Comments on: Gravity guns are impossible says scientists

By: Mikee

Mikee — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 04:48:15 +0000

I am reminded that 20 some years ago as a post doc working on UHV mass spectrometry techniques, I was impressed when some of the grad students in our group came up with a miniature MS design that required only a smidgeon of neutron star matter to act as a gravitational dispersant for ionized particles.

As I recall, this idea arose just after we learned in a seminar about X-ray lenses.

Good times at the old North Ave Trade School….

By: Gehraz

Gehraz — Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:02:14 +0000

The game in that screenshot is Half Life 2.

By: jdun1911

jdun1911 — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:38:33 +0000

And in ten years we will have one.

By: Sean Nack

Sean Nack — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:20:17 +0000

negative nancies! once upon a time, computers were supposed to be out of the reach of the average american…

By: DBaker

DBaker — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:13:27 +0000

They obviously haven’t read their Weber. Crystalline electron crystals, such as those formed by a degenerate harmonic trap, increase in gravitational wave generation efficiency with the square of the number of particles. You still need a couple of hundred pounds of trapped degenerate electrons to generate a watt of gravitational radiation, but it is not ‘impossible’ by any means. Their calculations are naive and simplistic.

By: Ed

Ed — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:59:32 +0000

Damn.

By: SwissFreek

SwissFreek — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:50:56 +0000

To put the acceleration of gravity into perspective, imagine a decently sporty sedan, or maybe an entry-level sports car (VW GTi, Subaru Impreza, that sort of thing). You will get a 0-60mph acceleration time of maybe 6 seconds. Not bad right? 60 miles per hour is 26 meters per second (and change), meaning that if you get to that speed in 6 seconds, you are hitting about 4.4 meters per second squared, a little less than half the acceleration of gravity. Now take a rip-roaring supercar (Ferarri, Lamborghini, what have you). You make 0-60 in just under 3 seconds. That’s just shy of 9 meters per second squared, still a little bit below the acceleration of gravity (on Earth), and that car will most definitely snap your neck back into the headrest with a quickness.

My point is that when I read this post about accelerating a space ship at the rate of gravity, my first thought was “that’s it?” but in fact by our standards gravity isn’t that pokey. Of course when you talk about space travel the acceleration of gravity is an important number, since gravity is the force you have to escape to get out of orbit (of Earth).

And as an aside, 1×10^25 the electrical output of the globe is also a crapload of power.