<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruger LCP Recall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:38:33 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: newbie2thegunworld</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-17772</link>
		<dc:creator>newbie2thegunworld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-17772</guid>
		<description>Hi All, I&#039;m a new person to the wonderful world of gun ownership and am very proud and happy to be a member of that club. I should preface my comments by saying that this is the second blog I&#039;ve come across where someone has done this with a Ruger/Kel-Tec. I can hardly believe it. 

Stupidity such as inappropriately using overloaded rounds and exploding guns is exactly the type of thing that makes me embarassed to be a part of the gun community and it gives just cause to the anti-gun movement that is growing in this country. As it is if we own a gun we&#039;re viewed as &quot;gun nuts&quot;. 

People that are willing to take such unnecessary and foolish risks need to be rooted out by the rest of us and educated about the process of applying common sense regarding safety in general. Then they need to be taught that these are guns and weapons of death and need to be treated as such. Most people wouldn&#039;t put something they aren&#039;t sure about in the gas tank of their car just because someone told them it was a good idea, so why do people risk doing things like this? 

I can tell you that before I even purchased my Ruger LCP I knew not to use Magtech +P rounds. I actually read quite a lot about this great little pistol before I even went to look at one. I don&#039;t want to get on a soap box here, but people that do these types of things scare the hell out of me. Sounds like the dealer that recommended that round should have his license pulled. The guy I bought mine from actually made a point to tell me not to use overloaded rounds, even though I already was aware, I most certainly appreciated his pointing that out.

Even without the information published...Lightweight + Compact should tell a gun owner that it does not add up to overloaded rounds.

Don&#039;t get me wrong. I believe that the overwhelming majority of gun owners are safety conscious people, but just like any other group that gets persecuted, it only takes a few bad or stupid apples and we all get labeled.

Everyone God bless and please be safe, our families depend on it. Be sure to support our rights to own guns every chance you can.

Thanks to all, I find these blogs to be very good sources of information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All, I&#8217;m a new person to the wonderful world of gun ownership and am very proud and happy to be a member of that club. I should preface my comments by saying that this is the second blog I&#8217;ve come across where someone has done this with a Ruger/Kel-Tec. I can hardly believe it. </p>
<p>Stupidity such as inappropriately using overloaded rounds and exploding guns is exactly the type of thing that makes me embarassed to be a part of the gun community and it gives just cause to the anti-gun movement that is growing in this country. As it is if we own a gun we&#8217;re viewed as &#8220;gun nuts&#8221;. </p>
<p>People that are willing to take such unnecessary and foolish risks need to be rooted out by the rest of us and educated about the process of applying common sense regarding safety in general. Then they need to be taught that these are guns and weapons of death and need to be treated as such. Most people wouldn&#8217;t put something they aren&#8217;t sure about in the gas tank of their car just because someone told them it was a good idea, so why do people risk doing things like this? </p>
<p>I can tell you that before I even purchased my Ruger LCP I knew not to use Magtech +P rounds. I actually read quite a lot about this great little pistol before I even went to look at one. I don&#8217;t want to get on a soap box here, but people that do these types of things scare the hell out of me. Sounds like the dealer that recommended that round should have his license pulled. The guy I bought mine from actually made a point to tell me not to use overloaded rounds, even though I already was aware, I most certainly appreciated his pointing that out.</p>
<p>Even without the information published&#8230;Lightweight + Compact should tell a gun owner that it does not add up to overloaded rounds.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong. I believe that the overwhelming majority of gun owners are safety conscious people, but just like any other group that gets persecuted, it only takes a few bad or stupid apples and we all get labeled.</p>
<p>Everyone God bless and please be safe, our families depend on it. Be sure to support our rights to own guns every chance you can.</p>
<p>Thanks to all, I find these blogs to be very good sources of information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marv</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-13905</link>
		<dc:creator>Marv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 01:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-13905</guid>
		<description>Please read the manual folks after you familiarize yourself with the firearm .
Page 11 states 
&quot;LCP pistols are compatable with standard factory ammunition loaded to U.S. Industry Standars,including hollow point loads loaded in brass or aluminium cases. No .380 Auto manufactured in accordance with NATO,U.S.,SAAMI , or CIP standards is known to be beyond the design limits or known not to function in these pistols.&quot;

In other words this plastic gun weighing less than 11 ozs. can&#039; t handle hot loads which are meant for steel framed pistols such as Bersa and Kahr which are 18 plus ozs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please read the manual folks after you familiarize yourself with the firearm .<br />
Page 11 states<br />
&#8220;LCP pistols are compatable with standard factory ammunition loaded to U.S. Industry Standars,including hollow point loads loaded in brass or aluminium cases. No .380 Auto manufactured in accordance with NATO,U.S.,SAAMI , or CIP standards is known to be beyond the design limits or known not to function in these pistols.&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words this plastic gun weighing less than 11 ozs. can&#8217; t handle hot loads which are meant for steel framed pistols such as Bersa and Kahr which are 18 plus ozs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil mccrackin</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-13893</link>
		<dc:creator>phil mccrackin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-13893</guid>
		<description>&quot;On the 11th the barrell burst shattering the gun and damn near my finger. What gives? Has anyone else had this problem. The ammo was Magtech Guardian gold 380 AUTO+P 85GR JHP recommended by the dealer.
&quot;
-------------------------------


When I got my LCP, I ONLY SCANNED, not read, the owners manual,.. but the one thing that stood out to me in the included owners manual, was DO NOT USE +P AMMO.. ALL OTHER NON +P .380 AMMO IS O.K...

you did not even bother to scan the manual- the gun is specifically NOT designed for the ammo you used and its says so SEVERAL TIMES in the gun manual..

even without you bothering with the manual, would it not occur to you that a L(LIGHT) C(OMPACT) P made out of plastic would not be a likely candidate for overloaded rounds..?.. are you &#039;special&#039;??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On the 11th the barrell burst shattering the gun and damn near my finger. What gives? Has anyone else had this problem. The ammo was Magtech Guardian gold 380 AUTO+P 85GR JHP recommended by the dealer.<br />
&#8220;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>When I got my LCP, I ONLY SCANNED, not read, the owners manual,.. but the one thing that stood out to me in the included owners manual, was DO NOT USE +P AMMO.. ALL OTHER NON +P .380 AMMO IS O.K&#8230;</p>
<p>you did not even bother to scan the manual- the gun is specifically NOT designed for the ammo you used and its says so SEVERAL TIMES in the gun manual..</p>
<p>even without you bothering with the manual, would it not occur to you that a L(LIGHT) C(OMPACT) P made out of plastic would not be a likely candidate for overloaded rounds..?.. are you &#8217;special&#8217;??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-11127</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-11127</guid>
		<description>Brian is right........The User&#039;s Manual that came with my LCP states, on page 11, not once, but twice --in BOLD RED PRINT--.....&quot;DO NOT USE +P AMMO&quot;.  Read the manuals on your guns, folks.  They are provided for a reason, no matter how much you and your dealer &quot;think&quot; you know about guns!  

Compact, subcompact and light alloy guns should never be used withe &quot;+P&quot; or &quot;+P+&quot; ammo.  You are asking for trouble when going to high pressure loads like this, let alone voiding any warranty and creating a danger for yourself and those around you!!

Read the manual and use your gun safely!!  I might be in the range next to you one day!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian is right&#8230;&#8230;..The User&#8217;s Manual that came with my LCP states, on page 11, not once, but twice &#8211;in BOLD RED PRINT&#8211;&#8230;..&#8221;DO NOT USE +P AMMO&#8221;.  Read the manuals on your guns, folks.  They are provided for a reason, no matter how much you and your dealer &#8220;think&#8221; you know about guns!  </p>
<p>Compact, subcompact and light alloy guns should never be used withe &#8220;+P&#8221; or &#8220;+P+&#8221; ammo.  You are asking for trouble when going to high pressure loads like this, let alone voiding any warranty and creating a danger for yourself and those around you!!</p>
<p>Read the manual and use your gun safely!!  I might be in the range next to you one day!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-10809</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-10809</guid>
		<description>Plastic!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plastic!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-10529</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-10529</guid>
		<description>you are not to use any +p ammo in the LCP at all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are not to use any +p ammo in the LCP at all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carter</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-8633</link>
		<dc:creator>carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-8633</guid>
		<description>i just bought a ruger lcp for my girl friend and she love it. i took her to the range to shoot it and she shoot about a hundred rounds out of it and use two different types of ammu remington umc and some aguila ammu the umc didnt jam at all but the aguila the cheap stuff jamed about 3 to 4 time out of ever clip almost every time but its a really good and reliable gun just dont use cheap ammu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just bought a ruger lcp for my girl friend and she love it. i took her to the range to shoot it and she shoot about a hundred rounds out of it and use two different types of ammu remington umc and some aguila ammu the umc didnt jam at all but the aguila the cheap stuff jamed about 3 to 4 time out of ever clip almost every time but its a really good and reliable gun just dont use cheap ammu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-7692</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-7692</guid>
		<description>I have a Ruger LCP that when purchased I was told it had been in for the recall. In fact it has the diamond on the slot indicating such. However, I have fired maybe ten rounds through it. On the 11th the barrell burst shattering the gun and damn near my finger. What gives? Has anyone else had this problem. The ammo was Magtech Guardian gold 380 AUTO+P 85GR JHP recommended by the dealer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Ruger LCP that when purchased I was told it had been in for the recall. In fact it has the diamond on the slot indicating such. However, I have fired maybe ten rounds through it. On the 11th the barrell burst shattering the gun and damn near my finger. What gives? Has anyone else had this problem. The ammo was Magtech Guardian gold 380 AUTO+P 85GR JHP recommended by the dealer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheepdog81</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-7185</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheepdog81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 05:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-7185</guid>
		<description>Never seen a Ruger LCP, but I have one comment:

I&#039;m a retired cop and carry a gun everyday.  I love Rugers, and own a couple. I also love S&amp;W, Colt, etc. You get the picture. 

I carry an S&amp;W Model 442 2&quot; J Frame (snub nose) 5 shot revolver for my everyday self defense gun. I have a Browning Hi Power 14 shot, Colt .45 Gold Cup, and many others, but the gun I bet my life on to go &quot;Bang!&quot; when I pull the trigger is the J Frame. I installed a Crimson Trace Laser grip and carry one extra HK speedloader.  And I carry it every day, everywhere.

That&#039;s it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never seen a Ruger LCP, but I have one comment:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a retired cop and carry a gun everyday.  I love Rugers, and own a couple. I also love S&amp;W, Colt, etc. You get the picture. </p>
<p>I carry an S&amp;W Model 442 2&#8243; J Frame (snub nose) 5 shot revolver for my everyday self defense gun. I have a Browning Hi Power 14 shot, Colt .45 Gold Cup, and many others, but the gun I bet my life on to go &#8220;Bang!&#8221; when I pull the trigger is the J Frame. I installed a Crimson Trace Laser grip and carry one extra HK speedloader.  And I carry it every day, everywhere.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce goffin</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-6687</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce goffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-6687</guid>
		<description>i have a kel-tec &amp; a ruger, the ruger is better finished no seam&#039;s,
kel-tec must be from over ???
  it does jam-up.
 i&#039;ll spent $30.00 more for a rugar you&#039;re life might depend on IT !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a kel-tec &amp; a ruger, the ruger is better finished no seam&#8217;s,<br />
kel-tec must be from over ???<br />
  it does jam-up.<br />
 i&#8217;ll spent $30.00 more for a rugar you&#8217;re life might depend on IT !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-6398</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-6398</guid>
		<description>Mark, it is a press release. There is no hype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, it is a press release. There is no hype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark M</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-6388</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-6388</guid>
		<description>I came accross this site by mistake.   And it turned out to be a mistak.  In the design and manufacture of any product -- it is &quot;almost&quot; impossible to test for all the billons of mishandled combinations of a &quot;loaded&quot; firearm.  If you drop a &quot;loaded&quot; firearm (never cleaned or maintained) from 50 feet making sure it hits on the sweet spot every time you may get it to discharge a time or two. 

I know where the general media stands, but its breath taking to witness the dumbing down of even the gun bloggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came accross this site by mistake.   And it turned out to be a mistak.  In the design and manufacture of any product &#8212; it is &#8220;almost&#8221; impossible to test for all the billons of mishandled combinations of a &#8220;loaded&#8221; firearm.  If you drop a &#8220;loaded&#8221; firearm (never cleaned or maintained) from 50 feet making sure it hits on the sweet spot every time you may get it to discharge a time or two. </p>
<p>I know where the general media stands, but its breath taking to witness the dumbing down of even the gun bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BSMITH</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-6227</link>
		<dc:creator>BSMITH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-6227</guid>
		<description>I LOVE MY LCP!!!! 2000RDS AND NO MISS FIRES!!!! AND AS SOON AS I GET THE FEELING BACK IN MY HAND I&#039;LL UPDATE YA!!!!! LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE MY LCP!!!! 2000RDS AND NO MISS FIRES!!!! AND AS SOON AS I GET THE FEELING BACK IN MY HAND I&#8217;LL UPDATE YA!!!!! LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-5622</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-5622</guid>
		<description>When this recall was first instituted Ruger stated that they would issue return packaging to owners on a first-come first-served basis.  At the same time they stated to me that I would receive the box when they had repair parts in stock.  My LCP has been in their possession since Jan 7th.  They now state that there are no parts available, that a new supplier was sourced and that they can&#039;t quote a return date.  This is BS - plain and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When this recall was first instituted Ruger stated that they would issue return packaging to owners on a first-come first-served basis.  At the same time they stated to me that I would receive the box when they had repair parts in stock.  My LCP has been in their possession since Jan 7th.  They now state that there are no parts available, that a new supplier was sourced and that they can&#8217;t quote a return date.  This is BS &#8211; plain and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-5214</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-5214</guid>
		<description>I returned my LCP for the recall on 1-5 and they received it on 1-6-09. I called today and the young lady said it would be 5 weeks from the time the unit was received before I get the gun back. She apologized and reported they had fallen way behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I returned my LCP for the recall on 1-5 and they received it on 1-6-09. I called today and the young lady said it would be 5 weeks from the time the unit was received before I get the gun back. She apologized and reported they had fallen way behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-4574</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-4574</guid>
		<description>Just received my LCP back from the manufacturer. They replaced the hammer as well as several other upgraded parts. They also included a magazine with an extension and a Ruger cap. 

The gun was returned within one week over the holidays. 

Great customer service and turn around time. I&#039;m glad they admitted to the issue and corrected it at no charge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just received my LCP back from the manufacturer. They replaced the hammer as well as several other upgraded parts. They also included a magazine with an extension and a Ruger cap. </p>
<p>The gun was returned within one week over the holidays. </p>
<p>Great customer service and turn around time. I&#8217;m glad they admitted to the issue and corrected it at no charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-3981</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-3981</guid>
		<description>Has anyone had issues with their LCP? I have a pre-recall LCP that has never misfired or had any other problems. I am waiting on the box to ship it back, if I decide to do so. I just purchased another LCP that just came back from Ruger. The 1st time I took it to the range, it jambed 7 times within a 50 round box. It is now on the way back to Ruger again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone had issues with their LCP? I have a pre-recall LCP that has never misfired or had any other problems. I am waiting on the box to ship it back, if I decide to do so. I just purchased another LCP that just came back from Ruger. The 1st time I took it to the range, it jambed 7 times within a 50 round box. It is now on the way back to Ruger again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-3909</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 22:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-3909</guid>
		<description>I currently own two 10/22&#039;s, a charger, a mini14, a mini30, two SP101&#039;s and this little LCP. I&#039;ve been extremly happy over the years with all but the LCP. I was so excited about it, I paid slightly more than their published retail price to get it. 

Right out of the box, on the third round, something internal caused the trigger to break (internally). I sent it back and 3 weeks later, after 3 phone calls, it arrived. They didn&#039;t tell me what was wrong, they just repaired and returned it. I put a mag through it and put it in the safe, because I don&#039;t dare carry it, (reliability concerns - not knowing when the next trigger pull won&#039;t work). A week or two later I got a phone call from a Ruger rep, asking if I still own it and telling me of the recall. He said I&#039;d get shipping materials in the mail &quot;as soon as they were ready to quickly repair and return it&quot;. That was about two weeks ago. Nothing yet!

I applaud their obvious concern over their reputation, their products, and concern for their liability and potential law suits; but, one little problem can cause alot of damage to the company. I hope they address whatever internal problems have caused this little blooper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently own two 10/22&#8217;s, a charger, a mini14, a mini30, two SP101&#8217;s and this little LCP. I&#8217;ve been extremly happy over the years with all but the LCP. I was so excited about it, I paid slightly more than their published retail price to get it. </p>
<p>Right out of the box, on the third round, something internal caused the trigger to break (internally). I sent it back and 3 weeks later, after 3 phone calls, it arrived. They didn&#8217;t tell me what was wrong, they just repaired and returned it. I put a mag through it and put it in the safe, because I don&#8217;t dare carry it, (reliability concerns &#8211; not knowing when the next trigger pull won&#8217;t work). A week or two later I got a phone call from a Ruger rep, asking if I still own it and telling me of the recall. He said I&#8217;d get shipping materials in the mail &#8220;as soon as they were ready to quickly repair and return it&#8221;. That was about two weeks ago. Nothing yet!</p>
<p>I applaud their obvious concern over their reputation, their products, and concern for their liability and potential law suits; but, one little problem can cause alot of damage to the company. I hope they address whatever internal problems have caused this little blooper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-3789</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-3789</guid>
		<description>Ruger is a responsible firearms company. They have made many fine auto pistols over the years. I have owned four Rugers and after using them for years under extreme outdoor conditions ie; backpacking, canoeing, hunting,  thousands of rounds down range, I have found them to be extremely reliable, sturdy and well made. 
Ruger continues to market their firearms as &quot;for responsible citizens&quot;.The recent recalls offered by Sturm Ruger solidifies the companies interest in being responsible. There have been other firearms known to have quality issues that were not recalled. They put their money where their mouth is. 
I recently purchasesd a Ruger LCP, called to give them my address and they are handling everything and returning the pistol with upgraded parts and a new magazine. 
Their commitment to responsibility and quality firearms is proven by the recent recalls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruger is a responsible firearms company. They have made many fine auto pistols over the years. I have owned four Rugers and after using them for years under extreme outdoor conditions ie; backpacking, canoeing, hunting,  thousands of rounds down range, I have found them to be extremely reliable, sturdy and well made.<br />
Ruger continues to market their firearms as &#8220;for responsible citizens&#8221;.The recent recalls offered by Sturm Ruger solidifies the companies interest in being responsible. There have been other firearms known to have quality issues that were not recalled. They put their money where their mouth is.<br />
I recently purchasesd a Ruger LCP, called to give them my address and they are handling everything and returning the pistol with upgraded parts and a new magazine.<br />
Their commitment to responsibility and quality firearms is proven by the recent recalls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-3684</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-3684</guid>
		<description>I heard the recall was from those idiots in California with all there wierd laws. If a firearm can fall from 50ft or less in height, it cannot be sold there. Ruger did the right thing and recalled them all, including my SR9. no inconvenience, free mag (and hat). Hats off to Ruger, an American company still making products in America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard the recall was from those idiots in California with all there wierd laws. If a firearm can fall from 50ft or less in height, it cannot be sold there. Ruger did the right thing and recalled them all, including my SR9. no inconvenience, free mag (and hat). Hats off to Ruger, an American company still making products in America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marv</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-3471</link>
		<dc:creator>Marv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 22:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-3471</guid>
		<description>I think this recall shows that the company is on the ball as far as product safety even though it is after the fact.I own one of the affected SN&#039;S.I used the LCP to replace the Kahr PM9 I tried the LCP gun out after I bought it.My comment is that it bites like a snake when fired.I hope when I have to use it my adrenaline will take over and I won&#039;t feel the pain the little pistol gives me.It&#039;s however a great carry gun for Florida in the hot months of which we have a few.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this recall shows that the company is on the ball as far as product safety even though it is after the fact.I own one of the affected SN&#8217;S.I used the LCP to replace the Kahr PM9 I tried the LCP gun out after I bought it.My comment is that it bites like a snake when fired.I hope when I have to use it my adrenaline will take over and I won&#8217;t feel the pain the little pistol gives me.It&#8217;s however a great carry gun for Florida in the hot months of which we have a few.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray White</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-3443</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-3443</guid>
		<description>For all those comments - I have an LCP and a Kel Tech 3AT.  I&#039;m not blind so I can see the difference in the quality of manufacturing.  At least Ruger is re-calling the LCP and giving you a new MAG to make up for your inconvenience.  I wonder if my Kel-Tech has the same problem?

I&#039;m asking you to &quot;Keep The Faith&quot; in Ruger.  They&#039;ve been making good guns for years!

Best of Luck,

Ray
(Dragoon AZ.) - One happy LCP owner!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all those comments &#8211; I have an LCP and a Kel Tech 3AT.  I&#8217;m not blind so I can see the difference in the quality of manufacturing.  At least Ruger is re-calling the LCP and giving you a new MAG to make up for your inconvenience.  I wonder if my Kel-Tech has the same problem?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m asking you to &#8220;Keep The Faith&#8221; in Ruger.  They&#8217;ve been making good guns for years!</p>
<p>Best of Luck,</p>
<p>Ray<br />
(Dragoon AZ.) &#8211; One happy LCP owner!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-3434</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-3434</guid>
		<description>Mark, no ones complaining about a recall. The issue is that the last two autoloaders made by the company both were recalled. 

Three questions need to be asked. 

Why?

( Why does this keep happening? Poor QA? Poor manufacturing techniques? Poor product testing? )

How?

( How can Ruger sort out these internal problems?)

What?

(What can Ruger do to fix these problems? What can Ruger do to assure us, the public, that the next gun produced will not have a recallable problem).


I am not anti ruger, I want them to succeed. Obviously they have problems. The symptom of these problems are product recalls. Ignoring the problem will not make it go away.

If anyone from Ruger emails me letting me know what they are doing to prevent this happening again, I will publish it on the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, no ones complaining about a recall. The issue is that the last two autoloaders made by the company both were recalled. </p>
<p>Three questions need to be asked. </p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>( Why does this keep happening? Poor QA? Poor manufacturing techniques? Poor product testing? )</p>
<p>How?</p>
<p>( How can Ruger sort out these internal problems?)</p>
<p>What?</p>
<p>(What can Ruger do to fix these problems? What can Ruger do to assure us, the public, that the next gun produced will not have a recallable problem).</p>
<p>I am not anti ruger, I want them to succeed. Obviously they have problems. The symptom of these problems are product recalls. Ignoring the problem will not make it go away.</p>
<p>If anyone from Ruger emails me letting me know what they are doing to prevent this happening again, I will publish it on the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A. Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-3432</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark A. Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-3432</guid>
		<description>Anyone who complains abvout a company doing a voluntary recall and up-grade isn&#039;t responsible enough to own a firearm, in my opinion. I thin Ruger has shown great pride in it&#039;s product by correcting these problems free of charge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who complains abvout a company doing a voluntary recall and up-grade isn&#8217;t responsible enough to own a firearm, in my opinion. I thin Ruger has shown great pride in it&#8217;s product by correcting these problems free of charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 22lr</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-3279</link>
		<dc:creator>22lr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-3279</guid>
		<description>I would have to say there Autos have always impressed me, and I still want a LCP and a SR-9 I just need more money to spend on such things. Ruger inst the only company that has to recall stuff. Dang I wish I had bought one though id love a free mag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to say there Autos have always impressed me, and I still want a LCP and a SR-9 I just need more money to spend on such things. Ruger inst the only company that has to recall stuff. Dang I wish I had bought one though id love a free mag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redmanlaw</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-3273</link>
		<dc:creator>redmanlaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-3273</guid>
		<description>I got a new Ruger this week - an SP 101.  Heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a new Ruger this week &#8211; an SP 101.  Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebronze</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-3267</link>
		<dc:creator>thebronze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 07:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-3267</guid>
		<description>One more reason why no one should ever buy a Ruger semi-auto.
They&#039;re great at revolvers, but they suck at auto&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more reason why no one should ever buy a Ruger semi-auto.<br />
They&#8217;re great at revolvers, but they suck at auto&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-3263</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-3263</guid>
		<description>Paul, ha, nice one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, ha, nice one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Simer</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/30/ruger-lcp-recall/#comment-3262</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Simer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=3038#comment-3262</guid>
		<description>Karma for ripping off Kel-tec?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karma for ripping off Kel-tec?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
