<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ed interviews ATI about their .410 AR.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/10/ed-interviews-ati-about-their-410-ar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/10/ed-interviews-ati-about-their-410-ar/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:06:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/10/ed-interviews-ati-about-their-410-ar/#comment-8736</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5537#comment-8736</guid>
		<description>I saw this advertised in the recent edition of Predator Xtreme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this advertised in the recent edition of Predator Xtreme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Kaczmarek</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/10/ed-interviews-ati-about-their-410-ar/#comment-7305</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Kaczmarek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5537#comment-7305</guid>
		<description>As far as 922R - it would be real easy to make that 410 AR compliant. You could change the stock, the pistol grip, the hand guard, the trigger, hammer (most likely), the disconnector, then using American made magazines would count as an additional three parts. The follower, spring, and the floor plate all count as a replcement part each.

Changing all those parts out with American made parts - that would give you nine American made replacement parts. That would most assuredly give you enough parts to be compliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as 922R &#8211; it would be real easy to make that 410 AR compliant. You could change the stock, the pistol grip, the hand guard, the trigger, hammer (most likely), the disconnector, then using American made magazines would count as an additional three parts. The follower, spring, and the floor plate all count as a replcement part each.</p>
<p>Changing all those parts out with American made parts &#8211; that would give you nine American made replacement parts. That would most assuredly give you enough parts to be compliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/10/ed-interviews-ati-about-their-410-ar/#comment-7284</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5537#comment-7284</guid>
		<description>The form 4 specifies the caliber or gauge.  So you would probably have to match the upper with a lower that is registered as a 410 gauge.  That would be an awesome little weapon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The form 4 specifies the caliber or gauge.  So you would probably have to match the upper with a lower that is registered as a 410 gauge.  That would be an awesome little weapon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Groom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/10/ed-interviews-ati-about-their-410-ar/#comment-7277</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5537#comment-7277</guid>
		<description>The ATF rules by fiat, not by law. The law has little if anything to do with their decisions. Their general method of enforcement is &quot;If we charge him, does he have the financial resources to fight the charge?&quot; If the answer is &quot;Yes&quot;, they back down, always. Even if you are clearly in violation of some obscure law, statute, or precedent which are usually based on some ATF field agent&#039;s gut feelings on the matter at the time, and how the previous case faired on trail. Keep in mind that practically everything the ATF does, right down to their very existance, is unconstitional and illegal because they exist to tax and infringe upon a civil right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ATF rules by fiat, not by law. The law has little if anything to do with their decisions. Their general method of enforcement is &#8220;If we charge him, does he have the financial resources to fight the charge?&#8221; If the answer is &#8220;Yes&#8221;, they back down, always. Even if you are clearly in violation of some obscure law, statute, or precedent which are usually based on some ATF field agent&#8217;s gut feelings on the matter at the time, and how the previous case faired on trail. Keep in mind that practically everything the ATF does, right down to their very existance, is unconstitional and illegal because they exist to tax and infringe upon a civil right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/03/10/ed-interviews-ati-about-their-410-ar/#comment-7267</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5537#comment-7267</guid>
		<description>I wonder if you can put that upper on a registered receiver?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if you can put that upper on a registered receiver?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
