<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shot at Point Blank with .308 and 44 Magnum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Counsel</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/#comment-2493</link>
		<dc:creator>Counsel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2192#comment-2493</guid>
		<description>"Standing" behind the armor is good marketing not safety.  It may be safe, but you could show it by tying it to a balloon, etc...

However, I like the education they provide most people who think a .45 ACp (or other "larger" calibedr) will throw you backwards.  I love Hollywood and those who talk about stopping power as if it relates to stopping the forward momentum of the target rather than the shot killing the attacker prior to them reaching you.

Hollywood--giving us the bullet that goes around corners because the shooter twists their gun-hand as they pull the trigger.  Don't they do any research to know that the SLOWER the pitch, the more curve the ball gets?  How are they both slowing the bullet and increasing its resistance?  Sigh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Standing&#8221; behind the armor is good marketing not safety.  It may be safe, but you could show it by tying it to a balloon, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>However, I like the education they provide most people who think a .45 ACp (or other &#8220;larger&#8221; calibedr) will throw you backwards.  I love Hollywood and those who talk about stopping power as if it relates to stopping the forward momentum of the target rather than the shot killing the attacker prior to them reaching you.</p>
<p>Hollywood&#8211;giving us the bullet that goes around corners because the shooter twists their gun-hand as they pull the trigger.  Don&#8217;t they do any research to know that the SLOWER the pitch, the more curve the ball gets?  How are they both slowing the bullet and increasing its resistance?  Sigh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pocosin.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Concealed Carry, Handgun, and Caliber&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/#comment-2492</link>
		<dc:creator>Pocosin.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Concealed Carry, Handgun, and Caliber&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2192#comment-2492</guid>
		<description>[...] Remember, a bigger bullet will not throw anyone backwards. If you think it does, there may be nothing wrong with that thought if you don&#8217;t know any better. The Firearm Blog has some video you might find interesting. Note, do NOT do anything you see in the video on their site as they are &#8220;violating&#8221; most firearm safety &#8220;rules.&#8221; Go to their blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Remember, a bigger bullet will not throw anyone backwards. If you think it does, there may be nothing wrong with that thought if you don&#8217;t know any better. The Firearm Blog has some video you might find interesting. Note, do NOT do anything you see in the video on their site as they are &#8220;violating&#8221; most firearm safety &#8220;rules.&#8221; Go to their blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/#comment-2244</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2192#comment-2244</guid>
		<description>Davis has been doing this ever since he started "Second Cjance" and would go to local pistol matches to show Police Officers that his vests worked and that he "Stood" behind them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Davis has been doing this ever since he started &#8220;Second Cjance&#8221; and would go to local pistol matches to show Police Officers that his vests worked and that he &#8220;Stood&#8221; behind them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/#comment-2235</link>
		<dc:creator>DB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2192#comment-2235</guid>
		<description>OK.... they need to see the nice guys in the white coats... (and the straight jackets)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK&#8230;. they need to see the nice guys in the white coats&#8230; (and the straight jackets)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/#comment-2217</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2192#comment-2217</guid>
		<description>Why would they need to reduce the load. First, it’s not an accurate test if you aren’t using actual standard rifle ammo. Second, if firing the round doesn’t knock over the person shooting it, then the round obviously doesn’t contain enough kinetic energy to knock over the person it hits.
--------------

I know bullets don't knock people down. I wasn't born yesterday. The reduce load is for safety. That was my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would they need to reduce the load. First, it’s not an accurate test if you aren’t using actual standard rifle ammo. Second, if firing the round doesn’t knock over the person shooting it, then the round obviously doesn’t contain enough kinetic energy to knock over the person it hits.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>I know bullets don&#8217;t knock people down. I wasn&#8217;t born yesterday. The reduce load is for safety. That was my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phelps</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/#comment-2206</link>
		<dc:creator>Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2192#comment-2206</guid>
		<description>Back in ancient Rome, when an engineer designed a bridge, he stood under it while the first loads were taken across it.

Engineering isn't about gray areas.  It is about fail or succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in ancient Rome, when an engineer designed a bridge, he stood under it while the first loads were taken across it.</p>
<p>Engineering isn&#8217;t about gray areas.  It is about fail or succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linoge</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/#comment-2205</link>
		<dc:creator>Linoge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2192#comment-2205</guid>
		<description>Reduced load or not, it violates at least two, and probably all four, of the basic firearm rules.  And I honestly do not give a flying squirrel's left testicle if they were wearing armor or not, trusting it or not...  that is just straight-up stupid, and not the image responsible firearm owners want to encourage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reduced load or not, it violates at least two, and probably all four, of the basic firearm rules.  And I honestly do not give a flying squirrel&#8217;s left testicle if they were wearing armor or not, trusting it or not&#8230;  that is just straight-up stupid, and not the image responsible firearm owners want to encourage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laughingdog</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/#comment-2203</link>
		<dc:creator>Laughingdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2192#comment-2203</guid>
		<description>"Anyway the load is probably reduced on both cartridge."

Why would they need to reduce the load.  First, it's not an accurate test if you aren't using actual standard rifle ammo.  Second, if firing the round doesn't knock over the person shooting it, then the round obviously doesn't contain enough kinetic energy to knock over the person it hits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anyway the load is probably reduced on both cartridge.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why would they need to reduce the load.  First, it&#8217;s not an accurate test if you aren&#8217;t using actual standard rifle ammo.  Second, if firing the round doesn&#8217;t knock over the person shooting it, then the round obviously doesn&#8217;t contain enough kinetic energy to knock over the person it hits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharp as a Marble</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/#comment-2202</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharp as a Marble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2192#comment-2202</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Here, shoot me again...&lt;/strong&gt;

Here, shoot me again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Here, shoot me again&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Here, shoot me again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; Way to prove a point</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/#comment-2201</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; Way to prove a point</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2192#comment-2201</guid>
		<description>[...] Shot point blank with a 308 to prove it won&#8217;t knock you down. Relax, he&#8217;s got a vest. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shot point blank with a 308 to prove it won&#8217;t knock you down. Relax, he&#8217;s got a vest. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdun</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/#comment-2193</link>
		<dc:creator>jdun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 05:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2192#comment-2193</guid>
		<description>They knew what they were doing and all the safety was account for. Anyway the load is probably reduced on both cartridge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They knew what they were doing and all the safety was account for. Anyway the load is probably reduced on both cartridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daverino</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/#comment-2186</link>
		<dc:creator>Daverino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2192#comment-2186</guid>
		<description>One of my favorite clips on the internet. If you want I will send you some other firearm related videos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite clips on the internet. If you want I will send you some other firearm related videos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/#comment-2183</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2192#comment-2183</guid>
		<description>Geez, what a couple of mental patients.  I don't care how good the armor is, that is just wrong on so many safety levels, I didn't want to watch when they actually shot themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez, what a couple of mental patients.  I don&#8217;t care how good the armor is, that is just wrong on so many safety levels, I didn&#8217;t want to watch when they actually shot themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddy Alvarez</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/06/03/shot-at-point-blank-with-308-and-44-magnum/#comment-2182</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddy Alvarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/?p=2192#comment-2182</guid>
		<description>wow...these guys are nuts. and irresponsible. but man they trust those vests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow&#8230;these guys are nuts. and irresponsible. but man they trust those vests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
