<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 12 Gauge AR-15 Upper machine gun!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:38:33 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Johann Van De Leeuw</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-13093</link>
		<dc:creator>Johann Van De Leeuw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-13093</guid>
		<description>Man, I&#039;d like one of those. (LOL)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, I&#8217;d like one of those. (LOL)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.A. James</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-12779</link>
		<dc:creator>J.A. James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 04:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-12779</guid>
		<description>Hey Steve, 

I&#039;m still hating life when it comes to files and documentation. Still unpacking after a major move and I had my friends help. They helped by packing everything in whatever space it would fit. Things like file folders and all of my external hard drives... sigh...

As I remember it, the belt feed conversion of the Brens was an attempt to convert from .303 British to 7X54 Russian Long. I honestly can&#039;t remember the name of the designer though later on he was one of the guys who got the Cz75 from design into manufacture.

The Bren was always touchy even feeding from the magazine because of the rimmed cartridge. Gunners had to be very careful when loading the magazines to make sure each cartridge was loaded with it&#039;s rim either directly on top or nested in front of the rim on the cartridge below. No stripper clips for those guys.

Things just got too complex with the system when converted to belt feed and then remachined to take the longer, wider Soviet cartridge.

I&#039;m not sure the Czech info would be generic enough to help with the 12ga system in the article but the problems with wide rimmed cases in belt feed systems are literally as old as the machinegun itself. 

The only reason I brought it up was because I had a chance to talk with some of the Czechs on the &#039;Soviet Military Liaison Mission&#039; teams assigned to the US 7th Army area in West Germany. For the most part the SMLM guys were pretty civil even to their avowed enemies in the US forces. I suspect I remember the Czechs better because they struck me as pretty decent guys in general and their level of technical expertise was easily on par with their US and NATO counterparts. The few other guys I met from the Soviet mission struck me as pretty generic military staff wonk types who&#039;d lucked into a pretty cushy position working the western side of the Wall. 

Since then I&#039;ve met and corresponded with other folks from the Czech Republic and their military historians are; at least in my view; among the best in the world. Meticulous documentation and extensive reference and cross reference. If my memory hasn&#039;t gone completely south, most of the technical documents from the post-WWII era were stored in Brno and since given to the museum run by CZ on behalf of the Czech Republic government. 

 Once I can find my old notes and docs, I&#039;ll post the most current contact info I&#039;ve got for them here. Just from a technical history perspective, some of the stuff the Czechs did is still mind blowingly fascinating. An awful lot of the &#039;modern&#039; firearms designs are descended either from first generation Czech systems or earlier systems the Czechs worked with for the Warsaw Pact and then their own national arms industries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Steve, </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still hating life when it comes to files and documentation. Still unpacking after a major move and I had my friends help. They helped by packing everything in whatever space it would fit. Things like file folders and all of my external hard drives&#8230; sigh&#8230;</p>
<p>As I remember it, the belt feed conversion of the Brens was an attempt to convert from .303 British to 7X54 Russian Long. I honestly can&#8217;t remember the name of the designer though later on he was one of the guys who got the Cz75 from design into manufacture.</p>
<p>The Bren was always touchy even feeding from the magazine because of the rimmed cartridge. Gunners had to be very careful when loading the magazines to make sure each cartridge was loaded with it&#8217;s rim either directly on top or nested in front of the rim on the cartridge below. No stripper clips for those guys.</p>
<p>Things just got too complex with the system when converted to belt feed and then remachined to take the longer, wider Soviet cartridge.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure the Czech info would be generic enough to help with the 12ga system in the article but the problems with wide rimmed cases in belt feed systems are literally as old as the machinegun itself. </p>
<p>The only reason I brought it up was because I had a chance to talk with some of the Czechs on the &#8216;Soviet Military Liaison Mission&#8217; teams assigned to the US 7th Army area in West Germany. For the most part the SMLM guys were pretty civil even to their avowed enemies in the US forces. I suspect I remember the Czechs better because they struck me as pretty decent guys in general and their level of technical expertise was easily on par with their US and NATO counterparts. The few other guys I met from the Soviet mission struck me as pretty generic military staff wonk types who&#8217;d lucked into a pretty cushy position working the western side of the Wall. </p>
<p>Since then I&#8217;ve met and corresponded with other folks from the Czech Republic and their military historians are; at least in my view; among the best in the world. Meticulous documentation and extensive reference and cross reference. If my memory hasn&#8217;t gone completely south, most of the technical documents from the post-WWII era were stored in Brno and since given to the museum run by CZ on behalf of the Czech Republic government. </p>
<p> Once I can find my old notes and docs, I&#8217;ll post the most current contact info I&#8217;ve got for them here. Just from a technical history perspective, some of the stuff the Czechs did is still mind blowingly fascinating. An awful lot of the &#8216;modern&#8217; firearms designs are descended either from first generation Czech systems or earlier systems the Czechs worked with for the Warsaw Pact and then their own national arms industries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-12772</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-12772</guid>
		<description>J.A., did the CZ conversion fire 12 gauge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.A., did the CZ conversion fire 12 gauge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.A. James</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-12762</link>
		<dc:creator>J.A. James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-12762</guid>
		<description>In reverse order of priority:

1. A full auto, belt fed 12 gauge shotgun.
2. A place to live where I can fire said shotgun from  the window of my garage and not go to jail.


On a more realistic note, the designer should get in touch with CZ in Brno, Czech Republic. They&#039;ve got rights to patents and designs for most of the old Czech Design Bureau&#039;s firearms designs. 

In the late 50s, early 60s, they experimented with a belt feed conversion for surplus Bren light machineguns. (Which itself was essentially a design ripoff of an earlier Czech design). Anyway, the Czechs were almost ridiculously meticulous in their testing and documentation. They&#039;ve got figures for belt tension, round spacing, degrees of curve in the belt, pretty much anything you can think of.

The beast in the article looks to be fairly serviceable until the curve in the belt gets too severe. In Vietnam, this was a problem with some helo mounted M60s which were resolved by soldering a C-Ration can to the receiver. Looks to me like the shotgun here is having similar issues caused by the weight of the rounds and the degree of curve in the belt. A pretty simple redesign of the feed tray should clear up the big problem shown in the video.
Also, think seriously about feeding directly from an ammo can mounted to the feed tray. That solves most of the problems with the belt dropping off your window frame and stopping your gun.

As always, YMMV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reverse order of priority:</p>
<p>1. A full auto, belt fed 12 gauge shotgun.<br />
2. A place to live where I can fire said shotgun from  the window of my garage and not go to jail.</p>
<p>On a more realistic note, the designer should get in touch with CZ in Brno, Czech Republic. They&#8217;ve got rights to patents and designs for most of the old Czech Design Bureau&#8217;s firearms designs. </p>
<p>In the late 50s, early 60s, they experimented with a belt feed conversion for surplus Bren light machineguns. (Which itself was essentially a design ripoff of an earlier Czech design). Anyway, the Czechs were almost ridiculously meticulous in their testing and documentation. They&#8217;ve got figures for belt tension, round spacing, degrees of curve in the belt, pretty much anything you can think of.</p>
<p>The beast in the article looks to be fairly serviceable until the curve in the belt gets too severe. In Vietnam, this was a problem with some helo mounted M60s which were resolved by soldering a C-Ration can to the receiver. Looks to me like the shotgun here is having similar issues caused by the weight of the rounds and the degree of curve in the belt. A pretty simple redesign of the feed tray should clear up the big problem shown in the video.<br />
Also, think seriously about feeding directly from an ammo can mounted to the feed tray. That solves most of the problems with the belt dropping off your window frame and stopping your gun.</p>
<p>As always, YMMV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomasco</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-11804</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomasco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-11804</guid>
		<description>Watching that just made me grin really big....  When I was in the Navy our skipper let us shoot the twin 40mm on the stern of our ship.  This reminded me of that in a way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching that just made me grin really big&#8230;.  When I was in the Navy our skipper let us shoot the twin 40mm on the stern of our ship.  This reminded me of that in a way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azski</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-8641</link>
		<dc:creator>azski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-8641</guid>
		<description>I agree with the mag fed upper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the mag fed upper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-8428</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-8428</guid>
		<description>when da bugs is worked out i will be giving you a call. the deer in michigan just wont have a chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when da bugs is worked out i will be giving you a call. the deer in michigan just wont have a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-8099</link>
		<dc:creator>Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-8099</guid>
		<description>Very cool indeed. Though I don&#039;t expect to ever own something approaching this in California. Even the belt (if 10+rounds) is illegal here! Not to mention it&#039;s both a SBS and a machine gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool indeed. Though I don&#8217;t expect to ever own something approaching this in California. Even the belt (if 10+rounds) is illegal here! Not to mention it&#8217;s both a SBS and a machine gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luv2ski</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-7329</link>
		<dc:creator>luv2ski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-7329</guid>
		<description>Cool.  Has ATF tech branch classified it as a non-gun, non-DD?  They are following a bizzare path these days with AR uppers that have magazines and feeding mechanisms.  Just look at what they did to the XMG AR upper:

http://www.brpguns.com/xmg.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool.  Has ATF tech branch classified it as a non-gun, non-DD?  They are following a bizzare path these days with AR uppers that have magazines and feeding mechanisms.  Just look at what they did to the XMG AR upper:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.brpguns.com/xmg.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.brpguns.com/xmg.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay.Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-6937</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay.Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-6937</guid>
		<description>This looks like an ideal home defence weapon- if you&#039;re facing off against zombie hordes that is.

Very cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like an ideal home defence weapon- if you&#8217;re facing off against zombie hordes that is.</p>
<p>Very cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddy Alvarez</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-6798</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddy Alvarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-6798</guid>
		<description>is this guy shooting in his back yard? i&#039;m so jealous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is this guy shooting in his back yard? i&#8217;m so jealous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-6792</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-6792</guid>
		<description>That is sweet, I want one.  I would prefer a horizontal magazine instead of a belt with ths design but still awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is sweet, I want one.  I would prefer a horizontal magazine instead of a belt with ths design but still awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-6782</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-6782</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s pretty slick!  Although I agree, it jams up way too often.  Any idea on weight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty slick!  Although I agree, it jams up way too often.  Any idea on weight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-6774</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-6774</guid>
		<description>Too much stoppage for my liking. Keep work on it tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too much stoppage for my liking. Keep work on it tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-6769</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-6769</guid>
		<description>So impractical, yet so cool... I want one badly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So impractical, yet so cool&#8230; I want one badly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N.U.G.U.N.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-6761</link>
		<dc:creator>N.U.G.U.N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-6761</guid>
		<description>*D.R.O.O.L.*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*D.R.O.O.L.*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 22lr</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/24/12-gauge-ar-15-upper-machine-gun/#comment-6758</link>
		<dc:creator>22lr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5326#comment-6758</guid>
		<description>1 vote for coolest AR upper ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 vote for coolest AR upper ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
