<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taurus have updated the PT22 PT25</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/18/taurus-have-updated-the-pt22-pt25/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/18/taurus-have-updated-the-pt22-pt25/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:17:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/18/taurus-have-updated-the-pt22-pt25/#comment-27511</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4541#comment-27511</guid>
		<description>Scott, thanks for the info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, thanks for the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott S.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/18/taurus-have-updated-the-pt22-pt25/#comment-27494</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4541#comment-27494</guid>
		<description>I called Taurus International today (02/25/2010) and got minimal information except that it is due out the 3rd quarter 2010.  Cost not known, color options not known, etc.  The advantage for females and senior citizens is that it still has the tip up barrel for safety and ease of loading.  A lot of people find that charging the LCPs and Kel-Tecs is difficult.  I hope they make this in the .380 besides the .22 and .25 ACP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I called Taurus International today (02/25/2010) and got minimal information except that it is due out the 3rd quarter 2010.  Cost not known, color options not known, etc.  The advantage for females and senior citizens is that it still has the tip up barrel for safety and ease of loading.  A lot of people find that charging the LCPs and Kel-Tecs is difficult.  I hope they make this in the .380 besides the .22 and .25 ACP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJR</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/18/taurus-have-updated-the-pt22-pt25/#comment-18838</link>
		<dc:creator>MJR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4541#comment-18838</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just wondering if I&#039;m ever gonna see one of these. My wife wants one as a back up. I think they would be cool with a second six inch long target barrel for practice time, and even a threaded one for a silencer. The new polymer one is a lot more attractive to me than the older metal ones. Its sleek, tactical looking and I like how the trigger guard comes all the way out to the end of the gun. It looks more ergonomic than my Ruger LCP.

I have done a little looking and it seems that its hard to make a good 22 rimfire pistol that is a small pocket gun like this. Maybe because its a revolver cartridge. I&#039;ve heard its a lot to do with how much gunk the spent cartridge leaves after you&#039;ve put 75- 100 rounds through it. Malfunctions seem to be common for all pistol brands not just the pot metal satuday night specials. Beretta 21a, Taurus PT-22, Walther TPH, Pheonix arms HP22A, Jimenez arms JA-22, Jennings J-22. They all seem to have problems. And in every forum people will tell you to clean them during range time. WHAT!!? I have even read of a revolver owner expressing the need to clean the cylinders during actual use.

I&#039;ve decided that the cartridge can&#039;t be to blame because my wife and I own a S&amp;W 22a and a Ruger Mark II and have put tens of thousands of rounds through them without cleaning them and never had a malfunction. Those are full size guns though. It has to be the design of these tiny guns. The extraction and feeding of the guns should be looked at by the designers. If it can be done in a big gun it should be possible to scale it down to this pocket size. This makes sense logically. Right? 

Perhaps these gun companies have not been trying hard enough. There are many, many full size 22lr auto pistols out there that function flawlessly dirty or not. They took the time to develop the other guns that they sell but maybe not these. Now that people are carrying two or sometimes three guns maybe things will improve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just wondering if I&#8217;m ever gonna see one of these. My wife wants one as a back up. I think they would be cool with a second six inch long target barrel for practice time, and even a threaded one for a silencer. The new polymer one is a lot more attractive to me than the older metal ones. Its sleek, tactical looking and I like how the trigger guard comes all the way out to the end of the gun. It looks more ergonomic than my Ruger LCP.</p>
<p>I have done a little looking and it seems that its hard to make a good 22 rimfire pistol that is a small pocket gun like this. Maybe because its a revolver cartridge. I&#8217;ve heard its a lot to do with how much gunk the spent cartridge leaves after you&#8217;ve put 75- 100 rounds through it. Malfunctions seem to be common for all pistol brands not just the pot metal satuday night specials. Beretta 21a, Taurus PT-22, Walther TPH, Pheonix arms HP22A, Jimenez arms JA-22, Jennings J-22. They all seem to have problems. And in every forum people will tell you to clean them during range time. WHAT!!? I have even read of a revolver owner expressing the need to clean the cylinders during actual use.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve decided that the cartridge can&#8217;t be to blame because my wife and I own a S&amp;W 22a and a Ruger Mark II and have put tens of thousands of rounds through them without cleaning them and never had a malfunction. Those are full size guns though. It has to be the design of these tiny guns. The extraction and feeding of the guns should be looked at by the designers. If it can be done in a big gun it should be possible to scale it down to this pocket size. This makes sense logically. Right? </p>
<p>Perhaps these gun companies have not been trying hard enough. There are many, many full size 22lr auto pistols out there that function flawlessly dirty or not. They took the time to develop the other guns that they sell but maybe not these. Now that people are carrying two or sometimes three guns maybe things will improve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrStrangegun</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/18/taurus-have-updated-the-pt22-pt25/#comment-5208</link>
		<dc:creator>DrStrangegun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4541#comment-5208</guid>
		<description>They should make available a threaded barrel for the PT22...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should make available a threaded barrel for the PT22&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
