<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: S&amp;H 2 Bore compared to 9mm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/21/sh-2-bore-compared-to-9mm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/21/sh-2-bore-compared-to-9mm/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:18:29 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Griffin</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/21/sh-2-bore-compared-to-9mm/#comment-10113</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 05:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4684#comment-10113</guid>
		<description>looks more like a Cannon shell!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks more like a Cannon shell!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/21/sh-2-bore-compared-to-9mm/#comment-9448</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 01:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4684#comment-9448</guid>
		<description>wow I&#039;m 15 and i think a 12 gauge slug or nitro buck shot but this would knock me across a field and back wow... i wonder how much pressure it takes to form the brass. hmm the POWER IT MUST HAVE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow I&#8217;m 15 and i think a 12 gauge slug or nitro buck shot but this would knock me across a field and back wow&#8230; i wonder how much pressure it takes to form the brass. hmm the POWER IT MUST HAVE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/21/sh-2-bore-compared-to-9mm/#comment-7430</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4684#comment-7430</guid>
		<description>jack76, I did not compare the cartridges, I compared their caliber.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caliber</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jack76, I did not compare the cartridges, I compared their caliber.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caliber" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caliber</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack76</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/21/sh-2-bore-compared-to-9mm/#comment-7429</link>
		<dc:creator>jack76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4684#comment-7429</guid>
		<description>you can&#039;t compare 9mm Luger and .375 H&amp;H they look nothing alike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can&#8217;t compare 9mm Luger and .375 H&amp;H they look nothing alike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Blessing</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/21/sh-2-bore-compared-to-9mm/#comment-5746</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Blessing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4684#comment-5746</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve wanted something in 4 bore for a while now, and I thought THAT was big..

I don&#039;t want to know how much pressure it takes to re-size those... or for that matter the cost of dies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve wanted something in 4 bore for a while now, and I thought THAT was big..</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to know how much pressure it takes to re-size those&#8230; or for that matter the cost of dies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/21/sh-2-bore-compared-to-9mm/#comment-5408</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4684#comment-5408</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s going cost a lot of money to reload. Better save the brass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s going cost a lot of money to reload. Better save the brass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/21/sh-2-bore-compared-to-9mm/#comment-5374</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4684#comment-5374</guid>
		<description>The recoil has got to be brutal on something that big.  I am flinching right now just thinking about it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recoil has got to be brutal on something that big.  I am flinching right now just thinking about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
