Comments on: Archangel “Assault” Pistol

By: Crypticglitch

Crypticglitch — Sun, 24 May 2009 13:39:07 +0000

after looking at there site a bit closer I
Find there “Archangel Trademark LOGO” too be a
tasteless ripe off and kind of insulting
St Michael with a monkey face holding a toy gun
and the SAS insigina missing the ribbon “Who dares wins” not very original
maybe next time they could Photoshop it
instead of using a light box tracer and a #2 pencil
here try this
A blonde Laura Croft “Victora secert angel babe” holding a toy gun
and a Snake missing the words “Don’t tread on me” more original
and stop asking the cute girl at the 7/11 to pose in a US flag suit
she’s getting pissed and is going to call the cops on you
Nice try guys but its time to clean the garage out
Moms tired of parking in the drive way

By: Crypticglitch

Crypticglitch — Sun, 24 May 2009 12:30:25 +0000

Cool looking Yes.
Useless Yes.
Can I see it with the skinny mag in it .or do they make a Prop for that ?
Do they make a Wii version?
The Wii version with a Vetical grip would not be NFA
These guys could make more money with a Wii version
With the price of ammo so high and availability so low I shoot the Wii alot
House of the dead “Over Kill ” is great. stand back as far as you can
and shoot Zombies not easy ,if they get to close you can’t shoot

If you want your “Bang for the Buck ” try Tapco Intrafuse 10/22 Rifle
Tapco isent a cool name
Tapco isent a toy maker
Tapco has been around for years and will be for alot more
Save your money
Get ready to see the price of ammo skyrocket !!!!

By: Bolter

Bolter — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:05:25 +0000

Cool looking, and useless. Go ahead, hang a laser, a light, and a 10X scope on it while you are at it.

By: Aarom

Aarom — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:01:10 +0000

The front sight is on backwards…

By: jdun1911

jdun1911 — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:55:14 +0000

Adding a Vertical/Forearm Grip will make it NFA on a pistol.

It looks front heavy but I guess the plastic won’t add that much weight to the pistol.

By: War Wolf

War Wolf — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:54:27 +0000

Slick. Me wants. Now I just have to get the Ruger Charger and I’ll be all set.

By: Higgs

Higgs — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:17:49 +0000

@ Dom,

Wouldnt adding a Grip to it make it an NFA item?

By: Fred

Fred — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:56:14 +0000

There’s a rifle version too, the add’s been in Shotgun News for the last few issues.

By: redmanlaw

redmanlaw — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:58:56 +0000

“Is this your sidearm, Mr. Imperial Stormtrooper?”

By: Cymond

Cymond — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:35:45 +0000

Sorry for the double-post, but I just remembered:

You can knock $100 off that price if you don’t want the folding sights!

By: Cymond

Cymond — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:34:49 +0000

Yeah, this has been on my radar for a bit.

Not only should it appeal to the tacticool crowd, but it has the added bonus of being a light weight Charger stock that can take open sights. Offhand shooting with the Charger just became more viable.

Note: I recently handled the rifle version in a local store (sans sights) and it seemed well made/sturdy.

By: Dom

Dom — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 05:13:52 +0000

Ohhh it’s a CONVERSION kit…wow! That is salty! And it was $169 w/o front rails.

By: Dom

Dom — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 05:12:44 +0000

Not cheap, but isn’t that less than a stock Charger? I never really cared for the whole bipod/laminate stock thing anyway. For $199 you can get it without the front rails, but it would probably be nice to have them for a grip…or a bipod if you like that…or a laser. Plus you can get longer sight radius.

Agreed, with a high-cap mag, this would definitely be loaded with “scary features.” Which, personally, I like.