<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New SIG 556 Classic (550 &#8220;Clone&#8221;)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/20/new-sig-556-classic-550-clone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/20/new-sig-556-classic-550-clone/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:18:29 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thebronze</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/20/new-sig-556-classic-550-clone/#comment-3602</link>
		<dc:creator>thebronze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3312#comment-3602</guid>
		<description>That sucks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sucks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/20/new-sig-556-classic-550-clone/#comment-3579</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3312#comment-3579</guid>
		<description>hga, thanks very much for posting the statement. I have posted it on the main blog.

It is a pity that it is delayed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hga, thanks very much for posting the statement. I have posted it on the main blog.</p>
<p>It is a pity that it is delayed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hga</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/20/new-sig-556-classic-550-clone/#comment-3578</link>
		<dc:creator>hga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3312#comment-3578</guid>
		<description>While the Masada/ACR certainly looks interesting and is lighter the SIG 55x family has a couple of decades more maturity.

For that matter, what does it have over the more mature FN SCAR L except the prototype being about a half pound lighter?

One might wait a long time for a Masada/ACR, this appears to be the latest info on its status (http://tinyurl.com/638tys):

The following is a joint statement from both Magpul and Bushmaster.

“The ACR is being redesigned to be a superior offering to compete for the next generation US Army infantry carbine and subcompact weapon requirement and will be available to select customers in 2009.”

Jarrod McDevitt
1-800-998-7928
Ext# .223

Bushmaster Firearms International, L.L.C
Made With Pride In The U.S.A.

(end)

I would expect that right now Bushmaster and Magpul are spending all their available management etc. time carefully maximizing production of currently shipping products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the Masada/ACR certainly looks interesting and is lighter the SIG 55x family has a couple of decades more maturity.</p>
<p>For that matter, what does it have over the more mature FN SCAR L except the prototype being about a half pound lighter?</p>
<p>One might wait a long time for a Masada/ACR, this appears to be the latest info on its status (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/638tys)" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/638tys)</a>:</p>
<p>The following is a joint statement from both Magpul and Bushmaster.</p>
<p>“The ACR is being redesigned to be a superior offering to compete for the next generation US Army infantry carbine and subcompact weapon requirement and will be available to select customers in 2009.”</p>
<p>Jarrod McDevitt<br />
1-800-998-7928<br />
Ext# .223</p>
<p>Bushmaster Firearms International, L.L.C<br />
Made With Pride In The U.S.A.</p>
<p>(end)</p>
<p>I would expect that right now Bushmaster and Magpul are spending all their available management etc. time carefully maximizing production of currently shipping products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebronze</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/20/new-sig-556-classic-550-clone/#comment-3574</link>
		<dc:creator>thebronze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3312#comment-3574</guid>
		<description>No thanks.  I&#039;ll wait for the Masada/ACR...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No thanks.  I&#8217;ll wait for the Masada/ACR&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/20/new-sig-556-classic-550-clone/#comment-3561</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3312#comment-3561</guid>
		<description>Aimpoint is still steaming mad that Sig copy their T-1 Micro and sell it for $200 less. Good times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aimpoint is still steaming mad that Sig copy their T-1 Micro and sell it for $200 less. Good times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hga</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/20/new-sig-556-classic-550-clone/#comment-3556</link>
		<dc:creator>hga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3312#comment-3556</guid>
		<description>R.A.W.: the 550 has a 20 inch barrel, the original 556 a 16 inch and the Police One report of this &quot;Classic&quot; says it will be 17 inches (I suspect an error there).

People who want a good handguard either bought one of the thousand &quot;Commando&quot; ones produced this year with a 551 carbine type handguard or just buy a standard 551 handguard and swap it for the ugly and nearly pointless standard 556 TriRail.

Jason: Yes, I&#039;ve read that it does collapse (and I think I&#039;ve read that the issue 550 rifle has or is maybe going to move to that sort of stock).  This &quot;Swiss style&quot; one plus its cast aluminum lower perhaps isn&#039;t durable enough to fire rifle grenades ^_^, but then again it doesn&#039;t have the barrel bulge for them.  

This version is said to be 0.4 pounds heavier; some of that would come from a longer barrel if it indeed has one, but a lot could be from a more durable  stock.  And a 551 handguard is quite a bit lighter than the TriRail.

Steve: Good point.  In profile, it looks like a 551&#039;s handguard, but it e.g. has more ventilation holes, like the 550&#039;s they run all the way to the back.

There is one good reason to buy it: you get a (presumably) better and certainly nicer looking stock with it (and nicer than any alternative I&#039;ve seen) and you don&#039;t have to pay $100+ to get a 551 handguard.  If the stock and its folding hinge is significantly better the combination might be worth the extra $433 MSRP.

Hmmm, it also looks like the stock will lock up with the handguard in the style of the originals but the mechanism is different (the handguard has a small nub vs. a large ring, similarly the stock&#039;s recess is a lot smaller).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R.A.W.: the 550 has a 20 inch barrel, the original 556 a 16 inch and the Police One report of this &#8220;Classic&#8221; says it will be 17 inches (I suspect an error there).</p>
<p>People who want a good handguard either bought one of the thousand &#8220;Commando&#8221; ones produced this year with a 551 carbine type handguard or just buy a standard 551 handguard and swap it for the ugly and nearly pointless standard 556 TriRail.</p>
<p>Jason: Yes, I&#8217;ve read that it does collapse (and I think I&#8217;ve read that the issue 550 rifle has or is maybe going to move to that sort of stock).  This &#8220;Swiss style&#8221; one plus its cast aluminum lower perhaps isn&#8217;t durable enough to fire rifle grenades ^_^, but then again it doesn&#8217;t have the barrel bulge for them.  </p>
<p>This version is said to be 0.4 pounds heavier; some of that would come from a longer barrel if it indeed has one, but a lot could be from a more durable  stock.  And a 551 handguard is quite a bit lighter than the TriRail.</p>
<p>Steve: Good point.  In profile, it looks like a 551&#8217;s handguard, but it e.g. has more ventilation holes, like the 550&#8217;s they run all the way to the back.</p>
<p>There is one good reason to buy it: you get a (presumably) better and certainly nicer looking stock with it (and nicer than any alternative I&#8217;ve seen) and you don&#8217;t have to pay $100+ to get a 551 handguard.  If the stock and its folding hinge is significantly better the combination might be worth the extra $433 MSRP.</p>
<p>Hmmm, it also looks like the stock will lock up with the handguard in the style of the originals but the mechanism is different (the handguard has a small nub vs. a large ring, similarly the stock&#8217;s recess is a lot smaller).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gun Blobber</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/20/new-sig-556-classic-550-clone/#comment-3551</link>
		<dc:creator>Gun Blobber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3312#comment-3551</guid>
		<description>Looking at the press release, the stock is both collapsible (&quot;length adjustable&quot; at least -- I guess they could mean shims or some other method) and foldable.

I am glad that they added a &quot;real&quot; front sight.  The default flip-up one on the 556 is awfully chintzy, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the press release, the stock is both collapsible (&#8221;length adjustable&#8221; at least &#8212; I guess they could mean shims or some other method) and foldable.</p>
<p>I am glad that they added a &#8220;real&#8221; front sight.  The default flip-up one on the 556 is awfully chintzy, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/20/new-sig-556-classic-550-clone/#comment-3549</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3312#comment-3549</guid>
		<description>is this a limited edition?
Where did SIG announce this?

The new stock appears to fold AND collapse. I wonder how durable it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is this a limited edition?<br />
Where did SIG announce this?</p>
<p>The new stock appears to fold AND collapse. I wonder how durable it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.A.W.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/20/new-sig-556-classic-550-clone/#comment-3544</link>
		<dc:creator>R.A.W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3312#comment-3544</guid>
		<description>Just eyeballing it, the handguards on the 550 bridge a longer gap than those on the 556.  They look pretty close to the guards on the 551 though, so maybe that&#039;s what they were going for:

http://www.biggerhammer.net/sigamt/550/550techinspection/550_551_covershot.jpg


Why Sigarms didn&#039;t release the 556 with a more recognizable and aesthetically attractive handguard, I don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just eyeballing it, the handguards on the 550 bridge a longer gap than those on the 556.  They look pretty close to the guards on the 551 though, so maybe that&#8217;s what they were going for:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.biggerhammer.net/sigamt/550/550techinspection/550_551_covershot.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.biggerhammer.net/sigamt/550/550techinspection/550_551_covershot.jpg</a></p>
<p>Why Sigarms didn&#8217;t release the 556 with a more recognizable and aesthetically attractive handguard, I don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
