Ultimax 100 Mk5 / General dynamics IAR

I have previously discussed the Ultimax 100 Mk4. This is the latest iteration of the Ultimax 100 design and is being entered into the IAR competition by General Dynamics, although it designed by Singapore Technologies Kinetics (STK).

Photos by SMGLee. Click to expand:

Dscn0776
Quick Change Barrel

Dscn1085
I like the design of the ambidextrous fire selector.

Compared to the Mk4 the Mk5 takes unmodified STANAG (M16) magazine, has quad rails and a bipod/foregrip rather than a separate bipod and foregrip.

I am not sure if the Ultimax 100 Mk4 100 round drum magazine will be made compatible with the Mk5. The Mk4 took modified STANAG magazines.

Ultimax100-1
Ultimax 100 Mk 4

 Smglee Ausa Huge Dscn1084
Ultimax 100 Mk 5

UPDATE: Defense Review has more info.

Related Posts

Steve Oct 22nd 2008 machine guns, military Tags: , , , , , , , , 7 Comments

7 Responses to “Ultimax 100 Mk5 / General dynamics IAR”

  1. Heartless Libertarianon 23 Oct 2008 at 2:32 pm link comment

    Now they need to make a belt feed version to sell the Army…

  2. Sven Ortmannon 31 Oct 2008 at 9:24 pm link comment

    I have reservations about this bipod/fore grip combo. I can see its utility for an assault rifle, but a suppressive fire weapon like an ‘automatic rifle with bipod’ deserves a true bipod that offers more stability.

  3. Danielon 02 Nov 2008 at 10:37 pm link comment

    I doubt a belt-fed would be in the works as the Ultimax design was originally created for high-mobility firepower and MOUT scenarios, a belt-fed removes some of the mobility by being unable to reload on the move (not that I ever recall doing any reloading other than stationary) but most importantly, reduces the ability to fire almost straight up, an important consideration when trying to clear buildings with multiple stories as you’d have to provide covering fire up stairwells. The 249 was designed for stationary (base of fire) and open field support, so the design purposes of the 2 weapons are different, hence the difference in focus of what the weapon is good at.

  4. Melvinon 03 Feb 2009 at 1:36 am link comment

    Trust me…the bipod is more than able to work very steadily. This is due to the very low and controllable recoil of the weapon. You gotta fire it to understand.

    The standard bipod wouldn’t shift even on full-automatic fire.

  5. happyon 09 Mar 2009 at 8:31 pm link comment

    The bipod/fore grip combo are great !!! It may be hard to believe, that is because like melvin have say it only when you fire it then you understand, because this is not another machine gun. The recoil is so low, that you could not believe you are firing a real gun.

    Thus it is the dream light machine gun, which enable you to run and shoot, very mobile and able to shoot in positions that you never dream of possible.

  6. stopping pahwarhon 26 Mar 2009 at 3:35 am link comment

    apparently it uses some “constant recoil” or “consistent recoil” concept or something that sounds like that… i dont quite understand it though

  7. d3von 23 Apr 2009 at 3:18 am link comment

    “Constant recoil” here simply means that the heavy bolt group never hits the backstop in the receiver by using a longer receiver housing and carefully measuring the strength of the spring.

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy: I reserve the right to remove comments at my discretion. Think of comment threads like a dinner party at someone's house. If you make the party unpleasant for others or me, you won't be invited back. I am happy to tolerate a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but I'm not going to tolerate nastiness, rudeness, trolling, vitriol, or excessive snarkiness toward the author(s) or other commenters. You may make your case passionately, but civility is expected. Please stay on topic and respect the technical nature of this blog.
Spam Filtering: To avoid spam, comments are filtered using Akismet and then manually approved. Do not be alarmed if you comment does not appear instantly. I do not check the spam folder more than once per day.