<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAV-15 polymer AR-15 lower recievers back in production</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:38:33 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-9611</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-9611</guid>
		<description>are they ca legal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are they ca legal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Young</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-6559</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-6559</guid>
		<description>I ordered one for a dedicated .22LR rifle. I plan on using it to teach my 9 year old how to shoot. The A1 stock length and light weight were the main reasons I wanted to build one.

I have a A3 upper with a 16&quot; 1/12 twist barrel. I think it will be a fund camp gun for our trips to the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ordered one for a dedicated .22LR rifle. I plan on using it to teach my 9 year old how to shoot. The A1 stock length and light weight were the main reasons I wanted to build one.</p>
<p>I have a A3 upper with a 16&#8243; 1/12 twist barrel. I think it will be a fund camp gun for our trips to the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crimson30</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-6340</link>
		<dc:creator>crimson30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-6340</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a shame they don&#039;t make a version that can take other buttstocks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame they don&#8217;t make a version that can take other buttstocks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-5880</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-5880</guid>
		<description>Oleg, great to see you on my blog :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oleg, great to see you on my blog <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oleg Volk</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-5873</link>
		<dc:creator>Oleg Volk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-5873</guid>
		<description>By the way, though ATF allows Cav Arms manufacture new receivers, they are holding on to the seized property. So Cav Arms has an expensive legal fight for the return of their property on their hands. It me, it&#039;s yet another reason to support them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, though ATF allows Cav Arms manufacture new receivers, they are holding on to the seized property. So Cav Arms has an expensive legal fight for the return of their property on their hands. It me, it&#8217;s yet another reason to support them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SinistralRifleman</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-5872</link>
		<dc:creator>SinistralRifleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-5872</guid>
		<description>@ jdun1911

MSRP on the receivers has never been less than $125.00.  Some distributors may have sold them cheaper on clearance years ago, but they were never sold more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ jdun1911</p>
<p>MSRP on the receivers has never been less than $125.00.  Some distributors may have sold them cheaper on clearance years ago, but they were never sold more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oleg Volk</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-5870</link>
		<dc:creator>Oleg Volk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-5870</guid>
		<description>The main advantages of Cav Arms guns are the light weight (1 pound less than metal receiver) and low cost (fewer parts needed to make a complete rifle). Steve Fisher uses one and hasn&#039;t broken it yet -- for Steve, that&#039;s unusual!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main advantages of Cav Arms guns are the light weight (1 pound less than metal receiver) and low cost (fewer parts needed to make a complete rifle). Steve Fisher uses one and hasn&#8217;t broken it yet &#8212; for Steve, that&#8217;s unusual!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-5844</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-5844</guid>
		<description>@Dave

The master catalog should come with a notice that tells you how to take advantage of discounts if you&#039;re a gunsmith, dealer, or collector.  They print special codes after the items in the catalog that translate to discounted prices, and the website automatically applies discounts if you&#039;re registered and logged in.

I doubled checked, and both the catalog and website list the CAV-15 receiver for $100 after discount, which is pretty awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave</p>
<p>The master catalog should come with a notice that tells you how to take advantage of discounts if you&#8217;re a gunsmith, dealer, or collector.  They print special codes after the items in the catalog that translate to discounted prices, and the website automatically applies discounts if you&#8217;re registered and logged in.</p>
<p>I doubled checked, and both the catalog and website list the CAV-15 receiver for $100 after discount, which is pretty awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KP</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-5826</link>
		<dc:creator>KP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-5826</guid>
		<description>Cool.  Glad they got past that ATF lunacy in tact.  I&#039;d be interested to know the details of that.

It&#039;d also be cool if they made a polymer lower without the stock &amp; handguard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool.  Glad they got past that ATF lunacy in tact.  I&#8217;d be interested to know the details of that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d also be cool if they made a polymer lower without the stock &amp; handguard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-5817</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-5817</guid>
		<description>Brownells member discounts?  I&#039;ve been ordering from them for years and don&#039;t know about this -- what does this refer to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brownells member discounts?  I&#8217;ve been ordering from them for years and don&#8217;t know about this &#8212; what does this refer to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-5804</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-5804</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re quite affordable, around $100 from Brownells with member discounts.  I think the MSRP is $150 from Cav Arms&#039; website.

I don&#039;t think they make the crazy colors anymore (yellow, red, blue, glow in the dark, etc), just OD, Coyote and black.

I&#039;m too much of a customization junkie to build one as a main shooter, but I&#039;d absolutely put together an entry-level light build and camo finish it myself at the shop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re quite affordable, around $100 from Brownells with member discounts.  I think the MSRP is $150 from Cav Arms&#8217; website.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think they make the crazy colors anymore (yellow, red, blue, glow in the dark, etc), just OD, Coyote and black.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m too much of a customization junkie to build one as a main shooter, but I&#8217;d absolutely put together an entry-level light build and camo finish it myself at the shop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-5801</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-5801</guid>
		<description>Their old polymer black lower/receiver cost around $50 two years ago before the ATF mess.

I&#039;m going to get one or three because I don&#039;t have a single polymer lower in my collection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their old polymer black lower/receiver cost around $50 two years ago before the ATF mess.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to get one or three because I don&#8217;t have a single polymer lower in my collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-5795</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-5795</guid>
		<description>According to their website:

$150 for a stripped lower
$225 for a complete lower

http://www.cavalryarms.com/MKII.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to their website:</p>
<p>$150 for a stripped lower<br />
$225 for a complete lower</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cavalryarms.com/MKII.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cavalryarms.com/MKII.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-5792</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-5792</guid>
		<description>Price isn&#039;t bad,

http://www.cavalryarms.com/MKII.html has it listed as 150 for the stripped and $225 for the complete.  Plus if it ever breaks for any reason they&#039;ll send you a replacement for 30$...thats pretty good.

Florian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Price isn&#8217;t bad,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cavalryarms.com/MKII.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cavalryarms.com/MKII.html</a> has it listed as 150 for the stripped and $225 for the complete.  Plus if it ever breaks for any reason they&#8217;ll send you a replacement for 30$&#8230;thats pretty good.</p>
<p>Florian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-5789</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-5789</guid>
		<description>Their website indicated $150 for a stripped lower, $225 with all the little bits included. 

Novel idea; I&#039;m surprised no one else has done this yet.  It works for all those great modern pistol designs so I&#039;m sure it will work well for a rifle too.  I want one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their website indicated $150 for a stripped lower, $225 with all the little bits included. </p>
<p>Novel idea; I&#8217;m surprised no one else has done this yet.  It works for all those great modern pistol designs so I&#8217;m sure it will work well for a rifle too.  I want one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-5788</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-5788</guid>
		<description>They were $150 for the stripped last I heard. That&#039;s in the standard colors like black, green, and desert tan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were $150 for the stripped last I heard. That&#8217;s in the standard colors like black, green, and desert tan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-5782</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-5782</guid>
		<description>KP, I don&#039;t know the price</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KP, I don&#8217;t know the price</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KP</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/29/cav-15-polymer-ar-15-lower-recievers-back-in-production/#comment-5781</link>
		<dc:creator>KP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4877#comment-5781</guid>
		<description>price?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>price?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
