<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .50 Glock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/</link>
	<description>Firearms not Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kelley</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/#comment-3535</link>
		<dc:creator>kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/#comment-3535</guid>
		<description>I'ts put out by guncrafter industries, not glock. Have another look at the ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ts put out by guncrafter industries, not glock. Have another look at the ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/#comment-3117</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/#comment-3117</guid>
		<description>What was glock thinking?  $600 for a .45 conversion kit?  I wonder how much it cost to develop and get the manufacturing equipment for a glorified 45.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was glock thinking?  $600 for a .45 conversion kit?  I wonder how much it cost to develop and get the manufacturing equipment for a glorified 45.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macf</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/#comment-2491</link>
		<dc:creator>macf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/#comment-2491</guid>
		<description>Because, genius, the trials that led to the selection of the Beretta 92F(S) as the M9 pistol were many years prior to this conversion being created.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because, genius, the trials that led to the selection of the Beretta 92F(S) as the M9 pistol were many years prior to this conversion being created.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glockenspiel</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/#comment-2332</link>
		<dc:creator>Glockenspiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/#comment-2332</guid>
		<description>Why didn't the US Armed Forces pick this over the M9?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why didn&#8217;t the US Armed Forces pick this over the M9?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/#comment-2082</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 12:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/#comment-2082</guid>
		<description>.50 CAl. Glock Great Idea. Go 4 It. The Bigger the Better !  U.S.A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.50 CAl. Glock Great Idea. Go 4 It. The Bigger the Better !  U.S.A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gun guy</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/#comment-1855</link>
		<dc:creator>gun guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/#comment-1855</guid>
		<description>The .50 GI operates at pressures comparable to the .45 ACP, around 15,000 psi (100 MPa). Interestingly, felt recoil is also similar to the .45 ACP. Also, the .50 GI is moderately accurate bullet. The 300 grain (19 g) JFP (jacketed flatpoint) produces a 25-yard group of 2.24 inches, and the 300-grain JHP (jacketed hollowpoint) and 275-grain JHP produce a 25-yard group of only 1.14 inches.  source... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.50_GI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The .50 GI operates at pressures comparable to the .45 ACP, around 15,000 psi (100 MPa). Interestingly, felt recoil is also similar to the .45 ACP. Also, the .50 GI is moderately accurate bullet. The 300 grain (19 g) JFP (jacketed flatpoint) produces a 25-yard group of 2.24 inches, and the 300-grain JHP (jacketed hollowpoint) and 275-grain JHP produce a 25-yard group of only 1.14 inches.  source&#8230; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.50_GI" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.50_GI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddy Alvarez</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/#comment-1797</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddy Alvarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/#comment-1797</guid>
		<description>hey...thats kinda sexy. i wonder how recoil is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey&#8230;thats kinda sexy. i wonder how recoil is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fighting For Liberty &#187; .50 Cal &#8230; GLOCK?</title>
		<link>http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/#comment-1792</link>
		<dc:creator>Fighting For Liberty &#187; .50 Cal &#8230; GLOCK?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/03/27/50-glock/#comment-1792</guid>
		<description>[...] Poor man&#8217;s Lara Croft. Heh. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Poor man&#8217;s Lara Croft. Heh. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
