Engineers’ perspective on the Remington 700 VTR triangular barrel

700-vtr-muzzlebreak-1-tm.jpg

CR Riddell, PE posted a comment about the Remington 700 VTR triangular barrel and I thought it deserved its own blog post:

I am a professional structural engineer. In 1977, I was granted a patent on a structural system that uses triangular cross-section members with a circular cross-section hole down the middle. Remington’s VTR barrel is identical to that shape. The objective of this shape is to maximize structural force transmission with a minimum of mass.

700 Vtr Muzzlebreak-1
Remington Model 700 VTR barrel and integral muzzle brake.

During development of the concept, I established that the triangular cross-section provides the maximum surface area for a given enclosed volume. This accounts for the Remington heat dissipation claim/feature. Removing the mass along the central axis leaves the mass in the three corners at a maximum distance from the central axis. This maximizes the axial compression rigidity and the torsional rigidity, also a Remington claim/feature. The torsional rigidity promotes stability under the influence of the rifling twist, a special benefit in a rifle barrel. Flexural stiffness is optimal for downward bending of the muzzle end in the orientation Remington uses in the stock; one corner up and two corners down. That puts the top corner in tension and the bottom corners in compression, where buckling concerns reduce the allowable load-carrying capacity.

Picture 4-26
From Riddell’s Structural Member and System patent (#4007574)

All this techno-mumb-jumbo counts for doodly, unless the holes in the target get chummy and cuddle up together. As with all accuracy discussions, the teamwork between barrel, bedding, and ammo gives a unique performance result. This must be where Remington spent its advertised years in development.

Obviously, the manufacturer cannot control the customer’s choice of rounds, so they have to shoot for a statistical middle, so to speak. But the bedding is another story. Remington advertises a multi-point mount, not free-floating or glass bedding. This would be crucial for taming the harmonics in concert with the unique tension-vs-compression qualities of the barrel shape.

Thoretically, this barrel should be better than round, but the industrial wisdom and inertia is all compiled for round. Some tuning is required.

Very interesting. Thanks CR for the information.


Steve Johnson

Founder and Dictator-In-Chief of TFB. A passionate gun owner, a shooting enthusiast and totally tacti-uncool. Favorite first date location: any gun range. Steve can be contacted here.



  • jdun1911

    Oh I’m getting one of these probably later this year or next in .223 version.

    Just found out that Bubgunshop has it below $700.

    http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/advanced_search_result.php?keywords=VTR&osCsid=8fb5f6a911d8f044df32392e4aa3343b&x=21&y=3

    • http://www.thefirearmblog.com Steve

      jdun1911, I also want one. Everytime I see one in a gun shop I can help but want one. It is a very sexy rifle.

      • http://www.thefirearmblog.com Steve

        This year they will have the new Remington adjustable trigger and butt plate inserts to adjust length of pull.

  • jdun1911

    Yeah it’s very sexy and you don’t see triangular barrel often.

    I didn’t even know it existed until now.

    • http://www.thefirearmblog.com Steve

      jdun1911, thats what you get for not keeping up with the blog ;)

  • michael

    Thanks for that info on the VTR.
    I have had my VTR in 308 since December last year and i think its a great rifle, handles well and shoots excellent. Only wish it came with a free floating barrel.

  • http://ninthstage.com/ Ninth Stage

    Like the Remingtons but this engineer’s analysis is a bunch of silly nonsense.

  • Warhawke

    I designed exactly this kind of barrel in the mid ’90′s and nobody would buy the idea. the barrel is just about as ridged as a round barrel the same diameter as the points of the triangle but the weight is reduced greatly. The key is that the three strongest points on the barrel are exactly opposite the three weakest points so the strength is not compromised. I just wish I was getting paid for them.

  • Whatever

    “During development of the concept, I established that the triangular cross-section provides the maximum surface area for a given enclosed volume.”

    Ahhh, no. More surface for a given enclosed volume can be generated by a very narrow rectangle. A star shaped cross section will also provide more surface area for a given volume. This is not the only error in this. He mentions that this particular cross section “maximizes the axial compression rigidity and the torsional rigidity”. The axial loads are dependent only on the amount of material and a triangle is not a good shape for torsional rigidity; torsion bars are round for a reason. He mentions buckling; if you’re barrel is buckling it would be a very strange occurence to have happen when the barrel is in tension which is what happens when the bullet is squeezing down the barrel. Bucking happens under compression.

    I don’t think there’s any harm from making a barrel with a triangular cross section but I would doubt there’s any real benefit from it.

  • ddearborn

    Interesting insight from the original patent holder. Clearly someone at the patent office deemed his idea legitimate enough to grant him a patent. I noticed also that he is a licensed engineer. I would be curious to know about the credentials of those individuals attempting to counter the information he provided. If they would come forward with their credentials it would be a great help for a lay person such as myself to make a better purchasing decision.

    Regards,

    DDearborn

  • twilson

    I’m a retired P. Eng. I appreciate Mr. Riddell’s comments, both the analysis and particularly his observation regarding Remington’s “multi-point” stock being designed to tame harmonics. It would certainly have been simple enough to provide a free floated barrel otherwise. I would offer the observation that the design of the muzzle brake likely plays a role in the harmonics equation also.
    The internal design of the forward portion of the stock reminds me of the recent Smith and Wesson “i-bolt”.
    Also, I have seen a triangular barrel before, but where? I think I’m trying to remember a pistol barrel. Help me out somebody?

  • Tony

    Desert Eagle

  • chris

    I just got one of the rem. vtr 700 with a all black stock in 308. i love this rifle.i can shoot around a 1in group at 100yd with 150gr corelock.and i got a good deal on it $500 new.i cant wait to to it hunting.

  • chris

    I got a rem. vtr 700 in 308 cal. this is a great rifle.i can shoot around 1in groups at 100yds with cheap bullets.and i only paid 500 for rifle.and i love the look of the rifle.

  • jimbo

    just a touch off subject. the remington 700 target tactical rifle has the 26″ vtr barrel with the 5r rifling. is this barrel free-floated and is the 5r rifling in the target tactical the same as the 700 ss 5r milspec. also, is the ss 5r milspec barrel free-floated. trying to decide on a new rifle but cant find thi info out there. anyone know of any websites i can get that info. tried the remington website and e-mailed them, no response. thanks in advance

  • Douglas Price

    I too own a Remington Model 700 VTR in .308 Win.

    I don’t compromise with something as basic to my particular style of shooting as trigger pull.

    If a factory trigger won’t adjust down to my favorite pull weight (1.5 pounds) it’s GONZO.

    I pulled the factory VTR trigger & replaced it with a full adjustable Timney Target trigger & adjusted it to my preferred break weight of 1.5 pounds.

    With a Bushnell (I can hear the groans now) Elite 4200 2.5 -10x40mm sitting on top groups never stray over 1/2″ @ 100 yards with Remington factory ammo loaded with 150 grain Core-Lokt bullets.

    I have to add that I tested the rifle off a Caldwell Lead Sled with provides a very stable, recoil absorbing shooting platform. The Caldwell is a must for anyone who sights-in as many magnum caliber rifles as I do in a typical year.

  • joe gillette

    11 /12/09- THE LAST DAY OF DEER IN PENNSYLVANIA. I SHOT A EIGHT POINTER. I HAVE A VTR 308 THIS GUN IS A REAL KILLER I HIT HIM RUNNING AT 100 YARDS IN THE WOODS, HE RAN AROUND 65 YARDS AFTER BEING HIT. this gun is the best in its class. this is deer number 3 with this gun.if they come out with a 7mm mag or 30.06 i will get both i love the way the gun handles the looks its great i would tell anyone getting a deer rifle this is it and i have a lot of guns. i been hunting for 43 years.and this is the gun i will be useing for the nex 43 years. rem really got a winner here.

    joe gillette

  • Mark

    I have one in .308. It shoots sub half MOA groups. I noticed a lot of people claiming results with core lokt bullets… they are the next best thing to lead balls. Try putting some match grade ammunition down the barrel. The pressure points in the stock I don’t think are really needed. I put my action in a Bell and Carlson stock, bedded the recoil lug and it has never shot better. I’ve taken 300 yd head shots on deer and never had one live to argue the accuracy of this rifle. wether the triangle contour actually helps or hinders accuracy… well, when a rig can produce .25 inch groups, you don’t really need to know why, just accept that it does. And believe me, it does.

  • axemanzack

    I also have the VTR in .308 amazing tight groups out of the box! .25 MOA and Im very impressed with this gun. I just found them online at GPS sniper school for $600 I paid $699 but well worth every dime! Using an Eagle Eye optics 10-40×44 scope. Descent scope but nothing compared to a Leupold or Night Force, which I will be installing as soon as I get $$$.

  • Mark

    I’ve heard that the new ones have an adjustable trigger, which is sort of pointless… they won’t adjust down below 3.5 pounds or so. (I may be wrong) Am I the only one that has bothered to try to adjust the original x-mark??? My VTR was one of the first runs with the original trigger. I got mine down to 2lb 2oz and it has stayed there for the last two years. it’s been dropped, knocked over, drug through the grass, and has never failed to fire or went off on it’s own. Below 1lb 10oz, it simply won’t hold the firing pin back. Maybe I’m just crazy. was going to put a Rifle Basix trigger in, but unless you need a bench gun trigger, the x-mark will go as low as you need to go.

  • John

    I have a VTR in .308 and absolutely love this rifle.To touch on the x-mark pro trigger, most information that I have read states that the VTR’s commonly come with a 4lb 10oz pull weight on the trigger. I’m not sure how accurate this is as I have not been able to measure my own rifle’s trigger weight, I have done some research and according to Remington, found that the x-mark pro has a 2lb. adjustable range, from 3-5lbs. Having said all that, all I can do is echo the gleaming reviews already posted by others here. I had to play with multiple rounds and bullet combinations, but it didn’t take long before Hornady’s Custom BTSP rounds were sailing, delivering 1/2″ MOA groups at 100yrds, and that was just prone with a Harris bi-pod. To those interested in this rifle for hunting and not just the range, buy with confidence. While I don’t typically buy into firing at game at anywhere near the effective or accurate range of this rifle, I took a buck at 250yds this past season with ease.

  • brent

    My buddy let me use his vtr .308 for a weekend to see how i liked it. i shot a raccoon in the eye at 150 and a beaver in the head at 200. i picked one up on Monday. great gun

  • wes haertling

    what scope do you guys think is the best to use with this gun?

  • Mark

    That all depends on what type of shooting you plan on doing with it. Will the gun sit on a bench, or is it a close range deer rifle, or varmint gun, or a long range hunting rifle. Then you have to consider how much money you want to spend. A rifle that is going to make nothing but shots inside 100yds at deer won’t reqire an 8-32x Nightforce. Any kind of early morning/early evening shooting and you typically won’t want anything over 10x or 12x. It all depends on what you are going to use it for.

  • wes haertling

    I will be shooting the gun up to 300 yards at deer and varmits. I was thinking of the leupold Mark 4 but there is so many, and some of them have a really bad reputation. Also, i have an okay setup right now with a Nikon Monarck on it right now but i can’t seem to get it to shoot a good pattern, so I may need to try something new. I will be useing it the most for long range coyote hunting.

  • Mark

    I doubt that the Nikon is your problem. You may have something loose in your mounts if it’s not grouping the way it should. Cheap ammunition can do the same thing. Good ammunition can too. Black hills match .308 won’t group as well out of mine as Hornady TAP. It’s some of the best out there, but the gun doesn’t like it. And of course it could be the shooter. I don’t know your background or training or your ability, so… If you just want to change scopes, Some of the Bushnell Elite scopes are good, Burris XTR’s are nice, but I’ve never seen a Leupold with a bad rep. Personally, once you get past the retarded name, I still stand behind my S/S scope, formerly known as the super sniper. dumb name, but one of the most reliable scopes I’ve ever owned. With the small calibers of the VTR’s, a fixed 10x would work fine for you. If you get good enough, you can use the mil-dot to range your game. I’ve taken head shots on deer out to 315yds with mine. Off a bag I can hit half gallon jugs at 500. It’s no bench gun, but I didn’t have to spend $4000 to make it shoot that tight. Do your research, read all the blogs, but in the end, it’s going to come down to which one fits YOU best.

  • twilson

    Scopes: real happy with my Vortex 3.5-10 X 50! Check them out…
    http://www.vortexoptics.com/

    My next upgrade will be Dednutz scope mounts.
    http://www.dnzproducts.com/index.php?main_page=page&id=4

  • Concerned

    I have the VTR in .308 caliber and can shoot sub 1″ group all day. This gun has a Leupold Gold Ring 12X fixed scope. Absolutely love it.

    But…I have the VTR in .223 caliber and I cant get the groups within 1.5″ So I free floated the barrel, bedded the action and upgraded to a Sightron SIII 8-32X56 scope, shot it today and the groups got worse. I am going to start the load process again. 40-55 grain bullets just dont work with the fast twist, my best groups came from a 60 grain v-max with 26.6 grains of varget. I tried the 69 grain a max but was still under performing.

    I hear alot of excellent comments on the 308. Anybody have any good news about the 223. Please send me load data at rsedlmajer@hotmail

    Thanks.

  • snelson

    a) Sorry, I didn’t get your patent number? I would like to see that. I couldn’t find anything after I did a patent search.
    b) I think you need to go and read Beers’ Mechanics of Materials (industry standard text, which I’m sure you know being a PE and all), because your analysis of the surface area of the extrusion and the flexural stiffness of the section is completely wrong. Can you explain to me why the construction industry is still using the completely inefficient S or W section structural steel instead of your more efficient design?
    c) I suggest you find some legal representation and get some royalties from Remington for using your design.

    Good Luck

  • Mark

    I love the ignorance displayed by someone in such a rush to criticize something that they would make the statement, “Sorry, I didn’t get your patent number? I would like to see that. I couldn’t find anything after I did a patent search.” when the patent number is listed below the diagram that is included with the authors description of the patent. “From Riddell’s Structural Member and System patent (#4007574)” And yes it is listed in the U.S. patent registry. And like I have told numerous other people that want to pick apart the design, it works… PERIOD. Find a way to make an S or W shaped gun barrel and I’m all ears.

  • axemanzack

    Finished sniper school 4 weeks ago at GPSsniper school… Great school! I used my VTR for the class and farthest shot was a spay paint can at 1365 yards and yes I have witnesses…lol The VTR is a great design! I have also put a H-S precision stock, timney trigger, leupold 3.5 – 10 x 44 mark 4 m3 scope, and of course camo paint job.

    Ammo was 175 grain HPBT Black hills match grade ammo.

    Point is this barrel design works great! I am very happy with the performance of this rifle and definitely recomend it to anyone out there. And a huge thanks to Rob and Nate at GPS for the training they gave me…Once again, Great School!

  • Douglas Price

    Concerned:

    The .223 might have a bad barrel, perhaps a damaged or malformed crown.
    Doesn’t happen often, but it happens.

  • Thanks

    Mr. Price:

    Figured out the .223. Hornady 52 grain BTHP with 23 grains of Varget. One hole at 100. I was thinking the same as you for a minute, even contacted Remington. They were going to fix for free. Love the two VTR so much I bought a 3rd in 22-250. Great Gun.

    R. Sedlmajer

  • Harry HH

    Some 10 years ago I sold my hunting rifle. (Life interfered with my hunting/shooting hobby). However, now that I am retired I can go and hunt deer/elk again in my home state of Colorado. So I started to shop for a new 308 hunting rifle. Today I found a brand new VTR that fit me perfectly. Since the price was right and I liked all your comments, I decided to buy it. So “thanks” to all posters for sharing your opinions on this rifle. It is very much appreciated.

    I have two questions:
    1. I wonder if there is a certain brand ammo/bullet grain that seems to work best with this rifle.
    2. Some years ago I bought a brand new Burris Signature Scope 2.5x-10 on a sports shop closing auction. (Again, the price was right). Can anybody tell me if that scope would work OK with the VTR?
    Thanks much for helping me out with these two questions.

  • Scott

    No offense to Mr. Riddell, but he basically acknowledges that this barrel shape will cause some unusual harmonics, then contradicts himself by stating that it would be “better than round”.

    Experience with triangular structural members for bridges or buildings has little to do with a rifle barrel. I am an engineer myself (mechanical), and I have specific research experience with rifles and what happens when they are fired. Let’s just say that I live quite close to Elizabethtown, KY…. A uniformly round barrel gives the most predictable harmonic reaction every time. The key word there is predictable. In terms of accuracy, it does not matter what the barrel does when it is fired as long you can make it do the exact same thing every time.

  • Mark

    I’m beginning to accept that the people who own these rifles will continue to tout their accuracy while the engineers and scentists will tear the design apart. The claims of being an engineer mean very little to me when it comes down to who to trust on things like this. I have to deal with engineers constantly on design flaws that stem from a lack of understanding of how the consumer needs something to work vs. what looks good on paper. What does hold it’s ground in this argument is the tiny group holes produced by quality ammunition fired from a well designed firearm. When lives are on the line or supper is in the crosshairs, the evidence of those groups will always trump your engineering degree.

  • Douglas Price

    Consistent tiny groups trump a wall covered with engineering degrees & written opinions chock full of “fourteen dollar” jargon terms.
    Either the bullet arrives where the cross-hairs meet or it doesn’t.
    Keep the simple stuff simple.

  • MIKE

    Is my Remington 700 BDL supposed to have a floating barrel.A dollar bill won’t slide down the barrel.The bill won’t get passed about 2″ down from the tip of the forearm.It used to shoot 1″ groups.Now 1.5 to 2″ is the norm.

  • Mark

    Not many BDL’s had the barrel floated. It’s something usually done to the precision rifles. If your BDL has a factory synthetic stock, chances are, it was never floated. Some of the wood stocks were floated, but it was almost unintentional. Yours may have left the factory with a slight gap between the barrel and the stock and over time, the stock has shifted and come to rest on the barrel. That might explain the group change. The synthetic stocks can’t be floated without major gutting (Unless you have a factory fiberglass stock… not the black or green plastic) I have a Bell and Carlson fiberglass and I can slide 4 dollar bills all the way to the recoil lug. If you decide to try to float the barrel, remember that just because it doesn’t touch when you set the action back into the stock doesn’t mean it will stay that way with the screws tight and the weight of the gun resting on the forend.

  • MIKE

    Thanks Mark,I forgot to put in that it is a wood stock.Also it dawned on me,after I emailed you, that I switched from new Federal Power Shock 130gr.(270) to Winchester Power Point 130gr.I was out of the Fed.So I tried the Win. and the Win. is from my dad and is from about 40 years old! I guess my mind isn’t “grouping” a good as it used to.I’ll leave everything as is and work up some hand loads.Thanks again,Mike

  • james h

    well guys i have one ..2000 rounds through it and i shoot eggs at 300 yards with about a 90% hit rate..and from a bipod andna small sandbag or holding it in a loose grip…”not a bench rest”……the gun is extremly acurate if you are…1/4 to 1/2 moa is normal with hornady 168 tap for me out to 300 ( thats all we have to shoot at here)…i cannot ask for more for a gun cost in 6-700 dollers.or 2000 for that matter…

    dont get caught up in to much science disscusion..the boiled egges explode when you shoot them..thats what matters…clay pigions are easy…. and a cantalope is a no brainer if you get my drift.. a b-27 would be like shooting a buick…

  • http://None Graham

    While i can say that the idea is unique in its self, and the physical data is interesting- there are a number of things that would potentially draw concern to myself. How does the heat have effect on the barrel, over prolonged repetitive use? The easiest way i could construct this design if i were to attempt reproduction would be to turn the barrel as normal – Round- stress relieve – cut or button the rifling, and then mill the flats. My guess is that it would be the process used already. Now – what is the likelihood that all the flats are milled within extremely tight tolerances during mass production – with tool wear taken in to consideration? If one flat is off say .0002- to .0010 how much effect will this have on the overall harmonics, as well as effect over the heat during the natural relaxation of the metal? Could this design be implemented on magnum calibers and or .50bmg?
    With my own inspection of the VTR the main thing that jumps out to eye- is the godly barrel ports. The flat cut ports look as if they came from a entry level machinist that got his hands on a end mill. How much effect does this have on the barrel gasses, muzzle rise, sight picture, recoil, and so forth? If this was not done would it have had a effect on the muzzle crown – and escaping gasses leaving the muzzle? – from high pressure to low pressure- i think there was too much effort put in to a good idea. While remington is known for its ability to produce a good off the shelf barrel – they are also like all barrels in the essence that each one likes its own load that it handles. One guys vtr might like a hotter load- and heavier grain – then the others. Depending on what the twist rate is – there could be a endless number of factors. But On the other hand – round barrels have had tens of thousands of design changes – and time trials. While I like the design- minus the barrel ports, I myself will have to stick with the simpler design of using a round barrel. Now – if they start producing this barrel design with ports 120 degrees apart and out of inconel, then i might be one of the many ready to jump on the band wagon. Also if anyone would be interested in using their VTR as a test subject- check consistency of flats, ID, OD, and overall change after the barrel has been heated up. I would be very interested to see how close the tolerances are, as well as how well the design react when in repetitive use!

  • Rich

    I just bought a Remington 700 VTR 308 and the first thing I noticed was the cheap injection molded stock. It seemed pretty solid but it didn’t weigh enough for a 308. First thing I did was add some lead sinkers to the fore grip and the butt stock. I filled in the rest of the forearm with liquid nails and to make sure it stayed solid I used a small cutting disk and cut in some mechanical locks on all 4 sides of each small chamber. The butt stock I filled in all the way with some of the expanding foam crack filler in a can. Awesome stuff. I put a total of 8 pounds into this rifle and now it feels perfect. After the liquid nails dried i ground enough of the material out to free float the barrel. After break in I tested it at 100, 300, 600, and 1000 yards. This gun really like the heavier rounds. It shot moa at 1000 yards with Sierra Match King 175 grain.

    This is a great rifle and i would reccomend it to anyone. But the stock needs work or replaced. Its the only downfall of this rifle.

    • Joe

      You can’t shoot moa at a grand you stupid prick. even the best groups I have gotten out of my CUSTOM $8000 rifle wont even hit MOA at 700. So there fore you are a stupid fuck

      • BOB

        Joe has managed to slag off someone without checking how deep in his mouth, or better still how short the distance is from one hole to the other.

        Minute of Arc of 1 at 1000yards is 10.47 inches, which I am sure is what Rich had meant in his comment, which is how I read it, because Joe is right that to achieve 1 MOA @1000yds from shot to shot is just plain silly.

        Then again, if Joe spent $8k to achieve MOA at 700 yds, which is around $1000 per minute, that too (to me IMHO) is just plain silly as well. Read on…

        Have an old Australian built Omark Sportco in 7.62 / .308. A single loader, built in the late 1960s / early 1970s, heavy walnut stock, full floating original barrel, so don’t know how many thousands of pills have been pushed down its throat but has been well looked after, yet once the front sight block and tube was removed and a Schmit & Bender fitted up back, using tuned ammunition (ammunition developed specifically for this set up = tightest groups) this little puppy on its best day delivered a 49.7 @ 600yds, with the one dropped shot my fault.

        Ok, so how did this performance measure up? Taking the best nine of the ten, the “.7″ part represents seven shots inside of four inches (0.75 MOA), with the remaining two (of the nine) within eight inches (1.33 MOA).

        Not bad for an old bloke with a $280 rifle with a $2k scope.

        So, eat my dirt Joe and think a bit before dissing / dumping on someone.

      • pricer

        Joe needs to crawl back into his hole which then needs to be back filled with dirt. His remarks are a disgrace and should be deleted from the blog. That kind of disrespectful, disgusting filth has no place in a civilized discussion. Moderator please delete Joes outrageous spew.

  • Douglas Price

    I think the muzzle brake ports make the gun look rather amateurish somewhat like a kids “Star Wars” toy. It also causes the barrel to forcefully “bottom out” on the barrel channel if you attempt to free float the barrel by removing the contact points.
    I finally “circumcised” my VTR in .308 Winchester by removing the muzzle brake just behind the rearmost port. I recess crowned the remaining barrel the standard 1/4″ from the muzzle face. I then pillar bedded the action.
    These modifications in addition to the Timney trigger (trigger pull set to 2 pounds) I installed make for a very light, fast pointing & accurate deer rifle with 2″ less barrel (20″ barrel after cutting & recess crowning) to catch onto switches & alders in the bush.
    I’m getting tiny 3 shot “keyhole” groups (all shots touching) @ 100 yards with a hand load containing H-Varget powder & the 150 grain Nosler Partition spitzer bullet.

  • Marcel

    Hello. thanks for your info. My question is ,I have a vtr in 308, is better to float the barrel? or it could be a problem and shoots more open.

  • http://tp-link victor nicolao

    My VTR camo .308 after 40 rounds from new,at 100 meters puts all rounds in the same hole using CBC brazilian military rounds ,reducing the charge to 41 grains and with a 168 grains Sierra match king.Millet tactical scope 6-25×50

  • JOSEPH GILLETTE

    I HAVE MY 308 VTR FOR 3 YEARS NOW I’M VERY HAPPY WITH IT THERE IS A LOT OF NEGATIVE TALK ABOUT THE GUN. ITS A MATTER OF WHAT YOU LIKE. THE CALABER AND THE NAME. I HAVE A LOT OF DIFFERENT DEER RIFLES. I KNOW THERE IS BETTER AND MORE EXPENSIVE.I LIKE THE 308. ITS A NICE FLAT SHOOTING CALABER. I HIT DEER UP TO 250 YARDS. I LET SOME ARMY GUYS SHOOT IT ON THE RANGE AND GAVE IT A GOOD MARK. THEY WERE IN ACTION MORE THAN ONCE AND THEY SAID IT WAS A KILLER AND THEY DID A LOT OF THAT OVER THERE.BEFORE YOU JUDGE THE GUN OR GET ONE MAYBE YOU SHOULD READ UP ON IT THIS GUN WAS IN THE MAKEING FOR OVER 3 YEARS AND WAS TESTED FOR 1 YEAR. REM MAKES THE MOST ON THE MONEY GUN OUT OF THE BOX FOR THE PRICE YOU PAY.BELIEVE ME GUYS ITS A GREAT DEER KILLER.YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR.

  • DION

    Had a remington 22-250 VTR 700 tri-barrell for 4 months now and still can’t get it to group. it has had reloads and factories through it a total of about 350-400. Do i need to float my barrell???

  • nate

    I just took mine out for the first time i got it to group within a nickle this is my first bolt action and scoped rifle. I grouped with Hornady Steel Match BTHP 155′s . I then went to 100 yards and was feeling good but not great with the steel match. After playing around for a bit i went with 150 barnes triple shock Federal’s i had horrid results(which im glad cause they cost a bunch) I finally got to a box of Hornady Superformance SST 150′s the rifle came to life and really let me be in control. I placed 8 of them 1/2 inch below center of the target and all within a half inch left to right. I then proceeded to aim ,without any scope adjustments, at the head of a bowling pin at 300 yards and i landed all 4 rounds that i had left. i spent a lot of time lapping my scope rings properly aligning them making sure the scope was properly aligned to the rifle and I have to say I ,for this being my first scoped weapon, am truly ecstatic with this rifle. my only other rifle experience is M4′s M16′s with or without red dots. I feel more than confident with this rifle and my nikon buckmaster 3x9x40

    • nate

      oh and as far as heat goes I shot 16 rounds at a considerable rate and its barely warm and it was cooling very quickly. my experience with heating and cooling of weapons prior to this one is with an m16 a2 m2 m249 m240b and a g23.

  • gregory bedell

    I feel that everyone should spend time getting to know that if it’s a .223 .243.270 .308 lets face it, it comes down to the shooter you either have it or you don’t. I have friends I shoot shoot with that are Savage men now they’ll shoot my Remington VTR on one of my bad days and it will bullseye everytime, Now that being said I will go in shoot Bullseye all day on 25/60 and he can’t get it in! It’s the mind set and preparedness I agree that rounds and finding out what your rifle likes to eat is very Impoortant, Shooting is supposed to be fun if to much pressure on your self mentally then you can’t relax enough to make that shot. Lets face it One shot, One Kill! I’ve had my .308 at least a couple of years I’ll tell you I went from 180′s that drop like a stone at 300yds to 120′s to high settled on 150′s just a little off I’m going with with steel cased 145′s right now,
    It’s bullseye, bulleye, Bullseye so I’m happy I know what she likes to eat.
    I think it’s the same for all find your groove get in it and stay there!

  • donald jenkins

    I can wait to get mys out of layway at sportsman’s warehouse in southaven Ms.