<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AR Five Seven:  5.7&#215;28mm AR Upper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/12/ar-five-seven-57x28mm-ar-upper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/12/ar-five-seven-57x28mm-ar-upper/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:38:33 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/12/ar-five-seven-57x28mm-ar-upper/#comment-5911</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2366#comment-5911</guid>
		<description>Davis, How does the thing operate?  The site says it&#039;s recoil operated, but I want to make sure the bolt is actually locking somehow before I buy one.

Please tell me it&#039;s not straight blowback...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Davis, How does the thing operate?  The site says it&#8217;s recoil operated, but I want to make sure the bolt is actually locking somehow before I buy one.</p>
<p>Please tell me it&#8217;s not straight blowback&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/12/ar-five-seven-57x28mm-ar-upper/#comment-4227</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2366#comment-4227</guid>
		<description>The ar-fiveseven upper I put on my lower is more than I hoped for. It worked perfectly, with no problames at all!! Accurate to sub-moa at 50 yrds. and good to 100 with a propper scope. Moreover, any one with a suppressor for the 223,(it will thread on to this barrel) will find the only noise is the recoil buffer slamming past your ear in the tube.(with sub-sonics) Of-course a bit of a crack with standard 5.7 ammo. This set up, with an EOtech or other such sight is nothing less than a pleasure to shoot.  I am only put off by the the length of the upper rail. The rail of the upper by necessity is short, so no bad-ass set-ups with magnifiers and such, but with three full length rails at 3/6/9 o&#039;clock at no extra cost, it more than makes up for lack of top rail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ar-fiveseven upper I put on my lower is more than I hoped for. It worked perfectly, with no problames at all!! Accurate to sub-moa at 50 yrds. and good to 100 with a propper scope. Moreover, any one with a suppressor for the 223,(it will thread on to this barrel) will find the only noise is the recoil buffer slamming past your ear in the tube.(with sub-sonics) Of-course a bit of a crack with standard 5.7 ammo. This set up, with an EOtech or other such sight is nothing less than a pleasure to shoot.  I am only put off by the the length of the upper rail. The rail of the upper by necessity is short, so no bad-ass set-ups with magnifiers and such, but with three full length rails at 3/6/9 o&#8217;clock at no extra cost, it more than makes up for lack of top rail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/12/ar-five-seven-57x28mm-ar-upper/#comment-3222</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2366#comment-3222</guid>
		<description>the coming together of the 2 best firearms in the world.(in my opinion)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the coming together of the 2 best firearms in the world.(in my opinion)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/12/ar-five-seven-57x28mm-ar-upper/#comment-3114</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2366#comment-3114</guid>
		<description>Base price is 699.95 without the PS-90 Mag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Base price is 699.95 without the PS-90 Mag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/12/ar-five-seven-57x28mm-ar-upper/#comment-2925</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2366#comment-2925</guid>
		<description>It should hold 50 but it would be tight.  I know for a fact 20-30 is not a problem.  you have to cut a little of the top of the magazine off.  I figured I would have to cut the feed lips off to ensure there wouldnt be a blockage.  However you actually have to cut a little more off so it clears the bolt.  I also smoothed the internal edges so it wouldnt catch/snag on anything.  I also placed some small ammounts of soft sided Velcro on the inside bottom of the magazine to soften the first few case ejections so the cases shouldnt deform on ejection.

I know people think I&#039;m probably nuts for cutting a Sig Arms 556 magazine but I wasnt about to cut any of my HK magazines up.

http://www.make-it-so.com/Guns/PWarms/ARcenter/jpegs/Magazine1-small.jpg

http://www.make-it-so.com/Guns/PWarms/ARcenter/jpegs/Magazine2-small.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should hold 50 but it would be tight.  I know for a fact 20-30 is not a problem.  you have to cut a little of the top of the magazine off.  I figured I would have to cut the feed lips off to ensure there wouldnt be a blockage.  However you actually have to cut a little more off so it clears the bolt.  I also smoothed the internal edges so it wouldnt catch/snag on anything.  I also placed some small ammounts of soft sided Velcro on the inside bottom of the magazine to soften the first few case ejections so the cases shouldnt deform on ejection.</p>
<p>I know people think I&#8217;m probably nuts for cutting a Sig Arms 556 magazine but I wasnt about to cut any of my HK magazines up.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.make-it-so.com/Guns/PWarms/ARcenter/jpegs/Magazine1-small.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.make-it-so.com/Guns/PWarms/ARcenter/jpegs/Magazine1-small.jpg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.make-it-so.com/Guns/PWarms/ARcenter/jpegs/Magazine2-small.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.make-it-so.com/Guns/PWarms/ARcenter/jpegs/Magazine2-small.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/12/ar-five-seven-57x28mm-ar-upper/#comment-2923</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2366#comment-2923</guid>
		<description>Davis, using the magazine as a brass catcher is awesome! How many cases can a 30 round mag hold before you need to empty it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Davis, using the magazine as a brass catcher is awesome! How many cases can a 30 round mag hold before you need to empty it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/12/ar-five-seven-57x28mm-ar-upper/#comment-2920</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2366#comment-2920</guid>
		<description>I just picked one of these up.
Put 200+ rounds through it no problem.  
Its nice to have a very light AR with 50 round capacity.  
With an empty 30rd AR magazine its a great brass catcher so not only is there no hot brass flying around theres nothing to pick up - great for re-loading.  Also I have a pretty big investment in the PS90 and the magazines and the 5.7x28 ammo and re-loading dies so this was a very nice addition that gives me a less expensive alternative to having another carbine that shoots 5.7x28.  
Also with the price of the 5.7x28 dropping now that its being made in the US its getting very cost effective to shoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just picked one of these up.<br />
Put 200+ rounds through it no problem.<br />
Its nice to have a very light AR with 50 round capacity.<br />
With an empty 30rd AR magazine its a great brass catcher so not only is there no hot brass flying around theres nothing to pick up &#8211; great for re-loading.  Also I have a pretty big investment in the PS90 and the magazines and the 5.7&#215;28 ammo and re-loading dies so this was a very nice addition that gives me a less expensive alternative to having another carbine that shoots 5.7&#215;28.<br />
Also with the price of the 5.7&#215;28 dropping now that its being made in the US its getting very cost effective to shoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tractiongrips</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/12/ar-five-seven-57x28mm-ar-upper/#comment-2683</link>
		<dc:creator>Tractiongrips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2366#comment-2683</guid>
		<description>How about the hot brass spilling out onto your arm?  The PS-90 doesn&#039;t have much of an issue with that because of how the weapon is held, but an AR-15 would seem to have an issue with the ejection from the mag well.  Some sort of catcher may be a good idea.  A short barreled version would be interesting, maybe a ten inch with a supressor added.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the hot brass spilling out onto your arm?  The PS-90 doesn&#8217;t have much of an issue with that because of how the weapon is held, but an AR-15 would seem to have an issue with the ejection from the mag well.  Some sort of catcher may be a good idea.  A short barreled version would be interesting, maybe a ten inch with a supressor added.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmblake6</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/12/ar-five-seven-57x28mm-ar-upper/#comment-2670</link>
		<dc:creator>cmblake6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2366#comment-2670</guid>
		<description>Does seem rather a nifty toy. Mind you, I&#039;d want something to plug up the magazine area to keep dirt out. Not a magazine proper, but some form of plastic/rubber plug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does seem rather a nifty toy. Mind you, I&#8217;d want something to plug up the magazine area to keep dirt out. Not a magazine proper, but some form of plastic/rubber plug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/12/ar-five-seven-57x28mm-ar-upper/#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 03:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2366#comment-2668</guid>
		<description>I did ask but they could not give me a &quot;base&quot; price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did ask but they could not give me a &#8220;base&#8221; price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmblake6</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/12/ar-five-seven-57x28mm-ar-upper/#comment-2664</link>
		<dc:creator>cmblake6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2366#comment-2664</guid>
		<description>Tru dat. WTF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tru dat. WTF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/12/ar-five-seven-57x28mm-ar-upper/#comment-2660</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2366#comment-2660</guid>
		<description>why not? Since when have gun enthusiasts needed good reasons for spending money on new toys?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why not? Since when have gun enthusiasts needed good reasons for spending money on new toys?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmblake6</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/08/12/ar-five-seven-57x28mm-ar-upper/#comment-2658</link>
		<dc:creator>cmblake6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2366#comment-2658</guid>
		<description>Okay. Why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay. Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
