<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese MP5 style 9mm submachine gun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/chinese-mp5-style-9mm-submachine-gun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/chinese-mp5-style-9mm-submachine-gun/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:04:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ann O. Namos</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/chinese-mp5-style-9mm-submachine-gun/#comment-21068</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann O. Namos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6431#comment-21068</guid>
		<description>Cool, looks awesome, follows the usual style (copy someone else&#039;s design and improve it until it&#039;s unbreakable, never jams, powerful, chambered for every cartridge the gunmakers can think of, and stamped by Norinco), and could probably be effective in any CQC. Still, Norinco have yet to top the type 97.
NOTE: If you want to fire a 97 in full auto, go to China, where we usually keep a few handy at the firing ranges (yes, we have firing ranges). You can buy the civilian version (of the QBZ 97, 5.56 NATO) in Canada, but you won&#039;t find it in America. This is probably because America is full of anti-communists, who won&#039;t buy a thing we make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, looks awesome, follows the usual style (copy someone else&#8217;s design and improve it until it&#8217;s unbreakable, never jams, powerful, chambered for every cartridge the gunmakers can think of, and stamped by Norinco), and could probably be effective in any CQC. Still, Norinco have yet to top the type 97.<br />
NOTE: If you want to fire a 97 in full auto, go to China, where we usually keep a few handy at the firing ranges (yes, we have firing ranges). You can buy the civilian version (of the QBZ 97, 5.56 NATO) in Canada, but you won&#8217;t find it in America. This is probably because America is full of anti-communists, who won&#8217;t buy a thing we make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/chinese-mp5-style-9mm-submachine-gun/#comment-14768</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 06:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6431#comment-14768</guid>
		<description>Looks like a bunch of cheap chi-com crap to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a bunch of cheap chi-com crap to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/chinese-mp5-style-9mm-submachine-gun/#comment-12924</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6431#comment-12924</guid>
		<description>They should have copied some designs and internal mechanism from other famous submachine guns... That&#039;s what Chinese always do when they make their firearms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should have copied some designs and internal mechanism from other famous submachine guns&#8230; That&#8217;s what Chinese always do when they make their firearms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XxleoxX</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/chinese-mp5-style-9mm-submachine-gun/#comment-11010</link>
		<dc:creator>XxleoxX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6431#comment-11010</guid>
		<description>i kinda think it looks like a sig AR variant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i kinda think it looks like a sig AR variant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/chinese-mp5-style-9mm-submachine-gun/#comment-9913</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 10:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6431#comment-9913</guid>
		<description>I agree with Matt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Matt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/chinese-mp5-style-9mm-submachine-gun/#comment-9896</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 23:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6431#comment-9896</guid>
		<description>&quot;It looks a lot like what I would expect the child of a Sig 550 rifle and an H&amp;K MP5 submachine gun would look like.&quot;

To me it looks more like a copy of the H&amp;K UMP.

http://www.hkpro.com/ump.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It looks a lot like what I would expect the child of a Sig 550 rifle and an H&amp;K MP5 submachine gun would look like.&#8221;</p>
<p>To me it looks more like a copy of the H&amp;K UMP.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hkpro.com/ump.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.hkpro.com/ump.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Groom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/chinese-mp5-style-9mm-submachine-gun/#comment-9877</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 03:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6431#comment-9877</guid>
		<description>&quot;Communists using MP5s is nothing short of blasphemy.&quot;

On second thought... no comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Communists using MP5s is nothing short of blasphemy.&#8221;</p>
<p>On second thought&#8230; no comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woodfiend</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/05/21/chinese-mp5-style-9mm-submachine-gun/#comment-9812</link>
		<dc:creator>woodfiend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6431#comment-9812</guid>
		<description>At least they&#039;re keeping their hands off of real MP5s. Communists using MP5s is nothing short of blasphemy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least they&#8217;re keeping their hands off of real MP5s. Communists using MP5s is nothing short of blasphemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
