AK-107 / AK-108 animation

It has been a while since I have posted an animation. This one, author unknown, shows how the balanced gas operating system works in the AK-107 and AK-108 rifles.

Ak 107 108-3
( If the animation is not playing, try this link: click here)

Wikipedia explains how the system works:

The AK-107 and AK-108 represent a significant change to the Kalashnikov operating system originally designed in the late 1940s. The new rifle features a balanced system that functions along the lines of Newton’s third law of motion, which states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. This system uses a recoil-dampening countermass mechanism with two operating rods that move in opposite directions, thereby providing “balance”. One operating rod, the upper, has a gas piston facing forward while the bolt carrier also has a gas piston. The gas tube at the forward end of the handguard is double-ended to accommodate the two rods. The enlarged gas tube cover of the upper handguard guides both rods in their travel.

When the rifle is fired, gas is tapped from the gas port to enter the gas tube, driving the bolt carrier to the rear and the counter-recoil upper rail forward. The critical timing of the reciprocating parts is accomplished by a star-shaped sprocket that links and synchronizes both components, causing both to reach their maximum extension, or null point where forces are exactly equal, at exactly the same instant. The felt recoil is therefore eliminated, enhancing accuracy and assisting control during fully automatic fire. The travel distance of the AK-107 reciprocating parts is less than other Kalashnikov designs, so the cyclic rate is higher at 850–900 rounds/min rather than 600 rounds/min on other AK rifles. However, as the felt recoil is virtually eliminated, the manufacturer claims that accuracy is enhanced, especially during burst fire. An enhancement of 1.5 to 2 times has been reported.

The system was previously used on the prototype AL-7 and AEK-971 rifles in the 1970s.

Hat Tip: fuliginosus @ guns.reddit.com

Related Posts

Steve Feb 25th 2009 military, rifles Tags: , , , , , 21 Comments

21 Responses to “AK-107 / AK-108 animation”

  1. Jesseon 26 Feb 2009 at 1:49 am link comment

    That’s amazing. I wonder if this will improve accuracy because a large part of the reason that the AK is less accurate has to do with the recoiling mass of the piston.

  2. EmptorMavenon 26 Feb 2009 at 2:26 am link comment

    That is a very cool design! Are there any balanced piston actions available in the U.S.?

  3. Vitoron 26 Feb 2009 at 2:47 am link comment

    Really cool mechanism, and actually looks quite simple.

  4. Brandonon 26 Feb 2009 at 3:22 am link comment

    Hmm, scratching my head on this one. I’m usually pretty keen on physics so in my estimation “recoil free” is not true here. With newtons laws accounted for the reciprocating bolt is balanced by the reciprocating rod, but that still leaves one opposite reaction for the bullet. Since this is a gas operated gun not a recoil operated gun where has the recoil gone for the bullet?

    No I haven’t shot one, maybe they are recoil free. This is just a physics inquiry for those who may know a lot more about what goes on under the hoo…err… furniture in this rifle than is apparent by the animation up there.

  5. Jayon 26 Feb 2009 at 4:34 am link comment

    Excellent animation. Descriptions of how a mechanism works are always good, however sometimes the addition of an animation helps smooth things out a bit… I’ve never seen one for the 107/108 before. Thanks!

  6. Jacobon 26 Feb 2009 at 6:15 am link comment

    It`d be cool to see a AR-15 model with the balanced system. A modded HK416 perhaps?

  7. Bramon 26 Feb 2009 at 9:13 am link comment

    I thought that the purpose was to eliminate climb – not recoil. Of course they are related – your shoulder gets shoved back hard, the muzzle is going to head skyward.

    But get that reduced recoil going straight back with the counter weight at the end of the barrel and you have a chance of keeping the sights on target.

  8. hgaon 26 Feb 2009 at 1:03 pm link comment

    This can’t be “recoil free”. The bullet and gas behind it cannot be counteracted by any contraption of moving parts in what’s left behind.

    Which doesn’t mean that this design can’t be ergonomically more friendly than the original (beyond improving on the problem of the moving piston), just that it can’t negate Newton’s Third Law.

  9. Steveon 26 Feb 2009 at 1:16 pm link comment

    you are right, it cannon eliminate recoil, it it built to reduce the effect movement of the bolt on accuracy.

  10. jgon281on 26 Feb 2009 at 4:20 pm link comment

    I have an Ak-107 F from Arsenal . I have never fired an Ak previous to firing mine so I can’t say if it has less recoil or not. I can say that it is not what I expected . My first thought was that I’d better prepare for a good kick but it didn’t happen . It was very similar to firing my AR with a tad more ummff. A very pleased owner here.

  11. jgon281on 26 Feb 2009 at 4:28 pm link comment

    disregard my comment . I have a different rifle than the russian Ak .

  12. Bradon 26 Feb 2009 at 4:58 pm link comment

    I don’t know anything more about the AK-107 than what is contained in the story, but I see how the counter-mass could function to reduce recoil from firing the cartridge.

    Just because the counter-mass/gas-piston is synchronized with the bolt-carrier/gas-piston doesn’t mean the counter-mass is equal to the bolt-carrier. Perhaps the gas-port for the counter-mass is much larger (and operating spring much stiffer) than that for the bolt-carrier. There might be much more momentum in the counter-mass than in the bolt-carrier.

    But even if the AK-107 functions as advertised the tactical concept of hand-held full-auto fire for every infantryman seems like an idea whose time has come and gone. A mixed squad combining accurate semi-automatic fire provided by well trained infantry using accurate rifles with optical sights plus volume fire from a dedicated squad-automatic weapon seems like the wave of the future now.

  13. comatuson 26 Feb 2009 at 5:40 pm link comment

    I suppose everyone here would know it already, but there are similar mechanisms in high grade air rifles. It’s why an Anschutz target air rifle costs more than an Anschutz target smallbore: more parts.

  14. MattCFIIon 27 Feb 2009 at 10:49 am link comment

    If you want to see a similar Russian development look into the An-94 as well. The AK-107/108 should be more reliable than the AN-94 because it uses cables and pulleys IIRC. One other piece of cool AK-107/108 trivia is that it has 3 round burst, full, and semi. I still don’t think that the newer system is as reliable as a standard AK but interesting.

    Yes their is still going to be a recoil force back but Netwon’s 3rd still applies the forward force of the counter weight which is timed to counter the recoil at the same time reducing the resultant rearward force of the recoil impluse.

  15. jdun1911on 27 Feb 2009 at 1:19 pm link comment

    A good muzzle break and free floating barrel is far better then this complicated system.

  16. Vitoron 28 Feb 2009 at 4:44 am link comment

    Complicated? I didnt find it so.

  17. jdun1911on 28 Feb 2009 at 6:49 pm link comment

    Mechanically it is complicated for a rifle. AR15 is simpler then the standard Kalashnikov because the piston on the AR15 is part of the bolt. So you have one less moving part to deal with and hence greater accuracy and lighter weight.

    The AK107/108 has an extra piston, spring, and a wheel from the looks of the animation. That’s three extra moving parts that can fail. It add unneeded weight and complexity for what? Lower muzzle climb and better accuracy? You can do it with a free floating handguard and a good muzzle break.

    The AK 107/108 like the AN-94 isn’t going anywhere.

    AR15 accuracy:
    http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=118&t=414599&sr=0

    How the Piston in your DI AR works
    http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=2&f=130&t=165511

  18. Ride Faston 02 Mar 2009 at 6:56 am link comment

    [...] AK-107 / AK-108 dual gas system [...]

  19. mikeon 19 Apr 2009 at 5:06 am link comment

    i think its a better system than , every time you fire the bullet craps into the receiver , this system is very effective look it up its on youtube. if they made a 308 or 762.54r with this system in a saw config. they would dominate. the NEW 416 that everybody is suckin on is really nice but isn’t it just a gas piston like the ak? hmmm maybe those darn russians were onto somethin! they have less red tape and are very interested in infantry small arms and the mythical FREE floated barrel and muzzle brake don’t really compare to this system you can throw all types of crap on your fake m4 but it will never be as good or advanced as this, the m4 is not even close to being as reliable as this system you cannot take a handful of ammo from 7 different countries load it into a clip and fire . it will NOT work i bet u my check on it . you can fire the 762.39 on full auto and the weapon barely moves ?? its a very good system

  20. mikeon 19 Apr 2009 at 5:35 am link comment

    well i checked and couldn find it easily on youtube i was thinking of the aek which similar and had them all mixed up

  21. Stevenon 27 Jun 2009 at 5:30 am link comment

    To everyone who thinks this is a complicated/unreliable system. First I am going to explain that this system only works on 1 spring, not 2. The recoil spring is in the exact same place as on a normal AK rifle. The Pinion wheel returns the forward gas piston, not a spring. The forward gas piston is essentially a free-floating part. If you study these images…

    http://world.guns.ru/assault/as07-e.htm

    …you will find that there are only 2 or 3 more parts than a standard AK, and field stripping is just as easily done.

    Aslo, nowhere in this article were the words “Recoiless” or “Recoil Free”. The counter-mass’ only purpose is to dampen the blow-back of the bolt-carrier, and to keep the muzzle down as a result of the force vector from the recoil spring and shoulder collisions. To sum it all up, the only collision that is canceled in the entire mechanical operation is the recoil-spring and shoulder. The explosive force of the cartridge is the only felt recoil of the weapon, which is actually less force that the recoil spring using the receiver and your shoulder as a backstop in order to return forward.

    Also the force vector from the explosion is exactly perpendicular to your shoulder as you fire the weapon. The force vector of the recoil-spring is actually offset above your shoulder which is ultimately what causes the muzzle to climb. So it should be clear to anyone that just the reduction/cancellation of the recoil-spring’s force alone, is enough to improve a weapons accuracy incredibly.

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy: I reserve the right to remove comments at my discretion. Think of comment threads like a dinner party at someone's house. If you make the party unpleasant for others or me, you won't be invited back. I am happy to tolerate a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but I'm not going to tolerate nastiness, rudeness, trolling, vitriol, or excessive snarkiness toward the author(s) or other commenters. You may make your case passionately, but civility is expected. Please stay on topic and respect the technical nature of this blog.
Spam Filtering: To avoid spam, comments are filtered using Akismet and then manually approved. Do not be alarmed if you comment does not appear instantly. I do not check the spam folder more than once per day.