Comments on: Winchester overstates muzzle energy by 30% http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/07/winchester-overstates-muzzle-energy-by-30/ Firearms not Politics Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:10:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Steve http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/07/winchester-overstates-muzzle-energy-by-30/comment-page-1/#comment-3348 Steve Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:05:41 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3103#comment-3348 Sven, you are right but in this case Winchester claim 50% less recoil which happens to correspond to approx. 50% less energy compared to the full power load. Sven, you are right but in this case Winchester claim 50% less recoil which happens to correspond to approx. 50% less energy compared to the full power load.

Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]> By: Sven Ortmann http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/11/07/winchester-overstates-muzzle-energy-by-30/comment-page-1/#comment-3347 Sven Ortmann Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:52:29 +0000 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3103#comment-3347 Felt recoil is not only dependent on muzzle energy, but also on muzzle brake function, weapon weight, and a bit the action. Furthermore, muzzle energy is actually an even worse indicator for felt recoil than the impulse. Felt recoil is not only dependent on muzzle energy, but also on muzzle brake function, weapon weight, and a bit the action. Furthermore, muzzle energy is actually an even worse indicator for felt recoil than the impulse.

Please rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
]]>