<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M3 Grease Gun possibly still in service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/04/m3-grease-gun-possibly-still-in-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/04/m3-grease-gun-possibly-still-in-service/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:18:29 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Big Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/04/m3-grease-gun-possibly-still-in-service/#comment-18155</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3551#comment-18155</guid>
		<description>National Guard in SoCal has them in the motor pool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National Guard in SoCal has them in the motor pool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "gunner"</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/04/m3-grease-gun-possibly-still-in-service/#comment-6701</link>
		<dc:creator>"gunner"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3551#comment-6701</guid>
		<description>bolter,
 the m-3 and m-3a1 were nicknamed &quot;the grease gun&quot; for their alleged resemblance to the garage mechanic&#039;s tool. they came out in ww2 as a replacement for the m1928a1 and m-1 and m-1a1 thompson submachine guns and as the blog post notes, remained in service until just recently, and may still be held in some national guard arms rooms. i did see one m-3 model racked in an m113 apc on a visit to a vermont guard unit back some years ago when my daughter was a teen ager, i was amused thinking it was surely older than any of the troops in the unit.
&quot;gunner&quot;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M3_submachine_gun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bolter,<br />
 the m-3 and m-3a1 were nicknamed &#8220;the grease gun&#8221; for their alleged resemblance to the garage mechanic&#8217;s tool. they came out in ww2 as a replacement for the m1928a1 and m-1 and m-1a1 thompson submachine guns and as the blog post notes, remained in service until just recently, and may still be held in some national guard arms rooms. i did see one m-3 model racked in an m113 apc on a visit to a vermont guard unit back some years ago when my daughter was a teen ager, i was amused thinking it was surely older than any of the troops in the unit.<br />
&#8220;gunner&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M3_submachine_gun" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M3_submachine_gun</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayson</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/04/m3-grease-gun-possibly-still-in-service/#comment-5189</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3551#comment-5189</guid>
		<description>I was the unit armorer for B Company 8th Engineer Battalion stationed in Ft Hood Texas and back in 1990 we still had some M3s They were issued to the mechanics on the tank recovery vehicles and the CEVs if I remember correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was the unit armorer for B Company 8th Engineer Battalion stationed in Ft Hood Texas and back in 1990 we still had some M3s They were issued to the mechanics on the tank recovery vehicles and the CEVs if I remember correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/04/m3-grease-gun-possibly-still-in-service/#comment-4501</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 01:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3551#comment-4501</guid>
		<description>a friend of mine was a tanker in the gulf war in 1991 and he was issued an m3 grease gun and a m1911, both in .45.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a friend of mine was a tanker in the gulf war in 1991 and he was issued an m3 grease gun and a m1911, both in .45.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Daddy</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/04/m3-grease-gun-possibly-still-in-service/#comment-4158</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Daddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3551#comment-4158</guid>
		<description>I carried one when I was stationed in Fulda, Germany in about 1981. I was a driver in a M-577 for regimental HQ 11 ACR. I was a 19 Delta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I carried one when I was stationed in Fulda, Germany in about 1981. I was a driver in a M-577 for regimental HQ 11 ACR. I was a 19 Delta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bolter</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/04/m3-grease-gun-possibly-still-in-service/#comment-3866</link>
		<dc:creator>Bolter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3551#comment-3866</guid>
		<description>My old friend (Major in U.S. Army) was a Mechanized Infantry platoon leader (Bradleys) and Company Commander in the early 2000s.  M4s were it back then, and a few M-16 Firing Port Weapons also.  He kept a Firing Port Weapon near him in the turret for &quot;close encounters&quot; because it was compact and fired full-auto only.  Never heard of grease guns at all, I&#039;d bet this is old information.  One problem is the supply of .45 caliber ammo to line units since regular Army uses the M9 in 9mm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My old friend (Major in U.S. Army) was a Mechanized Infantry platoon leader (Bradleys) and Company Commander in the early 2000s.  M4s were it back then, and a few M-16 Firing Port Weapons also.  He kept a Firing Port Weapon near him in the turret for &#8220;close encounters&#8221; because it was compact and fired full-auto only.  Never heard of grease guns at all, I&#8217;d bet this is old information.  One problem is the supply of .45 caliber ammo to line units since regular Army uses the M9 in 9mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/12/04/m3-grease-gun-possibly-still-in-service/#comment-3823</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3551#comment-3823</guid>
		<description>The US military doesn&#039;t throw anything away, well mostly. They keep them in storage until it is needed again or forced by congress to depose of it. Worn out none weapon equipments can be auction off, tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US military doesn&#8217;t throw anything away, well mostly. They keep them in storage until it is needed again or forced by congress to depose of it. Worn out none weapon equipments can be auction off, tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
