<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Para Ordnance TTR AR-15</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/26/para-ordnance-ttr-ar-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/26/para-ordnance-ttr-ar-15/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:38:33 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Whatever</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/26/para-ordnance-ttr-ar-15/#comment-9497</link>
		<dc:creator>Whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 12:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2411#comment-9497</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fmY13xYUkc 

Someone disassembling then reassembling their LR300.

One thing about the design is that it wouldn&#039;t be possible to use a full-auto lower receiver and have it fire on full-auto due to the chopped bolt carrier. Not that it would be a negative to the casual plinker.

The thing that would worry me about this design is that little part which connects the recoil spring to the bolt carrier (in the video the person doing the narration called it a C-clamp). It&#039;s likely to get lost and if that little part isn&#039;t installed properly or works itself lose, bad things are probably going to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fmY13xYUkc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fmY13xYUkc</a> </p>
<p>Someone disassembling then reassembling their LR300.</p>
<p>One thing about the design is that it wouldn&#8217;t be possible to use a full-auto lower receiver and have it fire on full-auto due to the chopped bolt carrier. Not that it would be a negative to the casual plinker.</p>
<p>The thing that would worry me about this design is that little part which connects the recoil spring to the bolt carrier (in the video the person doing the narration called it a C-clamp). It&#8217;s likely to get lost and if that little part isn&#8217;t installed properly or works itself lose, bad things are probably going to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/26/para-ordnance-ttr-ar-15/#comment-4092</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2411#comment-4092</guid>
		<description>&quot;The recoil spring is over the op-rod so there is no “twang” in your ear as your head rests on the rifle’s stock while the bolt cycles between shots.&quot;

I would miss that sound. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The recoil spring is over the op-rod so there is no “twang” in your ear as your head rests on the rifle’s stock while the bolt cycles between shots.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would miss that sound. <img src='http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/26/para-ordnance-ttr-ar-15/#comment-2748</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2411#comment-2748</guid>
		<description>Hi Olav,

Thanks very much for the photo and link to your blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Olav,</p>
<p>Thanks very much for the photo and link to your blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olav</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/26/para-ordnance-ttr-ar-15/#comment-2747</link>
		<dc:creator>olav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2411#comment-2747</guid>
		<description>I have one of these and describe it here:

http://firearmsandtraining.blogspot.com/2008/09/z-m-weapons-lr300-becomes-parausa-ttr.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one of these and describe it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://firearmsandtraining.blogspot.com/2008/09/z-m-weapons-lr300-becomes-parausa-ttr.html" rel="nofollow">http://firearmsandtraining.blogspot.com/2008/09/z-m-weapons-lr300-becomes-parausa-ttr.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olav</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/26/para-ordnance-ttr-ar-15/#comment-2745</link>
		<dc:creator>Olav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2411#comment-2745</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a video of me shooting the LR300 NXL

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MK3NwONJ6s4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a video of me shooting the LR300 NXL</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MK3NwONJ6s4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MK3NwONJ6s4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olav</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/26/para-ordnance-ttr-ar-15/#comment-2744</link>
		<dc:creator>Olav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2411#comment-2744</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a picture of mine:

http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc212/olava1/ar15/ar15flowers.jpg

You can add this to my previous comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a picture of mine:</p>
<p><a href="http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc212/olava1/ar15/ar15flowers.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc212/olava1/ar15/ar15flowers.jpg</a></p>
<p>You can add this to my previous comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olav</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/26/para-ordnance-ttr-ar-15/#comment-2743</link>
		<dc:creator>Olav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2411#comment-2743</guid>
		<description>I have one of them. It&#039;s a Z-M Weapons LR300 NXL. Aldo Zitta invented it about 20 years ago and YHM was manufacturing them. I bought the upper only.

Aldo sold the manufacturing equipment to Para and now they are making them with the new marketing spin.

The rifle is nice and with a muzzle break the barrel does not move between shots. The design keeps the bolt a little cleaner too.

The pricey part is the folding butt stock. That alone is about $350.00. The upper part that I purchased was around $1400.00 with BUIS. That&#039;s about the price range of a higher end Noveske. I have a skeleton stock for it since there is no buffer needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one of them. It&#8217;s a Z-M Weapons LR300 NXL. Aldo Zitta invented it about 20 years ago and YHM was manufacturing them. I bought the upper only.</p>
<p>Aldo sold the manufacturing equipment to Para and now they are making them with the new marketing spin.</p>
<p>The rifle is nice and with a muzzle break the barrel does not move between shots. The design keeps the bolt a little cleaner too.</p>
<p>The pricey part is the folding butt stock. That alone is about $350.00. The upper part that I purchased was around $1400.00 with BUIS. That&#8217;s about the price range of a higher end Noveske. I have a skeleton stock for it since there is no buffer needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/26/para-ordnance-ttr-ar-15/#comment-2720</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2411#comment-2720</guid>
		<description>They wont sell a whole lot of them if they keep the price that high. I would consider one in the $1500-1600 range, but for $2200, i can get 3 or 4 different custom built AR&#039;s in different calibers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They wont sell a whole lot of them if they keep the price that high. I would consider one in the $1500-1600 range, but for $2200, i can get 3 or 4 different custom built AR&#8217;s in different calibers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/26/para-ordnance-ttr-ar-15/#comment-2704</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2411#comment-2704</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info Roughedge. It looks identical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info Roughedge. It looks identical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughedge</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/26/para-ordnance-ttr-ar-15/#comment-2703</link>
		<dc:creator>Roughedge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2411#comment-2703</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a ZM weapon systems rifle.  Yankee Hill Machine was selling them for a number of years.

Now YHM is NOT selling them, so i guess they either where not manufacturing them in the first place and where just distributing them, or something else happened.

I wonder if they price is going to go up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a ZM weapon systems rifle.  Yankee Hill Machine was selling them for a number of years.</p>
<p>Now YHM is NOT selling them, so i guess they either where not manufacturing them in the first place and where just distributing them, or something else happened.</p>
<p>I wonder if they price is going to go up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/26/para-ordnance-ttr-ar-15/#comment-2698</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2411#comment-2698</guid>
		<description>Kyle Huff, thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle Huff, thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Huff</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/26/para-ordnance-ttr-ar-15/#comment-2695</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Huff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2411#comment-2695</guid>
		<description>Para-Ordnance.
ORDNANCE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Para-Ordnance.<br />
ORDNANCE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
