<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tavor rifle performing well</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/02/tavor-rifle-performing-well/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/02/tavor-rifle-performing-well/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:11:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/02/tavor-rifle-performing-well/#comment-23494</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5830#comment-23494</guid>
		<description>Tavor and many others lack proper trigger guard presumably because it allows the gun to be operated with mittens on.  That&#039;s the explanation an israeli soldier told me.  When i asked him &quot;does it get that cold in israel?&quot;, he said &quot;sometimes, but we don&#039;t have military issue mittens.&quot;

Another explanation I heard from a marine sniper (who is also an excellent gunsmith) is that because bullpup designs don&#039;t have a magazine in front of the handgrip, the shooters gripping fingers lack protection when you&#039;re shooting from a covered position with just barrel sticking out.  And once you put a full hand guard, it&#039;s hard to sub-divide it and put in an extra trigger-finger guard.  Difficulties in shooting a bullpup rifle from a covered position along with slower change of magazines, difficulties in implementing ambidextrous control cheaply, and need for a full review of tactics and re-training of 1m+ personnel are the reasons why US military won&#039;t adopt bullpup design for a very long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tavor and many others lack proper trigger guard presumably because it allows the gun to be operated with mittens on.  That&#8217;s the explanation an israeli soldier told me.  When i asked him &#8220;does it get that cold in israel?&#8221;, he said &#8220;sometimes, but we don&#8217;t have military issue mittens.&#8221;</p>
<p>Another explanation I heard from a marine sniper (who is also an excellent gunsmith) is that because bullpup designs don&#8217;t have a magazine in front of the handgrip, the shooters gripping fingers lack protection when you&#8217;re shooting from a covered position with just barrel sticking out.  And once you put a full hand guard, it&#8217;s hard to sub-divide it and put in an extra trigger-finger guard.  Difficulties in shooting a bullpup rifle from a covered position along with slower change of magazines, difficulties in implementing ambidextrous control cheaply, and need for a full review of tactics and re-training of 1m+ personnel are the reasons why US military won&#8217;t adopt bullpup design for a very long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/02/tavor-rifle-performing-well/#comment-11174</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5830#comment-11174</guid>
		<description>Looks like an extremely well designed and efficient bull pup design, except for the knuckle/brush gaurd.  I cannot for the life of me understand that design concept, especially when the weapon was designed for military applications.  jd1911, I have to agree with you.  That weaopn has accidental discharge written all over it.  I would be paranoid taking it hunting in the woods by myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like an extremely well designed and efficient bull pup design, except for the knuckle/brush gaurd.  I cannot for the life of me understand that design concept, especially when the weapon was designed for military applications.  jd1911, I have to agree with you.  That weaopn has accidental discharge written all over it.  I would be paranoid taking it hunting in the woods by myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CS</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/02/tavor-rifle-performing-well/#comment-8413</link>
		<dc:creator>CS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 04:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5830#comment-8413</guid>
		<description>I own a semi-auto Tavor here in Canada and like it... got a good deal on it, was barely used by some mall ninja. Maybe 40 rounds were put through it before I bought it. I got it last fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a semi-auto Tavor here in Canada and like it&#8230; got a good deal on it, was barely used by some mall ninja. Maybe 40 rounds were put through it before I bought it. I got it last fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overload in CO</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/02/tavor-rifle-performing-well/#comment-8342</link>
		<dc:creator>Overload in CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 06:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5830#comment-8342</guid>
		<description>I remember some talk about a company out of Florida importing a semi auto Tavor, but nothing has come of it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember some talk about a company out of Florida importing a semi auto Tavor, but nothing has come of it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/02/tavor-rifle-performing-well/#comment-8339</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5830#comment-8339</guid>
		<description>Anyone know what kind of Chest rig/ plate carrier is standard issue in the IDF?

Or the Marine corps for that matter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know what kind of Chest rig/ plate carrier is standard issue in the IDF?</p>
<p>Or the Marine corps for that matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/02/tavor-rifle-performing-well/#comment-8329</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 01:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5830#comment-8329</guid>
		<description>75+% of the rifle is made out of plastic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>75+% of the rifle is made out of plastic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Nack</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/02/tavor-rifle-performing-well/#comment-8321</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Nack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5830#comment-8321</guid>
		<description>maybe they think the big funky plastic thing is sufficient?

i&#039;m not a &quot;fan&quot; of bullpups per se, but i&#039;m also not ready to hate on the concept. i think there&#039;s a good bullpup idea out there, we just haven&#039;t gotten to it yet; i would almost vote for the FN2000, but i don&#039;t like the mag release (picky, i know). maybe the tavor is the one. though, with a trigger guard, obviously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe they think the big funky plastic thing is sufficient?</p>
<p>i&#8217;m not a &#8220;fan&#8221; of bullpups per se, but i&#8217;m also not ready to hate on the concept. i think there&#8217;s a good bullpup idea out there, we just haven&#8217;t gotten to it yet; i would almost vote for the FN2000, but i don&#8217;t like the mag release (picky, i know). maybe the tavor is the one. though, with a trigger guard, obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/02/tavor-rifle-performing-well/#comment-8314</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5830#comment-8314</guid>
		<description>FAMAS doesn&#039;t have a trigger guard. 

The report is full of BS. They are saying that conscripted soldiers have nothing to bitch about. I find that hard to believe. 

Do another survey in a year and I bet you it will be the opposite of this report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FAMAS doesn&#8217;t have a trigger guard. </p>
<p>The report is full of BS. They are saying that conscripted soldiers have nothing to bitch about. I find that hard to believe. </p>
<p>Do another survey in a year and I bet you it will be the opposite of this report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/02/tavor-rifle-performing-well/#comment-8311</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5830#comment-8311</guid>
		<description>More bullpups without trigger guards:
http://world.guns.ru/assault/as81-e.htm
http://world.guns.ru/assault/as72-e.htm
http://world.guns.ru/assault/as26-e.htm

So that makes eight at least.

A quick unscientific estimate based on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Bullpup_firearms
that comes to something like 20-25% of the lot.

How many non-bullpup rifles lack trigger guards?

Ergo many bullpup rifles lack trigger guards.

It is possible that there hasn´t been many accidents due to this. But it is still a stupid way to build a gun, IMHO. What is the benefit of deleting the trigger guard? Any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More bullpups without trigger guards:<br />
<a href="http://world.guns.ru/assault/as81-e.htm" rel="nofollow">http://world.guns.ru/assault/as81-e.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://world.guns.ru/assault/as72-e.htm" rel="nofollow">http://world.guns.ru/assault/as72-e.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://world.guns.ru/assault/as26-e.htm" rel="nofollow">http://world.guns.ru/assault/as26-e.htm</a></p>
<p>So that makes eight at least.</p>
<p>A quick unscientific estimate based on<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Bullpup_firearms" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Bullpup_firearms</a><br />
that comes to something like 20-25% of the lot.</p>
<p>How many non-bullpup rifles lack trigger guards?</p>
<p>Ergo many bullpup rifles lack trigger guards.</p>
<p>It is possible that there hasn´t been many accidents due to this. But it is still a stupid way to build a gun, IMHO. What is the benefit of deleting the trigger guard? Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/02/tavor-rifle-performing-well/#comment-8306</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5830#comment-8306</guid>
		<description>sure, they don&#039;t all, but it is still weird that some do not have a trigger guard. Others that do not have a trigger guard are the XM25, ACR and SAR 21. The early prototype for the VHS did not but they added it later, a very good move in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure, they don&#8217;t all, but it is still weird that some do not have a trigger guard. Others that do not have a trigger guard are the XM25, ACR and SAR 21. The early prototype for the VHS did not but they added it later, a very good move in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/02/tavor-rifle-performing-well/#comment-8305</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5830#comment-8305</guid>
		<description>f2000, p90, rfb, vhs, sa80, m17s, g11 and a dozen other bullpup designs all have &quot;proper&quot; trigger guards. so your statement is false, there are really  only two bullpup designs that don&#039;t: steyr aug and the tavor

i agree though it is an accident that has probably happened a couple times  and no one has gotten hurt, yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>f2000, p90, rfb, vhs, sa80, m17s, g11 and a dozen other bullpup designs all have &#8220;proper&#8221; trigger guards. so your statement is false, there are really  only two bullpup designs that don&#8217;t: steyr aug and the tavor</p>
<p>i agree though it is an accident that has probably happened a couple times  and no one has gotten hurt, yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linoge</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/02/tavor-rifle-performing-well/#comment-8301</link>
		<dc:creator>Linoge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5830#comment-8301</guid>
		<description>*sigh*  No fair teasing us with firearms we are likely to never have over here ;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh*  No fair teasing us with firearms we are likely to never have over here <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/02/tavor-rifle-performing-well/#comment-8300</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5830#comment-8300</guid>
		<description>Carl, I agree. I have often wondered why they resist adding a trigger guard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl, I agree. I have often wondered why they resist adding a trigger guard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/04/02/tavor-rifle-performing-well/#comment-8299</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5830#comment-8299</guid>
		<description>Why do so many bullpup rifles lack proper trigger guards? It looks like an accident waiting to happen to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do so many bullpup rifles lack proper trigger guards? It looks like an accident waiting to happen to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
