<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tacti-cool StG44 rifles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bolter</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/#comment-8062</link>
		<dc:creator>Bolter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5753#comment-8062</guid>
		<description>Interordnance was going to import these a year ago (I had a deposit on one).  Vaporware so far.  The ads disappeared months ago, and have not heard about the importation since.  They are sold in Canada and have been for some time.  The same manufacturer also makes a very nice repro MP-38 that has been imported by IO (unfortunately folding stock welded shut naturally due to short barrel).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interordnance was going to import these a year ago (I had a deposit on one).  Vaporware so far.  The ads disappeared months ago, and have not heard about the importation since.  They are sold in Canada and have been for some time.  The same manufacturer also makes a very nice repro MP-38 that has been imported by IO (unfortunately folding stock welded shut naturally due to short barrel).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/#comment-8044</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5753#comment-8044</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s built on a duplicate of the original Stg44 receiver, which the ATF says is a machine gun receiver. An MG is anything that fires more than one shot per activation of the trigger, or anything that can be readily made to do so. It fits the bill of the latter. In Germany the barrel and bolt are the controlled parts, so there was no reason for them to change the receiver design for a semi-auto rifle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s built on a duplicate of the original Stg44 receiver, which the ATF says is a machine gun receiver. An MG is anything that fires more than one shot per activation of the trigger, or anything that can be readily made to do so. It fits the bill of the latter. In Germany the barrel and bolt are the controlled parts, so there was no reason for them to change the receiver design for a semi-auto rifle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viper5552</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/#comment-8031</link>
		<dc:creator>Viper5552</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5753#comment-8031</guid>
		<description>BD44... an MG  Why? it is not selective fire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BD44&#8230; an MG  Why? it is not selective fire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/#comment-7959</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5753#comment-7959</guid>
		<description>&quot;Any ideas if the BD44 is allowed in the states?&quot;

It&#039;s not. ATF considers it an MG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Any ideas if the BD44 is allowed in the states?&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not. ATF considers it an MG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nooky</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/#comment-7957</link>
		<dc:creator>Nooky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5753#comment-7957</guid>
		<description>I kinda like the tacticool version, I don&#039;t mind since it&#039;s a replica and not an actual historic rifle. It looks like a FN SCAR.


But it doesn&#039;t come near that masterpiece.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jcq7yGhhoE0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda like the tacticool version, I don&#8217;t mind since it&#8217;s a replica and not an actual historic rifle. It looks like a FN SCAR.</p>
<p>But it doesn&#8217;t come near that masterpiece.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jcq7yGhhoE0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jcq7yGhhoE0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarkko Koskinen</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/#comment-7949</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarkko Koskinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5753#comment-7949</guid>
		<description>I agree with Bullzebub that both of the two first ones are normal underfolder stocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Bullzebub that both of the two first ones are normal underfolder stocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mehul Kamdar</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/#comment-7944</link>
		<dc:creator>Mehul Kamdar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5753#comment-7944</guid>
		<description>Steve,

The updates are fantastic and I do like the look of the Tacti-COol version though some might think any variation heretical. Thanks for getting the latest pictures for this post - this is why I always enjoy reading your blog and visiting it to learn about what is happening in the world of firearms.

Best wishes and good shooting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>The updates are fantastic and I do like the look of the Tacti-COol version though some might think any variation heretical. Thanks for getting the latest pictures for this post &#8211; this is why I always enjoy reading your blog and visiting it to learn about what is happening in the world of firearms.</p>
<p>Best wishes and good shooting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 22lr</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/#comment-7935</link>
		<dc:creator>22lr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5753#comment-7935</guid>
		<description>Thats way cool, we need a modern version of the BAR in all its tactical glory, not that sissy rifle Browning makes, LOL. Any ideas if the BD44 is allowed in the states?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats way cool, we need a modern version of the BAR in all its tactical glory, not that sissy rifle Browning makes, LOL. Any ideas if the BD44 is allowed in the states?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven Ortmann</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/#comment-7932</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven Ortmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5753#comment-7932</guid>
		<description>The blue colour ruins the whole photo.

I converted it to 8bit grey scale - it looked like a modern assault rifle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blue colour ruins the whole photo.</p>
<p>I converted it to 8bit grey scale &#8211; it looked like a modern assault rifle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/#comment-7926</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5753#comment-7926</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think they&#039;re legal for import into the U.S. as semi-autos, unfortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re legal for import into the U.S. as semi-autos, unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Groom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/#comment-7924</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5753#comment-7924</guid>
		<description>Awesome! I want Haenel version (BD42(H) not shown, but on website) so bad....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! I want Haenel version (BD42(H) not shown, but on website) so bad&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bullzebub</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/#comment-7919</link>
		<dc:creator>bullzebub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5753#comment-7919</guid>
		<description>both the 2 first are ak47s type underfolder stocks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>both the 2 first are ak47s type underfolder stocks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/#comment-7918</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5753#comment-7918</guid>
		<description>Himmel, I don&#039;t think they are. Remi is quite well known.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Himmel, I don&#8217;t think they are. Remi is quite well known.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Himmel</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/#comment-7917</link>
		<dc:creator>Himmel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5753#comment-7917</guid>
		<description>Cool, but the pics look photoshopped?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, but the pics look photoshopped?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/25/tacti-cool-stg44-rifles/#comment-7916</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5753#comment-7916</guid>
		<description>I gotta admit, I&#039;d find room in the safe for that over-folder. Doesn&#039;t the AK-47 and the 7.62 Soviet look an awful lot like the STG-44 and the 7.92 Kurz? As a result, it seems like these alternative histories look a lot like the  real history of the AK-47/AKM series. I&#039;d like to see a carbine, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta admit, I&#8217;d find room in the safe for that over-folder. Doesn&#8217;t the AK-47 and the 7.62 Soviet look an awful lot like the STG-44 and the 7.92 Kurz? As a result, it seems like these alternative histories look a lot like the  real history of the AK-47/AKM series. I&#8217;d like to see a carbine, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
