with rounds having a low-powered launch charge, but a high-velocity rocket motor, getting them to the target at least trans-sonic at 25 meters or less. During the &#8216;Nam war, a company, GyroJet, pioneered something like that, but aside from making locator flares for downed airmen, they never sold the idea to the DOD. The handheld locator flares had a max velocity of 1100 fps, IIRC, and WERE used to defeat enemy soldiers on a couple of occasions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon_the_Brit</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/#comment-9816</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon_the_Brit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6440#comment-9816</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure this is a solution to a problem that does not exist ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure this is a solution to a problem that does not exist <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valhalla</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/#comment-9813</link>
		<dc:creator>Valhalla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6440#comment-9813</guid>
		<description>I just had an idea of the use for SWAT.

M4/other small Assault Rifle
Less Lethal Grenade launcher (tear gas, and what not)
This as a less lethal side arm with 12 gauge rubber slugs or something, low powered to stun.

But I would like a demonstration with full powered 12 gauge buckshot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had an idea of the use for SWAT.</p>
<p>M4/other small Assault Rifle<br />
Less Lethal Grenade launcher (tear gas, and what not)<br />
This as a less lethal side arm with 12 gauge rubber slugs or something, low powered to stun.</p>
<p>But I would like a demonstration with full powered 12 gauge buckshot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/#comment-9810</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 07:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6440#comment-9810</guid>
		<description>Juan, obeyed? Yes. Respected? No ;)

I think the rounds were low powered less-lethal ammo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Juan, obeyed? Yes. Respected? No <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think the rounds were low powered less-lethal ammo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/#comment-9809</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 07:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6440#comment-9809</guid>
		<description>No recoil? 12 gauge? 2 lbs?

Come on... I thought that physics&#039; laws were still respected :D :D :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No recoil? 12 gauge? 2 lbs?</p>
<p>Come on&#8230; I thought that physics&#8217; laws were still respected <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iMick</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/#comment-9807</link>
		<dc:creator>iMick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 04:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6440#comment-9807</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen them reload the 3GL and its exactly the same as an M203, but you insert 3 stand alone grenades, one after the other up the barrel from the breach.  I am assuming the loading principle would be the same for the MAUL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen them reload the 3GL and its exactly the same as an M203, but you insert 3 stand alone grenades, one after the other up the barrel from the breach.  I am assuming the loading principle would be the same for the MAUL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linoge</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/#comment-9803</link>
		<dc:creator>Linoge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6440#comment-9803</guid>
		<description>If there was ever a whiz-bang awesome piece of technology I sincerley hope comes to fruition, this would pretty much be it...  

As for the reloads, the orginal versions of the technology required barrel swap-out, but the ammunition is contained entirely within the barrel - there is no receiver or magazine or anything like that.  They seem to have moved on to a tube-in-the-magazine methodology from the video, but it will definitely warrant further research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there was ever a whiz-bang awesome piece of technology I sincerley hope comes to fruition, this would pretty much be it&#8230;  </p>
<p>As for the reloads, the orginal versions of the technology required barrel swap-out, but the ammunition is contained entirely within the barrel &#8211; there is no receiver or magazine or anything like that.  They seem to have moved on to a tube-in-the-magazine methodology from the video, but it will definitely warrant further research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/#comment-9802</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6440#comment-9802</guid>
		<description>@Fred: I agree! It says it&#039;s a 12-gauge, but it looked like he was shooting .22 shotshells in the pistol grip configuration. Also, I&#039;m pretty sure we could see the projectiles starting to drop in the first shot. I guess they were sandbags. I&#039;d like to see buckshot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fred: I agree! It says it&#8217;s a 12-gauge, but it looked like he was shooting .22 shotshells in the pistol grip configuration. Also, I&#8217;m pretty sure we could see the projectiles starting to drop in the first shot. I guess they were sandbags. I&#8217;d like to see buckshot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/#comment-9799</link>
		<dc:creator>Random Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6440#comment-9799</guid>
		<description>virtually no recoil, no ear protection, what visually appears to be about 200-300 fps and sounds just like a gas paintball or airsoft gun steadily running out of charge as the magazines are run out.

definitely cool, but, hrmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>virtually no recoil, no ear protection, what visually appears to be about 200-300 fps and sounds just like a gas paintball or airsoft gun steadily running out of charge as the magazines are run out.</p>
<p>definitely cool, but, hrmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/#comment-9796</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6440#comment-9796</guid>
		<description>I just watched a future weapons episode with their machine guns and pistols in it. I just kept asking how do you reload? Apparently that was kind of a glaring error or the show creators were retards because they never went over that other than to say replacing the barrels. Changing barrels would be horrible - that&#039;s the part in the gun that absolutely needs the most precision manufacturing to be accurate. Looks like they may have some other methods for relading too though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just watched a future weapons episode with their machine guns and pistols in it. I just kept asking how do you reload? Apparently that was kind of a glaring error or the show creators were retards because they never went over that other than to say replacing the barrels. Changing barrels would be horrible &#8211; that&#8217;s the part in the gun that absolutely needs the most precision manufacturing to be accurate. Looks like they may have some other methods for relading too though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/#comment-9792</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6440#comment-9792</guid>
		<description>Wonder what kind of loads it&#039;s firing, there&#039;s pretty much no recoil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder what kind of loads it&#8217;s firing, there&#8217;s pretty much no recoil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valhalla</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/semi-auto-shotgun-pistol-maul-awesome/#comment-9788</link>
		<dc:creator>Valhalla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6440#comment-9788</guid>
		<description>Amazing... now you can have your point man carry his M4/M16A4 and this, instead of having to work around an extra Mossberg 590 or SPAS-12.

How long you think before deployment in military settings?

SWAT must also want this, 12 Gauge less lethal or something. Get 12 gauge gas grenades, instead of full size one shot under barrel grenade launchers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing&#8230; now you can have your point man carry his M4/M16A4 and this, instead of having to work around an extra Mossberg 590 or SPAS-12.</p>
<p>How long you think before deployment in military settings?</p>
<p>SWAT must also want this, 12 Gauge less lethal or something. Get 12 gauge gas grenades, instead of full size one shot under barrel grenade launchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
