<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Browning: Cynergy Classic Trap 12 guage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/28/new-browning-cynergy-classic-trap-12-guage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/28/new-browning-cynergy-classic-trap-12-guage/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony piotrowski</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/28/new-browning-cynergy-classic-trap-12-guage/comment-page-1/#comment-11886</link>
		<dc:creator>tony piotrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/28/new-browning-cynergy-classic-trap-12-guage/#comment-11886</guid>
		<description>I just got a new Cynergy classic trap. (not the combo, couldn&#039;t afford that) I traded a BT 99 Golden Clays. This gun is easier to handle than the Golden Clays (GC) and faster. I think there is less felt recoil with the Cynergy than the GC even though the GC has a Gracoil. I could shoot the GC worth a darn. I picked up the Cynergy and ran a 49 and a 47, with little effort at all.  It is a great gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got a new Cynergy classic trap. (not the combo, couldn&#8217;t afford that) I traded a BT 99 Golden Clays. This gun is easier to handle than the Golden Clays (GC) and faster. I think there is less felt recoil with the Cynergy than the GC even though the GC has a Gracoil. I could shoot the GC worth a darn. I picked up the Cynergy and ran a 49 and a 47, with little effort at all.  It is a great gun.</p>
<div class="CommentRating">Please rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-11886" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('11886', 'add', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-11886-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-11886" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('11886', 'subtract', 'www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-11886-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)

Served from: www.thefirearmblog.com @ 2012-02-11 10:44:03 -->
