<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Wilson Carry Pistol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/14/bill-wilson-carry-pistol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/14/bill-wilson-carry-pistol/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:26:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/14/bill-wilson-carry-pistol/#comment-22685</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3710#comment-22685</guid>
		<description>From what i understand most people that buy kimbers (which are really nice guns) replace parts with wilson pieces anyway.  Why not just buy the wilson in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what i understand most people that buy kimbers (which are really nice guns) replace parts with wilson pieces anyway.  Why not just buy the wilson in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/14/bill-wilson-carry-pistol/#comment-11468</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3710#comment-11468</guid>
		<description>The best way I can describe the difference in a Kimber or any other production line 1911 is, the production line 1911&#039;s are like a Timex watch, &quot;they take a lickin and keep on tickin, but they are just that a Timex, not a Rolex. I have a Wilson and I have an XD. Both very nice, one&#039;s a Chevy and ones a Rolls
The economy is bad but there are still going to be people who buy Rolex&#039;s.
NOT EVERYONE WITH MONEY IS A CROOK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best way I can describe the difference in a Kimber or any other production line 1911 is, the production line 1911&#8217;s are like a Timex watch, &#8220;they take a lickin and keep on tickin, but they are just that a Timex, not a Rolex. I have a Wilson and I have an XD. Both very nice, one&#8217;s a Chevy and ones a Rolls<br />
The economy is bad but there are still going to be people who buy Rolex&#8217;s.<br />
NOT EVERYONE WITH MONEY IS A CROOK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barney</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/14/bill-wilson-carry-pistol/#comment-11239</link>
		<dc:creator>barney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3710#comment-11239</guid>
		<description>That is a beautiful 1911.  It&#039;s a work of art.  

For you naysayers...  A Wilson Combat is far superior to anything that Kimber could ever dream of making.  What makes the price so high?  Every pistol is a custom pistol.  There is nothing standard on a Wilson.  Each gun is handcrafted and there is no such thing as a production line at their facility.  Accuracy?  The 5&quot; barrels are guaranteed 1&quot; at 25 yards and the 4&quot; barrels are guaranteed 1.5&quot; at 25 yards.  Quality.  You pay for it.  You can buy 3 Kimber Crimson Carries for the same price because Kimber can probably make more than 3 of them in the time it takes to handcraft 1 Wilson.  Nothing against Kimber.  My point is just that one is made by a production line and the other is handcrafted by a person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a beautiful 1911.  It&#8217;s a work of art.  </p>
<p>For you naysayers&#8230;  A Wilson Combat is far superior to anything that Kimber could ever dream of making.  What makes the price so high?  Every pistol is a custom pistol.  There is nothing standard on a Wilson.  Each gun is handcrafted and there is no such thing as a production line at their facility.  Accuracy?  The 5&#8243; barrels are guaranteed 1&#8243; at 25 yards and the 4&#8243; barrels are guaranteed 1.5&#8243; at 25 yards.  Quality.  You pay for it.  You can buy 3 Kimber Crimson Carries for the same price because Kimber can probably make more than 3 of them in the time it takes to handcraft 1 Wilson.  Nothing against Kimber.  My point is just that one is made by a production line and the other is handcrafted by a person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/14/bill-wilson-carry-pistol/#comment-7412</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3710#comment-7412</guid>
		<description>I have had a Wilson in the past.  They are worth every penny.  Far nicer than a Kimber.  Maybe as accurate, but the fit and finish is the best in the business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had a Wilson in the past.  They are worth every penny.  Far nicer than a Kimber.  Maybe as accurate, but the fit and finish is the best in the business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MjrPayne</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/14/bill-wilson-carry-pistol/#comment-6245</link>
		<dc:creator>MjrPayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3710#comment-6245</guid>
		<description>Obviously at $2,800 this pistol is not designed for the average Joe.  Maybe it&#039;s designed for all of these investment crooks who have stolen other peoples money or CEOs using the money we bailed their sorry asses out with!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously at $2,800 this pistol is not designed for the average Joe.  Maybe it&#8217;s designed for all of these investment crooks who have stolen other peoples money or CEOs using the money we bailed their sorry asses out with!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JACK WAGONER</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/14/bill-wilson-carry-pistol/#comment-6198</link>
		<dc:creator>JACK WAGONER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3710#comment-6198</guid>
		<description>I CAN BUY 3 ULTRA CARRY 45 ACP KIMBERS WITH CRIMSON LAZER SIGHTS FOR THAT PRICE! 

WHAT MAKES THEM SO HIGH?

CANNOT BE $2000 DIFFERENCE IN A BILL WILSON AND A KIMBER, ESPECIALLY IN THIS ECONOMY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I CAN BUY 3 ULTRA CARRY 45 ACP KIMBERS WITH CRIMSON LAZER SIGHTS FOR THAT PRICE! </p>
<p>WHAT MAKES THEM SO HIGH?</p>
<p>CANNOT BE $2000 DIFFERENCE IN A BILL WILSON AND A KIMBER, ESPECIALLY IN THIS ECONOMY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/14/bill-wilson-carry-pistol/#comment-4431</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 02:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3710#comment-4431</guid>
		<description>$2800?  I don&#039;t think my allowance will pay for that very quickly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$2800?  I don&#8217;t think my allowance will pay for that very quickly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/14/bill-wilson-carry-pistol/#comment-4088</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3710#comment-4088</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a nice compact 1911.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a nice compact 1911.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
