Just in case you had any doubt … AWB is coming back. UN arms treaty not far behind

Xavier spotted the following on change.gov, the official president-elect website:

As president, Barack Obama would repeal the Tiahrt Amendment, which restricts the ability of local law enforcement to access important gun trace information, and give police officers across the nation the tools they need to solve gun crimes and fight the illegal arms trade. Obama and Biden also favor commonsense measures that respect the Second Amendment rights of gun owners, while keeping guns away from children and from criminals who shouldn’t have them. They support closing the gun show loophole and making guns in this country childproof. They also support making the expired federal Assault Weapons Ban permanent, as such weapons belong on foreign battlefields and not on our streets.

It also looks like the Obama administration will likely support the proposed UN arms trade treaty. From the LA Times (November 1, 2008):

In a United Nations General Assembly vote, 147 of its 192 members voted in favor of creating a global treaty that would impose rules on the import, export and transfer of weapons among nations. Only the U.S., long an opponent of such a treaty, and Zimbabwe voted against the idea. Arms exporters such as China, Russia and Israel showed their reluctance over the regulations by abstaining; other nations were absent.

I think it is also safe to say that Obama will not lift the import ban on Chinese/Norinco arms. If you want that Type 97 bullpup you are going to have to move to Canada!

Related Posts

Steve Nov 7th 2008 news Tags: , , , , , 4 Comments

4 Responses to “Just in case you had any doubt … AWB is coming back. UN arms treaty not far behind”

  1. jdunon 08 Nov 2008 at 11:19 am link comment

    I don’t know how he’s going to fight illegal Arm trades with some law that other nations are ignoring. Good luck trying to enforce it.

  2. Mehul Kamdaron 08 Nov 2008 at 8:52 pm link comment

    I hope those who voted Democratic believing the promises made to them make it a point to send e-mails to the President elect’s campaign asking him what exactly he plans to do. And, when they lose their guns in a permanent “assault weapon ban” they pause to ponder how easily they threw their freedoms away.

  3. Mr. Wolfon 12 Mar 2009 at 10:08 am link comment

    It is a sad day, when people are so near-sighted that they cant remember that the reason for civilians owning guns is to protect themselves. A large group of armed civilians is the only thing that can really help keep America in the hands of the people. I’m not foolish enough to even hope that Obama will realize this, though. I can only hope that Congress will step up and not let such a disaster unfold.

  4. ACE Ballisticson 03 May 2009 at 12:51 pm link comment

    Have we allowed government issues to distract us? Is it gun restrictions, ammo prices, freedom to keep arms, freedom of speech? We need to stay focused. If our founding fathers were here today they would not recognize us nor the ideals some have assimilated. Government will not and cannot solve our problems. Politicians are cheap entertainers; puppets dancing in place while families are being separated by ideals woven together during a cold war years ago…. devide and conquer. Their goal, transform us into a global conglomerate of minds; all different yet all blended and tolerant, impossible! Terrorism is at our doorstep and asking our commander to be friends. The nature of a $300,000 photo op involving Air Force One, does it make you wonder? Why subject so many to fear with 911 fresh in our minds? We were “forewarned” that six month after the election we would be asked to support a decision which would require our support regardless of how it may seem. What will we be asked to support? Is our moral fiber falling apart? Worried about ammo prices? Slingshot and stones.

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy: I reserve the right to remove comments at my discretion. Think of comment threads like a dinner party at someone's house. If you make the party unpleasant for others or me, you won't be invited back. I am happy to tolerate a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but I'm not going to tolerate nastiness, rudeness, trolling, vitriol, or excessive snarkiness toward the author(s) or other commenters. You may make your case passionately, but civility is expected. Please stay on topic and respect the technical nature of this blog.
Spam Filtering: To avoid spam, comments are filtered using Akismet and then manually approved. Do not be alarmed if you comment does not appear instantly. I do not check the spam folder more than once per day.