<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ballistics by the inch: a $15,000 ballistics experiment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/30/ballistics-by-the-inch-a-15000-ballistics-experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/30/ballistics-by-the-inch-a-15000-ballistics-experiment/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:38:33 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mikee</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/30/ballistics-by-the-inch-a-15000-ballistics-experiment/#comment-3810</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3461#comment-3810</guid>
		<description>I hope (before I go look) that they used multiple barrels of each length, and provided results based on exact bore size and land/groove dimensions.  

I think the cylinder gap on a revolver might vary enough from one gun to the next, or one cylinder to the next, that the repeatability of velocity could be affected.

I also wonder if the lot to lot variation for ammunition can be a significant contributor to velocity differences....

All in all, I look forward to reviewing the data</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope (before I go look) that they used multiple barrels of each length, and provided results based on exact bore size and land/groove dimensions.  </p>
<p>I think the cylinder gap on a revolver might vary enough from one gun to the next, or one cylinder to the next, that the repeatability of velocity could be affected.</p>
<p>I also wonder if the lot to lot variation for ammunition can be a significant contributor to velocity differences&#8230;.</p>
<p>All in all, I look forward to reviewing the data</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K. D.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/30/ballistics-by-the-inch-a-15000-ballistics-experiment/#comment-3690</link>
		<dc:creator>K. D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3461#comment-3690</guid>
		<description>There is nothing cooler than shooting rounds for an experiment. 6,000? You are my new hero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing cooler than shooting rounds for an experiment. 6,000? You are my new hero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/30/ballistics-by-the-inch-a-15000-ballistics-experiment/#comment-3689</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3461#comment-3689</guid>
		<description>What these guys have done is 13 different types of cartridges all under the same conditions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What these guys have done is 13 different types of cartridges all under the same conditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel E. Watters</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/30/ballistics-by-the-inch-a-15000-ballistics-experiment/#comment-3688</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel E. Watters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3461#comment-3688</guid>
		<description>Barrel length experiments like this used to pop up in gun magazines every couple of years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barrel length experiments like this used to pop up in gun magazines every couple of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Downey</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/30/ballistics-by-the-inch-a-15000-ballistics-experiment/#comment-3687</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Downey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3461#comment-3687</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for the positive mention - we&#039;re hoping that people find it useful, perhaps even be inspired to do some testing of their own and post the results on our blog to help expand the database available to all.

Jim D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for the positive mention &#8211; we&#8217;re hoping that people find it useful, perhaps even be inspired to do some testing of their own and post the results on our blog to help expand the database available to all.</p>
<p>Jim D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
