<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gemtech suppressed GSD-5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/16/gemtech-suppressed-gsd-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/16/gemtech-suppressed-gsd-5/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:46:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 7trees</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/16/gemtech-suppressed-gsd-5/#comment-13260</link>
		<dc:creator>7trees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5150#comment-13260</guid>
		<description>Recently they have said production would start in the Fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently they have said production would start in the Fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve cole</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/16/gemtech-suppressed-gsd-5/#comment-9198</link>
		<dc:creator>steve cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 02:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5150#comment-9198</guid>
		<description>When is the GSG5SD due out? I want one before the &quot;chosen 1&quot; slams the door on our fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is the GSG5SD due out? I want one before the &#8220;chosen 1&#8243; slams the door on our fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/16/gemtech-suppressed-gsd-5/#comment-8656</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5150#comment-8656</guid>
		<description>Ok.  Well i own the GSG-5 so I was thinking on integrally suppressing it or cutting the barrel shorter and then tapping the barrel but I&#039;m afraid that will make it class III for being short barreled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok.  Well i own the GSG-5 so I was thinking on integrally suppressing it or cutting the barrel shorter and then tapping the barrel but I&#8217;m afraid that will make it class III for being short barreled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/16/gemtech-suppressed-gsd-5/#comment-8655</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5150#comment-8655</guid>
		<description>buying one the above ... otherwise you could get a gunsmith to cut the barrel shorter (making it a Short Barreled Rifle) and finding a suppressor small enough in diameter that it can be squeezed in, maybe with modifications to the shell. I have not seen them in person, so I can&#039;t be of more help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>buying one the above &#8230; otherwise you could get a gunsmith to cut the barrel shorter (making it a Short Barreled Rifle) and finding a suppressor small enough in diameter that it can be squeezed in, maybe with modifications to the shell. I have not seen them in person, so I can&#8217;t be of more help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/16/gemtech-suppressed-gsd-5/#comment-8654</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5150#comment-8654</guid>
		<description>What would be the cheapest way to suppress the GSG-5 SD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would be the cheapest way to suppress the GSG-5 SD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/16/gemtech-suppressed-gsd-5/#comment-8653</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5150#comment-8653</guid>
		<description>Bill, you can integrally suppress any rifle, but getting a gunsmith to build a custom suppressor would be costly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, you can integrally suppress any rifle, but getting a gunsmith to build a custom suppressor would be costly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/16/gemtech-suppressed-gsd-5/#comment-8652</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5150#comment-8652</guid>
		<description>If you have the GSG-5 SD, is it possible to integrally suppress it or suppress it in anyway even though it has a fake suppressor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have the GSG-5 SD, is it possible to integrally suppress it or suppress it in anyway even though it has a fake suppressor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linoge</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/16/gemtech-suppressed-gsd-5/#comment-6946</link>
		<dc:creator>Linoge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 02:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5150#comment-6946</guid>
		<description>After handling one of the GSG pistols at a show today, the full-length integrally suppressed model may just be my first .22...  I can see one $200 stamp, but not both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After handling one of the GSG pistols at a show today, the full-length integrally suppressed model may just be my first .22&#8230;  I can see one $200 stamp, but not both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/16/gemtech-suppressed-gsd-5/#comment-6489</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5150#comment-6489</guid>
		<description>Don, yes, it requires a stamp. Unlike the gamo suppressor, which is plastic and could not be used on a firearm, this is a &quot;real&quot; suppressor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don, yes, it requires a stamp. Unlike the gamo suppressor, which is plastic and could not be used on a firearm, this is a &#8220;real&#8221; suppressor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/16/gemtech-suppressed-gsd-5/#comment-6475</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=5150#comment-6475</guid>
		<description>I was just talking about this with a guy at work.  Does an integral suppressor count as class III?  I remember there was a big todo over the gamo whisper (permanently suppressed pellet gun) and there was a ruling that since the suppressor couldn&#039;t be removed without substantial effort (cutting it off the barrel) it didn&#039;t count as class III.  Am I mistaken or did I get that right?

-Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just talking about this with a guy at work.  Does an integral suppressor count as class III?  I remember there was a big todo over the gamo whisper (permanently suppressed pellet gun) and there was a ruling that since the suppressor couldn&#8217;t be removed without substantial effort (cutting it off the barrel) it didn&#8217;t count as class III.  Am I mistaken or did I get that right?</p>
<p>-Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
