<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My SHOW Show 2009 predictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/12/my-show-show-2009-predictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/12/my-show-show-2009-predictions/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:33:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/12/my-show-show-2009-predictions/#comment-23685</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4221#comment-23685</guid>
		<description>Just remember when you go to the shot show most of the hotels have union workers who support anti gun liberals politicians, so I tip a lot less to the union hotels.  The Ventician was non union the last time I was there I tip them a lot more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just remember when you go to the shot show most of the hotels have union workers who support anti gun liberals politicians, so I tip a lot less to the union hotels.  The Ventician was non union the last time I was there I tip them a lot more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i-luv-1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/12/my-show-show-2009-predictions/#comment-5139</link>
		<dc:creator>i-luv-1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4221#comment-5139</guid>
		<description>well... an m1911a1 with polymer silde n frame will be great. after all it lightens the gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well&#8230; an m1911a1 with polymer silde n frame will be great. after all it lightens the gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogon1013</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/12/my-show-show-2009-predictions/#comment-4867</link>
		<dc:creator>dogon1013</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4221#comment-4867</guid>
		<description>Is Ruger&#039;s WOW product the LCR which was recently leaked (accidentally I believe)? Pictures are up on several boards. At least it looks like ruger didn&#039;t copy someone on this polymer grip revolver (but I don&#039;t know my revolvers very well, so maybe they did).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Ruger&#8217;s WOW product the LCR which was recently leaked (accidentally I believe)? Pictures are up on several boards. At least it looks like ruger didn&#8217;t copy someone on this polymer grip revolver (but I don&#8217;t know my revolvers very well, so maybe they did).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/12/my-show-show-2009-predictions/#comment-4836</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4221#comment-4836</guid>
		<description>Bullpup aren&#039;t new. The first bullpup design was Thorneycroft which is a bolt action carbine. I believe it was invented around 1900.  

Bullpup design are fundamentally flawed. Over 100 years and the flaws are still there. 

The US military use their rifles to fight wars and not to show off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bullpup aren&#8217;t new. The first bullpup design was Thorneycroft which is a bolt action carbine. I believe it was invented around 1900.  </p>
<p>Bullpup design are fundamentally flawed. Over 100 years and the flaws are still there. </p>
<p>The US military use their rifles to fight wars and not to show off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/12/my-show-show-2009-predictions/#comment-4832</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4221#comment-4832</guid>
		<description>Dave, I sure do! They are quite a few but they concept has never been used for a  mainstream civilian rifle. Here is are a few example:

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/09/12/alex-bullpup-bolt-action-rifles/
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/02/t-4-bullpup-pcp-air-gun/
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/04/desert-tactical-arms-stealth-recon-scout/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, I sure do! They are quite a few but they concept has never been used for a  mainstream civilian rifle. Here is are a few example:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/09/12/alex-bullpup-bolt-action-rifles/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/09/12/alex-bullpup-bolt-action-rifles/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/02/t-4-bullpup-pcp-air-gun/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/02/t-4-bullpup-pcp-air-gun/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/04/desert-tactical-arms-stealth-recon-scout/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/04/desert-tactical-arms-stealth-recon-scout/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/12/my-show-show-2009-predictions/#comment-4831</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4221#comment-4831</guid>
		<description>Do you really mean a &quot;bullpup bolt action rifle&quot;?  Is there anything like that in existence?

I&#039;m a fan of the bullpup concept and am sad we haven&#039;t seen wider development of the design in the U.S. with autoloaders, but I have a hard time seeing the attraction of a manual action at the rear of a stock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you really mean a &#8220;bullpup bolt action rifle&#8221;?  Is there anything like that in existence?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a fan of the bullpup concept and am sad we haven&#8217;t seen wider development of the design in the U.S. with autoloaders, but I have a hard time seeing the attraction of a manual action at the rear of a stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Concerned_Soldier</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/12/my-show-show-2009-predictions/#comment-4824</link>
		<dc:creator>Concerned_Soldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4221#comment-4824</guid>
		<description>Steve,
Great Post,
Warning not all predictions will come out of the shot show.

I agree with the new cartridge, even if I think we really don&#039;t need one.

Glock, Yes.... BUT why?

Springfield Armory M1A in .308 with two round burst for MIL/LE Only!  You have to admit that would be cool!!

Being military and having used the M4 and M16, I wish someone (read Colt, or FN) would Sh&amp;tcan the  gas system and make a move toward all piston type firearm for the US Military.

Another would be a new pistol for the US Military, maybe something like the M&amp;P .40.

Just my 2 cents.

Thanks Steve, great site, best I have seen so far and visit often.

V/R

C_S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,<br />
Great Post,<br />
Warning not all predictions will come out of the shot show.</p>
<p>I agree with the new cartridge, even if I think we really don&#8217;t need one.</p>
<p>Glock, Yes&#8230;. BUT why?</p>
<p>Springfield Armory M1A in .308 with two round burst for MIL/LE Only!  You have to admit that would be cool!!</p>
<p>Being military and having used the M4 and M16, I wish someone (read Colt, or FN) would Sh&amp;tcan the  gas system and make a move toward all piston type firearm for the US Military.</p>
<p>Another would be a new pistol for the US Military, maybe something like the M&amp;P .40.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents.</p>
<p>Thanks Steve, great site, best I have seen so far and visit often.</p>
<p>V/R</p>
<p>C_S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 22lr</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/12/my-show-show-2009-predictions/#comment-4821</link>
		<dc:creator>22lr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4221#comment-4821</guid>
		<description>Im hoping that the 9mm LCP comes true. I would go crazy trying to get one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im hoping that the 9mm LCP comes true. I would go crazy trying to get one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel E. Watters</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/12/my-show-show-2009-predictions/#comment-4820</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel E. Watters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4221#comment-4820</guid>
		<description>I suspect that S&amp;W will introduce a M1873 SAA clone before Ruger ever introduces an AR-15.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that S&amp;W will introduce a M1873 SAA clone before Ruger ever introduces an AR-15.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/01/12/my-show-show-2009-predictions/#comment-4818</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=4221#comment-4818</guid>
		<description>I believe that the Taurus in 4.6 was already confirmed by the president of Taurus on Tom Greshem&#039;s radio shot. 

Also, Michael Bane already had a picture of Magpul&#039;s new rifle on his web site. If it makes it to the public is another question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that the Taurus in 4.6 was already confirmed by the president of Taurus on Tom Greshem&#8217;s radio shot. </p>
<p>Also, Michael Bane already had a picture of Magpul&#8217;s new rifle on his web site. If it makes it to the public is another question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
