<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advantage Tactical Universal Shotgun and Ruger 10/22 Sights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/18/advantage-tactical-universal-shotgun-and-ruger-1022-sights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/18/advantage-tactical-universal-shotgun-and-ruger-1022-sights/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:18:29 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/18/advantage-tactical-universal-shotgun-and-ruger-1022-sights/#comment-8868</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6024#comment-8868</guid>
		<description>Ocerload in CO beat me to it.  Here is a Steyr picture with similiar sights.


http://www.cybershooters.org/dgca/SteyrM9/sights.JPG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ocerload in CO beat me to it.  Here is a Steyr picture with similiar sights.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cybershooters.org/dgca/SteyrM9/sights.JPG" rel="nofollow">http://www.cybershooters.org/dgca/SteyrM9/sights.JPG</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asjadest</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/18/advantage-tactical-universal-shotgun-and-ruger-1022-sights/#comment-8864</link>
		<dc:creator>Asjadest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6024#comment-8864</guid>
		<description>The only Finnish pistol currently in production: http://www.ouluntyostokeskus.com/guns.htm :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only Finnish pistol currently in production: <a href="http://www.ouluntyostokeskus.com/guns.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ouluntyostokeskus.com/guns.htm</a> <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Groom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/18/advantage-tactical-universal-shotgun-and-ruger-1022-sights/#comment-8861</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6024#comment-8861</guid>
		<description>I always thought this style of sight was intriguing, and I personally shoot much better with sharp pointed sights ala&#039; ACOG Chevron vs. a conventional cross hair, but this was the biggest compliant I&#039;ve heard about the Steyr M9.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought this style of sight was intriguing, and I personally shoot much better with sharp pointed sights ala&#8217; ACOG Chevron vs. a conventional cross hair, but this was the biggest compliant I&#8217;ve heard about the Steyr M9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/18/advantage-tactical-universal-shotgun-and-ruger-1022-sights/#comment-8847</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6024#comment-8847</guid>
		<description>I know what jdun means, but you gotta remember that shorter sight radius also allows for quicker sight picture acquisition. Yeah, it will never be as accurate as a longer radius, but it&#039;s easier to bring the bore in rough alignment with your eye. Good for a tac shotgun or pistol, I would think. Like Steve said, on the 10/22 you&#039;d use it for plate matches. Definitely not a traditional sight, but I could see how it has its uses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what jdun means, but you gotta remember that shorter sight radius also allows for quicker sight picture acquisition. Yeah, it will never be as accurate as a longer radius, but it&#8217;s easier to bring the bore in rough alignment with your eye. Good for a tac shotgun or pistol, I would think. Like Steve said, on the 10/22 you&#8217;d use it for plate matches. Definitely not a traditional sight, but I could see how it has its uses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: War Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/18/advantage-tactical-universal-shotgun-and-ruger-1022-sights/#comment-8846</link>
		<dc:creator>War Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6024#comment-8846</guid>
		<description>The Steyr sight are similar. I have a couple of Steyr M9-A1&#039;s and I shoot very well with their sights. They are a little to large to EDC but they are great range guns. Since I live in a restrictive state that only allows 10 in the mag I can&#039;t justify carrying a gun that has a 15-17 round capacity in the handle and only having a 10 round mag with a huge spacer. I roll EDC with my Glock 27 or my Walther PPS. But the sights on the Steyr are better than either of the two EDC guns I commonly carry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Steyr sight are similar. I have a couple of Steyr M9-A1&#8217;s and I shoot very well with their sights. They are a little to large to EDC but they are great range guns. Since I live in a restrictive state that only allows 10 in the mag I can&#8217;t justify carrying a gun that has a 15-17 round capacity in the handle and only having a 10 round mag with a huge spacer. I roll EDC with my Glock 27 or my Walther PPS. But the sights on the Steyr are better than either of the two EDC guns I commonly carry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overload in CO</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/18/advantage-tactical-universal-shotgun-and-ruger-1022-sights/#comment-8840</link>
		<dc:creator>Overload in CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6024#comment-8840</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t the Steyr pistols have these sights, or something like it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t the Steyr pistols have these sights, or something like it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/18/advantage-tactical-universal-shotgun-and-ruger-1022-sights/#comment-8837</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 00:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6024#comment-8837</guid>
		<description>All this does is add more weight and limit the sight radius. I think it is a step backward. 

XS sight is a much better system IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this does is add more weight and limit the sight radius. I think it is a step backward. </p>
<p>XS sight is a much better system IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billll</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/18/advantage-tactical-universal-shotgun-and-ruger-1022-sights/#comment-8829</link>
		<dc:creator>Billll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=6024#comment-8829</guid>
		<description>It looks to me like the rear sight would work OK with an existing front blade sight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks to me like the rear sight would work OK with an existing front blade sight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
