<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beretta ARX-160 Carbine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:38:33 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel E. Watters</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/#comment-15956</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel E. Watters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 03:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2912#comment-15956</guid>
		<description>Oddly enough, the designer of the rifle is Ulrich Zedrosser.  Zedrosser used to work for Steyr, and participated in the development of the AUG, ACR, and Scout Rifle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oddly enough, the designer of the rifle is Ulrich Zedrosser.  Zedrosser used to work for Steyr, and participated in the development of the AUG, ACR, and Scout Rifle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.J</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/#comment-3618</link>
		<dc:creator>J.J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2912#comment-3618</guid>
		<description>it is actually made of a composite material</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is actually made of a composite material</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/#comment-3251</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2912#comment-3251</guid>
		<description>R.A.W., you were spot on! It is the ARX-160</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R.A.W., you were spot on! It is the ARX-160</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.A.W.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/#comment-3151</link>
		<dc:creator>R.A.W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2912#comment-3151</guid>
		<description>Oscar, it&#039;s not just the charging handle that&#039;s reversible.  The bolt&#039;s extractor can operate as an ejector and vice versa (I believe they&#039;re actually symmetrical, interchangeable parts), so with the flick of a switch you can make the rifle throw brass left or right.

According to their marketing brochures the reason for this is to allow the rifle to be used with a helmet-mounted fiber optic sight that would allow the user to shoot around corners and not burn themselves with the brass.  Pretty slick urban combat setup.

Obviously, the no-disassembly reversible ejection concept would be very, very handy on a bullpup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oscar, it&#8217;s not just the charging handle that&#8217;s reversible.  The bolt&#8217;s extractor can operate as an ejector and vice versa (I believe they&#8217;re actually symmetrical, interchangeable parts), so with the flick of a switch you can make the rifle throw brass left or right.</p>
<p>According to their marketing brochures the reason for this is to allow the rifle to be used with a helmet-mounted fiber optic sight that would allow the user to shoot around corners and not burn themselves with the brass.  Pretty slick urban combat setup.</p>
<p>Obviously, the no-disassembly reversible ejection concept would be very, very handy on a bullpup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/#comment-3150</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2912#comment-3150</guid>
		<description>The weapon below the NRX looks like the Beretta CX4 Carbine:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beretta_Cx4_Storm

As for the NRX, I got to see it at the recent AUSA Conference in DC. It&#039;s a neat firearm. The Beretta rep showed me some of the features: it&#039;s got an easy barrel-replacement set-up, so you can go from 10- to 20-inch barrels (and lengths in-between) with relatively little effort. I thought it was pretty light, but I didn&#039;t have an M-4 with which to compare weight. There&#039;s also an awesome feature that allows the user to change the charging handle from right-hand to left-hand mode. Although you can&#039;t see it in the picture, the ejection port opens on both sides, so that with the ability to transfer the charging handle, the rifle is fully ambidextrous. The field-strip procedure is not any more complicated than the M-4/M-16 currently fielded; with the features built into the design, I&#039;d say it would be &quot;value added&quot; for the warfighter.

As per the Beretta rep, this rifle is to be fielded with the Italian military and some Carabinieri units. There is no word on whether Beretta will field it with any other national militaries, or with units within the U.S. military. Of course, nix on the civilian version for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The weapon below the NRX looks like the Beretta CX4 Carbine:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beretta_Cx4_Storm" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beretta_Cx4_Storm</a></p>
<p>As for the NRX, I got to see it at the recent AUSA Conference in DC. It&#8217;s a neat firearm. The Beretta rep showed me some of the features: it&#8217;s got an easy barrel-replacement set-up, so you can go from 10- to 20-inch barrels (and lengths in-between) with relatively little effort. I thought it was pretty light, but I didn&#8217;t have an M-4 with which to compare weight. There&#8217;s also an awesome feature that allows the user to change the charging handle from right-hand to left-hand mode. Although you can&#8217;t see it in the picture, the ejection port opens on both sides, so that with the ability to transfer the charging handle, the rifle is fully ambidextrous. The field-strip procedure is not any more complicated than the M-4/M-16 currently fielded; with the features built into the design, I&#8217;d say it would be &#8220;value added&#8221; for the warfighter.</p>
<p>As per the Beretta rep, this rifle is to be fielded with the Italian military and some Carabinieri units. There is no word on whether Beretta will field it with any other national militaries, or with units within the U.S. military. Of course, nix on the civilian version for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spence</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/#comment-3149</link>
		<dc:creator>Spence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2912#comment-3149</guid>
		<description>does anyone know the weapon below it? it looks familiar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone know the weapon below it? it looks familiar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/#comment-3146</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2912#comment-3146</guid>
		<description>So the rifle is almost completely made out of plastic. It won&#039;t have a chance in the test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the rifle is almost completely made out of plastic. It won&#8217;t have a chance in the test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/#comment-3144</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2912#comment-3144</guid>
		<description>R.A.W., I think you are right, it looks like it is the &quot;M4&quot; version of the ARX-160. I had not come across the ARX before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R.A.W., I think you are right, it looks like it is the &#8220;M4&#8243; version of the ARX-160. I had not come across the ARX before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 22lr</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/#comment-3143</link>
		<dc:creator>22lr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2912#comment-3143</guid>
		<description>Im kinda old school but ill stick with my AR, but maybe im the only one who likes a rifle that actually handles like and extension of my arm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im kinda old school but ill stick with my AR, but maybe im the only one who likes a rifle that actually handles like and extension of my arm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/#comment-3142</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2912#comment-3142</guid>
		<description>So ... it&#039;s a black scar without most ambidextrous features, but the same feel as the ar15 that the troops are already acquainted with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So &#8230; it&#8217;s a black scar without most ambidextrous features, but the same feel as the ar15 that the troops are already acquainted with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.A.W.</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/10/21/beretta-nrx-carbine/#comment-3141</link>
		<dc:creator>R.A.W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2912#comment-3141</guid>
		<description>This appears to be the same weapons system, or at least substantially similar to &lt;a href=&quot;http://world.guns.ru/assault/as90-e.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the ARX-160&lt;/A&gt;.

Interesting features include:

-quick detachable barrel, apparently similar to the AUG&#039;s.
-quick reversible ejection.  A button behind the pistol grip changes the side the brass is ejected on.  Odd that they would include this feature on a non-bullpup design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This appears to be the same weapons system, or at least substantially similar to <a href="http://world.guns.ru/assault/as90-e.htm" rel="nofollow">the ARX-160</a>.</p>
<p>Interesting features include:</p>
<p>-quick detachable barrel, apparently similar to the AUG&#8217;s.<br />
-quick reversible ejection.  A button behind the pistol grip changes the side the brass is ejected on.  Odd that they would include this feature on a non-bullpup design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
