<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Lease on Life for M14</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/16/new-lease-on-life-for-m14/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/16/new-lease-on-life-for-m14/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:18:29 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/16/new-lease-on-life-for-m14/#comment-3517</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3235#comment-3517</guid>
		<description>I think it will be around for a while. The M24 was supposed to replace the M14/M21. The M110 is supposed to replace the M24 but the Army is still upgrading M24s ( http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/02/us-army-to-upgrade-m24-rifles/ ). 

With all the urgent expenses the military is facing, I think both the M24 and M14 will be around for some time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it will be around for a while. The M24 was supposed to replace the M14/M21. The M110 is supposed to replace the M24 but the Army is still upgrading M24s ( <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/02/us-army-to-upgrade-m24-rifles/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/02/us-army-to-upgrade-m24-rifles/</a> ). </p>
<p>With all the urgent expenses the military is facing, I think both the M24 and M14 will be around for some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 22lr</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/16/new-lease-on-life-for-m14/#comment-3516</link>
		<dc:creator>22lr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3235#comment-3516</guid>
		<description>Sad but true. Once M110s are fielded on a widespread basis the M14 days will be drastically shortened. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to see some Spec Ops guys with them still but nothing like they are used today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad but true. Once M110s are fielded on a widespread basis the M14 days will be drastically shortened. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see some Spec Ops guys with them still but nothing like they are used today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun1911</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/16/new-lease-on-life-for-m14/#comment-3480</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun1911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3235#comment-3480</guid>
		<description>The M14 days are over in the US military. It is more or less a stop gap. It will be out of service once there are enough M110 in the field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The M14 days are over in the US military. It is more or less a stop gap. It will be out of service once there are enough M110 in the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
