<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M22 Pistol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/17/m22-pistol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/17/m22-pistol/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:46:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: G. R. Nolan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/17/m22-pistol/#comment-14000</link>
		<dc:creator>G. R. Nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 02:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4460#comment-14000</guid>
		<description>I saw the M-22 for the first time, today. Very good looking pistol and really hard to distinguish from a Glock until you make a close inspection. Very smooth to operate, but I thought the trigger was a little sharp around the edges. Looks like quality throughout. Sites are pure Glock style. Nice feel to the weapon, although I did not fire it.

Given the price, it looks like a reasonable buy. Certainly interesting that it comes with two springs for SV and HV .22 Cal ammo, . I did not find the safety features to be an obstacle, but very useful for instructing a new shooter. The side slide releases may be a problem with holstering, but not sure.

I do not see many people shooting .22 at the range, but given the price of ammo and where it appears to be going (UP), .22 cal then has it&#039;s advantages. You can shoot all day at low cost verses .9mm, .38 Super, .40, .45 or long guns. I for one like to first shoot my high caliber pistols and then spend most of the day with practice using my .22 cal HV (Kimber and S&amp;W).

On a scale of 1-10, I would give this pistol a 9.

GRN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the M-22 for the first time, today. Very good looking pistol and really hard to distinguish from a Glock until you make a close inspection. Very smooth to operate, but I thought the trigger was a little sharp around the edges. Looks like quality throughout. Sites are pure Glock style. Nice feel to the weapon, although I did not fire it.</p>
<p>Given the price, it looks like a reasonable buy. Certainly interesting that it comes with two springs for SV and HV .22 Cal ammo, . I did not find the safety features to be an obstacle, but very useful for instructing a new shooter. The side slide releases may be a problem with holstering, but not sure.</p>
<p>I do not see many people shooting .22 at the range, but given the price of ammo and where it appears to be going (UP), .22 cal then has it&#8217;s advantages. You can shoot all day at low cost verses .9mm, .38 Super, .40, .45 or long guns. I for one like to first shoot my high caliber pistols and then spend most of the day with practice using my .22 cal HV (Kimber and S&amp;W).</p>
<p>On a scale of 1-10, I would give this pistol a 9.</p>
<p>GRN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gun_maker</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/17/m22-pistol/#comment-13211</link>
		<dc:creator>gun_maker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4460#comment-13211</guid>
		<description>I have personally inspected this weapon and it is build sound. The gun has multiple safetys including a switch saftey, a trigger lock and a system that will not allow the hammer to cock unless the saftey is not engaged. this weapon has a decocker. This gun has been thourly engineered. It looks and feels like a glock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have personally inspected this weapon and it is build sound. The gun has multiple safetys including a switch saftey, a trigger lock and a system that will not allow the hammer to cock unless the saftey is not engaged. this weapon has a decocker. This gun has been thourly engineered. It looks and feels like a glock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrStrangegun</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/17/m22-pistol/#comment-7704</link>
		<dc:creator>DrStrangegun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 03:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4460#comment-7704</guid>
		<description>Pardon my vitriol, but if the same guy here is responsible for putting the non-locking safety on the single-action capable P22, and this idiot does the same thing  on this pistol, I will personally ensure that we will *NOT* carry it in my store. 

Any gun that leaves you hangin&#039; with the hammer back, unlocked, over a pin block safety that may or may not work at any given time is UNSAFE, a FAULTY DESIGN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon my vitriol, but if the same guy here is responsible for putting the non-locking safety on the single-action capable P22, and this idiot does the same thing  on this pistol, I will personally ensure that we will *NOT* carry it in my store. </p>
<p>Any gun that leaves you hangin&#8217; with the hammer back, unlocked, over a pin block safety that may or may not work at any given time is UNSAFE, a FAULTY DESIGN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lap1</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/17/m22-pistol/#comment-7528</link>
		<dc:creator>Lap1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4460#comment-7528</guid>
		<description>Well... it felt real good ! I had the pleasure of handling it this friday..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; it felt real good ! I had the pleasure of handling it this friday..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Hafemeister</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/17/m22-pistol/#comment-5135</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Hafemeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4460#comment-5135</guid>
		<description>Wait. Is that a hammer poking out the back. That is so not right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait. Is that a hammer poking out the back. That is so not right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vak</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/17/m22-pistol/#comment-5053</link>
		<dc:creator>Vak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4460#comment-5053</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of those .22lr glock conversions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of those .22lr glock conversions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/17/m22-pistol/#comment-5048</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4460#comment-5048</guid>
		<description>I think Wolfram Kriegleder needs a better focus group. Slide mounted control is not what I call &quot;wanted&quot; by Americans target shooters. 

What Americans would like to see is a low cost versions of Olympic target pistols and not a tactical target pistol.  

I sure hope that M22 slide isn&#039;t made out of pot metal like the P22 and sig mosquito.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Wolfram Kriegleder needs a better focus group. Slide mounted control is not what I call &#8220;wanted&#8221; by Americans target shooters. </p>
<p>What Americans would like to see is a low cost versions of Olympic target pistols and not a tactical target pistol.  </p>
<p>I sure hope that M22 slide isn&#8217;t made out of pot metal like the P22 and sig mosquito.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennersen</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/17/m22-pistol/#comment-5040</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4460#comment-5040</guid>
		<description>I like, but then again I like the P-22.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like, but then again I like the P-22.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/17/m22-pistol/#comment-5028</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4460#comment-5028</guid>
		<description>Ouch. A .22 LR Glock is nice, but in 2008, why so many mechanical safeties ? If it&#039;s like Walther P22, it may even be lacking a decocker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch. A .22 LR Glock is nice, but in 2008, why so many mechanical safeties ? If it&#8217;s like Walther P22, it may even be lacking a decocker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
