<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glock G22 RTF2: 4th Gen Glock is official</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:38:33 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-17857</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-17857</guid>
		<description>To date Glock has not released the 4th gen pistol. This is all heresay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To date Glock has not released the 4th gen pistol. This is all heresay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smolti</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-17768</link>
		<dc:creator>smolti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-17768</guid>
		<description>The slide serrations look like they imitate the shape of your fingertip.  I know it&#039;s kinda gross but almost like the shape of your fingernail clipping.  Curved maybe for your thumb to grab on to?  I don&#039;t know,  I&#039;m not really much of an expert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The slide serrations look like they imitate the shape of your fingertip.  I know it&#8217;s kinda gross but almost like the shape of your fingernail clipping.  Curved maybe for your thumb to grab on to?  I don&#8217;t know,  I&#8217;m not really much of an expert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmill</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-17391</link>
		<dc:creator>rmill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-17391</guid>
		<description>just bought mine and find it much easier to handle with less slippage when hands sweat.  the looks won&#039;t interfere with its function.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just bought mine and find it much easier to handle with less slippage when hands sweat.  the looks won&#8217;t interfere with its function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zach</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-17082</link>
		<dc:creator>zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-17082</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s ugly, the rtf grip according to massad ayoob is excellent, but yes, I agree the serrations look bad and don&#039;t look any more comfortable then the old one. I would just do this, buy (if possible) an RTF frame, and then just put a 3rd gen. slide on it. If not, then just buy the whole gun and switch slides. problem solved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s ugly, the rtf grip according to massad ayoob is excellent, but yes, I agree the serrations look bad and don&#8217;t look any more comfortable then the old one. I would just do this, buy (if possible) an RTF frame, and then just put a 3rd gen. slide on it. If not, then just buy the whole gun and switch slides. problem solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-14937</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-14937</guid>
		<description>Change is different. I just purchased this gun after testing out both the 3G and this 4G Glock.  This grip is very comfortable and I definitely feel more secure holding it versus the 3G versions.  As far as the new serrations, I thought it looked a lot better for my taste. Looks like they put more attention to detail with the design of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Change is different. I just purchased this gun after testing out both the 3G and this 4G Glock.  This grip is very comfortable and I definitely feel more secure holding it versus the 3G versions.  As far as the new serrations, I thought it looked a lot better for my taste. Looks like they put more attention to detail with the design of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DasBeck</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-13638</link>
		<dc:creator>DasBeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-13638</guid>
		<description>This thing may look ugly, but who cares. The grip is awesome. It couldn&#039;t slip unless you threw it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This thing may look ugly, but who cares. The grip is awesome. It couldn&#8217;t slip unless you threw it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-9994</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-9994</guid>
		<description>I purchased the Glock 22 RTF2 a few days ago and so far I&#039;m in love with it. Yes, the serrations look stupid, but the new grip is amazing. To anyone who has used this gun a lot: Any problems that I should be looking forward to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased the Glock 22 RTF2 a few days ago and so far I&#8217;m in love with it. Yes, the serrations look stupid, but the new grip is amazing. To anyone who has used this gun a lot: Any problems that I should be looking forward to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-9264</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 16:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-9264</guid>
		<description>I agree with dogon.  The serrations appear to be backwards in my opinion.  Why did they have to mess with them?  What most companies do when designing new firearms is to study the way previous owners have modified them.  As far as the slide serrations, I have seen them customized to be diagonal and even to add serrations near the muzzle.  These new &quot;serrations&quot; look weak.  Glock, however, is known for innovation rather than immitation and these serrations probably work.  I cannot decide until I pick one up.  Glocks are indeed ugly.  These days, I favor revolvers, my current favorite is my 50th anniversary .44 mag Blackhawk.  We watch movies together a lot.  But, when I go out, there is a G27 with laser guide-rod, pachmeyer grip, re-triple blued Quick-Draw, XS sights, Glock extended mag-release and slide-stop lever, custom trigger and .357 sig stainless barrel drop-in parts; laser engraved with flames and the Punisher Skull.  Overkill? Maybe.  The fact is: I know my Glock will work.  No matter the scenario, I can count on it above anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with dogon.  The serrations appear to be backwards in my opinion.  Why did they have to mess with them?  What most companies do when designing new firearms is to study the way previous owners have modified them.  As far as the slide serrations, I have seen them customized to be diagonal and even to add serrations near the muzzle.  These new &#8220;serrations&#8221; look weak.  Glock, however, is known for innovation rather than immitation and these serrations probably work.  I cannot decide until I pick one up.  Glocks are indeed ugly.  These days, I favor revolvers, my current favorite is my 50th anniversary .44 mag Blackhawk.  We watch movies together a lot.  But, when I go out, there is a G27 with laser guide-rod, pachmeyer grip, re-triple blued Quick-Draw, XS sights, Glock extended mag-release and slide-stop lever, custom trigger and .357 sig stainless barrel drop-in parts; laser engraved with flames and the Punisher Skull.  Overkill? Maybe.  The fact is: I know my Glock will work.  No matter the scenario, I can count on it above anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Candler</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-8085</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Candler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-8085</guid>
		<description>Use a tighter grip I have had no problems with mine been through 500 rounds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use a tighter grip I have had no problems with mine been through 500 rounds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-7646</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-7646</guid>
		<description>As long as they fixed the failure to feed issue in attaching a weaponlight to the G22, that gun will rule. Honestly, who cares what it looks like? It&#039;s a tool, not a showpiece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as they fixed the failure to feed issue in attaching a weaponlight to the G22, that gun will rule. Honestly, who cares what it looks like? It&#8217;s a tool, not a showpiece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glockRTF2</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-7044</link>
		<dc:creator>glockRTF2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-7044</guid>
		<description>I just got for 3 weeks now and everytime i shoot it it would get jammed after 7 or 8 rounds is anybody else is having this problem..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got for 3 weeks now and everytime i shoot it it would get jammed after 7 or 8 rounds is anybody else is having this problem..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yankee</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-6849</link>
		<dc:creator>yankee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-6849</guid>
		<description>AMEN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMEN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleatus Van Damme</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-6772</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleatus Van Damme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-6772</guid>
		<description>I find ignorance in those of you who believe in the cosmetic looks over function. The only reason I am commenting is because I carry one now. Its reliability is the same, the grip is improved. Watch, it will catch on, and to those who don&#039;t like it, don&#039;t buy it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find ignorance in those of you who believe in the cosmetic looks over function. The only reason I am commenting is because I carry one now. Its reliability is the same, the grip is improved. Watch, it will catch on, and to those who don&#8217;t like it, don&#8217;t buy it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gglass</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-6005</link>
		<dc:creator>gglass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-6005</guid>
		<description>If any other manufacturer changed so little and called their product the next generation, the buyers would run away in droves.

It really must be nice to have a cult following.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If any other manufacturer changed so little and called their product the next generation, the buyers would run away in droves.</p>
<p>It really must be nice to have a cult following.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gglass</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-6003</link>
		<dc:creator>gglass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-6003</guid>
		<description>MY EYES!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MY EYES!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-5763</link>
		<dc:creator>David H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-5763</guid>
		<description>Great site Steve. Have 5 Glocks and love everything about them, company, support and quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site Steve. Have 5 Glocks and love everything about them, company, support and quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogon1013</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-5118</link>
		<dc:creator>dogon1013</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-5118</guid>
		<description>I handled it at the show. The grip texture actually feels good (very grippy). But the serrations do not feel any better (I think worse).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I handled it at the show. The grip texture actually feels good (very grippy). But the serrations do not feel any better (I think worse).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 22lr</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-5037</link>
		<dc:creator>22lr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-5037</guid>
		<description>Wow that looks really bad. I defiantly wont be buying a new one (if I even ever buy an older 3rd gen).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow that looks really bad. I defiantly wont be buying a new one (if I even ever buy an older 3rd gen).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rustmeister</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/16/4th-gen-glock-is-official/#comment-5032</link>
		<dc:creator>Rustmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4393#comment-5032</guid>
		<description>Since when have Glocks looked like anything other than awful?  =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when have Glocks looked like anything other than awful?  =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
