Comments on: Has Colt chosen the MWG 90 round magazine for the IAR? http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/has-colt-chosen-the-mwg-90-round-magazine-for-the-iar/ Firearms not Politics Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:18:29 +1300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Daniel E. Watters http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/has-colt-chosen-the-mwg-90-round-magazine-for-the-iar/#comment-17440 Daniel E. Watters Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:35:54 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3435#comment-17440 Brian: The .30 AR ammunition is heavier per round than the 5.56mm NATO and undoubtedly more than the 7.62x39mm. A dedicated double stack magazine for the .30 AR would be slightly taller and fatter than an equivalent capacity 7.62mm NATO magazine. The only magazine dimension where you'd be smaller than the 7.62mm NATO is in length, front-to-back. Brian:

The .30 AR ammunition is heavier per round than the 5.56mm NATO and undoubtedly more than the 7.62×39mm. A dedicated double stack magazine for the .30 AR would be slightly taller and fatter than an equivalent capacity 7.62mm NATO magazine. The only magazine dimension where you’d be smaller than the 7.62mm NATO is in length, front-to-back.

]]> By: Brian P http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/has-colt-chosen-the-mwg-90-round-magazine-for-the-iar/#comment-17428 Brian P Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:09:24 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3435#comment-17428 Hey since the military is so hot on upgrading or replacing the AR platform, where does the new Remington 15/30ar ammo fit into the mix??? Could they use this in a close combat platform for extra energy and less weight?? Hey since the military is so hot on upgrading or replacing the AR platform, where does the new Remington 15/30ar ammo fit into the mix???
Could they use this in a close combat platform for extra energy and less weight??

]]> By: WB BRYANT http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/has-colt-chosen-the-mwg-90-round-magazine-for-the-iar/#comment-11687 WB BRYANT Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:25:55 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3435#comment-11687 heck, in the old days we felt good taping 2 30's together! you young guys got all the cool toys. GOD BLESS YOU, AND THANKS FOR ALL YOU DO! heck,
in the old days we felt good taping 2 30’s together!
you young guys got all the cool toys.
GOD BLESS YOU, AND THANKS FOR ALL YOU DO!

]]> By: Chris http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/has-colt-chosen-the-mwg-90-round-magazine-for-the-iar/#comment-5465 Chris Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:45:55 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3435#comment-5465 Magpul is making extensions too: http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/MAG061-7.html Hideous! Maybe Beta will read this and make a right-side feed 75-round drum (heck, maybe make one you can put on either side so lefties can use it too!). ;) Magpul is making extensions too:

http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/MAG061-7.html

Hideous! Maybe Beta will read this and make a right-side feed 75-round drum (heck, maybe make one you can put on either side so lefties can use it too!). ;)

]]> By: Daniel E. Watters http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/has-colt-chosen-the-mwg-90-round-magazine-for-the-iar/#comment-5438 Daniel E. Watters Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:21:31 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3435#comment-5438 Update: Tripp has 42 and 52rd magazines. I didn't realize that he was using extensions. They appear to be nearly as bulky as Lancer's coupler. http://www.trippresearch.com/CVS/products/ar15/ar15.html Update: Tripp has 42 and 52rd magazines. I didn’t realize that he was using extensions. They appear to be nearly as bulky as Lancer’s coupler.

http://www.trippresearch.com/CVS/products/ar15/ar15.html

]]> By: Daniel E. Watters http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/has-colt-chosen-the-mwg-90-round-magazine-for-the-iar/#comment-5434 Daniel E. Watters Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:09:07 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3435#comment-5434 The 48 round magazine is made by Lancer. It is two (closer to 1.5) of their polymer magazines grafted together with a coupler. The coupler looks kind of bulky. I also understand that Virgil Tripp has introduced a >40rd metal magazine. The 48 round magazine is made by Lancer. It is two (closer to 1.5) of their polymer magazines grafted together with a coupler. The coupler looks kind of bulky.

I also understand that Virgil Tripp has introduced a >40rd metal magazine.

]]> By: Chris http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/has-colt-chosen-the-mwg-90-round-magazine-for-the-iar/#comment-5323 Chris Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:03:33 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3435#comment-5323 Yeah, 2x the basic load on me, and 2x the basic load in the pack. Enough for a good little firefight if the gunships don't show up and shorten it for ya! ;) Don't worry, I'll be watching your blog for updates! :D Yeah, 2x the basic load on me, and 2x the basic load in the pack. Enough for a good little firefight if the gunships don’t show up and shorten it for ya! ;)

Don’t worry, I’ll be watching your blog for updates! :D

]]> By: Steve http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/has-colt-chosen-the-mwg-90-round-magazine-for-the-iar/#comment-5322 Steve Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:00:05 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3435#comment-5322 Chris, thanks for the info, that is a lot of ammo! I am not sure who will be making them, but I think they were at SHOT Show. When I find out I will blog it and do my best to remember to email you (I am very forgetful, so please don't be offended if I forget). Chris, thanks for the info, that is a lot of ammo! I am not sure who will be making them, but I think they were at SHOT Show. When I find out I will blog it and do my best to remember to email you (I am very forgetful, so please don’t be offended if I forget).

]]> By: Chris http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/has-colt-chosen-the-mwg-90-round-magazine-for-the-iar/#comment-5321 Chris Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:56:52 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3435#comment-5321 Like everything else, it depends. The Redi-mag with 60 rounds was pretty handy. If I could get two polymer 48-round mags next to each other using it, that would be great. If they're triple-stacked, they'd probably be too wide for that. If not, then they might be too long. The cheap Chinese 40's are already too long (and unreliable anyway). As with the drums, the extra firepower is only for the front-end of the firefight; I wouldn't put 48-round mags in my pouches unless they were about the same size as regular mags (I use HSGI Weesatch for carrying my ammo, 12 mags +2 in the M4, plus 14 spare mags in the assault pack and sometimes 4 in a left-side thigh drop rig if I'm feeling frisky). I'd like to get my hands on a couple of those 48-rounders to try out if you know where to get them. :) Like everything else, it depends. The Redi-mag with 60 rounds was pretty handy. If I could get two polymer 48-round mags next to each other using it, that would be great. If they’re triple-stacked, they’d probably be too wide for that. If not, then they might be too long. The cheap Chinese 40’s are already too long (and unreliable anyway). As with the drums, the extra firepower is only for the front-end of the firefight; I wouldn’t put 48-round mags in my pouches unless they were about the same size as regular mags (I use HSGI Weesatch for carrying my ammo, 12 mags +2 in the M4, plus 14 spare mags in the assault pack and sometimes 4 in a left-side thigh drop rig if I’m feeling frisky). I’d like to get my hands on a couple of those 48-rounders to try out if you know where to get them. :)

]]> By: Steve http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/has-colt-chosen-the-mwg-90-round-magazine-for-the-iar/#comment-5320 Steve Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:50:00 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3435#comment-5320 Chris, thanks for your insight. I believe someone will be coming out with a 48 round polymer magazine shortly. Would the extra 50% capacity been much benefit? Considering that it would be bulkier. Chris, thanks for your insight. I believe someone will be coming out with a 48 round polymer magazine shortly. Would the extra 50% capacity been much benefit? Considering that it would be bulkier.

]]> By: Chris http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/has-colt-chosen-the-mwg-90-round-magazine-for-the-iar/#comment-5318 Chris Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:46:24 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3435#comment-5318 Actually, the MWG mag and the Beta C-mag share one critical flaw (I have both and have used both in training, but although I have been in combat I used a Redi-mag instead of either of these options!): they stick out to the left. When using a single-point attachment, if you're right-handed, the left side of the rifle should lay flat against the right front of your body. These drums prevent this and impede crossdraw in an emergency transition (I learned to carry crossdraw on my chest because you can't get at a thigh holster squeezed into a HMMWV or any other vehicle). They also prevent a good grip on the front handguard (or forward grip) because the left arm is pushed out of place. If I could find a drum that went to the right I'd buy it! Ideally, it would be slightly larger than one of the halves of the C-mag and hold 75 rounds. Actually, the MWG mag and the Beta C-mag share one critical flaw (I have both and have used both in training, but although I have been in combat I used a Redi-mag instead of either of these options!): they stick out to the left. When using a single-point attachment, if you’re right-handed, the left side of the rifle should lay flat against the right front of your body. These drums prevent this and impede crossdraw in an emergency transition (I learned to carry crossdraw on my chest because you can’t get at a thigh holster squeezed into a HMMWV or any other vehicle). They also prevent a good grip on the front handguard (or forward grip) because the left arm is pushed out of place. If I could find a drum that went to the right I’d buy it! Ideally, it would be slightly larger than one of the halves of the C-mag and hold 75 rounds.

]]> By: Roger A. Krupski http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/has-colt-chosen-the-mwg-90-round-magazine-for-the-iar/#comment-5291 Roger A. Krupski Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:01:56 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3435#comment-5291 Are you kidding? I thought the Beta-C mag was the rage? Are you kidding? I thought the Beta-C mag was the rage?

]]> By: name http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/has-colt-chosen-the-mwg-90-round-magazine-for-the-iar/#comment-3979 name Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:34:55 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3435#comment-3979 How's the weight balance with that type of design? How’s the weight balance with that type of design?

]]> By: Steve http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/has-colt-chosen-the-mwg-90-round-magazine-for-the-iar/#comment-3683 Steve Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:20:50 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3435#comment-3683 Daniel, I think you could be right! Daniel, I think you could be right!

]]> By: Daniel E. Watters http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/28/has-colt-chosen-the-mwg-90-round-magazine-for-the-iar/#comment-3682 Daniel E. Watters Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:05:29 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3435#comment-3682 I suspect that the object on the upper receiver is the quadrant sight for the M203. I suspect that the object on the upper receiver is the quadrant sight for the M203.

]]>